Owner Scorecard


← Catalog

UCB · UCB SA

IFRS
Latest filing: FY2024 annual report · ESEF (Inline XBRL)

This is a quantitative scorecard. The numbers below are read from UCB SA’s ESEF annual report, in EUR. The narrative — what the business does, its risks, what changed this year — is not machine-read here, so we do not paraphrase it. The filed annual report →

I

The record

What the business has done across the cycle, read straight from the ESEF filing: the multi-year record, and the walk from reported profit to the cash an owner could take out.

The record, 2020–2024

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2020’202021’212022’222023’232024’24
Income statement
€5.3B€5.8B€5.5B€5.3B€6.2BRevenueRevenue
75%75%70%67%72%Gross marginGross mgn
€971M€1.3B€585M€604M€1.3BOperating incomeOp. inc.
18.2%22.2%10.6%11.5%21.5%Operating marginOp. mgn
€732M€1.1B€418M€343M€1.1BNet incomeNet inc.
14%14%18%22%8%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
€1.1B€1.6B€1.1B€761M€1.2BOperating cash flowOp. cash
€349M€495M€701M€418M€177MWorking capital & otherWC & other
€256M€282M€252M€238M€234MCapexCapex
4.8%4.9%4.6%4.5%3.8%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
€825M€1.3B€867M€523M€1.0BOwner earningsOwner earn.
15.4%22.0%15.7%10.0%16.4%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
€825M€1.3B€867M€523M€1.0BFree cash flowFCF
15.4%22.0%15.7%10.0%16.4%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
€235M€240M€247M€252M€259MDividends paidDiv. paid
10%13%5%4%11%Return on equityROE
7%10%2%1%8%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
€1.3B€1.3B€899M€861M€1.6BCash & investmentsCash+inv
€1.0B€1.2B€1.1B€1.2B€1.5BReceivablesReceiv.
€854M€878M€907M€1.0B€1.3BInventoryInvent.
€1.9B€2.1B€2.0B€2.3B€2.8BOperating working capitalOper. WC
€3.6B€3.7B€3.3B€3.4B€4.8BCurrent assetsCur. assets
€2.8B€2.8B€3.1B€2.6B€3.5BCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.3×1.3×1.1×1.3×1.4×Current ratioCurr. ratio
€5.0B€5.2B€5.3B€5.3B€5.5BGoodwillGoodwill
€13.3B€14.2B€15.9B€15.5B€17.3BTotal assetsAssets
9.1×9.3×5.2×2.9×6.6×Interest coverageInt. cov.
€7.3B€8.4B€9.1B€9.0B€10.0BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
189M189M190M190M190MShares out (diluted)Shares
€28.27€30.58€29.04€27.71€32.41Revenue / shareRev/sh
€3.87€5.60€2.20€1.81€5.61EPS (diluted)EPS
€4.36€6.73€4.56€2.76€5.31Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
€4.36€6.73€4.56€2.76€5.31Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
€1.24€1.27€1.30€1.33€1.36Dividends / shareDiv/sh
€1.35€1.49€1.33€1.26€1.23Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
€38.44€44.39€47.71€47.36€52.83Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
4-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+3.5%/yr+3.5%/yr (4-yr)
Owner earnings / share+5.0%/yr+5.0%/yr (4-yr)
EPS+9.7%/yr+9.7%/yr (4-yr)
Dividends / share+2.4%/yr+2.4%/yr (4-yr)
Capital spending / share−2.3%/yr−2.3%/yr (4-yr)
Book value / share+8.3%/yr+8.3%/yr (4-yr)

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2024 the business reported €1.1B of profit but €1.0B of owner earnings: €57M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.

Reported net income€1.1B
Owner earnings€1.0B · 16% of revenue
FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Reported net income€1.1B€343M€418M€1.1B€732M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+€177M+€418M+€701M+€495M+€349M
Cash from operations€1.2B€761M€1.1B€1.6B€1.1B
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−€234M−€238M−€252M−€282M−€256M
Owner earnings€1.0B€523M€867M€1.3B€825M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue16%10%16%22%15%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

II

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, and stewardship. The same checks the US pages run, in the reporting currency.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2024 ESEF (Inline XBRL) · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income €1.3B ÷ interest expense €200M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • Debt under-captured — leverage unknown, not low
    What this means

    This company pays far more interest than its tagged debt implies (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so its net cash or net debt cannot be read honestly: the gap is unknown, not zero, and 'net cash' here would be exactly the fiction the figure is meant to prevent. Judge it on the record and owner earnings instead.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Debt under-captured
    Industry peers: median 2%
    What this means

    This company's interest bill implies far more debt than its filings tag at the consolidated level (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so invested capital, and the return on it, cannot be read honestly. Judge this one on Owner Earnings and the record instead.

  • High through the cycle
    5-yr median margin, range 10%–22%; latest €1.0B = operating cash €1.2B − maintenance capex €234M
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 16% of revenue this year, a 16% median across 5 years.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops €1.2B ÷ net income €1.1B
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks €259M ÷ Owner Earnings €1.0B
    What this means

    Of €1.0B Owner Earnings, €259M (26%) went back to shareholders, €259M dividends, €0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting?
    Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 3 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €6.2B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.36×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt
    Debt ≤ working capital ·
    What this means

    The filings tag only a fraction of the debt this company's interest bill implies (much of it sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so this test can't be run honestly.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (5-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 5 of 6 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €3.21/share (latest year €5.61), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €52.83/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2020–2024

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 5 of 5
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Operating margin 20% → 17% (2-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    The recent-years average (17%) sits below the early years (20%), but the latest year (22%) is back near the early level: a cyclical trough dragging the window down, not a one-way slide. The through-cycle median is 18% — read it across the cycle, not on the dip.

  • Owner earnings growth −8%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings shrank about 8% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2022 · 10.6% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count +0.1%/yr
    What this means

    Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

  • How management talks about it Owner’s terms
    What this means

    Returns have thinned, but the filing discusses it in an owner’s vocabulary rather than selling past it — candor about a hard stretch counts for more than an adjective.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“Recent technologies that have been integrated into the existing financial and banking systems, such as artificial intelligence, machine learning and continued development of smartphone applications have also been utilized by non-bank competitors, which has siphoned a portion of the revenues from those services away fro…”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

How the cash was used, 2020–2024

Over the record, the business generated €5.8B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested€1.3B · 22%
  • Dividends€1.2B · 21%
  • Retained (debt / cash)€3.3B · 57%
  • Returned to owners€1.2B

    27% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, €1.2B as dividends and €0 as buybacks.

  • Net change in share count0.4%

    The diluted count barely moved (189M to 190M): buybacks roughly offset the stock issued to staff.

  • Dividend record€1.36/sh

    Paid in 5 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 2% a year. It was never cut over the span.

  • Return on what it retained−8%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out (€2.4B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) fell €188M, so each retained €1 gave back about 0.08 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why UCB SA is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2019–2024.

1 of the 3 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.

  • Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?13.2% vs 18.7%

    The owner-earnings margin averaged 18.7% early in the record and 13.2% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.

And these came back clean
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did reported profit become cash?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

III

The price

What a price would have to assume, set against the record above. You bring the price, in the reporting currency.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what UCB SA has delivered.

Through the cycle, UCB SA earns about €967M on its 15.7% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 16.4% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’20→’24−8%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’22–’24)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings €1.0B on 190M diluted shares; net cash €1.6B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.