← All companies ← TWFG Manual TWIN → ← TS Steel TX →
TWI, Titan International Inc. (DE)
Titan, is a global wheel, tire, and undercarriage industrial manufacturer and supplier that services customers across the globe.
As a leading manufacturer in the off-highway industry, Titan produces a broad range of products to meet the specifications of original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") and aftermarket customers in the agricultural, earthmoving/construction, and consumer markets.
Titan manufactures and sells certain tires under the Goodyear Farm Tire, Titan Tire, Carlstar and Voltyre-Prom Tire brands and has complete research and development facilities to validate tire and wheel designs.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand. Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 12% and operating margin about 1.1% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −2.8% and 9.5% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Inventory runs near 23% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the commodity price and the cost position. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 2%, above 15% in 2 of 9 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Revenue spreads across 4 regions, the largest North America at 53%.
- North America53%$976M
- Europe24%$447M
- Latin America18%$324M
- Other Countries4%$82M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.8B | $2.2B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.8B | RevenueRevenue |
| 11% | 12% | 12% | 9% | 10% | 13% | 17% | 17% | 14% | 14% | 14% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 11% | 10% | 8% | 10% | 10% | 7% | 6% | 7% | 10% | 11% | 11% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| ($22M) | ($11M) | $42M | ($28M) | ($35M) | $85M | $206M | $149M | $33M | $21M | ($5M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −1.8% | −0.8% | 2.6% | −2.0% | −2.8% | 4.8% | 9.5% | 8.2% | 1.8% | 1.1% | −0.3% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($38M) | ($60M) | $16M | ($48M) | ($60M) | $50M | $176M | $79M | ($6M) | ($63M) | ($87M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | 30% | — | — | 2% | 12% | 25% | — | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $44M | ($1M) | ($36M) | $45M | $57M | $11M | $161M | $179M | $141M | $30M | $22M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $60M | $58M | $58M | $54M | $55M | $48M | $43M | $42M | $61M | $67M | $68M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $19M | ($1M) | ($111M) | $38M | $61M | ($90M) | ($63M) | $53M | $81M | $23M | $36M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $42M | $33M | $39M | $36M | $22M | $39M | $47M | $61M | $66M | $55M | $53M | CapexCapex |
| 3.3% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 3.3% | 3.6% | 3.0% | 2.9% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $2M | ($34M) | ($75M) | $9M | $36M | ($28M) | $114M | $137M | $76M | ($25M) | ($31M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 0.1% | −2.3% | −4.7% | 0.6% | 2.8% | −1.6% | 5.2% | 7.5% | 4.1% | −1.3% | −1.7% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $2M | ($34M) | ($75M) | $9M | $36M | ($28M) | $114M | $119M | $76M | ($25M) | ($31M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| 0.1% | −2.3% | −4.7% | 0.6% | 2.8% | −1.6% | 5.2% | 6.5% | 4.1% | −1.3% | −1.7% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $0 | — | — | — | — | — | $0 | $0 | $144M | $0 | $0 | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $603K | $0 | $0 | — | — | — | $0 | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | — | — | — | $0 | $0 | $25M | $33M | — | — | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| -3% | -1% | 5% | -3% | -5% | 14% | 22% | 17% | 2% | — | -0% | ROICROIC |
| -13% | -19% | 6% | -21% | -34% | 22% | 46% | 17% | -1% | -12% | -18% | Return on equityROE |
| −13% | −19% | 5% | −21% | −34% | 22% | 46% | — | — | — | −18% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $148M | $144M | $82M | $67M | $117M | $98M | — | $220M | $196M | $203M | $199M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $179M | $227M | $242M | $185M | $193M | $255M | $267M | $219M | $212M | $239M | $338M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $272M | $340M | $396M | $333M | $294M | $393M | $397M | $365M | $437M | $471M | $468M | InventoryInvent. |
| $148M | $195M | $212M | $159M | $167M | $278M | $263M | $201M | $220M | $252M | $278M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $303M | $371M | $425M | $360M | $319M | $370M | $401M | $383M | $429M | $458M | $528M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $729M | $783M | $779M | $651M | $659M | $813M | $910M | $877M | $912M | $986M | $1.1B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $366M | $373M | $375M | $327M | $330M | $451M | $446M | $363M | $387M | $428M | $479M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 2.0× | 2.1× | 2.1× | 2.0× | 2.0× | 1.8× | 2.0× | 2.4× | 2.4× | 2.3× | 2.2× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0 | $30M | $30M | $30M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $1.7B | Total assetsAssets |
| $506M | $451M | $461M | $500M | $465M | $485M | $446M | $426M | $568M | $588M | $666M | Total debtDebt |
| $358M | $307M | $380M | $433M | $347M | $387M | $446M | $206M | $372M | $385M | $467M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -0.7× | -0.4× | 1.5× | -0.9× | -1.2× | 2.6× | 6.9× | 7.9× | 0.9× | 0.5× | -0.1× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $297M | $321M | $279M | $235M | $179M | $229M | $381M | $467M | $496M | $514M | $495M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.3% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 53.9M | 59.3M | 59.9M | 60.1M | 60.8M | 62.7M | 63.7M | 63.0M | 68.7M | 63.7M | 64.1M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $23.47 | $24.75 | $26.75 | $24.10 | $20.71 | $28.40 | $34.06 | $28.94 | $26.88 | $28.70 | $28.76 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.70 | $-1.01 | $0.27 | $-0.81 | $-0.99 | $0.79 | $2.77 | $1.25 | $-0.08 | $-1.00 | $-1.36 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.03 | $-0.57 | $-1.25 | $0.15 | $0.58 | $-0.45 | $1.79 | $2.17 | $1.10 | $-0.39 | $-0.48 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.03 | $-0.57 | $-1.25 | $0.15 | $0.58 | $-0.45 | $1.79 | $1.88 | $1.10 | $-0.39 | $-0.48 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.02 | $0.02 | $0.02 | $0.02 | $0.01 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | — | — | $0.00 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.78 | $0.55 | $0.65 | $0.61 | $0.36 | $0.62 | $0.74 | $0.97 | $0.96 | $0.86 | $0.82 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $5.51 | $5.41 | $4.66 | $3.91 | $2.95 | $3.66 | $5.99 | $7.42 | $7.22 | $8.07 | $7.72 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +2.3%/yr | +6.7%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +1.1%/yr | +19.2%/yr |
| Book value / share | +4.3%/yr | +22.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $63M loss into ($25M) of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($63M) | ($6M) | $79M | $176M | $50M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$67M | +$61M | +$42M | +$43M | +$48M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$3M | +$5M | +$5M | +$4M | +$3M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$23M | +$81M | +$53M | −$63M | −$90M |
| Cash from operations | $30M | $141M | $179M | $161M | $11M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$55M | −$66M | −$42M | −$47M | −$39M |
| Owner earnings | ($25M) | $76M | $137M | $114M | ($28M) |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | — | −$18M | — | — |
| Free cash flow | ($25M) | $76M | $119M | $114M | ($28M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -1% | 4% | 8% | 5% | -2% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $3M), owner earnings is nearer ($28M).
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Does not cover its interestOperating income $21M ÷ interest expense $39M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $437M · 21.0× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $203M − debt $640M
What this means
Netting $203M of cash and short-term investments against $640M of debt leaves $437M owed, about 21.0× a year's operating profit (30.8× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 48 + DIO 109 − DPO 58 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle9-yr median, range -5%–22%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profitIndustry peers: median 6%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Thin through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -5%–8%; latest ($25M) = operating cash $30M − maintenance capex $55MIndustry peers: median 5%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -1% of revenue this year, a 0% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $3M of SBC) leaves ($28M).
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($63M) · cash from operations $30M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.81×MaintainingCapex $55M ÷ depreciation $67M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size NearRevenue ≥ $2B · $1.8B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 2.30×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt NearDebt ≤ working capital · $640M vs $558M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 6 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 5 of 10 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.05/share (latest year $-0.99), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $7.99/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 4 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 6 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 2 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 0% → 4% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The record and the words agree: the margin widened and the filing attributes the gain to its own pricing, not volume alone.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 0% early to 4% lately, median 1% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Worst year 2020 · −2.8% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +1.9%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 5 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$199M
- Receivables$338M
- Inventory$468M
- Other current assets$45M
- Debt due within a year$52M
- Accounts payable$278M
- Other current liabilities$149M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $631M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$438M · 69%
- Dividends$5M · 1%
- Buybacks$58M · 9%
- Retained (debt / cash)$130M · 21%
- Returned to owners$63M
30% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $5M as dividends and $58M as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose $160M and cash and short-term investments rose $52M.
- Average price paid for buybacks$8.61
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 7M shares were bought for $58M, about $8.61 each.
- Net change in share count18.8%
The diluted count rose from 54M to 64M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$0.00/sh
Paid in 5 of the years on record. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mr. Reitz | $4.5M | $5.2M | ($28M) |
| 2022 | Mr. Reitz | $3.3M | $5.1M | $114M |
| 2023 | Mr. Reitz | $3.2M | $3.1M | $137M |
| 2024 | Mr. Reitz | $2.7M | −$502k | $76M |
| 2025 | Mr. Reitz | $2.4M | $2.6M | ($25M) |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership6.1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio69:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$3M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue, equal to 16% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Titan International Inc. (DE) is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
2 of the 6 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?18.8%
Diluted shares grew 18.8% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $58M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$506M → $666M
Debt rose from $506M to $666M while owner earnings went from about ($36M) to $63M: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?≈$608M · 33% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
“CUSTOMERS Titan's 10 largest customers accounted for 33% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2025, and 35% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2024.”verify →
- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Pension & retirement, Income taxes as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Steel
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSWorthington Steel Inc. | $3.1B | 11% | 5.2% | 12% | 3% |
| CRSCarpenter Technology | $2.9B | 17% | 6.0% | 5% | 5% |
| NXQuanex Building Products Corporation | $1.8B | 23% | 4.2% | 6% | 5% |
| SXCSunCoke Energy Inc. | $1.8B | — | 7.8% | 8% | 6% |
| TWITitan International Inc. (DE) | $1.8B | 13% | 1.5% | 2% | 0% |
| MTUSMetallus Inc. | $1.2B | 8% | 0.3% | 0% | 3% |
| WORWorthington | $1.2B | 17% | 2.4% | 4% | 8% |
| ROCKGibraltar Industries Inc. | $1.1B | 25% | 9.6% | 12% | 11% |
| Group median | — | 17% | 4.7% | 6% | 5% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Titan International Inc. (DE) has delivered.
Titan International Inc. (DE)’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, a cyclical trough. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Titan International Inc. (DE) earns about $7M on its 0.4% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s −1.3% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings ($31M) on 64M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-22; net debt $467M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits off the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← TWFG its page in the Manual TWIN →
Industry order: ← TS the Steel chapter TX →