Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← WRLD Manual WSBC → ← TX Steel X →

WS, Worthington Steel Inc.

Steel capital-intensive

Worthington Steel, Inc. is one of North America's premier value-added metals processors with the ability to provide a diversified range of products and services that span a variety of end markets.

We are a value-added processor of carbon flat-rolled steel and a producer of laser welded solutions and electrical steel laminations.

We occupy a niche in the steel industry by focusing on products requiring exact specifications.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
WS · Worthington Steel Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$3.1B
−9.8% YoY · −9% 3-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 4-yr average
Revenue $3.3B 4-yr avg $3.6B
Gross margin 12% 4-yr avg 11%
Operating margin 4.2% 4-yr avg 4.8%
ROIC 8% 4-yr avg 12%
Owner-earnings margin 2% 4-yr avg 3%
Free cash flow margin 2% 4-yr avg 3%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 10% and operating margin about 4.8% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. That margin has held in a narrow 3.3%–5.7% band over the years, so steadiness itself is the evidence — the lever is unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line. Read this kind of business on the commodity price and the cost position. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 12%). By owner earnings: roughly 3% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

21% of revenue comes from outside the United States.

Revenue by geography, FY2025
  • United States79%$2.4B
  • Canada11%$331M
  • Mexico7%$208M
  • Rest of World4%$119M

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2022–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMFeb 2026
Income statement
$4.1B$3.6B$3.4B$3.1B$3.3BRevenueRevenue
10%9%13%13%12%Gross marginGross mgn
4%6%7%7%8%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
$227M$120M$195M$147M$140MOperating incomeOp. inc.
5.6%3.3%5.7%4.8%4.2%Operating marginOp. mgn
$180M$87M$155M$111M$122MNet incomeNet inc.
23%25%23%21%23%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$40M$315M$200M$230M$210MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$60M$70M$65M$66M$81MDepreciationDeprec.
($200M)$158M($21M)$54M$8MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$36M$46M$103M$130M$130MCapexCapex
0.9%1.3%3.0%4.2%3.9%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$3M$270M$96M$100M$81MOwner earningsOwner earn.
0.1%7.5%2.8%3.2%2.4%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$3M$270M$96M$100M$81MFree cash flowFCF
0.1%7.5%2.8%3.2%2.4%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$377M$0$21M$0$2MAcquisitionsAcquis.
$0$0$8M$32M$33MDividends paidDiv. paid
14%9%14%10%8%ROICROIC
14%8%16%10%11%Return on equityROE
14%8%15%7%8%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$20M$33M$40M$38M$90MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$468M$473M$439M$462MReceivablesReceiv.
$415M$405M$422M$436MInventoryInvent.
$402M$380M$403M$402MAccounts payablePayables
$481M$498M$458M$495MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$981M$1.0B$1.0B$1.1BCurrent assetsCur. assets
$478M$618M$632M$746MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
2.1×1.6×1.7×1.5×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$80M$79M$80M$80M$103MGoodwillGoodwill
$1.8B$1.9B$2.0B$2.3BTotal assetsAssets
$23M$148M$152M$251MTotal debtDebt
($10M)$108M$114M$161MNet debt / (cash)Net debt
75.5×40.1×32.4×20.7×16.0×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$1.3B$1.0B$985M$1.1B$1.1BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
49.3M49.3M49.8M50.5M50.7MShares out (diluted)Shares
$82.53$73.18$68.89$61.25$66.03Revenue / shareRev/sh
$3.66$1.77$3.11$2.19$2.40EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.06$5.47$1.93$1.98$1.59Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$0.06$5.47$1.93$1.98$1.59Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.00$0.00$0.16$0.63$0.64Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$0.74$0.92$2.08$2.58$2.56Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$25.69$20.87$19.79$21.27$22.18Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
3-yr5-yr
Revenue / share−9.5%/yr−9.5%/yr (3-yr)
Owner earnings / share+215.7%/yr+215.7%/yr (3-yr)
EPS−15.7%/yr−15.7%/yr (3-yr)
Capital spending / share+51.8%/yr+51.8%/yr (3-yr)
Book value / share−6.1%/yr−6.1%/yr (3-yr)

The record, charted

FY2022–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
51Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
10%low FY2023
Gross margin
13%low FY2023
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
1.1×peak FY2025

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$100Mowner earningsvs.$111Mnet incomelow FY2022

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cash

Each year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.

FY2022FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business reported $111M of profit but $100M of owner earnings: $11M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.

Reported net income$111M
Owner earnings$100M · 3% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Reported net income$111M$155M$87M$180M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$66M+$65M+$70M+$60M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$54M−$21M+$158M−$200M
Cash from operations$230M$200M$315M$40M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$130M−$103M−$46M−$36M
Owner earnings$100M$96M$270M$3M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue3%3%7%0%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $147M ÷ interest expense $7M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $114M · 0.8× operating profit
    Modest net debt
    Cash $38M − debt $152M
    What this means

    Netting $38M of cash and short-term investments against $152M of debt leaves $114M owed, about 0.8× a year's operating profit (1.0× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Tight
    DSO 52 + DIO 57 − DPO 54 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Solid through the cycle
    4-yr median, range 9%–14%; 10% latest = NOPAT $117M ÷ invested capital $1.2B
    Industry peers: median 8%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 4 years (it ran 10% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Thin through the cycle
    4-yr median margin, range 0%–7%; latest $100M = operating cash $230M − maintenance capex $130M
    Industry peers: median 5%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 3% of revenue this year, a 3% median across 4 years.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $230M ÷ net income $111M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $32M ÷ Owner Earnings $100M
    What this means

    Of $100M Owner Earnings, $32M (32%) went back to shareholders, $32M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.98×
    Expanding
    Capex $130M ÷ depreciation $66M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 3 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Pass
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $3.1B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Near
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.66×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $152M vs $417M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $2.31/share (latest year $2.18), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $21.14/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2022–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 4 of 4
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 3 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 4% → 5% (2-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The margin has held, but the filing names price competition — the pressure is present even where the margin has absorbed it so far.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 4% early, 5% lately, median 5%.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Owner earnings growth −10%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings shrank about 10% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2023 · 3.3% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count +0.8%/yr
    What this means

    Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

  • How management talks about it Promotional
    What this means

    The returns have faded, yet the filing reaches for a promoter’s vocabulary — world-class, best-in-class, disruptive — more than an owner’s. When the words sell harder than the results deliver, the gap is the thing to weigh.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“Additionally, reliance on third-party AI providers could expose us to service disruptions, quality concerns, or liability for unintended consequences.”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Feb 28, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$1.1B
  • Cash & short-term investments$90M
  • Receivables$462M
  • Inventory$436M
  • Other current assets$119M
Current liabilities$746M
  • Debt due within a year$27M
  • Accounts payable$402M
  • Other current liabilities$317M
Current ratio1.48×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio0.90×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.12×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$361Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$27M due · $90M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Feb 28, 2026 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+12.0%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters1.6× → 1.5×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$934Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value$148MGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$152M$94M of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

Not how much it owes, but when it falls due, and against what. The ladder the company files, beside cash on hand and a year's owner earnings.

'26$149M
'27$100K
'28$500K
'29$500K
'30$500K
later$700K

Bars scaled to the largest single year; “later” is everything due after 2030, shown apart since it dwarfs the years.

Due in the next 12 months$149Mthe first rung: what must be repaid or rolled over within the year
Within two years$149Mthe near wall, the part most exposed to today’s credit conditions
Biggest single year$149Min 2026the lumpiest maturity, where a refinancing, if needed, is largest
Total scheduled principal$152Mevery year plus what lies beyond, as the footnote totals it

Against what the business has and earns

Cash & short-term investments, Feb 28, 2026$90M
One year of owner earnings (FY2025)$100M
Together, against $149M due next year1.3×

Cash on hand as of Feb 28, 2026 plus a year’s owner earnings comes to $190M against the $149M due in the twelve months after the May 31, 2025 schedule: 1.3 times it.

Maturity schedule extracted from the company’s May 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled to the total the table states.

How the cash was used, 2022–2025

Over the record, the business generated $784M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$316M · 40%
  • Dividends$40M · 5%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$429M · 55%
  • Returned to owners$40M

    8% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $40M as dividends and $0 as buybacks.

  • Net change in share count2.8%

    The diluted count rose from 49M to 51M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record$0.63/sh

    Paid in 2 of the years on record. It was never cut over the span.

  • Return on what it retained7%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($493M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $32M, so each retained $1 added about 0.07 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 4-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles$148M8% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity7%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiring$398Mover 4 years buying other businesses, against $316M of capital spent building

None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 4-year record, from the company's own filings.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.

  • Insider ownership2.6%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2025 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • CEO pay ratio62:1

    What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2025 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Worthington Steel Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2022–2025.

2 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.

  • Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?3.0% vs 3.8%

    The owner-earnings margin averaged 3.8% early in the record and 3.0% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.

  • Look hereAre "one-time" charges a yearly habit?4 of 4 years

    Management took an impairment or write-down in 4 of the last 4 years, $14M in all. A charge taken almost every year is not one-time; it is the business — past deals coming due, and an admission the assets were worth less than what was paid. Munger's rule: when the "one-time" keeps happening, it is the business. Read it beside the goodwill the company still carries.

And these came back clean
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did reported profit become cash?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?
    ≈$1.1B · 33% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
    “During fiscal 2025, our top three customers represented approximately 33.0% of total net sales.”verify →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Pension & retirement, Income taxes, Acquisitions as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Steel

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
ATIATI Inc$4.6B15%6.5%8%-0%
KALUKaiser Aluminum Corporation$3.4B16%6.3%8%5%
WSWorthington Steel Inc.$3.1B11%5.2%12%3%
CRSCarpenter Technology$2.9B17%6.0%5%5%
SXCSunCoke Energy Inc.$1.8B7.8%8%6%
TWITitan International Inc. (DE)$1.8B13%1.5%2%0%
WORWorthington$1.2B17%2.4%4%8%
ROCKGibraltar Industries Inc.$1.1B25%9.6%12%11%
Group median16%6.1%8%5%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Worthington Steel Inc. has delivered.

$

Through the cycle, Worthington Steel Inc. earns about $93M on its 3.0% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 3.2% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’22→’25−10%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $81M on 51M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-06; net debt $161M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Worthington Steel Inc. (WS), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/WS, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← WRLD its page in the Manual WSBC →

Industry order: ← TX the Steel chapter X →