NESTE · Neste Oyj
This is a quantitative scorecard. The numbers below are read from Neste Oyj’s ESEF annual report, in EUR. The narrative — what the business does, its risks, what changed this year — is not machine-read here, so we do not paraphrase it. The filed annual report →
The record
What the business has done across the cycle, read straight from the ESEF filing: the multi-year record, and the walk from reported profit to the cash an owner could take out.
The record, 2019–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||
| €15.8B | €11.8B | €15.1B | €25.7B | €22.9B | €20.6B | €19.0B | RevenueRevenue |
| €2.2B | €828M | €2.0B | €2.4B | €1.7B | €25M | €503M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 14.1% | 7.0% | 13.4% | 9.4% | 7.3% | 0.1% | 2.6% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| €1.8B | €712M | €1.8B | €1.9B | €1.4B | (€95M) | €144M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 13% | 9% | 10% | 17% | 10% | — | 28% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||
| €1.5B | €2.1B | €2.0B | €1.2B | €2.3B | €1.2B | €1.7B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| €502M | €680M | €584M | €638M | €866M | €980M | €934M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| (€834M) | €665M | (€361M) | (€1.3B) | (€20M) | €269M | €669M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| €522M | €727M | €929M | €1.7B | €1.4B | €1.5B | €910M | CapexCapex |
| 3.3% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 6.5% | 6.1% | 7.4% | 4.8% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| €934M | €1.3B | €1.4B | €559M | €1.4B | €174M | €837M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 5.9% | 11.3% | 9.3% | 2.2% | 6.2% | 0.8% | 4.4% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| €934M | €1.3B | €1.1B | (€473M) | €876M | (€371M) | €837M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 5.9% | 11.3% | 7.0% | −1.8% | 3.8% | −1.8% | 4.4% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| €583M | €783M | €614M | €630M | €1.2B | €922M | €154M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| 30% | 12% | 25% | 23% | 17% | -1% | 2% | Return on equityROE |
| 20% | −1% | 17% | 15% | 3% | −14% | −0% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||
| €1.5B | €1.6B | €1.7B | €1.3B | €1.6B | €955M | €1.4B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| €1.9B | €1.2B | €1.7B | €2.1B | €1.9B | €1.5B | €1.4B | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| €1.7B | €1.8B | €2.6B | €3.6B | €3.4B | €2.9B | €2.9B | InventoryInvent. |
| €3.6B | €3.0B | €4.3B | €5.8B | €5.3B | €4.4B | €4.3B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| €5.3B | €4.9B | €6.3B | €7.5B | €7.1B | €5.6B | €5.8B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| €2.3B | €2.2B | €3.3B | €3.9B | €3.4B | €3.2B | €3.1B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 2.3× | 2.2× | 1.9× | 1.9× | 2.1× | 1.7× | 1.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | — | — | €401M | €496M | €514M | €478M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| €9.8B | €9.8B | €12.4B | €14.9B | €16.0B | €15.6B | €15.7B | Total assetsAssets |
| 20.4× | 18.4× | 36.8× | 40.2× | 13.8× | 0.2× | 2.5× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| €5.9B | €5.9B | €7.0B | €8.3B | €8.5B | €7.4B | €7.3B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||
| 767M | 766M | 767M | 767M | 766M | 792M | 758M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| €20.64 | €15.35 | €19.76 | €33.50 | €29.92 | €26.07 | €25.09 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| €2.33 | €0.93 | €2.31 | €2.46 | €1.87 | €-0.12 | €0.19 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| €1.22 | €1.74 | €1.84 | €0.73 | €1.84 | €0.22 | €1.10 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| €1.22 | €1.74 | €1.39 | €-0.62 | €1.14 | €-0.47 | €1.10 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| €0.76 | €1.02 | €0.80 | €0.82 | €1.52 | €1.16 | €0.20 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| €0.68 | €0.95 | €1.21 | €2.18 | €1.83 | €1.93 | €1.20 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| €7.72 | €7.74 | €9.11 | €10.85 | €11.04 | €9.37 | €9.65 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 6-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +3.3%/yr | +10.3%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −1.6%/yr | −8.7%/yr |
| EPS | −34.1%/yr | −27.2%/yr |
| Dividends / share | −19.7%/yr | −27.6%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +9.9%/yr | +4.8%/yr |
| Book value / share | +3.8%/yr | +4.5%/yr |
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned €144M of profit into €837M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | €144M | (€95M) | €1.4B | €1.9B | €1.8B |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +€934M | +€980M | +€866M | +€638M | +€584M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +€669M | +€269M | −€20M | −€1.3B | −€361M |
| Cash from operations | €1.7B | €1.2B | €2.3B | €1.2B | €2.0B |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −€910M | −€980M | −€866M | −€638M | −€584M |
| Owner earnings | €837M | €174M | €1.4B | €559M | €1.4B |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | −€545M | −€537M | −€1.0B | −€345M |
| Free cash flow | €837M | (€371M) | €876M | (€473M) | €1.1B |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 4% | 1% | 6% | 2% | 9% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, and stewardship. The same checks the US pages run, in the reporting currency.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- AdequateOperating income €503M ÷ interest expense €205M
What this means
Comfortable in a normal year, but below the margin of safety Graham looked for. Worth checking how stable the coverage has been across a full cycle.
- Debt under-captured — leverage unknown, not low
What this means
This company pays far more interest than its tagged debt implies (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so its net cash or net debt cannot be read honestly: the gap is unknown, not zero, and 'net cash' here would be exactly the fiction the figure is meant to prevent. Judge it on the record and owner earnings instead.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Debt under-capturedIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
This company's interest bill implies far more debt than its filings tag at the consolidated level (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so invested capital, and the return on it, cannot be read honestly. Judge this one on Owner Earnings and the record instead.
- Solid through the cycle7-yr median margin, range 1%–11%; latest €837M = operating cash €1.7B − maintenance capex €910MIndustry peers: median 2%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 4% of revenue this year, a 6% median across 7 years.
- Are earnings backed by cash? 12.13×Cash-backedCash from ops €1.7B ÷ net income €144M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks €154M ÷ Owner Earnings €837M
What this means
Of €837M Owner Earnings, €154M (18%) went back to shareholders, €154M dividends, €0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.97×MaintainingCapex €910M ÷ depreciation €934M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 4 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €19.0B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.89×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt —Debt ≤ working capital · —
What this means
The filings tag only a fraction of the debt this company's interest bill implies (much of it sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so this test can't be run honestly.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (7-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (7)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −65%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €0.65/share (latest year €0.19), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €9.65/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2019–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 6 of 7
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin 11% → 3% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 11% early to 3% lately, median 7% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Owner earnings growth −13%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings shrank about 13% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2024 · 0.1% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −0.2%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 7 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
How the cash was used, 2019–2025
Over the record, the business generated €11.9B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested€7.7B · 65%
- Dividends€4.9B · 41%
- Returned to owners€4.9B
73% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, €4.9B as dividends and €0 as buybacks.
- Source of funding−€656M
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran €656M beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet: cash and short-term investments drew down €126M.
- Net change in share count−1.2%
The diluted count fell from 767M to 758M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record€0.20/sh
Paid in 7 of the years on record, the per-share dividend shrinking about 20% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
- Return on what it retained−15%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out (€2.8B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) fell €417M, so each retained €1 gave back about 0.15 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Neste Oyj is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2019–2025.
1 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?3.8% vs 8.8%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 8.8% early in the record and 3.8% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
The price
What a price would have to assume, set against the record above. You bring the price, in the reporting currency.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Neste Oyj has delivered.
Through the cycle, Neste Oyj earns about €1.1B on its 5.9% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 4.4% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings €837M on 758M diluted shares; net cash €1.4B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.