Owner Scorecard


← Catalog

ADYEN · Adyen NV

IFRS
Latest filing: FY2025 annual report · ESEF (Inline XBRL)

This is a quantitative scorecard. The numbers below are read from Adyen NV’s ESEF annual report, in EUR. The narrative — what the business does, its risks, what changed this year — is not machine-read here, so we do not paraphrase it. The filed annual report →

I

The record

What the business has done across the cycle, read straight from the ESEF filing: the multi-year record, and the walk from reported profit to the cash an owner could take out.

The record, 2019–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25
Income statement
€2.7B€3.6B€6.0B€8.9B€1.9B€2.2B€2.6BRevenueRevenue
99%99%99%95%96%96%Gross marginGross mgn
€295M€374M€595M€665M€658M€888M€1.1BOperating incomeOp. inc.
11.1%10.3%9.9%7.4%35.3%39.9%41.9%Operating marginOp. mgn
€234M€261M€470M€564M€698M€925M€1.1BNet incomeNet inc.
21%19%19%22%26%25%24%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
€529M€1.0B€1.8B€2.0B€1.9B€1.7B€1.0BOperating cash flowOp. cash
€22M€29M€35M€64M€85M€104M€136MDepreciationDeprec.
€273M€727M€1.3B€1.4B€1.1B€675M(€168M)Working capital & otherWC & other
€15M€17M€51M€96M€66M€98M€124MCapexCapex
0.6%0.5%0.9%1.1%3.5%4.4%4.7%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
€514M€1000M€1.8B€1.9B€1.8B€1.6B€907MOwner earningsOwner earn.
19.4%27.4%29.5%21.5%96.8%72.2%34.3%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
€514M€1000M€1.8B€1.9B€1.8B€1.6B€907MFree cash flowFCF
19.4%27.4%29.5%21.5%96.8%72.2%34.3%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
26%21%26%23%22%22%20%Return on equityROE
26%21%26%23%22%22%20%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
€1.7B€2.7B€4.6B€6.5B€8.3B€10.0B€10.8BCash & investmentsCash+inv
€134M€132M€217MReceivablesReceiv.
€7M€20M€22M€88M€105M€100M€77MInventoryInvent.
€7M€20M€22M€88M€239M€232M€294MOperating working capitalOper. WC
€2.3B€3.7B€5.3B€7.1B€9.0B€10.9B€11.7BCurrent assetsCur. assets
€1.6B€2.7B€3.7B€5.0B€6.2B€7.0B€6.8BCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.4×1.4×1.4×1.4×1.5×1.6×1.7×Current ratioCurr. ratio
€2.6B€4.2B€5.8B€7.6B€9.6B€11.4B€12.3BTotal assetsAssets
(€1.7B)(€2.7B)(€4.6B)(€6.5B)(€8.3B)(€10.0B)(€10.8B)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
63.6×39.8×46.5×55.6×137.5×111.9×147.4×Interest coverageInt. cov.
€918M€1.2B€1.8B€2.4B€3.2B€4.2B€5.3BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
29.7M30.2M30.5M31.0M31.0M31.2M31.5MShares out (diluted)Shares
€89.36€120.39€196.56€288.44€60.09€71.42€84.00Revenue / shareRev/sh
€7.88€8.63€15.40€18.21€22.52€29.69€33.72EPS (diluted)EPS
€17.30€33.05€57.99€62.16€58.19€51.56€28.78Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
€17.30€33.05€57.99€62.16€58.19€51.56€28.78Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
€0.51€0.57€1.68€3.09€2.12€3.15€3.92Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
€30.89€40.27€59.48€77.99€101.61€135.80€167.74Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
6-yr5-yr
Revenue / share−1.0%/yr−6.9%/yr
Owner earnings / share+8.9%/yr−2.7%/yr
EPS+27.4%/yr+31.3%/yr
Capital spending / share+40.5%/yr+47.3%/yr
Book value / share+32.6%/yr+33.0%/yr

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business reported €1.1B of profit but €907M of owner earnings: €156M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.

Reported net income€1.1B
Owner earnings€907M · 34% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income€1.1B€925M€698M€564M€470M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+€136M+€104M+€85M+€64M+€35M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−€168M+€675M+€1.1B+€1.4B+€1.3B
Cash from operations€1.0B€1.7B€1.9B€2.0B€1.8B
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−€124M−€98M−€66M−€96M−€51M
Owner earnings€907M€1.6B€1.8B€1.9B€1.8B
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue34%72%97%22%30%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

II

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, and stewardship. The same checks the US pages run, in the reporting currency.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 ESEF (Inline XBRL) · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income €1.1B ÷ interest expense €8M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • Net cash, debt-free
    Cash €10.8B − debt €0
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by €10.8B, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Not enough data
    Industry peers: median -1%
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • High through the cycle
    7-yr median margin, range 19%–97%; latest €907M = operating cash €1.0B − maintenance capex €124M
    Industry peers: median 19%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 34% of revenue this year, a 30% median across 7 years.

  • Mostly cash-backed
    Cash from ops €1.0B ÷ net income €1.1B
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.91×
    Maintaining
    Capex €124M ÷ depreciation €136M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 4 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €2.6B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity Near
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.72×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (7-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · none paid
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +178%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €28.41/share (latest year €33.72), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €167.74/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2019–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 7 of 7
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Operating margin 10% → 39% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 10% early to 39% lately, median 11% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Owner earnings growth +9%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 9% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2022 · 7.4% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count +1.0%/yr
    What this means

    Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Elevated contestability

The product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.

AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

How the cash was used, 2019–2025

Over the record, the business generated €10.0B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash builder, a large share of cash simply built up on the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested€467M · 5%
  • Retained (debt / cash)€9.5B · 95%
  • Source of fundingOperating cash

    Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span cash and short-term investments rose €9.1B.

  • Net change in share count6.0%

    The diluted count rose from 30M to 32M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record

    No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.

  • Return on what it retained8%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out (€4.2B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew €345M, so each retained €1 added about 0.08 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Adyen NV is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2019–2025.

2 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?6.0%

    Diluted shares grew 6.0% over 2019–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

  • Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?0% → 3% of sales

    Receivables and inventory grew from €7M to €77M while revenue grew −0%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (0% of revenue then, 3% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did reported profit become cash?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

III

The price

What a price would have to assume, set against the record above. You bring the price, in the reporting currency.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Adyen NV has delivered.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25−9%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’19→’25+9%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings €907M on 32M diluted shares; net cash €10.8B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.