ASSAB · ASSA ABLOY AB
This is a quantitative scorecard. The numbers below are read from ASSA ABLOY AB’s ESEF annual report, in SEK. The narrative — what the business does, its risks, what changed this year — is not machine-read here, so we do not paraphrase it. The filed annual report →
The record
What the business has done across the cycle, read straight from the ESEF filing: the multi-year record, and the walk from reported profit to the cash an owner could take out.
The record, 2020–2024
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||
| SEK 87.6B | SEK 95.0B | SEK 120.8B | SEK 140.7B | SEK 150.2B | RevenueRevenue |
| 39% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 42% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| SEK 12.5B | SEK 14.2B | SEK 18.5B | SEK 21.8B | SEK 24.3B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 14.2% | 14.9% | 15.3% | 15.5% | 16.2% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| SEK 9.2B | SEK 10.9B | SEK 13.3B | SEK 13.6B | SEK 15.6B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 21% | 19% | 24% | 29% | 25% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||
| SEK 13.7B | SEK 12.5B | SEK 14.4B | SEK 21.3B | SEK 21.4B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| SEK 3.8B | SEK 3.8B | SEK 4.1B | — | — | DepreciationDeprec. |
| SEK 711M | (SEK 2.3B) | (SEK 3.0B) | SEK 7.7B | SEK 5.8B | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| SEK 1.8B | SEK 1.7B | SEK 2.0B | SEK 2.6B | SEK 2.6B | CapexCapex |
| 2.1% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 1.9% | 1.7% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| SEK 11.9B | SEK 10.7B | SEK 12.4B | SEK 18.7B | SEK 18.8B | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 13.5% | 11.3% | 10.2% | 13.3% | 12.5% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| SEK 11.9B | SEK 10.7B | SEK 12.4B | SEK 18.7B | SEK 18.8B | Free cash flowFCF |
| 13.5% | 11.3% | 10.2% | 13.3% | 12.5% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| SEK 4.3B | SEK 4.3B | SEK 4.7B | SEK 5.3B | SEK 6.0B | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| 12% | 13% | 14% | 11% | 12% | ROICROIC |
| 16% | 16% | 15% | 15% | 15% | Return on equityROE |
| 8% | 9% | 10% | 9% | 9% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||
| SEK 2.8B | SEK 4.3B | SEK 3.4B | SEK 1.5B | SEK 4.5B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| SEK 13.7B | SEK 15.8B | SEK 19.8B | SEK 20.9B | SEK 23.4B | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| SEK 10.1B | SEK 13.9B | SEK 19.2B | SEK 18.6B | SEK 21.0B | InventoryInvent. |
| SEK 23.7B | SEK 29.8B | SEK 39.0B | SEK 39.5B | SEK 44.5B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| SEK 31.3B | SEK 39.3B | SEK 47.4B | SEK 49.0B | SEK 55.7B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| SEK 25.9B | SEK 31.3B | SEK 39.6B | SEK 44.6B | SEK 50.5B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.2× | 1.3× | 1.2× | 1.1× | 1.1× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| SEK 117.4B | SEK 130.0B | SEK 154.6B | SEK 196.4B | SEK 223.6B | Total assetsAssets |
| SEK 22.4B | SEK 20.2B | SEK 20.5B | SEK 49.9B | SEK 55.0B | Total debtDebt |
| SEK 19.6B | SEK 15.9B | SEK 17.1B | SEK 48.5B | SEK 50.5B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 15.7× | 21.9× | 17.3× | 8.1× | 6.9× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| SEK 58.9B | SEK 69.6B | SEK 86.0B | SEK 91.6B | SEK 107.1B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||
| — | 1.11B | 1.11B | 1.11B | 1.11B | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| — | SEK 85.51 | SEK 108.79 | SEK 126.65 | SEK 135.19 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| — | SEK 9.81 | SEK 11.97 | SEK 12.27 | SEK 14.08 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| — | SEK 9.67 | SEK 11.13 | SEK 16.79 | SEK 16.95 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| — | SEK 9.67 | SEK 11.13 | SEK 16.79 | SEK 16.95 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| — | SEK 3.90 | SEK 4.20 | SEK 4.80 | SEK 5.40 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| — | SEK 1.54 | SEK 1.80 | SEK 2.38 | SEK 2.31 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| — | SEK 62.63 | SEK 77.48 | SEK 82.47 | SEK 96.40 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 4-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +16.5%/yr (3-yr) | +16.5%/yr (3-yr) |
| Owner earnings / share | +20.6%/yr (3-yr) | +20.6%/yr (3-yr) |
| EPS | +12.8%/yr (3-yr) | +12.8%/yr (3-yr) |
| Dividends / share | +11.5%/yr (3-yr) | +11.5%/yr (3-yr) |
| Capital spending / share | +14.4%/yr (3-yr) | +14.4%/yr (3-yr) |
| Book value / share | +15.5%/yr (3-yr) | +15.5%/yr (3-yr) |
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2024 the business turned SEK 15.6B of profit into SEK 18.8B of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | SEK 15.6B | SEK 13.6B | SEK 13.3B | SEK 10.9B | SEK 9.2B |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | — | — | +SEK 4.1B | +SEK 3.8B | +SEK 3.8B |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +SEK 5.8B | +SEK 7.7B | −SEK 3.0B | −SEK 2.3B | +SEK 711M |
| Cash from operations | SEK 21.4B | SEK 21.3B | SEK 14.4B | SEK 12.5B | SEK 13.7B |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −SEK 2.6B | −SEK 2.6B | −SEK 2.0B | −SEK 1.7B | −SEK 1.8B |
| Owner earnings | SEK 18.8B | SEK 18.7B | SEK 12.4B | SEK 10.7B | SEK 11.9B |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 13% | 13% | 10% | 11% | 14% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, and stewardship. The same checks the US pages run, in the reporting currency.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ComfortableOperating income SEK 24.3B ÷ interest expense SEK 3.5B
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? SEK 50.5B · 2.1× operating profitMeaningful net debtCash SEK 4.5B − debt SEK 55.0B
What this means
Netting SEK 4.5B of cash and short-term investments against SEK 55.0B of debt leaves SEK 50.5B owed, about 2.1× a year's operating profit (2.3× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Solid through the cycle5-yr median, range 11%–14%; 12% latest = NOPAT SEK 18.2B ÷ invested capital SEK 157.6BIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 5 years (it ran 12% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle5-yr median margin, range 10%–14%; latest SEK 18.8B = operating cash SEK 21.4B − maintenance capex SEK 2.6BIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 13% of revenue this year, a 13% median across 5 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops SEK 21.4B ÷ net income SEK 15.6B
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks SEK 6.0B ÷ Owner Earnings SEK 18.8B
What this means
Of SEK 18.8B Owner Earnings, SEK 6.0B (32%) went back to shareholders, SEK 6.0B dividends, SEK 0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? —Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 4 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · SEK 150.2B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.10×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · SEK 55.0B vs SEK 5.3B WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (5-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 5 of 6 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are SEK 12.77/share (latest year SEK 14.08), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is SEK 96.40/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2020–2024
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 5 of 5
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 5 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 15% → 16% (2-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 15% early, 16% lately, median 15%.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 9%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.
- Owner earnings growth +13%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 13% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · 14.2% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −0.0%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
How the cash was used, 2020–2024
Over the record, the business generated SEK 83.2B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- ReinvestedSEK 10.7B · 13%
- DividendsSEK 24.6B · 30%
- Retained (debt / cash)SEK 47.8B · 58%
- Returned to ownersSEK 24.6B
34% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, SEK 24.6B as dividends and SEK 0 as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose SEK 32.6B and cash and short-term investments rose SEK 1.7B.
- Net change in share count−0.0%
The diluted count barely moved (1111M to 1111M): buybacks roughly offset the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend recordSEK 5.40/sh
Paid in 5 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 11% a year. It was never cut over the span.
- Return on what it retained13%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out (SEK 38.0B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew SEK 5.0B, so each retained SEK 1 added about 0.13 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why ASSA ABLOY AB is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2019–2024.
None of the 3 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
The price
What a price would have to assume, set against the record above. You bring the price, in the reporting currency.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what ASSA ABLOY AB has delivered.
Through the cycle, ASSA ABLOY AB earns about SEK 18.8B on its 12.5% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 12.5% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings SEK 18.8B on 1111M diluted shares; net debt SEK 50.5B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.