LR · Legrand SA
This is a quantitative scorecard. The numbers below are read from Legrand SA’s ESEF annual report, in EUR. The narrative — what the business does, its risks, what changed this year — is not machine-read here, so we do not paraphrase it. The filed annual report →
The record
What the business has done across the cycle, read straight from the ESEF filing: the multi-year record, and the walk from reported profit to the cash an owner could take out.
The record, 2020–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| €6.1B | €7.0B | €8.3B | €8.4B | €8.6B | €9.5B | RevenueRevenue |
| 52% | 51% | 50% | 52% | 52% | 51% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| €1.1B | €1.3B | €1.4B | €1.6B | €1.6B | €1.8B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 17.5% | 19.2% | 17.3% | 18.9% | 19.0% | 19.1% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| €681M | €905M | €1000M | €1.1B | €1.2B | €1.2B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 29% | 28% | 28% | 26% | 26% | 26% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||
| €1.2B | €1.1B | €1.2B | €1.8B | €1.5B | €1.6B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| €481M | €208M | €237M | €688M | €357M | €332M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| €127M | €140M | €178M | — | — | — | CapexCapex |
| 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.1% | — | — | — | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| €1.0B | €973M | €1.1B | — | — | — | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 17.0% | 13.9% | 12.7% | — | — | — | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| €1.0B | €973M | €1.1B | — | — | — | Free cash flowFCF |
| 17.0% | 13.9% | 12.7% | — | — | — | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| €357M | €378M | €439M | €504M | €547M | €576M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| 10% | 12% | 12% | 13% | 12% | 12% | ROICROIC |
| 14% | 16% | 15% | 17% | 15% | 17% | Return on equityROE |
| 7% | 9% | 8% | 10% | 8% | 9% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||||
| €2.8B | €2.8B | €2.3B | €2.8B | €2.1B | €2.4B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| €645M | €729M | €958M | €970M | €1.1B | €1.2B | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | €1.3B | €1.4B | €1.2B | €1.3B | €1.5B | InventoryInvent. |
| €645M | €2.0B | €2.3B | €2.2B | €2.4B | €2.7B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| €4.5B | €5.1B | €5.1B | €5.5B | €5.0B | €5.6B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| €2.8B | €2.6B | €2.5B | €2.8B | €2.6B | €2.9B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.7× | 2.0× | 2.0× | 2.0× | 1.9× | 1.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| €4.8B | €5.2B | €5.6B | €5.5B | €6.9B | €7.6B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| €12.9B | €14.0B | €14.4B | €14.8B | €16.1B | €17.6B | Total assetsAssets |
| €5.4B | €5.3B | €4.7B | €4.8B | €5.1B | €6.6B | Total debtDebt |
| €2.6B | €2.5B | €2.3B | €2.0B | €3.0B | €4.2B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 10.7× | 14.5× | 13.3× | 13.2× | 10.7× | 10.8× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| €4.9B | €5.7B | €6.6B | €6.7B | €7.5B | €7.3B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | ||||||
| 267M | 267M | 267M | 265M | 262M | 262M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| €22.83 | €26.21 | €31.28 | €31.75 | €33.01 | €36.18 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| €2.55 | €3.39 | €3.75 | €4.33 | €4.45 | €4.75 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| €3.87 | €3.64 | €3.97 | — | — | — | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| €3.87 | €3.64 | €3.97 | — | — | — | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| €1.34 | €1.42 | €1.65 | €1.90 | €2.09 | €2.20 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| €0.47 | €0.52 | €0.67 | — | — | — | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| €18.37 | €21.43 | €24.92 | €25.41 | €28.74 | €27.84 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 5-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +9.6%/yr | +9.6%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +1.2%/yr (2-yr) | +1.2%/yr (2-yr) |
| EPS | +13.2%/yr | +13.2%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +10.4%/yr | +10.4%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +18.5%/yr (2-yr) | +18.5%/yr (2-yr) |
| Book value / share | +8.7%/yr | +8.7%/yr |
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2022 the business turned €1000M of profit into €1.1B of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | €1000M | €905M | €681M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +€237M | +€208M | +€481M |
| Cash from operations | €1.2B | €1.1B | €1.2B |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −€178M | −€140M | −€127M |
| Owner earnings | €1.1B | €973M | €1.0B |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 13% | 14% | 17% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, and stewardship. The same checks the US pages run, in the reporting currency.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 10.8×ComfortableOperating income €1.8B ÷ interest expense €168M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? €4.2B · 2.3× operating profitMeaningful net debtCash €2.4B − debt €6.6B
What this means
Netting €2.4B of cash and short-term investments against €6.6B of debt leaves €4.2B owed, about 2.3× a year's operating profit (3.7× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Solid through the cycle6-yr median, range 10%–13%; 12% latest = NOPAT €1.3B ÷ invested capital €11.5BIndustry peers: median 19%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 6 years (it ran 12% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median 6%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Cash-backedCash from ops €1.6B ÷ net income €1.2B
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? —Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €9.5B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.93×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · €6.6B vs €2.7B WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (6-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 6 of 7 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +38%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €4.53/share (latest year €4.75), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €27.84/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2020–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 6 of 6
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 6 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 18% → 19% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 18% early, 19% lately, median 19%.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Owner earnings growth +1%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 1% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2022 · 17.3% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −0.4%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
The price
What a price would have to assume, set against the record above. You bring the price, in the reporting currency.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Legrand SA has delivered.
Legrand SA’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings — on 262M diluted shares; net debt €4.2B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits off the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.