Owner Scorecard


← Catalog

SAF · Safran SA

IFRS
Latest filing: FY2025 annual report · ESEF (Inline XBRL)

This is a quantitative scorecard. The numbers below are read from Safran SA’s ESEF annual report, in EUR. The narrative — what the business does, its risks, what changed this year — is not machine-read here, so we do not paraphrase it. The filed annual report →

I

The record

What the business has done across the cycle, read straight from the ESEF filing: the multi-year record, and the walk from reported profit to the cash an owner could take out.

The record, 2019–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25
Income statement
€25.1B€16.6B€15.1B€19.5B€23.7B€28.2B€31.7BRevenueRevenue
€3.8B€927M€864M€2.0B€2.8B€4.2B€4.3BOperating incomeOp. inc.
15.3%5.6%5.7%10.5%11.8%14.9%13.6%Operating marginOp. mgn
€2.4B€352M€43M(€2.5B)€3.4B(€667M)€7.2BNet incomeNet inc.
28%34%26%29%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
€3.1B€1.9B€2.4B€3.5B€4.3B€4.7B€5.7BOperating cash flowOp. cash
€698M€1.5B€2.4B€6.0B€826M€5.4B(€1.5B)Working capital & otherWC & other
€785M€0€183M€213M€564M€911M€1.2BDividends paidDiv. paid
28%7%5%39%38%90%38%ROICROIC
20%3%0%-23%28%-7%48%Return on equityROE
13%3%−1%−25%24%−16%40%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
€2.6B€3.7B€5.2B€6.7B€6.7B€6.5B€6.8BCash & investmentsCash+inv
€7.6B€5.8B€6.5B€7.9B€9.4B€10.6B€14.2BReceivablesReceiv.
€6.3B€5.2B€5.1B€6.4B€7.9B€9.5B€10.3BInventoryInvent.
€14.0B€11.0B€11.6B€14.3B€17.3B€20.1B€24.5BOperating working capitalOper. WC
€20.1B€18.2B€20.6B€29.2B€31.5BCurrent assetsCur. assets
€22.9B€19.0B€19.8B€30.8B€37.4BCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
0.9×1.0×1.0×0.9×0.8×Current ratioCurr. ratio
€5.2B€5.1B€5.1B€5.0B€4.7B€4.9B€5.8BGoodwillGoodwill
€42.8B€39.5B€41.7B€46.8B€50.5B€55.0B€61.8BTotal assetsAssets
(€2.6B)(€3.7B)(€5.2B)(€6.7B)(€6.7B)(€6.5B)(€6.8B)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
€12.4B€12.8B€13.3B€10.9B€12.1B€10.2B€14.8BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
430M424M430M427M418M417M418MShares out (diluted)Shares
€58.36€39.22€35.19€45.73€56.59€67.54€75.73Revenue / shareRev/sh
€5.69€0.83€0.10€-5.76€8.24€-1.60€17.17EPS (diluted)EPS
€1.83€0.00€0.43€0.50€1.35€2.19€2.91Dividends / shareDiv/sh
€28.77€30.16€30.86€25.45€28.92€24.41€35.50Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
6-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+4.4%/yr+14.1%/yr
EPS+20.2%/yr+83.3%/yr
Dividends / share+8.1%/yr
Book value / share+3.6%/yr+3.3%/yr
II

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, and stewardship. The same checks the US pages run, in the reporting currency.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 ESEF (Inline XBRL) · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • No meaningful interest burden
    Little or no interest expense reported
    What this means

    Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.

  • Net cash, debt-free
    Cash €6.8B − debt €0
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by €6.8B, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Not enough data
    Industry peers: median 11%
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Not enough data
    Industry peers: median 5%
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Mostly cash-backed
    Cash from ops €5.7B ÷ net income €7.2B
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting?
    Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 3 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €31.7B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity
    Current ratio ≥ 2× ·
    What this means

    Current assets / liabilities not in the data yet.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (7-yr record) · 2 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 6 of 7 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +250%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €7.94/share (latest year €17.17), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €35.50/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2019–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 5 of 7
    What this means

    Lost money in 2 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Operating margin 9% → 13% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 9% early to 13% lately, median 12% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Worst year 2020 · 5.6% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count −0.5%/yr
    What this means

    Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Safran SA is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2019–2025.

1 of the 3 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?56% → 77% of sales

    Receivables and inventory grew from €14.0B to €24.5B while revenue grew 26%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (56% of revenue then, 77% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did reported profit become cash?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

III

The price

What a price would have to assume, set against the record above. You bring the price, in the reporting currency.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Safran SA is profitable, but its owner-earnings base could not be formed from this filing’s tagged data (operating cash flow or capital spending is missing), so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

The assumptions

Revenue, delivered16%/yr’20→’25

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach
Margin the price demands
Owner-earnings margin today

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.