Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← WXM Manual XCH → ← VITL Food Products

WYHG, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited

Food Products consumer brand

Revenue is led by Revenue from sales of cured pork sausages (40%) and Revenue from sales of snack products (35%), with 4 more lines behind.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F · 1 ADS = 1 ordinary share
WYHG · Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$135M
−6.5% YoY · 1% 3-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 4-yr average
Revenue $135M 4-yr avg $136M
Gross margin 29% 4-yr avg 32%
Operating margin 7.5% 4-yr avg 10.3%
ROIC 8% 4-yr avg 13%
Owner-earnings margin −13% 4-yr avg −1%
Free cash flow margin −13% 4-yr avg −1%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
A consumer-brand business, where the durable asset is the brand and the pricing power it commands.
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 31% and operating margin about 9.1% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 12%). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

Revenue spreads across 6 lines, the largest Revenue from sales of cured pork sausages at 40%.

Revenue by product line, FY2025
  • Revenue from sales of cured pork sausages40%$54M
  • Revenue from sales of snack products35%$47M
  • Revenue from sales of cured pork meat11%$15M
  • Revenue from sales of other cured meat products9%$12M
  • Revenue from sales of frozen meat products6%$8M
  • Revenue from sales of products through online platforms2%$2M

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2022–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
$131M$134M$145M$135M$135MRevenueRevenue
34%35%31%29%29%Gross marginGross mgn
$15M$17M$13M$10M$10MOperating incomeOp. inc.
11.5%13.0%9.1%7.5%7.5%Operating marginOp. mgn
$11M$14M$11M$8M$8MNet incomeNet inc.
25%15%7%13%13%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$9M$18M$12M($13M)($13M)Operating cash flowOp. cash
$1M$3M$4M$6M$6MDepreciationDeprec.
($4M)$625K($3M)($27M)($27M)Working capital & otherWC & other
$18M$217K$10M$5M$5MCapexCapex
13.8%0.2%7.0%3.4%3.4%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
($9M)$17M$2M($18M)($18M)Owner earningsOwner earn.
−7.0%13.0%1.6%−13.1%−13.1%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
($9M)$17M$2M($18M)($18M)Free cash flowFCF
−7.0%13.0%1.6%−13.1%−13.1%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
8%21%15%8%8%ROICROIC
8%10%7%5%5%Return on equityROE
8%10%7%5%5%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$91M$88M$85M$85MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$7M$8M$7M$7MReceivablesReceiv.
$7M$8M$10M$10MInventoryInvent.
$8M$8M$10M$10MAccounts payablePayables
$6M$8M$7M$7MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$109M$113M$132M$132MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$19M$32M$28M$28MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
5.6×3.6×4.8×4.8×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$181M$193M$215M$215MTotal assetsAssets
$18M$15M$18M$18MTotal debtDebt
($73M)($73M)($67M)($67M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
180.7×17.6×12.4×9.5×9.5×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$133M$143M$156M$172M$172MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
48.0M50.0M50.3M50.3MShares out (diluted)Shares
$2.79$2.89$2.69$2.69Revenue / shareRev/sh
$0.29$0.22$0.16$0.16EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.36$0.05$-0.35$-0.35Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$0.36$0.05$-0.35$-0.35Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.00$0.20$0.09$0.09Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$2.98$3.11$3.41$3.41Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
3-yr5-yr
Revenue / share−2.0%/yr (2-yr)−2.0%/yr (2-yr)
EPS−26.6%/yr (2-yr)−26.6%/yr (2-yr)
Capital spending / share+346.5%/yr (2-yr)+346.5%/yr (2-yr)
Book value / share+7.0%/yr (2-yr)+7.0%/yr (2-yr)

The record, charted

FY2022–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
50Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
8%low FY2025
Gross margin
29%low FY2025

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

($18M)owner earningsvs.$8Mnet incomelow FY2025

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2022FY2024

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business reported $8M of profit but ($18M) of owner earnings: $26M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Reported net income$8M$11M$14M$11M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$6M+$4M+$3M+$1M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−$27M−$3M+$625K−$4M
Cash from operations($13M)$12M$18M$9M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$5M−$10M−$217K−$18M
Owner earnings($18M)$2M$17M($9M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue-13%2%13%-7%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $10M ÷ interest expense $1M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • Net cash
    Cash $85M − debt $18M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $67M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Tight
    DSO 18 + DIO 38 − DPO 38 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Solid through the cycle
    4-yr median, range 8%–21%; 8% latest = NOPAT $9M ÷ invested capital $104M
    Industry peers: median 8%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 4 years (it ran 8% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Consumes cash through the cycle
    4-yr median margin, range -13%–13%; latest ($18M) = operating cash ($13M) − maintenance capex $5M
    Industry peers: median 3%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -13% of revenue this year, a -7% median across 4 years.

  • Thinly cash-backed
    Cash from ops ($13M) ÷ net income $8M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.79×
    Harvesting
    Capex $5M ÷ depreciation $6M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 3 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $135M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 4.77×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $18M vs $104M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.22/share (latest year $0.16), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $3.41/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2022–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 4 of 4
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 1 of 3 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 12% → 8% (2-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 12% early to 8% lately, median 9% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Worst year 2025 · 7.5% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count +1.6%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$132M
  • Cash & short-term investments$85M
  • Receivables$7M
  • Inventory$10M
  • Other current assets$30M
Current liabilities$28M
  • Debt due within a year$4M
  • Accounts payable$10M
  • Other current liabilities$14M
Current ratio4.77×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio4.42×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio3.08×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$104Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$4M due · $85M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Dec 31, 2025 balance sheet
Cash runway4.8 yrsthe business is consuming cash; this is how long the cash on hand lasts at that rate
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$172Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value$89MGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$18M$10K of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$32Kcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2022–2025

Over the record, the business generated $26M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.

  • Reinvested$33M · 127%
  • Source of funding−$7M

    Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $7M beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.

  • Net change in share count4.9%

    The diluted count rose from 48M to 50M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record

    No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.

  • Return on what it retained−6%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($44M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) fell $3M, so each retained $1 gave back about 0.06 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2022–2025.

All 3 tests turned up something to look into. A record that trips every wire is one to understand slowly.

  • Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?−5.7% vs 3.0%

    The owner-earnings margin averaged 3.0% early in the record and −5.7% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?4.9%

    Diluted shares grew 4.9% over 2022–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

  • Look hereDid reported profit become cash?0.58×

    Across the record the business reported $44M of net income but generated $26M of operating cash, a 0.58-to-one conversion. Profit that does not turn into cash over many years is the classic mark of earnings that are softer than they look. Ask where the gap sits, receivables, inventory, or costs being capitalized rather than expensed.

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Food Products

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
TRTootsie Roll Industries$733M36%13.6%9%14%
COCOThe Vita Coco Company Inc.$610M34%11.4%47%8%
BRCCBRC Inc.$398M38%-5.0%-40%-3%
BYNDBeyond Meat Inc.$275M13%-47.8%-30%-48%
LWAYLifeway Foods Inc.$212M27%4.0%6%3%
MAMAMama's Creations Inc.$172M29%4.1%27%5%
WYHGWing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited$135M32%10.3%12%-3%
BRLSBorealis Foods Inc. Class A$31M12%-63.6%-26%
Group median31%4.1%9%0%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American depositary shares, each representing one ordinary”; Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited reports in USD, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited has delivered.

Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, below the record’s own through-cycle owner earnings. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.

$
Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth, delivered
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings ($18M) on 50M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $67M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits off the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited (WYHG), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/WYHG, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← WXM its page in the Manual XCH →

Industry order: ← VITL the Food Products chapter