Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← ATAT Manual ATHM → ← APLD IT Services & Consulting ATHM →

ATGL, Alpha Technology Group Limited

IT Services & Consulting asset-light Net current asset value

Revenue is led by System Development (56%) and Technological support and maintenance service and other services (28%), with 2 more lines behind.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F · figures as filed, in HKD
ATGL · Alpha Technology Group Limited
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
HK$7M
−40.1% YoY · 16% 4-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue HK$7M 5-yr avg HK$7M
Gross margin 49% 5-yr avg 39%
Operating margin −770.5% 5-yr avg −196.6%
ROIC −224% 5-yr avg −74%
Owner-earnings margin −179% 5-yr avg −54%
Free cash flow margin −188% 5-yr avg −56%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
A software business, earning high margins on code once it is written.
Situation
Net current asset value. Current assets alone exceed every liability combined, and the surplus is most of the balance sheet: the shape Graham called a net-net.
What moves the needle
Operating margin has run around −61% through the cycle on a 36% gross margin, the operating line deeply negative — so the lever is the path to a margin at all: revenue growth against the cost curve and the cash runway, not the level of a margin that isn't there yet. Read this kind of business on retention and the cost of growth. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −31%, above 15% in 0 of 3 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

Revenue spreads across 4 lines, the largest System Development at 56%.

Revenue by product line, FY2025
  • System Development56%HK$4M
  • Technological support and maintenance service and other services28%HK$2M
  • Hardware installation13%HK$967K
  • AI-OCR development3%HK$196K

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2021–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMSep 2025
Income statement
HK$4MHK$4MHK$9MHK$12MHK$7MHK$7MRevenueRevenue
36%23%33%52%49%49%Gross marginGross mgn
(HK$925K)(HK$3M)(HK$7M)(HK$6M)(HK$57M)(HK$57M)Operating incomeOp. inc.
−22.8%−61.4%−77.7%−50.6%−770.5%−770.5%Operating marginOp. mgn
(HK$981K)(HK$3M)HK$7M(HK$5M)(HK$70M)HK$7MNet incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
(HK$532K)HK$2MHK$4M(HK$20M)(HK$13M)(HK$13M)Operating cash flowOp. cash
HK$450HK$6KHK$10KHK$15KHK$86KHK$86KDepreciationDeprec.
HK$449KHK$4M(HK$3M)(HK$14M)HK$57M(HK$20M)Working capital & otherWC & other
HK$15KHK$25KHK$48KHK$34KHK$785KHK$785KCapexCapex
0.4%0.6%0.6%0.3%10.6%10.6%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
(HK$532K)HK$2MHK$4M(HK$20M)(HK$13M)(HK$13M)Owner earningsOwner earn.
−13.1%35.2%46.2%−158.8%−179.0%−179.0%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
(HK$547K)HK$2MHK$4M(HK$20M)(HK$14M)(HK$14M)Free cash flowFCF
−13.5%34.8%45.7%−158.9%−188.5%−188.5%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
-31%-9%-181%-224%ROICROIC
36%-11%-287%28%Return on equityROE
36%−11%−287%28%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
HK$5KHK$248KHK$1MHK$1MHK$1MReceivablesReceiv.
HK$5KHK$248KHK$1MHK$711KHK$711KOperating working capitalOper. WC
HK$6MHK$26MHK$44MHK$33MHK$33MCurrent assetsCur. assets
HK$9MHK$20MHK$7MHK$10MHK$10MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
0.7×1.3×6.4×3.3×3.3×Current ratioCurr. ratio
HK$10MHK$10MHK$10MGoodwillGoodwill
HK$7MHK$41MHK$60MHK$35MHK$35MTotal assetsAssets
HK$2MHK$1MHK$900KHK$305KHK$900KTotal debtDebt
HK$2MHK$1MHK$900KHK$305KHK$900KNet debt / (cash)Net debt
-19.4×-31.3×-90.6×-61.2×-49.9×-764.1×Interest coverageInt. cov.
(HK$2M)(HK$4M)HK$19MHK$52MHK$25MHK$25MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
1.2M14.9M16.4M16.4MShares out (diluted)Shares
HK$7.43HK$0.83HK$0.45HK$0.45Revenue / shareRev/sh
HK$5.97HK$-0.37HK$-4.28HK$0.43EPS (diluted)EPS
HK$3.43HK$-1.31HK$-0.81HK$-0.81Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
HK$3.40HK$-1.31HK$-0.85HK$-0.85Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
HK$0.04HK$0.00HK$0.05HK$0.05Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
HK$16.56HK$3.46HK$1.49HK$1.49Book value / shareBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×12.77 into 2024 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
4-yr5-yr
Revenue / share−75.4%/yr (2-yr)−75.4%/yr (2-yr)
Capital spending / share+7.4%/yr (2-yr)+7.4%/yr (2-yr)
Book value / share−70.0%/yr (2-yr)−70.0%/yr (2-yr)

The record, charted

FY2021–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
16Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
−181%low FY2025
Gross margin
49%low FY2022

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

(HK$13M)owner earningsvs.(HK$70M)net incomelow FY2024

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business earned (HK$13M) of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the HK$86K it takes just to hold its position. It put HK$699K more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was (HK$14M).

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income(HK$70M)(HK$5M)HK$7M(HK$3M)(HK$981K)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+HK$86K+HK$15K+HK$10K+HK$6K+HK$450
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+HK$57M−HK$14M−HK$3M+HK$4M+HK$449K
Cash from operations(HK$13M)(HK$20M)HK$4MHK$2M(HK$532K)
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−HK$86K−HK$15K−HK$10K−HK$6K−HK$450
Owner earnings(HK$13M)(HK$20M)HK$4MHK$2M(HK$532K)
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−HK$699K−HK$19K−HK$39K−HK$19K−HK$14K
Free cash flow(HK$14M)(HK$20M)HK$4MHK$2M(HK$547K)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue-179%-159%46%35%-13%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about HK$86K, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other HK$699K of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Does not cover its interest
    Operating income (HK$57M) ÷ interest expense HK$75K
    What this means

    A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.

  • Net debt against an operating loss
    Cash HK$0 − debt HK$900K
    What this means

    Netting HK$0 of cash and short-term investments against HK$900K of debt leaves HK$900K owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Tight
    DSO 53 + DIO 0 − DPO 35 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash. (Little or no inventory, a services / asset-light model, so the inventory leg is ~0.)

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    3-yr median, range -181%–-9%; -224% latest = NOPAT (HK$57M) ÷ invested capital HK$25M
    Industry peers: median -124%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 3 years (it ran -224% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Consumes cash through the cycle
    5-yr median margin, range -179%–46%; latest (HK$13M) = operating cash (HK$13M) − maintenance capex HK$86K
    Industry peers: median -500%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -179% of revenue this year, a -13% median across 5 years.

  • Thinly cash-backed
    Cash from ops (HK$13M) ÷ net income HK$7M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting? 9.10×
    Expanding
    Capex HK$785K ÷ depreciation HK$86K
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 4 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · HK$7M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 3.33×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · HK$900K vs HK$23M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (5-yr record) · 4 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · none paid
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are HK$-1.50/share (latest year HK$0.46), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is HK$1.61/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2021–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 1 of 5
    What this means

    Lost money in 4 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 3 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin −42% → −411% (2-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The words explain the slip: the filing names price competition rather than pricing actions of its own — a business that looks to take its price, not set it.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about −42% early to −411% lately, median −61% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Worst year 2025 · −770.5% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2025, understand why before trusting the good years.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Elevated contestability

The product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.

AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Sep 30, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assetsHK$33M
  • ReceivablesHK$1M
  • Other current assetsHK$32M
Current liabilitiesHK$10M
  • Debt due within a yearHK$595K
  • Accounts payableHK$364K
  • Other current liabilitiesHK$9M
Current ratio3.33×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio3.33×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.00×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capitalHK$23Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cashHK$595K due · HK$0 cash cash alone won't cover the maturities; it leans on refinancing or operating cash · both figures from the Sep 30, 2025 balance sheet
Deeper floors
Tangible book valueHK$10Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset valueHK$23MGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leasesHK$1MHK$547K of it operating leases
Deferred revenueHK$2Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 5-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangiblesHK$14M41% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity41%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiringHK$0over 5 years buying other businesses, against HK$908K of capital spent building

None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 5-year record, from the company's own filings.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?
    ≈HK$2M · 32% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
    “For the year ended September 30, 2025, two customers accounted for 32 % and 27 % of the total revenue, respectively.”verify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, IT Services & Consulting

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc.$25M68%-724.6%-1142%-582%
GEGGLGreat Elm Group, Inc.$16M93%-46.5%-12%-3%
NXTTNext Technology Holding Inc.$12M59%-24.0%-1%-29%
ATGLAlpha Technology Group LimitedHK$7M36%-61.4%-31%-13%
PDYNPalladyne AI Corp.$5M30%-916.4%-333%-500%
DJTTrump Media & Technology Group Corp.$4M55%-3360.9%-18%-943%
ODYSOdysight.ai Inc.$3M29%-593.1%-442%-584%
PHUNPhunware Inc.$3M51%-175.0%-124%-161%
Group median53%-384.1%-77%-330%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Alpha Technology Group Limited reports in HKD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that HKD, ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share in HKD. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio and the exchange rate, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.

Alpha Technology Group Limited is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

HK$
The assumptions

Revenue, delivered25%/yr’21→’25

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach
Margin the price demands
Owner-earnings margin today−188%

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Alpha Technology Group Limited (ATGL), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/ATGL, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← ATAT its page in the Manual ATHM →

Industry order: ← APLD the IT Services & Consulting chapter ATHM →