← All companies ← CPF Manual CPK → ← CORT Pharmaceuticals CPRX →
CPHI, China Pharma Holdings Inc.
Helpson manufactures pharmaceutical products in the form of dry powder injectables, liquid injectables, tablets, capsules, and cephalosporin oral solutions.
We, through Helpson, are principally engaged in the development, manufacture and marketing of pharmaceutical products for human use in connection with a variety of high-incidence and high-mortality diseases and medical conditions prevalent in the People's Republic of China (the "PRC").
The majority of Helpson's pharmaceutical products are sold on a prescription basis and all of them have been approved for at least one or more therapeutic indications by the National Medical Products Administration (the "NMPA", formerly China Food and Drug Administration, CFDA) based upon demonstrated safety and efficacy.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No meaningful revenue yet; the record is the cash on hand against the burn. Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run around −78% through the cycle on a 3.6% gross margin, the operating line deeply negative — so the lever is the path to a margin at all: revenue growth against the cost curve and the cash runway, not the level of a margin that isn't there yet. Inventory runs near 39% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the pipeline against the patent cliff, and pricing. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −29%, above 15% in 0 of 10 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $16M | $13M | $12M | $11M | $11M | $10M | $8M | $7M | $5M | $4M | $4M | RevenueRevenue |
| 21% | 19% | 16% | 14% | 18% | 4% | −6% | −4% | −44% | −3% | 7% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 15% | 15% | 16% | 21% | 17% | 17% | 23% | 21% | 39% | 59% | 79% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 2% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 6% | 7% | 8% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| ($8M) | ($19M) | ($10M) | ($20M) | ($3M) | ($3M) | ($4M) | ($3M) | ($5M) | ($3M) | ($4M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −52.4% | −141.4% | −84.7% | −186.8% | −23.7% | −29.7% | −43.8% | −39.2% | −101.3% | −78.2% | −90.1% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($9M) | ($19M) | ($11M) | ($21M) | ($3M) | ($3M) | ($4M) | ($3M) | ($5M) | ($3M) | ($4M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $3M | $841K | $2M | $608K | ($42K) | ($250K) | ($410K) | ($700K) | ($406K) | $148K | $167K | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $2M | $2M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $9M | $17M | $9M | $18M | $145K | $62K | $863K | ($375K) | $2M | $2M | $2M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $193K | $136K | $51K | $136K | $867K | $438K | $402K | $12K | $38K | $59K | $59K | CapexCapex |
| 1.2% | 1.0% | 0.4% | 1.2% | 8.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 1.4% | 1.5% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $3M | $705K | $2M | $472K | ($910K) | ($688K) | ($812K) | ($711K) | ($444K) | $89K | $107K | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 17.4% | 5.3% | 14.8% | 4.3% | −8.4% | −7.1% | −10.0% | −10.1% | −9.8% | 2.1% | 2.7% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $3M | $705K | $2M | $472K | ($910K) | ($688K) | ($812K) | ($711K) | ($444K) | $89K | $107K | Free cash flowFCF |
| 17.4% | 5.3% | 14.8% | 4.3% | −8.4% | −7.1% | −10.0% | −10.1% | −9.8% | 2.1% | 2.7% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| -11% | -29% | -23% | -129% | -17% | -35% | -124% | -29% | -43% | -11% | -7% | ROICROIC |
| -16% | -45% | -36% | -224% | -36% | -56% | -93% | -41% | -61% | -14% | -10% | Return on equityROE |
| −16% | −45% | −36% | −224% | −36% | −56% | −93% | −41% | −61% | −14% | −10% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $3M | $2M | $1M | $1M | $958K | $5M | $2M | $1M | $627K | $345K | $168K | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $4M | $2M | $917K | $635K | $502K | — | $422K | $504K | $232K | $241K | $196K | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $7M | $6M | $5M | $4M | $4M | $3M | $3M | $4M | $2M | $2M | $1M | InventoryInvent. |
| $3M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $927K | $667K | $966K | $225K | $891K | $837K | Accounts payablePayables |
| $8M | $8M | $5M | $3M | $3M | $2M | $3M | $3M | $2M | $972K | $858K | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $18M | $12M | $9M | $6M | $5M | $9M | $6M | $6M | $3M | $2M | $2M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $10M | $9M | $10M | $10M | $11M | $11M | $13M | $7M | $5M | $7M | $7M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.7× | 1.3× | 0.9× | 0.6× | 0.5× | 0.9× | 0.5× | 0.9× | 0.7× | 0.3× | 0.3× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $79M | $60M | $45M | $22M | $21M | $23M | $18M | $16M | $15M | $31M | $45M | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $9M | $7M | $4M | $5M | $5M | — | $1M | $1M | — | $5M | Total debtDebt |
| — | $7M | $5M | $3M | $4M | $391K | — | ($12K) | $764K | — | $5M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -9.6× | -34.6× | -23.2× | -63.4× | -8.8× | -5.3× | -8.2× | -90.0× | -167.8× | -118.8× | -121.7× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $59M | $43M | $30M | $9M | $8M | $6M | $4M | $7M | $8M | $23M | $37M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| — | $14M | $6M | $17M | — | — | — | — | — | — | $17M | Goodwill written downGW imp. |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 1.1M | 1.1M | 1.1M | 1.1M | 1.1M | 1.2M | 1.1M | 3.4M | 1.7M | 4.3M | 25.6M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $14.29 | $12.13 | $11.32 | $10.03 | $9.96 | $8.36 | $7.71 | $2.07 | $2.59 | $0.97 | $0.16 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-8.43 | $-17.69 | $-9.87 | $-19.00 | $-2.63 | $-2.95 | $-3.78 | $-0.91 | $-2.71 | $-0.74 | $-0.14 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $2.48 | $0.65 | $1.68 | $0.43 | $-0.83 | $-0.60 | $-0.77 | $-0.21 | $-0.25 | $0.02 | $0.00 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $2.48 | $0.65 | $1.68 | $0.43 | $-0.83 | $-0.60 | $-0.77 | $-0.21 | $-0.25 | $0.02 | $0.00 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.18 | $0.13 | $0.05 | $0.12 | $0.80 | $0.38 | $0.38 | $0.00 | $0.02 | $0.01 | $0.00 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $54.07 | $39.53 | $27.72 | $8.48 | $7.34 | $5.22 | $4.08 | $2.20 | $4.44 | $5.30 | $1.45 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2022 are restated ×1/40 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
The diluted share count moved ×3.22 into 2023 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
The diluted share count moved ×1/1.94 into 2024 — shares retired, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
The diluted share count moved ×2.46 into 2025 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
The diluted share count moved ×5.97 into TTM — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −25.9%/yr | −37.3%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −41.2%/yr | — |
| Capital spending / share | −24.7%/yr | −55.5%/yr |
| Book value / share | −22.7%/yr | −6.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $3M loss into $89K of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($3M) | ($5M) | ($3M) | ($4M) | ($3M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$2M | +$3M | +$3M | +$3M | +$3M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$2M | +$2M | −$375K | +$863K | +$62K |
| Cash from operations | $148K | ($406K) | ($700K) | ($410K) | ($250K) |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$59K | −$38K | −$12K | −$402K | −$438K |
| Owner earnings | $89K | ($444K) | ($711K) | ($812K) | ($688K) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 2% | -10% | -10% | -10% | -7% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -118.8×Does not cover its interestOperating income ($3M) ÷ interest expense $27K
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Net debt against an operating lossCash $345K − debt $5M
What this means
Netting $345K of cash and short-term investments against $5M of debt leaves $5M owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 21 + DIO 138 − DPO 76 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle10-yr median, range -129%–-11%; -9% latest = NOPAT ($3M) ÷ invested capital $28MIndustry peers: median -58%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran -9% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Positive this year, negative across the cyclelatest $89K = operating cash $148K − maintenance capex $59K (positive this year), after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median -7%)Industry peers: median -2143%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 2% of revenue this year, a -7% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $0 of SBC) leaves $89K.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($3M) · cash from operations $148K
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.04×HarvestingCapex $59K ÷ depreciation $2M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $4M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.32×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $5M vs ($5M) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 10 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.09/share (latest year $-0.08), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $0.56/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 0 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 10 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 7 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin −93% → −73% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −93% early to −73% lately, median −78% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Worst year 2019 · −186.8% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2019, understand why before trusting the good years.
- How management talks about it Promotional
What this means
The record is compounding, but the filing leans on a promoter’s vocabulary rather than the per-share, return-on-capital terms an owner uses. The results back the talk here; the register is still worth noting.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$168K
- Receivables$196K
- Inventory$1M
- Other current assets$140K
- Accounts payable$837K
- Other current liabilities$6M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $5M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$2M · 51%
- Retained (debt / cash)$2M · 49%
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span cash and short-term investments fell $2M.
- Net change in share count2249.9%
The diluted count rose from 1M to 26M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.
- Stock-based compensation$0
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why China Pharma Holdings Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
3 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 1 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?−5.9% vs 12.5%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 12.5% early in the record and −5.9% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?2249.9%
Diluted shares grew 2249.9% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Look hereAre "one-time" charges a yearly habit?5 of 10 years
Management took an impairment or write-down in 5 of the last 10 years, $80M in all. Taken across the majority of the record, the "one-time" label is wearing thin — ask whether these are past deals coming due rather than genuinely isolated events. Read it beside the goodwill the company still carries.
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Pharmaceuticals
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRSAclaris Therapeutics Inc. | $8M | 28% | -975.9% | -73% | -603% |
| OVIDOvid Therapeutics Inc. | $7M | — | -2170.9% | -64% | -2143% |
| OCGNOcugen Inc. | $4M | — | -1425.7% | — | -1295% |
| CPHIChina Pharma Holdings Inc. | $4M | 9% | -65.3% | -29% | -2% |
| ATAIAtaiBeckley Inc. | $4M | — | -15751.1% | -356% | -2533% |
| CGONCG Oncology Inc. | $4M | — | -10067.3% | -21% | -3279% |
| UPBUpstream Bio Inc. | $3M | — | -3281.2% | -53% | -2500% |
| ORMPOramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. | $2M | 1% | -754.4% | -29% | -479% |
| Group median | — | 9% | -1798.3% | -53% | -1719% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what China Pharma Holdings Inc. has delivered.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $107K on 41M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-11; net debt $5M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← CPF its page in the Manual CPK →
Industry order: ← CORT the Pharmaceuticals chapter CPRX →