← All companies ← SSL Manual STAK → ← SNDK Technology Hardware STX →
SSYS, Stratasys Ltd. Ordinary Shares (Israel)
Revenue is Products (69%) and Services (31%).
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- A consumer-brand business, where the durable asset is the brand and the pricing power it commands.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run around −13% through the cycle on a 43% gross margin, the operating line in the red even at its best — so the lever is whether the spending below the gross line can come down enough to clear a profit: revenue growth against the cost curve, and the cash runway until it does. Inventory runs near 25% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −8%, above 15% in 0 of 10 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Products is 69% of revenue, with Services the other meaningful line at 31%.
- Products69%$380M
- Services31%$171M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $672M | $668M | $663M | $636M | $521M | $607M | $651M | $628M | $572M | $551M | $551M | RevenueRevenue |
| 47% | 48% | 49% | 49% | 42% | 43% | 42% | 43% | 45% | 41% | 37% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| ($87M) | ($31M) | ($9M) | ($12M) | ($456M) | ($79M) | ($57M) | ($88M) | ($86M) | ($72M) | ($72M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −12.9% | −4.6% | −1.3% | −1.8% | −87.6% | −13.0% | −8.8% | −14.0% | −15.0% | −13.2% | −13.2% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($78M) | ($40M) | ($11M) | ($11M) | ($444M) | ($62M) | ($29M) | ($123M) | ($120M) | ($104M) | ($104M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $62M | $62M | $64M | ($11M) | $28M | $36M | ($75M) | ($62M) | $8M | $15M | $15M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $93M | $67M | $61M | $51M | $50M | $56M | $60M | $49M | $45M | $43M | $50M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $47M | $36M | $14M | ($51M) | $422M | $42M | ($106M) | $12M | $83M | $76M | $70M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $45M | $22M | $23M | $22M | $27M | $25M | $14M | $14M | $11M | $22M | $22M | CapexCapex |
| 6.7% | 3.3% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 5.2% | 4.1% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 4.0% | 4.0% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $17M | $39M | $40M | ($34M) | $859K | $11M | ($89M) | ($75M) | ($3M) | ($7M) | ($7M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 2.5% | 5.9% | 6.1% | −5.3% | 0.2% | 1.8% | −13.7% | −12.0% | −0.5% | −1.3% | −1.3% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $17M | $39M | $40M | ($34M) | $859K | $11M | ($89M) | ($75M) | ($3M) | ($7M) | ($7M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| 2.5% | 5.9% | 6.1% | −5.3% | 0.2% | 1.8% | −13.7% | −12.0% | −0.5% | −1.3% | −1.3% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| -8% | -3% | -1% | -1% | -74% | -9% | -6% | -9% | -9% | -8% | -7% | ROICROIC |
| -7% | -4% | -1% | -1% | -58% | -6% | -3% | -14% | -15% | -12% | -12% | Return on equityROE |
| −7% | −4% | −1% | −1% | −58% | −6% | −3% | −14% | −15% | −12% | −12% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $280M | $329M | $393M | $293M | $272M | $243M | $150M | $83M | $70M | $95M | $95M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $120M | $133M | $138M | $133M | $106M | $129M | $145M | $172M | $153M | $151M | $151M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $118M | $116M | $124M | $169M | $132M | $129M | $194M | $193M | $180M | $145M | $145M | InventoryInvent. |
| $41M | $40M | $46M | $36M | $17M | $52M | $73M | $47M | $45M | $43M | $43M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $197M | $209M | $216M | $265M | $221M | $207M | $266M | $318M | $288M | $254M | $254M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $553M | $615M | $684M | $659M | $560M | $801M | $700M | $560M | $513M | $582M | $582M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $165M | $163M | $176M | $160M | $132M | $210M | $211M | $176M | $167M | $163M | $163M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 3.4× | 3.8× | 3.9× | 4.1× | 4.2× | 3.8× | 3.3× | 3.2× | 3.1× | 3.6× | 3.6× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $386M | $387M | $386M | $386M | $36M | $65M | $65M | $100M | $99M | $102M | $102M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $990M | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | Total assetsAssets |
| $26M | $32M | $27M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $27M | Total debtDebt |
| ($254M) | ($296M) | ($366M) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ($67M) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $759M | $956M | $959M | $885M | $793M | $843M | $843M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 210M | 212M | 215M | 200M | 54.9M | 63.5M | 66.5M | 69.7M | 71.1M | — | 71.1M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $3.20 | $3.16 | $3.08 | $3.18 | $9.48 | $9.57 | $9.80 | $9.01 | $8.05 | — | $7.75 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.37 | $-0.19 | $-0.05 | $-0.06 | $-8.09 | $-0.98 | $-0.44 | $-1.77 | $-1.69 | — | $-1.47 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.08 | $0.19 | $0.19 | $-0.17 | $0.02 | $0.17 | $-1.34 | $-1.08 | $-0.04 | — | $-0.10 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.08 | $0.19 | $0.19 | $-0.17 | $0.02 | $0.17 | $-1.34 | $-1.08 | $-0.04 | — | $-0.10 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.21 | $0.11 | $0.11 | $0.11 | $0.49 | $0.39 | $0.21 | $0.19 | $0.15 | — | $0.31 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $5.40 | $5.35 | $5.31 | $5.79 | $13.83 | $15.06 | $14.43 | $12.70 | $11.15 | — | $11.85 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2019 are restated ×4 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
The diluted share count moved ×1/3.64 into 2020 — shares retired, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +12.2%/yr (8-yr) | +20.4%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −4.1%/yr (8-yr) | +6.4%/yr |
| Book value / share | +9.5%/yr (8-yr) | +14.0%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $104M loss into ($7M) of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($104M) | ($120M) | ($123M) | ($29M) | ($62M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$43M | +$45M | +$49M | +$60M | +$56M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$76M | +$83M | +$12M | −$106M | +$42M |
| Cash from operations | $15M | $8M | ($62M) | ($75M) | $36M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$22M | −$11M | −$14M | −$14M | −$25M |
| Owner earnings | ($7M) | ($3M) | ($75M) | ($89M) | $11M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -1% | -1% | -12% | -14% | 2% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- No meaningful interest burdenLittle or no interest expense reported
What this means
Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.
- Net cashCash $95M − debt $27M
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $67M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 100 + DIO 153 − DPO 45 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle10-yr median, range -74%–-1%; -7% latest = NOPAT ($57M) ÷ invested capital $776MIndustry peers: median 4%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran -7% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Consumes cash through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -14%–6%; latest ($7M) = operating cash $15M − maintenance capex $22MIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -1% of revenue this year, a -1% median across 10 years.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($104M) · cash from operations $15M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.45×HarvestingCapex $22M ÷ depreciation $50M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $551M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 3.57×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · $27M vs $419M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 10 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-1.35/share (latest year $-1.21), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $9.79/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 0 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 10 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 3 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin −6% → −14% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about −6% early to −14% lately, median −13% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Worst year 2020 · −87.6% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +3.4%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$95M
- Receivables$151M
- Inventory$145M
- Other current assets$191M
- Debt due within a year$5M
- Accounts payable$43M
- Other current liabilities$115M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $126M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$225M · 179%
- Source of funding−$100M
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $100M beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet: cash and short-term investments drew down $186M.
- Net change in share count−66.2%
The diluted count fell from 210M to 71M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Stratasys Ltd. Ordinary Shares (Israel) is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
2 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?−4.6% vs 4.8%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 4.8% early in the record and −4.6% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?35% → 54% of sales
Receivables and inventory grew from $238M to $297M while revenue grew −18%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (35% of revenue then, 54% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Technology Hardware
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRSRCorsair Gaming Inc. | $1.5B | 25% | 1.4% | 1% | 2% |
| NTGRNETGEAR Inc. | $700M | 30% | 3.1% | 4% | 3% |
| SSYSStratasys Ltd. Ordinary Shares (Israel) | $551M | 44% | -13.0% | -8% | -0% |
| PARPAR Technology Corporation | $456M | 22% | -15.1% | -8% | -8% |
| DGIIDigi International Inc. | $430M | 53% | 6.7% | 5% | 11% |
| ATENA10 Networks Inc. | $291M | 78% | 10.6% | 38% | 16% |
| MITKMitek Systems Inc. | $180M | — | 7.3% | 4% | 20% |
| EVLVEvolv Technologies Holdings Inc. | $146M | 34% | -154.2% | -81% | 10% |
| Group median | — | 34% | 2.3% | 3% | 7% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Stratasys Ltd. Ordinary Shares (Israel)'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.
Stratasys Ltd. Ordinary Shares (Israel) is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.
Revenue, delivered0%/yr’20→’25
Enter a price to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.
Manual order: ← SSL its page in the Manual STAK →
Industry order: ← SNDK the Technology Hardware chapter STX →