Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← MESO Manual MFG → ← MET Insurance — Life & Health PFG →

MFC, Manulife Financial Corporation

We announced new milestones to strengthen our presence in the world's largest economies and augment our capabilities to deliver differentiated products and solutions for our customers.

Has a multi-channel distribution network in all the segments in which it operates, with different emphasis depending on the product line and geography.

We are a leading provider of insurance and insurance-based wealth accumulation products, driven by a customer-centric strategy, and we leverage the asset management expertise and products managed by our Global Wealth and Asset Management segment.

Latest annual: FY2025 40-F · figures as filed, in CAD
MFC · Manulife Financial Corporation
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
C$47.9B
+6.8% YoY · −10% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue C$47.9B 5-yr avg C$46.6B
Return on equity 11% 5-yr avg 8%
Return on assets 0.5% 5-yr avg 0.4%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
The spread on the float and the growth in book value. What decides it: the gap between what the invested reserves earn and what is credited to policyholders, the mortality and fee margins on top, and the scale of the float against equity. Benefits exceed premiums by design, so a P&C combined ratio is the wrong lens; the risks are interest rates and reserve adequacy. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
A life insurer is read on the spread it earns on a large float and the growth in book value, not a combined ratio: benefits exceed premiums by design, since claims fall due decades after the premium and are funded by the investment income on accumulated reserves. Book value per share, the measure Berkshire is judged on, has compounded about 4% a year across the record. Whether the spread holds as rates move, and whether the reserves prove adequate, are what the 10-K decides, not an earnings multiple.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
C$53.3BC$58.3BC$39.0BC$79.6BC$78.9BC$61.8BC$38.3BC$40.2BC$44.8BC$47.9BC$47.9BRevenueRevenue
C$23.1BC$24.0BC$26.6BC$28.9BC$28.9BPremiums earnedPremiums
C$13.4BC$13.6BC$13.6BC$15.4BC$16.4BC$15.6BC$15.2BC$16.2BC$18.2BC$19.0BC$19.0BInvestment incomeInv. inc.
C$2.9BC$2.1BC$4.8BC$5.6BC$5.9BC$7.1B(C$1.9B)C$5.1BC$5.4BC$5.6BC$5.6BNet incomeNet inc.
6%10%12%11%17%15%14%18%16%16%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
C$17.0BC$17.8BC$19.2BC$20.5BC$20.0BC$23.2BC$16.6BC$20.4BC$26.5BC$32.1BC$32.1BOperating cash flowOp. cash
7%5%10%11%11%12%-4%11%11%11%11%Return on equityROE
3%1%7%9%7%8%−10%11%4%5%11%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
C$720.7BC$729.5BC$750.3BC$809.1BC$880.3BC$917.6BC$928.2BC$875.6BC$978.8BC$1.03TC$1.03TTotal assetsAssets
C$15.2BC$16.0BC$16.2BC$20.3BC$26.2BC$22.6BC$19.2BC$20.3BC$25.8BC$26.7BC$26.7BCash & investmentsCash+inv
C$41.8BC$41.0BC$46.0BC$49.1BC$52.3BC$58.4BC$45.4BC$47.0BC$51.0BC$50.1BC$50.1BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
1.97B1.98B1.98B1.96B1.94B1.94B1.91B1.83B1.78B1.70B1.70BShares out (diluted)Shares
C$1.48C$1.06C$2.42C$2.86C$3.02C$3.66C$-1.01C$2.78C$3.03C$3.27C$3.27EPS (diluted)EPS
C$0.81C$0.90C$0.90C$0.71C$1.21C$1.29C$1.46C$0.00C$1.78C$1.94C$0.00Dividends / shareDiv/sh
C$21.20C$20.73C$23.18C$25.10C$26.96C$30.08C$23.75C$25.65C$28.65C$29.43C$29.43Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+0.4%/yr−7.1%/yr
EPS+9.2%/yr+1.6%/yr
Dividends / share+10.2%/yr+10.0%/yr
Book value / share+3.7%/yr+1.8%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
1.7Bpeak FY2018
Revenue
C$47.9Blow FY2022
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 40-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • Solid
    Net income C$5.6B ÷ equity C$50.1B
    Industry peers: median 11%
    What this means

    What it earns on shareholders' capital, the underwriting result plus what the float earns invested. Durably above the ~10% cost of equity is what compounds book value.

  • earned on investments
    Net investment income C$19.0B
    What this means

    What the float and capital earned this year. This is the second engine: an insurer that breaks even on underwriting still wins if the float is large and invested well.

The float and book value

  • Float
    Not enough data
    What this means

    Loss reserves weren't found.

  • the compounding scoreboard
    Equity C$50.1B ÷ 1703M shares
    What this means

    A life insurer is judged the way Berkshire is, by the growth in book value per share over the years as the spread on the float and the mortality and fee margins compound into equity. This is the level today; the record below shows whether it has grown. Note that reported book value swings with interest rates, which mark the bond portfolio up and down through other comprehensive income.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Pension & retirement, Income taxes as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Insurance — Life & Health

The same industry, side by side on the spread-and-book-value lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueROEReturn on assets
METMetLife Inc.$77.1B9%0.7%
PFHPrudential Financial Inc$60.8B9%0.5%
TRVTravelers Companies$48.8B12%2.4%
ATHSAthene Holding Ltd$25.7B14%0.9%
RGAReinsurance Group of America$23.7B9%1.0%
CRBGCorebridge Financial Inc.$19.0B14%0.6%
LNCLincoln National$18.2B11%0.4%
MFCManulife Financial CorporationC$47.9B11%0.6%
Group median11%0.6%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / tangible book

Enter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Manulife Financial Corporation reports in CAD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that CAD, ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share in CAD. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio and the exchange rate, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.

An insurer is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what Manulife Financial Corporation’s record justifies.

C$
The assumptions

Tangible book / share, delivered−0%/yr’20→’25

The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). An insurer earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for an insurer.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / tangible book
Justified by the return
Normalized return on tangible equity14%
Price / book
Earnings yield
P/E (3-yr avg ’23–’25)
Graham’s price gate

Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.

Tangible book C$37.8B on 1703M shares, a 14% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the insurer keeps earning that return; an underwriting cycle, a reserve shortfall or a bad year on the float changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/MFC, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← MESO its page in the Manual MFG →

Industry order: ← MET the Insurance — Life & Health chapter PFG →