ORA · Orange SA
This is a quantitative scorecard. The numbers below are read from Orange SA’s ESEF annual report, in EUR. The narrative — what the business does, its risks, what changed this year — is not machine-read here, so we do not paraphrase it. The filed annual report →
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Electricity is 70% of revenue, with Products the other meaningful line at 22%.
- Electricity70%€694M
- Products22%€217M
- Energy storage8%€79M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
What the business has done across the cycle, read straight from the ESEF filing: the multi-year record, and the walk from reported profit to the cash an owner could take out.
The record, 2019–2024
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| €42.2B | €42.3B | €42.5B | €39.1B | €39.7B | €40.3B | RevenueRevenue |
| €5.9B | €5.5B | €2.5B | €4.8B | €3.3B | €3.7B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 14.0% | 13.1% | 5.9% | 12.3% | 8.4% | 9.2% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| €3.0B | €4.8B | €233M | €2.1B | €2.4B | €2.4B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 33% | — | — | 38% | 26% | 37% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||
| €10.2B | €12.7B | €11.2B | €11.2B | €12.1B | €10.2B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| €7.2B | €7.9B | €11.0B | €9.1B | €9.6B | €7.8B | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| €1.9B | €1.6B | €2.1B | €1.9B | €1.9B | €1.9B | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| 7% | 9% | 2% | 5% | 4% | 5% | ROICROIC |
| 9% | 13% | 1% | 7% | 8% | 7% | Return on equityROE |
| 3% | 9% | −5% | 1% | 2% | 1% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||||
| €6.5B | €8.1B | €8.6B | €6.0B | €5.6B | €8.8B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| €5.3B | €5.6B | €6.0B | €6.3B | €6.0B | €5.8B | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| €906M | €814M | €952M | €1.0B | €1.2B | €791M | InventoryInvent. |
| €6.2B | €6.4B | €7.0B | €7.4B | €7.2B | €6.6B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| €25.0B | €25.1B | €25.8B | €26.8B | €25.2B | €25.7B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| €27.8B | €28.3B | €27.3B | €29.2B | €30.5B | €27.9B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 0.9× | 0.9× | 0.9× | 0.9× | 0.8× | 0.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| €27.6B | €27.6B | €24.2B | €23.1B | €23.8B | €21.1B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| €106.7B | €107.7B | €108.1B | €109.7B | €110.1B | €103.9B | Total assetsAssets |
| €33.1B | €30.1B | €31.9B | €31.9B | €30.5B | €29.0B | Total debtDebt |
| €26.7B | €21.9B | €23.3B | €25.9B | €24.9B | €20.2B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| €34.6B | €37.2B | €35.4B | €31.8B | €31.8B | €31.8B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | ||||||
| 2.92B | 2.80B | — | 2.94B | 2.87B | 2.87B | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| €14.48 | €15.08 | — | €13.31 | €13.82 | €14.05 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| €1.03 | €1.72 | — | €0.73 | €0.85 | €0.82 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| €0.64 | €0.57 | — | €0.63 | €0.65 | €0.67 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| €11.85 | €13.27 | — | €10.81 | €11.09 | €11.09 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 5-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −0.6%/yr | −0.6%/yr |
| EPS | −4.5%/yr | −4.5%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +1.0%/yr | +1.0%/yr |
| Book value / share | −1.3%/yr | −1.3%/yr |
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, and stewardship. The same checks the US pages run, in the reporting currency.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Interest expense not tagged in the data
What this means
No usable interest-expense line was tagged in the filing data, but the balance sheet carries real net debt — so the interest burden here is unknown, not absent. Read the debt on the net-debt check below.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? €20.2B · 5.5× operating profitHeavy net debtCash €8.8B − debt €29.0B
What this means
Netting €8.8B of cash and short-term investments against €29.0B of debt leaves €20.2B owed, about 5.5× a year's operating profit (7.8× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle6-yr median, range 2%–9%; 5% latest = NOPAT €2.4B ÷ invested capital €52.0BIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 6 years (it ran 5% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Cash-backedCash from ops €10.2B ÷ net income €2.4B
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? —Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €40.3B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.92×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · €29.0B vs (€2.2B) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (6-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 6 of 7 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −14%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €0.81/share (latest year €0.82), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €11.09/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2019–2024
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 6 of 6
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 6 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 11% → 10% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices, but the margin in the record has not followed — the claim outruns the result here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 11% early, 10% lately, median 9%.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Worst year 2021 · 5.9% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −0.3%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 6 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
The price
What a price would have to assume, set against the record above. You bring the price, in the reporting currency.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFOrange SA is profitable, but its owner-earnings base could not be formed from this filing’s tagged data (operating cash flow or capital spending is missing), so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.
Revenue, delivered−1%/yr’19→’24
Enter a price to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.