Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← WNC Manual WOLF → ← WEX Commercial Services & Supplies WSE →

WNS, WNS Holdings

A diversified business; where the profit really comes from, and whether it is earned or bought, is what the segment detail settles.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
WNS · WNS Holdings
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$1.3B
−0.6% YoY
Vital signs · TTM, with 3-yr average
Revenue $1.3B 3-yr avg $1.3B
Gross margin 35% 3-yr avg 35%
Operating margin 12.6% 3-yr avg 12.2%
ROIC 15% 3-yr avg 16%
Owner-earnings margin 12% 3-yr avg 11%
Free cash flow margin 12% 3-yr avg 11%

The business in brief

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 35% and operating margin about 13% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. That margin has held in a narrow 11%–13% band over the years, so steadiness itself is the evidence — the lever is unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has run in the teens (median 15%, above 15% in 3 of 3 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 11% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Returns like these are solid but short of clear franchise economics; whether they hold is what the 10-K settles, not the multiple.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2023–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMJun 2025
Income statement
$1.2B$1.3B$1.3B$1.3BRevenueRevenue
34%35%35%35%Gross marginGross mgn
14%14%14%14%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
$156M$141M$175M$170MOperating incomeOp. inc.
12.8%10.6%13.3%12.6%Operating marginOp. mgn
$138M$147M$170M$163MNet incomeNet inc.
16%11%18%19%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$176M$201M$207M$215MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$45M$58M$57M$59MDepreciationDeprec.
($57M)($56M)($57M)($44M)Working capital & otherWC & other
$45M$54M$54M$58MCapexCapex
3.7%4.1%4.1%4.3%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$131M$147M$153M$157MOwner earningsOwner earn.
10.7%11.1%11.6%11.7%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$131M$147M$153M$157MFree cash flowFCF
10.7%11.1%11.6%11.7%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
19%15%15%15%ROICROIC
17%19%20%20%Return on equityROE
17%19%20%20%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$137M$244M$264M$222MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$232M$238M$260MReceivablesReceiv.
$25M$29M$26MAccounts payablePayables
$207M$209M$234MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$530M$565M$548MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$312M$321M$374MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.7×1.8×1.5×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$356M$410M$418MGoodwillGoodwill
$1.4B$1.5B$1.6BTotal assetsAssets
$139M$228M$211MTotal debtDebt
($105M)($35M)($11M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
23.7×9.2×9.5×9.2×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$812M$787M$838M$798MShareholders’ equityEquity
4.1%3.9%2.9%2.8%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
50.5M49.3M45.9M45.2MShares out (diluted)Shares
$24.23$26.84$28.65$29.75Revenue / shareRev/sh
$2.74$2.99$3.71$3.60EPS (diluted)EPS
$2.59$2.97$3.33$3.47Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$2.59$2.97$3.33$3.47Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.89$1.10$1.18$1.29Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$16.07$15.97$18.25$17.63Book value / shareBVPS

The record, charted

FY2023–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
46Mpeak FY2023
ROIC
15%low FY2025
Gross margin
35%low FY2023

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$153Mowner earningsvs.$170Mnet incomelow FY2023

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2023FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business reported $170M of profit but $153M of owner earnings: $17M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.

Reported net income$170M
Owner earnings$153M · 12% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023
Reported net income$170M$147M$138M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$57M+$58M+$45M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$38M+$52M+$50M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−$57M−$56M−$57M
Cash from operations$207M$201M$176M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$54M−$54M−$45M
Owner earnings$153M$147M$131M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue12%11%11%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $38M), owner earnings is nearer $116M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $175M ÷ interest expense $19M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • Net cash
    Cash $107M + ST investments $157M − debt $228M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $35M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Tight
    DSO 66 + DIO 0 − DPO 13 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash. (Little or no inventory, a services / asset-light model, so the inventory leg is ~0.)

Is it a good business?

  • High through the cycle
    3-yr median, range 15%–19%; 15% latest = NOPAT $144M ÷ invested capital $959M
    Industry peers: median 3%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 3 years (it ran 15% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid through the cycle
    3-yr median margin, range 11%–12%; latest $153M = operating cash $207M − maintenance capex $54M
    Industry peers: median 7%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 12% of revenue this year, a 11% median across 3 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $38M of SBC) leaves $116M.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $207M ÷ net income $170M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.96×
    Maintaining
    Capex $54M ÷ depreciation $57M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 3 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Near
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $1.3B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Near
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.76×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $228M vs $244M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $3.54/share (latest year $3.97), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $19.53/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Elevated contestability

The product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.

The product is the kind capable AI most directly contests: when a substitute can be built cheaply, the incumbent's pricing power is the first thing at risk. The record cannot say whether the moat outlasts that; past durability is a starting point, not a promise.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Jun 30, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$548M
  • Cash & short-term investments$222M
  • Receivables$260M
  • Other current assets$66M
Current liabilities$374M
  • Debt due within a year$70M
  • Accounts payable$26M
  • Other current liabilities$278M
Current ratio1.47×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.47×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.59×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$175Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$70M due · $222M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Jun 30, 2025 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+9.5%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters1.7× → 1.5×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$262Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value($223M)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$429M$217M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$37Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 3-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles$532M34% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity49%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiring$0over 3 years buying other businesses, against $153M of capital spent building

None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 3-year record, from the company's own filings.

Management, ownership & pay

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.

  • Stock-based compensation$38M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 3% of revenue, equal to 21% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Peers, Commercial Services & Supplies

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
WEXWEX Inc.$1.8B45%29.9%7%25%
RELYRemitly Global Inc.$1.6B-11.4%-27%5%
TICTIC Solutions Inc.$1.5B29%-1.1%-0%4%
WNSWNS Holdings$1.3B35%12.8%15%11%
PAYPaymentus Holdings Inc.$1.2B30%5.1%13%7%
MAXMediaAlpha Inc.$1.1B16%2.7%-12%6%
ANDGAndersen Group Inc.$839M17.7%20%
PAYOPayoneer$813M1.2%27%13%
Group median30%3.9%7%9%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what WNS Holdings has delivered.

$
Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · since FY2023+8%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $157M on 43M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2025-06-30; net cash $11M. The if-converted diluted count is 45M, 5% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "WNS Holdings (WNS), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/WNS, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← WNC its page in the Manual WOLF →

Industry order: ← WEX the Commercial Services & Supplies chapter WSE →