Owner Scorecard


← Catalog

WKL · Wolters Kluwer NV

IFRS
Latest filing: FY2025 annual report · ESEF (Inline XBRL)

This is a quantitative scorecard. The numbers below are read from Wolters Kluwer NV’s ESEF annual report, in EUR. The narrative — what the business does, its risks, what changed this year — is not machine-read here, so we do not paraphrase it. The filed annual report →

I

The record

What the business has done across the cycle, read straight from the ESEF filing: the multi-year record, and the walk from reported profit to the cash an owner could take out.

The record, 2020–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25
Income statement
€4.6B€4.8B€5.5B€5.6B€5.9B€6.1BRevenueRevenue
70%71%71%72%73%73%Gross marginGross mgn
€972M€1.0B€1.3B€1.3B€1.4B€1.7BOperating incomeOp. inc.
21.1%21.2%24.4%23.7%24.4%28.3%Operating marginOp. mgn
€721M€728M€1.0B€1.0B€1.1B€1.3BNet incomeNet inc.
23%22%20%22%22%21%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
€1.2B€1.3B€1.6B€1.5B€1.7B€1.7BOperating cash flowOp. cash
€476M€564M€555M€538M€575M€360MWorking capital & otherWC & other
€334M€373M€424M€467M€521M€563MDividends paidDiv. paid
19%18%28%28%27%34%ROICROIC
35%30%44%58%70%164%Return on equityROE
19%15%26%31%36%93%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
€723M€1.0B€1.3B€1.1B€954M€932MCash & investmentsCash+inv
€986M€1.0B€1.1B€1.1B€1.1B€1.1BReceivablesReceiv.
€68M€65M€79M€84M€79M€62MInventoryInvent.
€1.1B€1.1B€1.2B€1.2B€1.2B€1.1BOperating working capitalOper. WC
€2.2B€2.7B€3.0B€2.8B€2.7B€2.6BCurrent assetsCur. assets
€3.2B€3.1B€3.9B€3.8B€3.8B€4.1BCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
0.7×0.9×0.8×0.7×0.7×0.6×Current ratioCurr. ratio
€4.0B€4.2B€4.4B€4.3B€4.7B€4.8BGoodwillGoodwill
€8.3B€9.0B€9.5B€9.1B€9.5B€9.6BTotal assetsAssets
€2.6B€3.1B€2.8B€3.1B€3.7B€4.2BTotal debtDebt
€1.9B€2.0B€1.5B€2.0B€2.7B€3.3BNet debt / (cash)Net debt
17.4×12.3×17.3×16.1×12.6×15.1×Interest coverageInt. cov.
€2.1B€2.4B€2.3B€1.7B€1.5B€798MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
265M261M255M245M238M231MShares out (diluted)Shares
€17.36€18.28€21.40€22.79€24.89€26.50Revenue / shareRev/sh
€2.72€2.79€4.03€4.11€4.54€5.66EPS (diluted)EPS
€1.26€1.43€1.66€1.91€2.19€2.44Dividends / shareDiv/sh
€7.87€9.26€9.06€7.14€6.50€3.45Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
5-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+8.8%/yr+8.8%/yr
EPS+15.8%/yr+15.8%/yr
Dividends / share+14.1%/yr+14.1%/yr
Book value / share−15.2%/yr−15.2%/yr
II

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, and stewardship. The same checks the US pages run, in the reporting currency.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 ESEF (Inline XBRL) · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income €1.7B ÷ interest expense €115M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? €3.3B · 1.9× operating profit
    Modest net debt
    Cash €932M − debt €4.2B
    What this means

    Netting €932M of cash and short-term investments against €4.2B of debt leaves €3.3B owed, about 1.9× a year's operating profit (2.4× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Very high (≥25%) through the cycle
    6-yr median, range 18%–34%; 34% latest = NOPAT €1.4B ÷ invested capital €4.1B
    Industry peers: median 9%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 6 years (it ran 34% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Not enough data
    Industry peers: median 11%
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops €1.7B ÷ net income €1.3B
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting?
    Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 5 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €6.1B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 0.65×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · €4.2B vs (€1.4B) WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (6-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 6 of 7 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +37%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €4.90/share (latest year €5.66), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €3.45/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2020–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 6 of 6
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 6 of 6 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 22% → 25% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 22% early to 25% lately, median 24% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Worst year 2020 · 21.1% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count −2.7%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Elevated contestability

The product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.

The moat the record shows, a high return on capital held across years, was earned before AI collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

III

The price

What a price would have to assume, set against the record above. You bring the price, in the reporting currency.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Wolters Kluwer NV is profitable, but its owner-earnings base could not be formed from this filing’s tagged data (operating cash flow or capital spending is missing), so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

The assumptions

Revenue, delivered6%/yr’20→’25

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach
Margin the price demands
Owner-earnings margin today

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.