Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← FRST Manual FSBC → ← FR REITs — Specialty & Diversified FVR →

FRT, Federal Realty Investment Trust

Federal Realty Investment Trust is an equity real estate investment trust.

Our portfolio includes, and we continue to acquire and redevelop, high quality retail in many formats ranging from regional, community and neighborhood shopping centers that often are anchored by grocery stores to mixed-use properties that are typically centered around a retail component but also include residential and office components.

We continuously evaluate and assess our operating strategies to ensure they are effective and put us in the best position to address changes in the market.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
FRT · Federal Realty Investment Trust
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$1.3B
+6.4% YoY · 9% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $1.3B 5-yr avg $1.1B
FFO margin 61% 5-yr avg 55%
Debt / assets 55% 5-yr avg 54%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on cyclicality & demand, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Funds from operations per share have compounded about 4% a year across the record. Debt is 55% of assets, moderate for a REIT. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$802M$857M$915M$936M$835M$951M$1.1B$1.1B$1.2B$1.3B$1.3BRevenueRevenue
$250M$290M$242M$354M$132M$261M$385M$237M$295M$411M$506MNet incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
$443M$428M$474M$477M$289M$452M$688M$559M$638M$779M$797MFunds from operationsFFO
Balance sheet
$6.8B$7.6B$7.8B$8.3B$8.6B$9.4B$10.1B$10.5B$10.9B$11.6B$11.7BReal estate (gross)RE gross
$5.4B$6.3B$6.3B$6.8B$7.6B$7.6B$8.2B$8.4B$8.5B$9.1B$9.1BTotal assetsAssets
52%52%51%50%57%53%53%55%53%54%55%Debt / assetsDebt/assets
$2.8B$3.3B$3.2B$3.4B$4.3B$4.1B$4.3B$4.6B$4.5B$5.0B$5.0BTotal debtDebt
$2.8B$3.3B$3.2B$3.2B$3.5B$3.9B$4.3B$4.4B$4.4B$4.9B$4.8BNet debt / (cash)Net debt
3.4×4.1×3.3×4.3×2.1×3.1×3.8×2.4×2.7×3.3×3.7×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$2.0B$2.3B$2.3B$2.5B$2.5B$2.6B$3.0B$3.0B$3.2B$3.2B$3.3BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
71.0M72.2M73.3M74.8M75.5M77.4M80.5M81.3M83.6M86.4M86.7MShares out (diluted)Shares
$6.24$5.93$6.47$6.38$3.82$5.84$8.54$6.87$7.63$9.01$9.19FFO / shareFFO/sh
$27.82$31.38$32.00$33.91$32.63$33.35$36.69$36.45$37.95$37.60$38.21Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+3.1%/yr+6.0%/yr
Owner earnings / share−0.9%/yr (3-yr)−0.9%/yr (3-yr)
EPS+3.4%/yr+22.2%/yr
Capital spending / share+11.0%/yr (3-yr)+11.0%/yr (3-yr)
Book value / share+3.4%/yr+2.9%/yr

The year, in the company's words

the filing →

Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.

  • Operating income+27.5%
    “Operating Income Operating income increased $129.8 million, or 27.5%, to $602.2 million in 2025 compared to $472.4 million in 2024. This increase is primarily driven by higher gains on sale of real estate, higher rental rates and average occupancy, income related to the sale of the new market tax credits, and 2025 and 2024 acquisitions, partially offset by property dispositions, impairment charge, and higher collectibility related adjustments.”
    ✓ figure matches the filed record

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
86Mpeak FY2025
Revenue
$1.3Blow FY2016
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • about $7.97 per share
    Net income $411M + depreciation $368M − gains on sale $90M
    What this means

    GAAP net income with property depreciation added back, because the buildings a REIT charges against earnings usually hold or grow their value. This, not net income, is what a REIT is actually priced on. It is an approximation here: where a filing reports gains on property sales, we remove them, the way the NAREIT definition does.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    FFO or dividends missing.

Is it sound?

  • Elevated
    Total debt $5.0B ÷ assets $9.1B
    Industry peers: median 45%
    What this means

    Every REIT runs on leverage; how much is the question. Heavy debt is what turns a property downturn into a wipeout, as 2008 showed, so a conservative balance sheet is part of the moat here, not a drag on it.

  • Strong
    (operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest $184M
    Industry peers: median 3.8×
    What this means

    How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Net income
2021Mr. Wood$7.5M$15.4M$261M
2022Mr. Wood$8.9M$6.6M$385M
2023Mr. Wood$8.9M$10.0M$237M
2024Mr. Wood$9.2M$11.3M$295M
2025Mr. Wood$9.9M$8.4M$411M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Net income is the whole business's, as filed, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership1.1%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • CEO pay ratio76:1

    What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.

  • Stock-based compensation$15M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 2% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Peers, Retail REITs

The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueFFO marginFFO / assetsPayout (FFO)Debt / assets
KIMKimco Realty Corporation (HC)$2.1B58%6.2%66%39%
REGRegency Centers Corporation$1.6B52%5.5%65%35%
BRXBrixmor$1.4B48%6.8%26%60%
FRTFederal Realty Investment Trust$1.3B51%7.3%53%
MACMacerich$1.0B34%3.5%110%51%
KRGKite Realty Group Trust$844M43%4.4%60%45%
PECOPhillips Edison$727M43%4.6%50%45%
CBLCBL & Associates Properties Inc.$578M35%5.8%26%76%
Group median45%5.7%48%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / FFO

A REIT is priced on a multiple of its funds from operations (FFO), the cash it earns once the depreciation on its buildings is added back. Type today’s price; we show the multiple you would pay and the income and growth it implies.

$
The assumptions

FFO / share, delivered15%/yr’20→’25

The justified multiple is 1 ÷ (required return − growth), a perpetuity on FFO. At an 8% required return and 3% growth, a REIT is worth about 20× FFO.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / FFO
Justified by growth
Dividend yield

FFO about $9.19 per share on 86M shares. The dials set the multiple they justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. FFO here adds back depreciation and removes property-sale gains, the NAREIT method; it does not net out maintenance capex (AFFO), occupancy or lease terms, which the 10-K does.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/FRT, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← FRST its page in the Manual FSBC →

Industry order: ← FR the REITs — Specialty & Diversified chapter FVR →