Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← PN Manual PONY → ← PLAB Semiconductors POWI →

POET, POET Technologies Inc.

Semiconductors capital-intensive UnprofitableCapital build-outNet current asset value

POET is on the forefront of providing scalable solutions for current and future AI systems.

POET Technologies is a design and development company offering photonic integrated packaging solutions based on the POET Optical Interposer , a novel platform that allows the seamless integration of electronic and photonic devices onto a single chip using advanced wafer-level semiconductor manufacturing techniques.

The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems over the past year has placed extraordinary demands on cloud-based AI service providers and hyperscale data centers for increases in network speeds and bandwidth and decreases in latency.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F · US listing is the ordinary share
POET · POET Technologies Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$1M
+2494.6% YoY · −23% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM
Cash & investments $313M
Cash burn · annual $31M
Runway 10+ yrs

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

Situation
Unprofitable. No meaningful revenue yet; the record is the cash on hand against the burn. Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 210% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be. Net current asset value. Current assets alone exceed every liability combined, and the surplus is most of the balance sheet: the shape Graham called a net-net.
What moves the needle
Operating margin has run around −737% through the cycle on a 52% gross margin, the operating line in the red even at its best — so the lever is whether the spending below the gross line can come down enough to clear a profit: revenue growth against the cost curve, and the cash runway until it does. Capital spending runs about 210% of sales, below what it charges for depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on process leadership and the capex cycle. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −48%, above 15% in 0 of 4 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
$2M$3M$4M$209K$553K$466K$41K$1M$1MRevenueRevenue
49%52%62%−37%Gross marginGross mgn
($14M)($8M)($8M)($16M)($16M)Operating incomeOp. inc.
−736.7%−283.1%−216.6%n/mn/mOperating marginOp. mgn
($13M)($13M)($16M)($16M)($21M)($20M)($57M)($63M)($63M)Net incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
($10M)($9M)($9M)($11M)($12M)($15M)($23M)($31M)($31M)Operating cash flowOp. cash
$1M$128K$96K$840K$1M$2M$2M$3M$3MDepreciationDeprec.
$2M$4M$7M$4M$8M$3M$32M$29M$29MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$1M$57K$3M$772K$3M$1M$7M$2M$2MCapexCapex
64.9%2.0%89.2%369.0%544.8%250.8%n/m209.8%209.8%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
($11M)($9M)($13M)($12M)($15M)($17M)($30M)($33M)($33M)Owner earningsOwner earn.
−600.0%−330.0%−328.1%n/mn/mn/mn/mn/mn/mOwner earnings marginOE mgn
($11M)($9M)($13M)($12M)($15M)($17M)($30M)($33M)($33M)Free cash flowFCF
−600.0%−330.0%−328.1%n/mn/mn/mn/mn/mn/mFree cash flow marginFCF mgn
-61%-35%-36%-123%-8%ROICROIC
-41%-55%-77%-63%-184%-411%-274%-34%-34%Return on equityROE
−41%−55%−77%−63%−184%−411%−274%−34%−34%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$15M$5M$3M$21M$9M$3M$54M$313M$313MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$293K$494K$947K$63K$7K$7KReceivablesReceiv.
$1M$525K$437K$437KInventoryInvent.
$2M$811K$3M$2M$3M$2M$6M$2M$2MAccounts payablePayables
($215K)$208K($2M)($3M)($6M)($1M)Operating working capitalOper. WC
$17M$8M$7M$22M$10M$3M$55M$314M$314MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$2M$811K$3M$2M$4M$4M$48M$144M$144MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
10.5×9.8×2.3×11.3×2.5×0.9×1.1×2.2×2.2×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$8M$8M$8M$8MGoodwillGoodwill
$36M$25M$25M$27M$15M$9M$70M$329M$329MTotal assetsAssets
$32M$23M$21M$25M$11M$5M$21M$184M$184MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
220M260M282M34.5M36.7M40.1M60.2M93.2M132MShares out (diluted)Shares
$0.01$0.01$0.01$0.01$0.02$0.01$0.00$0.01$0.01Revenue / shareRev/sh
$-0.06$-0.05$-0.06$-0.45$-0.57$-0.51$-0.94$-0.68$-0.48EPS (diluted)EPS
$-0.05$-0.04$-0.05$-0.35$-0.42$-0.41$-0.50$-0.36$-0.25Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$-0.05$-0.04$-0.05$-0.35$-0.42$-0.41$-0.50$-0.36$-0.25Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.01$0.00$0.01$0.02$0.08$0.03$0.11$0.02$0.02Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$0.15$0.09$0.07$0.72$0.31$0.12$0.34$1.97$1.39Book value / shareBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×1/8.17 into 2021 — shares retired, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×1.5 into 2024 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×1.55 into 2025 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×1.42 into TTM — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+3.5%/yr+17.5%/yr (4-yr)
Capital spending / share+17.9%/yr+2.0%/yr (4-yr)
Book value / share+33.5%/yr+28.5%/yr (4-yr)

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
93Mpeak FY2018
ROIC
−123%low FY2020
Gross margin
62%low FY2016

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

($33M)owner earningsvs.($63M)net incomelow FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $63M loss into ($33M) of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income($63M)($57M)($20M)($21M)($16M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$3M+$2M+$2M+$1M+$840K
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$29M+$32M+$3M+$8M+$4M
Cash from operations($31M)($23M)($15M)($12M)($11M)
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$2M−$7M−$1M−$3M−$772K
Owner earnings($33M)($30M)($17M)($15M)($12M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue-3102%-72593%-3559%-2775%-5741%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Does not cover its interest
    Operating income ($16M) ÷ interest expense $144K
    What this means

    A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.

  • Net cash
    Cash $40M + ST investments $273M − debt $3M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $310M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Negative, funded by others
    DSO 2 + DIO 108 − DPO 405 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    6-yr median, range -610%–-35%; -8% latest = NOPAT ($12M) ÷ invested capital $147M
    Industry peers: median -120%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 6 years (it ran -8% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Consumes cash through the cycle
    8-yr median margin, range -72593%–-328%; latest ($33M) = operating cash ($31M) − maintenance capex $2M
    Industry peers: median -190%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -3102% of revenue this year, a -3102% median across 8 years.

  • Loss, and burning cash
    Net income ($63M) · cash from operations ($31M)
    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did not.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.76×
    Harvesting
    Capex $2M ÷ depreciation $3M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 5 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $1M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 2.19×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $3M vs $171M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 10 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · none paid
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth
    Earnings +33% over the record ·
    What this means

    Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.35/share (latest year $-0.48), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $1.39/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 0 of 8
    What this means

    Lost money in 8 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Operating margin −510% → −3855% (2-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about −510% early to −3855% lately, median −737% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Worst year 2021 · −7493.6% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2021, understand why before trusting the good years.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Framed as a capability

The filing positions AI as something the company uses, not something it fears.

“We believe that chip-scale integration is essential to developing hardware that can meet such demands and that POET is on the forefront of providing scalable solutions for current and future AI systems.”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$314M
  • Cash & short-term investments$313M
  • Receivables$7K
  • Inventory$437K
  • Other current assets$619K
Current liabilities$144M
  • Debt due within a year$3M
  • Accounts payable$2M
  • Other current liabilities$139M
Current ratio2.19×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio2.18×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio2.18×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$171Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$3M due · $313M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Dec 31, 2025 balance sheet
Cash runway9.4 yrsthe business is consuming cash; this is how long the cash on hand lasts at that rate
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$175Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value$170MGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$5M$1M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$446Kcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

Peers, Semiconductors

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
WOLFWolfspeed Inc. Common Stock New$758M32%-38.3%-6%-94%
MRAMEverspin Technologies Inc.$55M52%-14.1%-29%11%
SLDPSolid Power Inc.$18M-537.1%-21%-435%
SATLSatellogic Inc.$18M-405.6%-194%-318%
QUIKQuickLogic Corporation$14M52%-97.1%-156%-64%
UMACUnusual Machines Inc.$11M-224.6%-242%-190%
POETPOET Technologies Inc.$1M52%-509.9%-52%-2938%
ATOMAtomera Incorporated$65K59%-5338.6%-120%-3982%
Group median52%-315.1%-86%-254%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. POET Technologies Inc.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.

POET Technologies Inc. is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

$
The assumptions

Revenue, delivered−16%/yr’18→’25

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach
Margin the price demands
Owner-earnings margin today−3102%

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "POET Technologies Inc. (POET), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/POET, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← PN its page in the Manual PONY →

Industry order: ← PLAB the Semiconductors chapter POWI →