Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← BROS Manual BRX → ← BNL REITs — Specialty & Diversified BRX →

BRSP, BrightSpire Capital Inc.

Our investment strategy is dynamic and flexible, enabling us to adapt to shifts in economic, real estate and capital market conditions and to exploit market inefficiencies.

The period for which we intend to hold our investments will vary depending on the type of asset, interest rates, investment performance, micro and macro real estate environment, capital markets and credit availability, among other factors.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
BRSP · BrightSpire Capital Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$331M
−7.9% YoY · 3% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $338M 5-yr avg $333M
Return on equity −3% 5-yr avg −4%
Return on tangible equity −3% 5-yr avg −4%
Equity / assets 25.2% 5-yr avg 28.0%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

Situation
Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand.
What moves the needle
Net interest margin, loan losses, and book value. A lender is read on the quality of its balance sheet, not an earnings multiple, and the worst year of credit losses matters more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on equity has sat below the cost of equity (median -5%, above 12% in only 0 of 10 years). A mortgage REIT lives on the spread between what its mortgages earn and what its borrowing costs, levered many times over; weigh the worst rate and credit years in the record, not the average, and read the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$158M$189M$501M$589M$291M$194M$365M$415M$359M$331M$338MRevenueRevenue
$114M$119M$116M$98M$102M$102MNet interest incomeNet int.
$3M$518K$109M$221M$79M$3MCredit-loss provisionProvision
$76M$89M($168M)($415M)($353M)($101M)$46M($16M)($132M)($31M)($32M)Net incomeNet inc.
2%2%5%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
4.8%-1.9%-5.6%-5.7%-1.8%1.0%-0.4%-3.5%-0.9%-0.9%Return on assetsROA
6%8%-6%-20%-21%-7%3%-1%-13%-3%-3%Return on equityROE
6%8%−13%−30%−24%−11%−4%−9%−22%−12%−13%Retained to equityRetained/eq
6%8%-6%-20%-21%-7%3%-1%-13%-3%-3%Return on tangible equityROTCE
Balance sheet
$1.8B$8.7B$7.4B$6.2B$5.6B$4.8B$4.2B$3.7B$3.6B$3.6BTotal assetsAssets
$1.2B$1.1B$2.7B$2.1B$1.7B$1.5B$1.4B$1.3B$1.0B$938M$918MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
44.4M44.4M121M128M129M128M129M127M127M127M129MShares out (diluted)Shares
$1.71$1.99$-1.40$-3.23$-2.75$-0.79$0.35$-0.12$-1.04$-0.25$-0.25EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.00$0.00$1.54$1.70$0.40$0.40$0.77$0.82$0.78$0.65$0.65Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$27.83$24.32$22.43$16.50$12.96$11.33$10.73$10.05$8.23$7.40$7.12Book value / shareBVPS
$27.83$24.32$22.43$16.50$12.96$11.33$10.73$10.05$8.23$7.40$7.12Tangible book / shareTBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×2.72 into 2018 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share−3.4%/yr+2.9%/yr
Owner earnings / share−15.6%/yr−5.3%/yr
Dividends / share+10.2%/yr
Capital spending / share+65.6%/yr−4.8%/yr
Book value / share−13.7%/yr−10.6%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
127Mpeak FY2022
Revenue
$331Mlow FY2016
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • Loss on equity
    Net income ($31M) ÷ equity $938M
    Industry peers: median 7%
    What this means

    The bank's north star, what it earns on shareholders' capital. Cost of equity is roughly 10%, so a return durably above that builds value and below it destroys it. One year is noisy; the durability across a full credit cycle is what counts.

  • Loss
    Net income ÷ (equity − goodwill $0 − intangibles $0)
    Industry peers: median 7%
    What this means

    The cleaner return, stripping out the goodwill paid for past acquisitions. This is the number a buyer of the whole bank actually earns on the hard capital.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    Noninterest expense or revenue missing.

Is it sound?

  • Capital (equity / assets) 26.3%
    Well capitalized
    Equity $938M ÷ assets $3.6B
    What this means

    A plain-English leverage read: how much of the balance sheet is the owners' own money. This is a rough proxy; the regulatory figure is the CET1 ratio, which is risk-weighted and reported in the filing. The point is the same, how much loss the bank can absorb before depositors are at risk.

  • Borrowed against book
    Assets $3.6B ÷ equity $938M
    What this means

    A mortgage REIT finances a pool of mortgages with borrowed money — mostly short-term repo, which sits in liabilities rather than as tagged debt — so its true leverage is the whole balance sheet against the owners' equity, not just labeled debt. That leverage magnifies both the spread it earns and the loss when rates or credit move against it; read it beside the book value, the question being whether the spread compensated for the leverage through a cycle.

  • Credit cost (provision / NII) 77%
    Elevated
    Provision for credit losses $79M ÷ net interest income $102M
    What this means

    What the bank set aside this year against loans going bad, as a share of its lending income. This swings hard with the cycle, low in good years and spiking in recessions, so read it across the record, not in one year. Disciplined underwriting shows up as low, stable provisions through a downturn.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“The proliferation and impact of artificial intelligence, automation and logistics may change how real-estate related interests and operations are valued, used, operated and competed against.”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Michael Mazzei$5.7M$6.7M($31M)
2022Michael Mazzei$5.9M$4.0M$121M
2023Michael Mazzei$5.8M$8.2M$131M
2024Michael Mazzei$5.8M$5.6M$97M
2025Michael Mazzei$5.7M$7.1M$55M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership2.8%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$13M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 4% of revenue, equal to 19% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Credit & receivables, Insurance reserves as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, REITs — Specialty & Diversified

The same industry, side by side on the bank lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueROEROTCEEfficiencyNII / assets
BRSPBrightSpire Capital Inc.$331M-5%-5%1.5%
ARIApollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.$272M7%7%2.7%
FBRTFranklin BSP Realty Trust Inc.$270M6%7%3.2%
LADRLadder Capital Corp$293M7%7%1.9%
TRTXTPG RE Finance Trust Inc.$146M6%6%2.4%
ABRArbor Realty Trust$510M10%11%2.1%
CIMChimera Investment Corporation$266M9%9%1.7%
ADAMAdamas Trust Inc.$149M10%11%1.2%
Group median7%7%2.0%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / tangible book

A mortgage REIT is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what BrightSpire Capital Inc.’s record justifies.

$
The assumptions

Tangible book / share, delivered−10%/yr’20→’25

The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). A mortgage REIT earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for a mortgage REIT.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / tangible book
Justified by the return
Normalized return on tangible equity−5%
Price / book
Earnings yield
P/E (3-yr avg ’23–’25)
Graham’s price gate

Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.

Tangible book $918M on 130M shares, a −5% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the mortgage REIT keeps earning that return; a rate shock, a spread that compresses or a credit cycle changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "BrightSpire Capital Inc. (BRSP), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/BRSP, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← BROS its page in the Manual BRX →

Industry order: ← BNL the REITs — Specialty & Diversified chapter BRX →