Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← AFYA Manual AGCC → ← AEM Gold & Precious Metals AGI →

AG, FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.

Gold & Precious Metals capital-intensive

Revenue is led by Los Gatos (39%) and Santa Elena (28%), with 3 more segments behind.

Latest annual: FY2025 40-F · US listing is the ordinary share
AG · FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$1.3B
+124.3% YoY · 28% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $1.3B 5-yr avg $720M
Gross margin 57% 5-yr avg 37%
Operating margin 31.6% 5-yr avg 0.4%
ROIC 9% 5-yr avg −0%
Owner-earnings margin 37% 5-yr avg 12%
Free cash flow margin 37% 5-yr avg 12%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
A metals and mining business, a price-taker on a global commodity.
What moves the needle
Operating margin has reached 32% at its best but run negative through the cycle (median −6.3%) on a 37% gross margin — so the question is which reading is truer: whether the median was pulled below zero by one-off charges, by the cycle, or by spending it is still growing into, and whether it settles back at a profit. The cash cycle has run negative through the cycle (a median of −36 days): the operation is paid before it pays, so working capital releases cash as the business grows rather than tying it up. Read this kind of business on the commodity price and the cost position. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on supplier & input dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −1%, above 15% in 0 of 10 years). By owner earnings: roughly 15% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings, and customers and suppliers fund the business through negative working capital. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

Revenue spreads across 7 segments, the largest Los Gatos at 39%.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
  • Los Gatos39%$490M
  • Santa Elena28%$346M
  • San Dimas24%$302M
  • La Encantada8%$101M
  • United States - First Mint4%$49M
  • United States Jerritt Canyon0%$1M
  • Other-3%($32M)

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
$278M$252M$301M$364M$364M$584M$624M$574M$561M$1.3B$1.3BRevenueRevenue
46%37%27%36%47%37%24%29%39%57%57%Gross marginGross mgn
$28M($71M)($249M)($32M)$40M$49M($39M)($179M)($4M)$397M$397MOperating incomeOp. inc.
10.2%−28.1%−82.8%−8.8%11.1%8.4%−6.3%−31.2%−0.7%31.6%31.6%Operating marginOp. mgn
$9M($53M)($204M)($40M)$23M($5M)($114M)($135M)($102M)$165M$165MNet incomeNet inc.
22%53%53%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$100M$70M$33M$140M$80M$69M$19M$56M$152M$526M$526MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$80M$77M$94M$66M$54M$117M$136M$125M$124M$263M$263MDepreciationDeprec.
$12M$47M$144M$115M$2M($43M)($3M)$66M$130M$98M$98MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$19M$21M$35M$42M$43M$57M$60M$32M$20M$62M$62MCapexCapex
6.7%8.3%11.6%11.4%11.9%9.7%9.6%5.6%3.6%4.9%4.9%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$81M$50M($2M)$98M$36M$12M($41M)$24M$132M$464M$464MOwner earningsOwner earn.
29.2%19.6%−0.6%27.0%10.0%2.1%−6.5%4.1%23.5%36.9%36.9%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$81M$50M($2M)$98M$36M$12M($41M)$24M$132M$464M$464MFree cash flowFCF
29.2%19.6%−0.6%27.0%10.0%2.1%−6.5%4.1%23.5%36.9%36.9%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$0$4M$7M$6M$5M$10M$10MDividends paidDiv. paid
3%-11%-29%-4%4%2%-2%-10%-0%9%9%ROICROIC
1%-9%-34%-6%3%-0%-8%-10%-8%6%6%Return on equityROE
3%−1%−9%−10%−8%6%6%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$143M$129M$65M$176M$275M$264M$186M$188M$252M$974M$974MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$16M$5M$6M$4M$4M$8M$9M$10M$12M$86M$86MReceivablesReceiv.
$20M$19M$32M$31M$33M$61M$65M$64M$63M$85M$85MInventoryInvent.
$28M$36M$50M$59M$76M$121M$115M$94M$104M$208M$208MAccounts payablePayables
$9M($11M)($12M)($24M)($39M)($52M)($42M)($21M)($29M)($37M)($37M)Operating working capitalOper. WC
$180M$171M$166M$243M$356M$397M$370M$309M$369M$1.2B$1.2BCurrent assetsCur. assets
$50M$54M$58M$72M$102M$173M$167M$120M$144M$459M$459MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
3.6×3.1×2.9×3.4×3.5×2.3×2.2×2.6×2.6×2.6×2.6×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0GoodwillGoodwill
$857M$781M$926M$1.0B$1.2B$2.1B$2.1B$2.0B$2.0B$4.7B$4.7BTotal assetsAssets
$44M$32M$150M$156M$153M$181M$210M$220M$209M$292M$292MTotal debtDebt
($99M)($98M)$84M($21M)($122M)($83M)$24M$32M($42M)($682M)($682M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
3.5×-16.6×-19.1×-2.1×2.7×2.3×-1.9×-6.8×-0.1×15.1×15.1×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$622M$582M$595M$662M$850M$1.4B$1.4B$1.4B$1.4B$2.8B$2.8BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
161M165M184M202M214M245M263M282M296M480M480MShares out (diluted)Shares
$1.73$1.53$1.64$1.81$1.70$2.39$2.37$2.03$1.90$2.62$2.62Revenue / shareRev/sh
$0.05$-0.32$-1.11$-0.20$0.11$-0.02$-0.43$-0.48$-0.34$0.34$0.34EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.51$0.30$-0.01$0.49$0.17$0.05$-0.15$0.08$0.45$0.97$0.97Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$0.51$0.30$-0.01$0.49$0.17$0.05$-0.15$0.08$0.45$0.97$0.97Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.00$0.02$0.03$0.02$0.02$0.02$0.02Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$0.12$0.13$0.19$0.21$0.20$0.23$0.23$0.11$0.07$0.13$0.13Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$3.86$3.52$3.24$3.29$3.98$5.76$5.36$4.81$4.57$5.76$5.76Book value / shareBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×1.62 into 2025 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+4.7%/yr+9.0%/yr
Owner earnings / share+7.5%/yr+41.6%/yr
EPS+23.0%/yr+26.1%/yr
Capital spending / share+1.2%/yr−8.6%/yr
Book value / share+4.5%/yr+7.7%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
480Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
9%low FY2018
Gross margin
57%low FY2022

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$464Mowner earningsvs.$165Mnet incomelow FY2022

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned $165M of profit into $464M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

Reported net income$165M
Owner earnings$464M · 37% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$165M($102M)($135M)($114M)($5M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$263M+$124M+$125M+$136M+$117M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$98M+$130M+$66M−$3M−$43M
Cash from operations$526M$152M$56M$19M$69M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$62M−$20M−$32M−$60M−$57M
Owner earnings$464M$132M$24M($41M)$12M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue37%24%4%-7%2%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 40-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $397M ÷ interest expense $26M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • Net cash
    Cash $793M + ST investments $180M − debt $292M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $682M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Negative, funded by others
    DSO 25 + DIO 57 − DPO 140 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    10-yr median, range -29%–9%; 9% latest = NOPAT $199M ÷ invested capital $2.3B
    Industry peers: median 2%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 9% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range -7%–37%; latest $464M = operating cash $526M − maintenance capex $62M
    Industry peers: median 2%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 37% of revenue this year, a 10% median across 10 years.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $526M ÷ net income $165M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $10M ÷ Owner Earnings $464M
    What this means

    Of $464M Owner Earnings, $10M (2%) went back to shareholders, $10M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.24×
    Harvesting
    Capex $62M ÷ depreciation $263M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 5 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Near
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $1.3B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 2.60×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $292M vs $734M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 7 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 5 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth
    Earnings +33% over the record ·
    What this means

    Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.05/share (latest year $0.34), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $5.62/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 3 of 10
    What this means

    Lost money in 7 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin −34% → −0% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The margin widened even though the filing names price competition — the gain came from volume or cost, not pricing power. Read where.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −34% early to −0% lately, median −6% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 9%
    What this means

    Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.

  • Owner earnings growth +18%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 18% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2018 · −82.8% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2018, understand why before trusting the good years.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$1.2B
  • Cash & short-term investments$974M
  • Receivables$86M
  • Inventory$85M
  • Other current assets$48M
Current liabilities$459M
  • Debt due within a year$487K
  • Accounts payable$208M
  • Other current liabilities$251M
Current ratio2.60×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio2.41×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio2.12×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$734Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$487K due · $974M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Dec 31, 2025 balance sheet
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$2.8Bequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value($329M)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$309M$17M of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $1.2B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash builder, a large share of cash simply built up on the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$390M · 31%
  • Dividends$32M · 3%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$823M · 66%
  • Returned to owners$32M

    4% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $32M as dividends and $0 as buybacks.

  • Source of fundingOperating cash

    Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose $248M and cash and short-term investments rose $831M.

  • Net change in share count198.1%

    The diluted count rose from 161M to 480M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record$0.02/sh

    Paid in 5 of the years on record. It was cut at least once along the way.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

2 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?198.1%

    Diluted shares grew 198.1% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

  • Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$44M → $292M

    Debt rose from $44M to $292M while owner earnings went from about $43M to $206M — about 1.0 year of owner earnings in debt then, about 1.4 now: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Gold & Precious Metals

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
NEMNewmont Corporation$22.7B12.0%4%19%
CLFCleveland-Cliffs$18.6B14%8.4%16%9%
SCCOSouthern Copper Corporation$13.4B52%41.5%18%24%
CDECoeur Mining Inc.$2.1B79%4.3%2%2%
AGFIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.$1.3B37%-3.5%-1%15%
MUXMcEwen Inc.$198M77%-43.0%-9%-7%
IAUXi-80 Gold Corp.$95M-177.0%-15%-157%
IDRIdaho Strategic Resources Inc.$42M6%-2.6%-9%-8%
Group median45%0.9%0%5%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. has delivered.

FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.

$

Through the cycle, FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. earns about $186M on its 14.8% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 36.9% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25+18%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $464M on 491M shares outstanding, per the 40-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $682M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. (AG), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/AG, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← AFYA its page in the Manual AGCC →

Industry order: ← AEM the Gold & Precious Metals chapter AGI →