Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← AKAM Manual AKR → ← AGIO Pharmaceuticals ALKS →

AKBA, Akebia Therapeutics Inc.

Pharmaceuticals consumer brand Unprofitable

A pharmaceutical business, where patents grant a temporary monopoly the pipeline must keep refilling.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
AKBA · Akebia Therapeutics Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$236M
+47.5% YoY · −4% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $232M 5-yr avg $219M
Gross margin 81% 5-yr avg 61%
Operating margin 2.3% 5-yr avg −39.6%
Owner-earnings margin 26% 5-yr avg −31%
Free cash flow margin 26% 5-yr avg −31%

The business in brief

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

Situation
Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand.
What moves the needle
Operating margin has run around −85% through the cycle on a 62% gross margin, the operating line in the red even at its best — so the lever is whether the spending below the gross line can come down enough to clear a profit: revenue growth against the cost curve, and the cash runway until it does. Read this kind of business on the pipeline against the patent cliff, and pricing.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −116%, above 15% in 0 of 5 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$2M$181M$208M$335M$295M$212M$292M$195M$160M$236M$232MRevenueRevenue
67%−1%29%71%62%61%83%81%Gross marginGross mgn
n/m15%42%45%52%82%47%52%67%46%48%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
n/m127%140%96%74%70%44%32%24%26%29%R&D / revenueR&D/rev
($136M)($77M)($178M)($286M)($378M)($265M)($81M)($46M)($50M)$23M$5MOperating incomeOp. inc.
n/m−42.3%−85.8%−85.5%−128.2%−125.0%−27.6%−23.8%−31.5%9.9%2.3%Operating marginOp. mgn
($136M)($74M)($144M)($280M)($385M)($282M)($94M)($52M)($69M)($5M)($21M)Net incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
$58M($56M)($97M)($257M)($110M)($253M)($73M)($23M)($41M)$68M$60MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$296K$617K$899K$2M$2M$2M$2M$2M$1M$1M$1MDepreciationDeprec.
$188M$8M$26M$8M$248M$4M$2M$18M$20M$61M$67MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$3M$2M$2M$7M$317K$59K$114K$0$33K$291K$335KCapexCapex
173.4%0.9%0.8%2.0%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.1%0.1%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$58M($57M)($98M)($260M)($111M)($253M)($73M)($23M)($41M)$68M$60MOwner earningsOwner earn.
n/m−31.3%−47.4%−77.5%−37.6%−119.5%−25.1%−12.0%−25.4%28.7%25.8%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$55M($58M)($99M)($264M)($111M)($253M)($73M)($23M)($41M)$68M$60MFree cash flowFCF
n/m−31.9%−47.7%−78.8%−37.6%−119.5%−25.1%−12.0%−25.4%28.7%25.8%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
-116%-26%-70%-266%-961%ROICROIC
-199%-60%-23%-71%-157%-381%-1802%-16%-75%Return on equityROE
−199%−60%−23%−71%−157%−381%n/m−16%−75%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$260M$318M$105M$147M$229M$150M$90M$43M$52M$185M$390MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$34M$34M$17M$39M$27M$52M$40M$39M$34M$47M$63MReceivablesReceiv.
$114M$116M$61M$37M$22M$16M$16M$16M$13MInventoryInvent.
$2M$7M$43M$39M$41M$34M$18M$15M$15M$21M$8MAccounts payablePayables
$32M$27M$88M$116M$47M$55M$44M$40M$35M$41M$67MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$296M$358M$468M$310M$371M$271M$185M$118M$114M$253M$243MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$114M$141M$266M$208M$187M$261M$130M$100M$81M$163M$174MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
2.6×2.5×1.8×1.5×2.0×1.0×1.4×1.2×1.4×1.6×1.4×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$55M$55M$55M$59M$59M$59M$59M$59M$59MGoodwillGoodwill
$300M$364M$997M$771M$644M$529M$356M$242M$221M$377M$363MTotal assetsAssets
$15M$76M$96M$98M$66M$35M$39M$48M$49MTotal debtDebt
($90M)($72M)($132M)($52M)($24M)($8M)($13M)($137M)($341M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
$68M$123M$636M$393M$244M$74M$5M($31M)($49M)$33M$27MShareholders’ equityEquity
379.5%4.9%9.2%3.6%8.3%10.7%6.1%4.8%4.9%4.8%5.5%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
75.4M87.0M116M118M138M166M183M187M211M257M267MShares out (diluted)Shares
$0.02$2.08$1.79$2.83$2.13$1.28$1.60$1.04$0.76$0.92$0.87Revenue / shareRev/sh
$-1.80$-0.85$-1.24$-2.36$-2.78$-1.70$-0.52$-0.28$-0.33$-0.02$-0.08EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.76$-0.65$-0.85$-2.19$-0.80$-1.52$-0.40$-0.12$-0.19$0.26$0.22Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$0.73$-0.66$-0.85$-2.23$-0.80$-1.52$-0.40$-0.12$-0.19$0.26$0.22Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.04$0.02$0.01$0.06$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$0.90$1.41$5.48$3.32$1.76$0.45$0.03$-0.16$-0.23$0.13$0.10Book value / shareBVPS

Share counts before 2019 are restated ×2 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+52.7%/yr−15.5%/yr
Owner earnings / share−11.2%/yr
Capital spending / share−31.8%/yr−13.1%/yr
Book value / share−19.6%/yr−40.9%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.

Share count
257Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
−961%low FY2021
Gross margin
83%low FY2020

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$68Mowner earningsvs.($5M)net incomelow FY2019

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $5M loss into $68M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income($5M)($69M)($52M)($94M)($282M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$1M+$1M+$2M+$2M+$2M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$11M+$8M+$9M+$18M+$23M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$61M+$20M+$18M+$2M+$4M
Cash from operations$68M($41M)($23M)($73M)($253M)
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$291K−$33K−$114K−$59K
Owner earnings$68M($41M)($23M)($73M)($253M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue29%-25%-12%-25%-120%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $11M), owner earnings is nearer $56M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • No meaningful interest burden
    Little or no interest expense reported
    What this means

    Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.

  • Net cash
    Cash $185M + ST investments $248M − debt $48M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $384M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Tight
    DSO 73 + DIO 144 − DPO 196 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Not meaningful here
    Invested capital ($104M) = debt $48M + equity $33M − cash
    Industry peers: median -25%
    What this means

    Invested capital is near zero or negative, usually years of buybacks pulling equity down. ROIC explodes or flips sign and stops meaning anything. Judge this one on Owner Earnings instead.

  • Positive this year, negative across the cycle
    latest $68M = operating cash $68M − maintenance capex $291K (positive this year), after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median -31%)
    Industry peers: median -53%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 29% of revenue this year, a -31% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $11M of SBC) leaves $56M.

  • Loss, but cash-generative
    Net income ($5M) · cash from operations $68M
    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $162K ÷ Owner Earnings $68M
    What this means

    Of $68M Owner Earnings, $162K (0%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $162K buybacks. But the buybacks barely exceed stock issued to employees ($11M SBC), net of dilution, little was truly returned. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.23×
    Harvesting
    Capex $291K ÷ depreciation $1M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 5 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $236M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Near
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.55×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $48M vs $90M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 10 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · none paid
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth
    Earnings +33% over the record ·
    What this means

    Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.16/share (latest year $-0.02), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $0.12/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 0 of 10
    What this means

    Lost money in 10 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 4 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin −3006% → −15% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −3006% early to −15% lately, median −85% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Owner earnings growth +47%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 47% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2016 · −8889.9% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2016, understand why before trusting the good years.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$243M
  • Cash & short-term investments$390M
  • Receivables$63M
  • Inventory$13M
Current liabilities$174M
  • Debt due within a year$12M
  • Accounts payable$8M
  • Other current liabilities$153M
Current ratio1.40×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.33×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio2.24×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$70Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$12M due · $390M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Mar 31, 2026 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago−6.6%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters1.0× → 1.4×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value($32M)equity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value($92M)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$51M$2M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$4Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021John P. Butler$3.1M$2.4M($253M)
2022John P. Butler$3.1M$708k($73M)
2023John P. Butler$2.8M$4.5M($23M)
2024John P. Butler$4.3M$5.6M($41M)
2025John P. Butler$5.7M$4.2M$68M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Stock-based compensation$11M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 5% of revenue, equal to 48% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Akebia Therapeutics Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

None of the 3 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.

Each test came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
  • Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Pharmaceuticals

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
ARVNArvinas Inc.$263M-306.3%-37%-118%
SDGRSchrodinger Inc.$256M57%-80.8%-38%-53%
AKBAAkebia Therapeutics Inc.$236M62%-63.9%-116%-28%
ANABAnaptysBio Inc.$235M-206.9%-25%-172%
PBYIPuma Biotechnology Inc$228M76%0.5%-59%8%
IDYAIDEAYA Biosciences Inc.$219M-180.4%-22%-191%
VNDAVanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.$216M89%-2.4%-0%9%
AMRNAmarin Corporation plc$214M77%-24.3%-15%-18%
Group median76%-72.3%-31%-41%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Akebia Therapeutics Inc. has delivered.

$
Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth, delivered
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $60M on 268M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-04; net cash $341M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($335K) runs well above depreciation ($1M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $60M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Akebia Therapeutics Inc. (AKBA), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/AKBA, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← AKAM its page in the Manual AKR →

Industry order: ← AGIO the Pharmaceuticals chapter ALKS →