← All companies ← SIGIP Manual SIRI → ← SCCG REITs — Specialty & Diversified SLG →
SILA, Sila Realty Trust Inc.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a Maryland corporation that was formed on January 11, 2013, headquartered in Tampa, Florida, that has elected, and conducts its operations so as to qualify, to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, for federal income tax purposes.
As of December 31, 2025, we owned 140 real estate healthcare properties and three undeveloped land parcels, including the Stoughton Healthcare Facility which has been taken out of service and is being demolished.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Funds from operations per share have compounded about 18% a year across the record. Debt is 25% of assets, conservative for a REIT. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $56M | $125M | $177M | $101M | $166M | $173M | $180M | $189M | $187M | $198M | $200M | RevenueRevenue |
| $11M | $21M | $29M | $3M | $37M | $403M | ($8M) | $24M | $43M | $33M | $38M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $31M | $62M | $87M | $43M | $103M | $473M | $69M | $98M | $117M | $110M | $114M | Funds from operationsFFO |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| 58% | 46% | 46% | 116% | 74% | 99% | 95% | 68% | 70% | 81% | — | Dividend payout (FFO)Payout |
| $916M | $1.6B | $1.8B | $2.9B | $2.9B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $1.9B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.1B | Real estate (gross)RE gross |
| $1.1B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $3.2B | $3.2B | $2.2B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.1B | Total assetsAssets |
| 14% | 26% | 24% | 14% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25% | Debt / assetsDebt/assets |
| $151M | $464M | $464M | $455M | $147M | $0 | — | — | — | — | $517M | Total debtDebt |
| $101M | $389M | $396M | $386M | $93M | ($32M) | — | — | — | — | $486M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| — | — | — | — | — | 0.9× | 0.6× | 2.0× | 2.8× | 2.0× | 1.4× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $668M | $991M | $1.0B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.3B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 16.8M | 25.4M | 32.8M | 39.3M | 55.4M | 56.1M | 56.3M | 57.3M | 56.7M | 55.5M | 55.4M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $1.82 | $2.45 | $2.66 | $1.09 | $1.87 | $8.43 | $1.22 | $1.72 | $2.07 | $1.98 | $2.06 | FFO / shareFFO/sh |
| $1.05 | $1.14 | $1.23 | $1.26 | $1.38 | $8.31 | $1.16 | $1.16 | $1.44 | $1.60 | — | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $39.90 | $38.95 | $31.97 | $44.22 | $29.85 | $28.55 | $27.61 | $26.10 | $24.75 | $23.98 | $23.90 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The diluted share count moved ×1.52 into 2017 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
The diluted share count moved ×1.41 into 2020 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
Share counts before 2022 are restated ×1/4 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +0.6%/yr | +3.5%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +19.7%/yr (3-yr) | +19.7%/yr (3-yr) |
| EPS | −1.4%/yr | −2.1%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +4.7%/yr | +3.0%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −12.8%/yr (3-yr) | −12.8%/yr (3-yr) |
| Book value / share | −5.5%/yr | −4.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- about $1.98 per shareNet income $33M + depreciation $77M
What this means
GAAP net income with property depreciation added back, because the buildings a REIT charges against earnings usually hold or grow their value. This, not net income, is what a REIT is actually priced on. It is an approximation here: where a filing reports gains on property sales, we remove them, the way the NAREIT definition does.
- CoveredDividends $89M ÷ FFO $110MIndustry peers: median 88%
What this means
A REIT must distribute most of its taxable income, so a high payout is normal and the question is whether FFO covers it. Above 100%, the trust is funding the dividend with debt or asset sales, and a cut usually follows.
Is it sound?
- Not cleanly capturedIndustry peers: median 41%
What this means
This REIT tags its borrowings in a way the pipeline could not fully total, so we decline to show a leverage figure rather than a misleadingly low one. The debt schedule in the 10-K is where to read its true leverage.
- Comfortable(operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest $33MIndustry peers: median 4.0×
What this means
How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.
“Some of our competitors may have instituted, or may institute, low-cost, high-speed applications and services based on AI, and new competitors may enter our industry using new platforms based on AI.”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Net income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Mr. Seton | $2.5M | $2.5M | $37M |
| 2021 | Mr. Seton | $4.9M | $4.7M | $403M |
| 2022 | Mr. Seton | $4.4M | $4.9M | ($8M) |
| 2023 | Mr. Seton | $5.5M | $5.7M | $24M |
| 2024 | Mr. Seton | $5.5M | $3.5M | $43M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Net income is the whole business's, as filed, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership0.8%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2025 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$5M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 2% of revenue, equal to 13% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Peers, Healthcare REITs
The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | FFO margin | FFO / assets | Payout (FFO) | Debt / assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBRASabra Health Care REIT | $775M | 43% | 5.1% | 95% | 45% |
| CTRECareTrust REIT | $476M | 61% | 6.5% | 80% | 37% |
| NHPNational Healthcare Properties Inc. | $342M | -2% | -0.3% | 181% | 25% |
| LTCLTC Properties | $263M | 57% | 6.4% | 88% | 45% |
| SILASila Realty Trust Inc. | $198M | 52% | 4.0% | 72% | 19% |
| XRNChiron Real Estate Inc. | $148M | 32% | 3.2% | 14% | — |
| CHCTCommunity Healthcare Trust Incorporated | $121M | 53% | 5.5% | 107% | 35% |
| UHTUniversal Health Realty Income Trust | $99M | 56% | 8.5% | 85% | 58% |
| Group median | — | 52% | 5.3% | 87% | 37% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
price / FFOA REIT is priced on a multiple of its funds from operations (FFO), the cash it earns once the depreciation on its buildings is added back. Type today’s price; we show the multiple you would pay and the income and growth it implies.
FFO / share, delivered24%/yr’20→’25
The justified multiple is 1 ÷ (required return − growth), a perpetuity on FFO. At an 8% required return and 3% growth, a REIT is worth about 20× FFO.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
FFO about $2.06 per share on 55M shares. The dials set the multiple they justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. FFO here adds back depreciation and removes property-sale gains, the NAREIT method; it does not net out maintenance capex (AFFO), occupancy or lease terms, which the 10-K does.
Manual order: ← SIGIP its page in the Manual SIRI →
Industry order: ← SCCG the REITs — Specialty & Diversified chapter SLG →