← All companies ← ROOT Manual ROST → ← ROK Electronic Components & Instruments SANM →
ROP, Roper Technologies Inc.
Roper Technologies Inc. is a diversified technology company.
All currency amounts are in millions unless specified Our Business Roper Technologies, Inc.
We operate market leading businesses that design and develop vertical software and technology enabled products for a variety of defensible niche markets.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Application Software (57%), Technology Enabled Products (23%) and Network Software (20%).
- Situation
- Serial acquirer. Goodwill and acquired intangibles are 90% of assets, with meaningful acquisition spending in 10 of the record's 10 years; much of what this business is was bought, at prices the record carries.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 69% and operating margin about 28% through the cycle, a wide spread between price and the cost of what it sells — whether that advantage is durable pricing power or a margin that can erode is the question the record is for. That margin has held in a narrow 26%–28% band over the years, so steadiness itself is the evidence — the lever is unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line. Read this kind of business on the installed base and the upgrade cycle. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 6%, above 15% in 0 of 10 years). The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 26% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Revenue spreads across 3 segments, the largest Application Software at 57%.
- Application Software57%$4.5B
- Technology Enabled Products23%$1.8B
- Network Software20%$1.6B
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $3.8B | $4.6B | $5.2B | $4.7B | $4.0B | $4.8B | $5.4B | $6.2B | $7.0B | $7.9B | $8.1B | RevenueRevenue |
| 62% | 62% | 63% | 66% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 69% | 69% | 69% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 34% | 36% | 36% | 38% | 43% | 43% | 41% | 41% | 41% | 41% | 41% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 5% | 6% | 7% | 8% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 11% | 11% | 11% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $2.2B | $2.3B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 27.8% | 26.3% | 26.9% | 28.1% | 26.9% | 25.7% | 28.4% | 28.2% | 28.4% | 28.3% | 28.1% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $659M | $972M | $944M | $1.8B | $950M | $1.2B | $4.5B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.7B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 30% | 6% | 21% | 19% | 16% | 16% | 6% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 20% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $964M | $1.2B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $2.0B | $735M | $2.0B | $2.4B | $2.5B | $2.6B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $241M | $345M | $367M | $409M | $492M | $616M | $650M | $755M | $813M | $898M | $899M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($14M) | ($165M) | ($15M) | ($816M) | ($25M) | $120M | ($4.6B) | ($228M) | ($115M) | ($61M) | ($190M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $37M | $49M | $49M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $57M | CapexCapex |
| 1.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.7% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $927M | $1.2B | $1.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.5B | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 24.4% | 25.7% | 26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31.4% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $927M | $1.2B | $1.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.5B | Free cash flowFCF |
| 24.4% | 25.7% | 26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31.4% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $3.7B | $154M | $1.3B | $2.4B | $6.0B | $217M | $4.3B | $2.1B | $3.6B | $3.3B | $3.2B | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $121M | $143M | $170M | $192M | $214M | $236M | $262M | $290M | $322M | $355M | $364M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0 | $0 | $500M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 7% | 10% | 9% | 8% | 5% | 5% | 7% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% | ROICROIC |
| 11% | 14% | 12% | 19% | 9% | 10% | 28% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 9% | Return on equityROE |
| 9% | 12% | 10% | 17% | 7% | 8% | 27% | 6% | 7% | 6% | 7% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $757M | $671M | $364M | $710M | $308M | $352M | $793M | $214M | $188M | $297M | $383M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $620M | $642M | $701M | $792M | $746M | $688M | $725M | $830M | $885M | $1.0B | $877M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $182M | $205M | $191M | $199M | $165M | $69M | $111M | $119M | $121M | $142M | $145M | InventoryInvent. |
| $152M | $171M | $165M | $162M | $178M | — | — | — | — | — | $178M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $650M | $676M | $726M | $828M | $733M | $757M | $836M | $949M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $844M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.6B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $2.4B | $1.9B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.9B | $1.9B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $1.4B | $2.0B | $1.4B | $2.4B | $2.4B | $3.1B | $2.9B | $3.0B | $3.8B | $3.7B | $3.6B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.2× | 0.9× | 1.1× | 0.8× | 0.7× | 0.8× | 0.7× | 0.5× | 0.4× | 0.5× | 0.5× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $8.6B | $8.8B | $9.3B | $10.4B | $13.3B | $139M | $15.9B | $17.1B | $19.3B | $21.3B | $21.3B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $14.3B | $14.3B | $15.2B | $18.1B | $24.0B | $23.7B | $27.0B | $28.2B | $31.3B | $34.6B | $34.6B | Total assetsAssets |
| $6.2B | $5.2B | $5.0B | $5.3B | $9.6B | $8.0B | $6.7B | $6.4B | $7.7B | $9.4B | $10.5B | Total debtDebt |
| $5.5B | $4.5B | $4.6B | $4.6B | $9.3B | $7.6B | $5.9B | $6.1B | $7.5B | $9.1B | $10.1B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 9.4× | 6.7× | 7.7× | 7.1× | 5.0× | 5.3× | 7.9× | 10.6× | 7.7× | 6.9× | 6.3× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $5.8B | $6.9B | $7.7B | $9.5B | $10.5B | $11.6B | $16.0B | $17.4B | $18.9B | $19.9B | $18.8B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 2.1% | 1.8% | 2.6% | 2.1% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 2.0% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.2% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 103M | 104M | 104M | 105M | 106M | 107M | 107M | 107M | 108M | 108M | 105M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $36.97 | $44.52 | $49.72 | $44.98 | $38.05 | $45.39 | $50.30 | $57.52 | $65.18 | $73.04 | $77.58 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $6.43 | $9.39 | $9.05 | $16.82 | $8.98 | $10.82 | $42.55 | $12.89 | $14.35 | $14.20 | $16.39 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $9.04 | $11.46 | $13.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $24.35 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $9.04 | $11.46 | $13.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $24.35 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $1.18 | $1.38 | $1.63 | $1.82 | $2.03 | $2.22 | $2.46 | $2.70 | $2.98 | $3.28 | $3.48 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.36 | $0.47 | $0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0.55 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $56.48 | $66.31 | $74.12 | $90.31 | $99.15 | $108.58 | $150.17 | $162.43 | $174.70 | $183.75 | $179.90 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +7.9%/yr | +13.9%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +21.0%/yr (2-yr) | +21.0%/yr (2-yr) |
| EPS | +9.2%/yr | +9.6%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +12.0%/yr | +10.1%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +13.7%/yr (2-yr) | +13.7%/yr (2-yr) |
| Book value / share | +14.0%/yr | +13.1%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2018 the business turned $944M of profit into $1.4B of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $944M | $972M | $659M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$367M | +$345M | +$241M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$134M | +$83M | +$79M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$15M | −$165M | −$14M |
| Cash from operations | $1.4B | $1.2B | $964M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$49M | −$49M | −$37M |
| Owner earnings | $1.4B | $1.2B | $927M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 27% | 26% | 24% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $134M), owner earnings is nearer $1.2B.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ComfortableOperating income $2.2B ÷ interest expense $325M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $9.1B · 4.1× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $297M − debt $9.4B
What this means
Netting $297M of cash and short-term investments against $9.4B of debt leaves $9.1B owed, about 4.1× a year's operating profit (4.2× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- TightDSO 46 + DIO 21 − DPO 27 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle10-yr median, range 5%–10%; 6% latest = NOPAT $1.8B ÷ invested capital $28.9BIndustry peers: median -20%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 6% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- High through the cycle3-yr median margin, range 24%–27%; latest $2.5B = operating cash $2.5B − maintenance capex $49MIndustry peers: median -13%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 32% of revenue this year, a 26% median across 3 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $166M of SBC) leaves $2.3B.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $2.5B ÷ net income $1.5B
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $855M ÷ Owner Earnings $2.5B
What this means
Of $2.5B Owner Earnings, $855M (34%) went back to shareholders, $355M dividends, $500M buybacks. Net of $166M stock comp, the real buyback was about $334M. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.05×HarvestingCapex $49M ÷ depreciation $898M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $7.9B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.52×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $9.4B vs ($1.8B) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +74%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $14.76/share (latest year $15.22), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $197.01/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 10 of 10
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 27% → 28% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 27% early, 28% lately, median 28%.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 4%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.
- Owner earnings growth +10%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 10% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2021 · 25.7% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count +0.6%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.
“The rapid pace of AI advancement may make it difficult to maintain competitive advantages, and AI capabilities could quickly become commoditized, reducing our ability to differentiate our offerings.”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$383M
- Receivables$877M
- Inventory$145M
- Other current assets$507M
- Debt due within a year$716M
- Accounts payable$178M
- Other current liabilities$2.7B
From the company's latest filing.
Debt maturity
the debt note, SEC EDGAR →Not how much it owes, but when it falls due, and against what. The ladder the company files, beside cash on hand and a year's owner earnings.
Bars scaled to the largest single year; “later” is everything due after 2030, shown apart since it dwarfs the years.
Against what the business has and earns
Cash on hand as of Mar 31, 2026 plus a year’s owner earnings comes to $2.9B against the $706M due in the twelve months after the Dec 31, 2025 schedule: 4.1 times it.
Maturity schedule extracted from the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled to the total the table states.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Net income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | L. Neil Hunn | $21.5M | $34.6M | $1.2B |
| 2022 | L. Neil Hunn | $21.9M | $8.4M | $4.5B |
| 2023 | L. Neil Hunn | $41.3M | $58.8M | $1.4B |
| 2024 | L. Neil Hunn | $23.7M | $14.6M | $1.5B |
| 2025 | L. Neil Hunn | $26.2M | $3.9M | $1.5B |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Net income is the whole business's, as filed, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership<1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio260:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$166M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 2% of revenue, equal to 7% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Roper Technologies Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
1 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.
- Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$6.2B → $10.5B
Debt rose from $6.2B to $10.5B while owner earnings went from about $1.2B to $1.2B — about 5.4 years of owner earnings in debt then, about 9.0 now: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Electronic Components & Instruments
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corporation | $42.0B | 71% | 11.4% | 16% | 8% |
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc. | $7.9B | 69% | 28.0% | 6% | 26% |
| IRTCiRhythm Technologies | $747M | 70% | -25.5% | -29% | -13% |
| TCMDTactile Systems Technology Inc. | $330M | 71% | 4.3% | 9% | 3% |
| HTFLHeartflow Inc. | $176M | 75% | -48.7% | -20% | -58% |
| NNNextNav Inc. | $5M | 40% | -1657.1% | -157% | -1066% |
| Group median | — | 70% | -10.6% | -7% | -5% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Roper Technologies Inc. has delivered.
Roper Technologies Inc.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Roper Technologies Inc. earns about $2.1B on its 26.2% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 31.5% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow $2.5B on 101M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-30; net debt $10.1B. The if-converted diluted count is 105M, 4% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($57M) runs well above depreciation ($899M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $2.6B, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← ROOT its page in the Manual ROST →
Industry order: ← ROK the Electronic Components & Instruments chapter SANM →