← All companies ← TCBX Manual TCMD → ← SVC REITs — Specialty & Diversified TPTA →
TCI, Transcontinental Realty Investors Inc.
Transcontinental Realty Investors Inc. is a fully integrated externally managed real estate company.
We have no employees and rely upon the employees of Pillar to render services to us in accordance with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and the Cash Management Agreement.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Funds from operations per share have compounded about 15% a year across the record. Debt is 23% of assets, conservative for a REIT. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $118M | $125M | $149M | $48M | $57M | $41M | $37M | $50M | $47M | $49M | $49M | RevenueRevenue |
| $37K | ($16M) | $181M | ($27M) | $7M | $9M | $468M | $6M | $6M | $14M | $9M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $8M | ($99K) | $212M | ($11M) | $25M | $24M | $481M | $21M | $18M | $26M | $23M | Funds from operationsFFO |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $1.0B | $1.2B | $464M | $478M | $460M | $359M | $560M | $569M | $636M | $207M | $207M | Real estate (gross)RE gross |
| $1.2B | $1.3B | $862M | $866M | $879M | $788M | $1.2B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | Total assetsAssets |
| 71% | 68% | 33% | 29% | 27% | 22% | 15% | 17% | 17% | 19% | 23% | Debt / assetsDebt/assets |
| $842M | $894M | $286M | $253M | $236M | $177M | $184M | $179M | $182M | $211M | $262M | Total debtDebt |
| $824M | $852M | $249M | $202M | $199M | $110M | ($49M) | $52M | $82M | $122M | $174M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $206M | $189M | $360M | $333M | $342M | $351M | $819M | $826M | $832M | $847M | $847M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 8.7M | 8.7M | 8.7M | 8.7M | 8.6M | 8.6M | 8.6M | 8.6M | 8.6M | 8.6M | 8.6M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $0.86 | $-0.01 | $24.34 | $-1.29 | $2.92 | $2.83 | $55.72 | $2.37 | $2.13 | $3.06 | $2.64 | FFO / shareFFO/sh |
| $23.62 | $21.70 | $41.26 | $38.15 | $39.56 | $40.65 | $94.85 | $95.61 | $96.34 | $98.01 | $98.03 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −9.2%/yr | −3.0%/yr |
| EPS | +93.3%/yr | +15.7%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −63.6%/yr (2-yr) | −63.6%/yr (2-yr) |
| Book value / share | +17.1%/yr | +19.9%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- about $3.07 per shareNet income $14M + depreciation $13M − gains on sale ($80K)
What this means
GAAP net income with property depreciation added back, because the buildings a REIT charges against earnings usually hold or grow their value. This, not net income, is what a REIT is actually priced on. It is an approximation here: where a filing reports gains on property sales, we remove them, the way the NAREIT definition does.
- Not enough data
What this means
FFO or dividends missing.
Is it sound?
- Debt / assets 22%ConservativeTotal debt $253M ÷ assets $1.1BIndustry peers: median 49%
What this means
Every REIT runs on leverage; how much is the question. Heavy debt is what turns a property downturn into a wipeout, as 2008 showed, so a conservative balance sheet is part of the moat here, not a drag on it.
- Not enough data
What this means
Operating income or interest is missing, or operating income sits far below net income (a triple-net REIT's lease income bypasses the operating line), so an EBITDA coverage would mislead — read it on net income against the interest bill, and on debt / assets, instead.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Acquisitions as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Residential REITs
The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | FFO margin | FFO / assets | Payout (FFO) | Debt / assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UDRUDR Inc. | $1.7B | 49% | 6.7% | 68% | 50% |
| ELSEquity Lifestyle Properties Inc. | $1.5B | 36% | 9.3% | 58% | 60% |
| IRTIndependence Realty Trust | $658M | 32% | 3.9% | 83% | 48% |
| CSRCenterspace | $274M | 33% | 4.3% | 58% | 45% |
| UMHUMH Properties | $262M | 28% | 4.3% | 57% | 37% |
| NXRTNexPoint Real Estate Finance | $251M | 25% | 3.1% | 66% | 76% |
| AIVApartment Investment and Management Company | $138M | 38% | 3.6% | 86% | 49% |
| TCITranscontinental Realty Investors Inc. | $49M | 40% | 2.2% | — | 25% |
| Group median | — | 34% | 4.1% | — | 48% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
price / FFOA REIT is priced on a multiple of its funds from operations (FFO), the cash it earns once the depreciation on its buildings is added back. Type today’s price; we show the multiple you would pay and the income and growth it implies.
FFO / share, delivered−10%/yr’20→’25
The justified multiple is 1 ÷ (required return − growth), a perpetuity on FFO. At an 8% required return and 3% growth, a REIT is worth about 20× FFO.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
FFO about $2.64 per share on 9M shares. The dials set the multiple they justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. FFO here adds back depreciation and removes property-sale gains, the NAREIT method; it does not net out maintenance capex (AFFO), occupancy or lease terms, which the 10-K does.
Manual order: ← TCBX its page in the Manual TCMD →
Industry order: ← SVC the REITs — Specialty & Diversified chapter TPTA →