← All companies ← HP Manual HPK → ← FTNT Technology Hardware HPQ →
HPE, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Hewlett Packard Enterprise sells the gear that runs businesses and data centers — servers that do the computing, storage that holds the data, and the networking equipment, including its Aruba line, that ties them together. The customers are companies, governments, and the operators of large data centers. It earns money selling the hardware, and increasingly by wrapping software around it and renting the whole thing as a subscription rather than a one-time sale.
We enable our customers to accelerate business outcomes by driving new business models, creating new customer and employee experiences, and increasing operational efficiency today and into the future.
Hewlett and David Packard, and we strive every day to uphold and enhance that legacy through our dedication to providing innovative technological solutions to our customers.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is led by Server (51%) and Networking (20%), with 3 more segments behind.
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power. Serial acquirer. Goodwill and acquired intangibles are 40% of assets, with meaningful acquisition spending in 5 of the record's 10 years; much of what this business is was bought, at prices the record carries.
- What moves the needle
- The question is whether enterprise infrastructure is a franchise or a commodity: servers and storage are built from standardized parts a rival can assemble too, so the test is pricing power — whether the software bundled on top, the networking position, and the cost of replacing equipment that already runs a customer's operations let HPE hold its spread, or whether each refresh is a fresh bidding war on price. The deliberate effort is to shift the relationship from one-time hardware sales toward recurring, subscription revenue a rival cannot dislodge as easily; the lever to weigh is whether that base earns a better margin and stickier customers, or merely re-prices the same boxes. Against it sits a capital-heavy business that leans on contract manufacturers and a limited set of suppliers. The margins, returns on capital, and balance sheet in the record below show how the contest stands.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 3%, above 15% in 0 of 9 years). By owner earnings: roughly 5% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Drafted from the company's filings and reviewed by hand; every number is shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Revenue spreads across 5 segments, the largest Server at 51%.
- Server51%$17.6B
- Networking20%$6.8B
- Hybrid Cloud16%$5.5B
- Financial Services10%$3.5B
- Corporate Investments and Other2%$769M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMApr 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $30.3B | $28.9B | $30.9B | $29.1B | $27.0B | $27.8B | $28.5B | $29.1B | $30.1B | $34.3B | $38.8B | RevenueRevenue |
| 57% | 56% | 54% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 64% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 18% | 17% | 16% | 17% | 17% | 18% | 17% | 18% | 16% | 17% | 17% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 6% | 5% | 5% | 6% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 8% | 7% | 7% | 8% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| $3.9B | $564M | $1.7B | $1.3B | ($329M) | $1.1B | $782M | $2.1B | $2.2B | ($437M) | $1.5B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 12.9% | 2.0% | 5.6% | 4.4% | −1.2% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 7.2% | 7.3% | −1.3% | 3.8% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $3.2B | $344M | $1.9B | $1.0B | ($322M) | $3.4B | $868M | $2.0B | $2.6B | $57M | $1.6B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 16% | — | — | 32% | — | 4% | 1% | 9% | 13% | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $5.1B | $1.3B | $3.0B | $4.0B | $2.2B | $5.9B | $4.6B | $4.4B | $4.3B | $2.9B | $6.4B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $3.8B | $3.1B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $2.6B | $2.7B | $3.3B | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($2.4B) | ($2.5B) | ($1.8B) | $145M | ($337M) | ($535M) | $854M | ($641M) | ($1.2B) | ($518M) | $682M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $3.3B | $3.1B | $3.0B | $2.9B | $2.4B | $2.5B | $3.1B | $2.8B | $2.4B | $2.3B | $2.4B | CapexCapex |
| 10.8% | 10.9% | 9.6% | 9.8% | 8.8% | 9.0% | 11.0% | 9.7% | 7.9% | 6.7% | 6.1% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $1.8B | ($1.8B) | $8M | $1.1B | ($143M) | $3.4B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $2.0B | $627M | $4.0B | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 5.9% | −6.2% | 0.0% | 3.9% | −0.5% | 12.1% | 5.2% | 5.5% | 6.6% | 1.8% | 10.3% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $1.8B | ($1.8B) | $8M | $1.1B | ($143M) | $3.4B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $2.0B | $627M | $4.0B | Free cash flowFCF |
| 5.9% | −6.2% | 0.0% | 3.9% | −0.5% | 12.1% | 5.2% | 5.5% | 6.6% | 1.8% | 10.3% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $22M | $2.2B | $207M | $1.5B | $866M | $505M | $0 | $761M | $147M | $12.3B | $12.3B | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $373M | $428M | $570M | $608M | $618M | $625M | $621M | $619M | $676M | $684M | $721M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $2.7B | $2.6B | $3.6B | $2.2B | $355M | $213M | $512M | $421M | $150M | $202M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 10% | 2% | — | 3% | -1% | 3% | 2% | 6% | 6% | -1% | 3% | ROICROIC |
| 10% | 1% | 9% | 6% | -2% | 17% | 4% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 6% | Return on equityROE |
| 9% | −0% | 6% | 3% | −6% | 14% | 1% | 7% | 8% | −3% | 3% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $13.0B | $9.6B | $4.9B | $3.8B | $4.2B | $4.0B | $4.2B | $4.3B | $14.8B | $5.8B | $5.3B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $3.2B | $3.1B | $3.3B | $3.0B | $3.4B | $4.0B | $4.1B | $3.5B | $3.5B | $5.3B | $6.3B | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $1.7B | $2.3B | $2.4B | $2.4B | $2.7B | $4.5B | $5.2B | $4.6B | $7.8B | $6.4B | $9.0B | InventoryInvent. |
| $4.9B | $6.1B | $6.1B | $5.6B | $5.4B | $7.0B | $8.7B | $7.1B | $11.1B | $7.7B | $11.3B | Accounts payablePayables |
| ($74M) | ($684M) | ($382M) | ($251M) | $677M | $1.5B | $545M | $952M | $296M | $3.9B | $4.0B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $28.9B | $21.4B | $17.3B | $15.1B | $16.6B | $18.9B | $20.5B | $18.9B | $33.5B | $25.0B | $29.4B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $22.5B | $18.9B | $17.2B | $19.2B | $18.7B | $20.7B | $23.2B | $21.9B | $26.0B | $24.6B | $27.0B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.3× | 1.1× | 1.0× | 0.8× | 0.9× | 0.9× | 0.9× | 0.9× | 1.3× | 1.0× | 1.1× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $16.1B | $17.5B | $17.5B | $18.3B | $18.0B | $18.3B | $17.4B | $18.0B | $18.1B | $23.8B | $23.8B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $79.6B | $61.4B | $55.5B | $51.8B | $54.0B | $57.7B | $57.1B | $57.2B | $71.3B | $75.9B | $79.5B | Total assetsAssets |
| $15.7B | $14.0B | $12.1B | $13.8B | $17.6B | $15.1B | $15.8B | $15.7B | $21.6B | $25.5B | $22.4B | Total debtDebt |
| $2.7B | $4.4B | $7.2B | $10.0B | $13.3B | $11.1B | $11.7B | $11.4B | $6.8B | $19.8B | $17.1B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 7.1× | 0.9× | 2.8× | 2.1× | -0.5× | 2.3× | 1.7× | 2.9× | 2.8× | -0.4× | 1.3× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $31.4B | $23.5B | $21.2B | $17.1B | $16.0B | $20.0B | $19.9B | $21.2B | $24.8B | $24.7B | $25.3B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 1.8% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 2.1% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| — | — | $88M | — | $865M | — | $905M | — | — | $1.6B | $217M | Goodwill written downGW imp. |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 1.74B | 1.67B | 1.55B | 1.37B | 1.29B | 1.33B | 1.32B | 1.32B | 1.34B | 1.32B | 1.36B | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $17.41 | $17.25 | $19.87 | $21.33 | $20.85 | $20.89 | $21.56 | $22.14 | $22.53 | $25.90 | $28.61 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $1.82 | $0.21 | $1.23 | $0.77 | $-0.25 | $2.58 | $0.66 | $1.54 | $1.93 | $0.04 | $1.15 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $1.02 | $-1.08 | $0.01 | $0.84 | $-0.11 | $2.53 | $1.11 | $1.22 | $1.48 | $0.47 | $2.94 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $1.02 | $-1.08 | $0.01 | $0.84 | $-0.11 | $2.53 | $1.11 | $1.22 | $1.48 | $0.47 | $2.94 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.21 | $0.26 | $0.37 | $0.45 | $0.48 | $0.47 | $0.47 | $0.47 | $0.51 | $0.52 | $0.53 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $1.89 | $1.87 | $1.90 | $2.09 | $1.84 | $1.88 | $2.36 | $2.15 | $1.77 | $1.73 | $1.75 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $18.08 | $14.02 | $13.68 | $12.52 | $12.40 | $15.02 | $15.03 | $16.10 | $18.56 | $18.65 | $18.65 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +4.5%/yr | +4.4%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −8.2%/yr | — |
| EPS | −34.0%/yr | — |
| Dividends / share | +10.3%/yr | +1.6%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −0.9%/yr | −1.2%/yr |
| Book value / share | +0.3%/yr | +8.5%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $57M of profit into $627M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $57M | $2.6B | $2.0B | $868M | $3.4B |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$2.7B | +$2.6B | +$2.6B | +$2.5B | +$2.6B |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$643M | +$430M | +$428M | +$391M | +$382M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$518M | −$1.2B | −$641M | +$854M | −$535M |
| Cash from operations | $2.9B | $4.3B | $4.4B | $4.6B | $5.9B |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$2.3B | −$2.4B | −$2.8B | −$3.1B | −$2.5B |
| Owner earnings | $627M | $2.0B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $3.4B |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 2% | 7% | 5% | 5% | 12% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $643M), owner earnings is nearer ($16M).
Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -0.4×Does not cover its interestOperating income ($437M) ÷ interest expense $1.1B
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Net debt against an operating lossCash $5.8B − debt $25.5B
What this means
Netting $5.8B of cash and short-term investments against $25.5B of debt leaves $19.8B owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- TightDSO 56 + DIO 165 − DPO 200 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle9-yr median, range -1%–10%; -1% latest = NOPAT ($345M) ÷ invested capital $44.5BIndustry peers: median 13%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran -1% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Thin, recently turned positivelatest $627M = operating cash $2.9B − maintenance capex $2.3B; positive each of the last 3 years, after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median 4%)Industry peers: median 7%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 2% of revenue this year, a 4% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $643M of SBC) leaves ($16M).
- Are earnings backed by cash? 51.21×Cash-backedCash from ops $2.9B ÷ net income $57M
In the filing’s words The filing leans on adjusted, non-GAAP earnings, but the GAAP profit is itself cash-backed — the adjustments are not papering over a cash shortfall here.
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returned more than it generatedDividends + buybacks $886M ÷ Owner Earnings $627M
What this means
The company returned more than it generated: against $627M of Owner Earnings, $886M (141%) went back to shareholders, $684M dividends, $202M buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. But the buybacks barely exceed stock issued to employees ($643M SBC), net of dilution, little was truly returned. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.84×MaintainingCapex $2.3B ÷ depreciation $2.7B
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $34.3B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.01×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $25.5B vs $351M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (10-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −14%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $1.17/share (latest year $0.04), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $18.64/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 9 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 7% → 4% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices but names price competition too — and the margin slipped, so the pressure is winning here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 7% early to 4% lately, median 4% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Worst year 2025 · −1.3% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2025, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count −3.0%/yr
What this means
The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.
“Sales of AI systems to such customers have caused, and may continue to cause, fluctuations in our results of operations, as such large orders may occur in some periods and not others and are generally subject to intense competition and pricing pressure, which can have an impact on our margins and results of operations.…”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Apr 30, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$5.3B
- Receivables$6.3B
- Inventory$9.0B
- Other current assets$8.7B
- Debt due within a year$2.2B
- Accounts payable$11.3B
- Other current liabilities$13.4B
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $37.7B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$27.7B · 73%
- Dividends$5.8B · 15%
- Buybacks$12.9B · 34%
- Returned to owners$18.7B
187% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $5.8B as dividends and $12.9B as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$8.7B
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $8.7B beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet: debt rose from $15.7B to $22.4B, and cash and short-term investments drew down $7.7B.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $12.9B over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count−22.0%
The diluted count fell from 1739M to 1356M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record$0.52/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 10% a year. It was never cut over the span.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
$3.4B written down across 4 years (2018, 2020, 2022, 2025): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. That is roughly 19% of the cash it put into acquisitions over the span. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mr. Neri | $19.1M | $31.3M | $3.4B |
| 2022 | Mr. Neri | $17.4M | $12.3M | $1.5B |
| 2023 | Mr. Neri | $20.1M | $27.2M | $1.6B |
| 2024 | Mr. Neri | $21.4M | $24.0M | $2.0B |
| 2025 | Mr. Neri | $23.5M | $30.7M | $627M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership<1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio316:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$643M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 2% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
2 of the 6 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.
- Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$15.7B → $22.4B
Debt rose from $15.7B to $22.4B while owner earnings went from about ($6M) to $1.4B: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.
- Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?16% → 39% of sales
Receivables and inventory grew from $4.9B to $15.3B while revenue grew 28%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (16% of revenue then, 39% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Technology Hardware
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELLDell Technologies Inc. | $113.5B | 23% | 4.4% | 18% | 7% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp | $67.5B | 55% | 15.2% | 13% | 18% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. Common Stock (DE) | $56.7B | 63% | 25.7% | 21% | 26% |
| HPQHP Inc. | $55.3B | 19% | 6.6% | 64% | 6% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Company | $34.3B | 56% | 4.2% | 3% | 5% |
| SMCISuper Micro Computer Inc. | $22.0B | 15% | 4.3% | 12% | 2% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corporation | $9.5B | 28% | 7.2% | 6% | 4% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | $9.2B | 72% | -4.0% | -10% | 38% |
| Group median | — | 41% | 5.5% | 12% | 7% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company has delivered.
Through the cycle, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company earns about $1.6B on its 4.5% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 1.8% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $4.0B on 1324M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-26; net debt $17.1B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← HP its page in the Manual HPK →
Industry order: ← FTNT the Technology Hardware chapter HPQ →