Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← RLI Manual RLMD → ← RITM REITs — Specialty & Diversified RWT →

RLJ, RLJ Lodging Trust

The lodging industry in the United States consists of public and private entities that operate in an extremely diversified market under a variety of brand names.

We are a self-advised and self-administered Maryland real estate investment trust that owns primarily premium-branded, rooms-oriented, high-margin, focused-service and compact full-service hotels located within heart of demand locations.

Franchisors — own a brand or brands and provide the franchised hotels with brand recognition, marketing support and worldwide reservation systems.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
RLJ · RLJ Lodging Trust
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$1.3B
−1.4% YoY · 23% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $1.4B 5-yr avg $1.2B
FFO margin 14% 5-yr avg 11%
Dividend payout (FFO) 48% 5-yr avg 24%
Debt / assets 61% 5-yr avg 46%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is Occupancy (81%), Food and Beverage (12%) and Other (7%).
What moves the needle
Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Funds from operations per share have shrunk (−8% a year). The dividend takes 48% of FFO, and is covered. Debt is 61% of assets, heavy for a REIT. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

Occupancy is 81% of revenue, with Food and Beverage the other meaningful line at 12%.

Revenue by product line, FY2025
  • Occupancy81%$1.1B
  • Food and Beverage12%$158M
  • Other7%$98M
By geographyOther31%Northern California13%Southern California12%South Florida11%New York City7%Chicago5%Other21%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$1.2B$1.4B$1.8B$1.6B$473M$786M$1.2B$1.3B$1.4B$1.3B$1.4BRevenueRevenue
$200M$75M$189M$128M($404M)($305M)$42M$76M$68M$29M$25MNet incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
$363M$262M$430M$339M($210M)($117M)$227M$256M$247M$215M$189MFunds from operationsFFO
Balance sheet
45%65%54%67%6%19%28%43%48%Dividend payout (FFO)Payout
$4.3B$6.9B$6.7B$5.8B$5.9B$5.7B$5.8B$5.9B$6.2B$6.2B$6.2BReal estate (gross)RE gross
$4.0B$6.8B$6.0B$5.9B$5.6B$5.1B$5.0B$4.9B$4.9B$4.7B$4.7BTotal assetsAssets
68%60%37%38%46%47%45%45%45%46%61%Debt / assetsDebt/assets
$2.8B$4.1B$2.2B$2.2B$2.6B$2.4B$2.2B$2.2B$2.2B$2.2B$2.9BTotal debtDebt
$2.3B$3.5B$1.9B$1.3B$1.7B$1.7B$1.7B$1.7B$1.8B$1.8B$2.5BNet debt / (cash)Net debt
3.7×2.3×2.9×2.4×-2.5×-1.9×1.5×1.8×1.6×1.3×2.4×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$2.2B$3.5B$3.4B$3.2B$2.7B$2.4B$2.4B$2.3B$2.3B$2.2B$2.1BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
124M141M174M171M165M164M162M157M153M150M149MShares out (diluted)Shares
$2.93$1.86$2.47$1.98$-1.28$-0.72$1.40$1.63$1.61$1.43$1.27FFO / shareFFO/sh
$1.33$1.21$1.33$1.33$0.37$0.04$0.08$0.31$0.45$0.61$0.61Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$17.94$24.90$19.68$18.68$16.21$14.62$14.88$14.93$14.89$14.47$14.36Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share−0.4%/yr+25.6%/yr
Owner earnings / share−12.8%/yr
EPS−21.2%/yr
Dividends / share−8.3%/yr+10.4%/yr
Capital spending / share+92.9%/yr+13.6%/yr
Book value / share−2.4%/yr−2.2%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
150Mpeak FY2018
Revenue
$1.3Blow FY2020
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • about $1.28 per share
    Net income $29M + depreciation $186M − gains on sale $24M
    What this means

    GAAP net income with property depreciation added back, because the buildings a REIT charges against earnings usually hold or grow their value. This, not net income, is what a REIT is actually priced on. It is an approximation here: where a filing reports gains on property sales, we remove them, the way the NAREIT definition does.

  • Lightly covered
    Dividends $91M ÷ FFO $191M
    Industry peers: median 40%
    What this means

    A REIT must distribute most of its taxable income, so a high payout is normal and the question is whether FFO covers it. Above 100%, the trust is funding the dividend with debt or asset sales, and a cut usually follows.

Is it sound?

  • Heavy
    Total debt $4.1B ÷ assets $4.7B
    Industry peers: median 40%
    What this means

    Every REIT runs on leverage; how much is the question. Heavy debt is what turns a property downturn into a wipeout, as 2008 showed, so a conservative balance sheet is part of the moat here, not a drag on it.

  • Comfortable
    (operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest $112M
    Industry peers: median 3.3×
    What this means

    How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“AI could significantly disrupt the markets in which we operate and subject us to increased competition, legal and regulatory risks and compliance costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial condition and results of operations.”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Ms. Hale$16.3M$12.6M($5M)
2022Ms. Hale$8.4M$1.3M$132M
2023Ms. Hale$9.1M$9.4M$183M
2024Ms. Hale$9.4M$5.9M$149M
2025Ms. Hale$9.5M$4.3M$117M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership3.7%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$15M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 8% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Acquisitions as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Hotel & lodging REITs

The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueFFO marginFFO / assetsPayout (FFO)Debt / assets
RHPRyman Hospitality Properties$2.6B22%9.3%51%65%
SVCService Properties Trust$1.8B16%3.6%54%69%
PEBPebblebrook Hotel Trust$1.5B13%2.7%28%39%
APLEApple Hospitality REIT$1.4B27%7.1%69%29%
RLJRLJ Lodging Trust$1.3B19%4.8%44%46%
DRHDiamondrock Hospitality Company$1.1B20%6.1%40%34%
INNSummit Hotel Properties Inc.$729M18%4.6%22%48%
CLDTChatham Lodging Trust$295M21%5.0%29%40%
Group median20%4.9%42%43%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / FFO

A REIT is priced on a multiple of its funds from operations (FFO), the cash it earns once the depreciation on its buildings is added back. Type today’s price; we show the multiple you would pay and the income and growth it implies.

$
The assumptions

FFO / share, delivered1%/yr’20→’25

The justified multiple is 1 ÷ (required return − growth), a perpetuity on FFO. At an 8% required return and 3% growth, a REIT is worth about 20× FFO.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / FFO
Justified by growth
Dividend yield

FFO about $1.27 per share on 152M shares. The dials set the multiple they justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. FFO here adds back depreciation and removes property-sale gains, the NAREIT method; it does not net out maintenance capex (AFFO), occupancy or lease terms, which the 10-K does.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/RLJ, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← RLI its page in the Manual RLMD →

Industry order: ← RITM the REITs — Specialty & Diversified chapter RWT →