← All companies ← ATHM Manual AU → ← ALH Industrial Machinery AZ →
ATS, ATS Corporation
A capital-goods maker, whose demand swings with its customers' own spending.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 28% and operating margin about 8.6% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The operating margin has swung widely — from 0.4% to 10% — on a steadier 28% gross margin, so what moves it sits below the gross line, in operating spend and one-off charges more than in the cost of the product itself. Read this kind of business on the capital-goods cycle and the aftermarket. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Revenue spreads across 6 regions, the largest United States at 41%.
- United States41%C$1.0B
- Other Europe24%C$599M
- Other17%C$427M
- Germany10%C$251M
- Canada5%C$131M
- Italy3%C$88M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2023–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||
| C$2.6B | C$3.0B | C$2.5B | C$2.5B | RevenueRevenue |
| 28% | 28% | 26% | 26% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| C$222M | C$315M | C$9M | C$9M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 8.6% | 10.4% | 0.4% | 0.4% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| C$127M | C$194M | (C$28M) | (C$28M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 20% | 21% | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||
| C$128M | C$21M | C$26M | C$26M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| C$26M | C$28M | C$34M | C$34M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| (C$25M) | (C$201M) | C$20M | C$20M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| C$56M | C$59M | C$34M | C$34M | CapexCapex |
| 2.2% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 1.3% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| C$102M | (C$8M) | (C$8M) | (C$8M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 4.0% | −0.3% | −0.3% | −0.3% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| C$72M | (C$38M) | (C$8M) | (C$8M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| 2.8% | −1.3% | −0.3% | −0.3% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| C$21M | C$14K | C$45M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 8% | 9% | — | — | ROICROIC |
| 11% | 12% | -2% | -2% | Return on equityROE |
| 11% | 12% | −2% | −2% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||
| C$160M | C$170M | C$226M | C$226M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| C$400M | C$471M | C$719M | C$719M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| C$257M | C$296M | C$320M | C$320M | InventoryInvent. |
| C$648M | C$604M | C$665M | C$665M | Accounts payablePayables |
| C$9M | C$163M | C$374M | C$374M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| C$1.5B | C$1.8B | C$1.9B | C$1.9B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| C$1.0B | C$1.0B | C$1.1B | C$1.1B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.4× | 1.7× | 1.7× | 1.7× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| C$1.1B | C$1.2B | C$1.4B | C$1.4B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| C$3.5B | C$4.1B | C$4.6B | C$4.6B | Total assetsAssets |
| C$1.2B | C$1.2B | C$1.6B | C$1.6B | Total debtDebt |
| C$1.0B | C$1.0B | C$1.3B | C$1.3B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 3.5× | 4.6× | 0.1× | 0.1× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| C$1.1B | C$1.7B | C$1.7B | C$1.7B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | ||||
| 91.8M | 97.8M | 98.0M | 98.0M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| C$28.07 | C$31.02 | C$25.86 | C$25.86 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| C$1.39 | C$1.98 | C$-0.29 | C$-0.29 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| C$1.11 | C$-0.08 | C$-0.08 | C$-0.08 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| C$0.78 | C$-0.39 | C$-0.08 | C$-0.08 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| C$0.61 | C$0.60 | C$0.35 | C$0.35 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| C$12.27 | C$17.19 | C$17.41 | C$17.41 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The record, charted
FY2023–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a C$28M loss into (C$8M) of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | (C$28M) | C$194M | C$127M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +C$34M | +C$28M | +C$26M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +C$20M | −C$201M | −C$25M |
| Cash from operations | C$26M | C$21M | C$128M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −C$34M | −C$28M | −C$26M |
| Owner earnings | (C$8M) | (C$8M) | C$102M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | −C$30M | −C$31M |
| Free cash flow | (C$8M) | (C$38M) | C$72M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 0% | 0% | 4% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
“Until the remediation steps set forth above are fully designed, implemented, and operate for a sufficient period of time such that they can be concluded to be operating effectively, the material weakness described above will not be considered remediated.”
The figures below are only as sound as the controls that produced them. read the note →
Will it survive?
- Does not cover its interestOperating income C$9M ÷ interest expense C$92M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? C$1.3B · 145.3× operating profitHeavy net debtCash C$226M − debt C$1.6B
What this means
Netting C$226M of cash and short-term investments against C$1.6B of debt leaves C$1.3B owed, about 145.3× a year's operating profit (169.7× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- TightDSO 104 + DIO 62 − DPO 129 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median 12%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Consumes cash through the cycle3-yr median margin, range -0%–4%; latest (C$8M) = operating cash C$26M − maintenance capex C$34MIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -0% of revenue this year, a -0% median across 3 years.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income (C$28M) · cash from operations C$26M
In the filing’s words The filing discloses a material weakness in its financial controls — the reported numbers here, and the record built on them, are only as reliable as the controls that produced them.
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.01×MaintainingCapex C$34M ÷ depreciation C$34M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 2 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · C$2.5B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.69×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · C$1.6B vs C$780M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are C$1.01/share (latest year C$-0.29), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is C$17.61/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
Its FY2026 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat.
“These deficiencies could undermine the decisions, predictions, or analysis AI applications produce, subjecting the Company to competitive harm, legal liability, and brand or reputational harm.”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Mar 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investmentsC$226M
- ReceivablesC$719M
- InventoryC$320M
- Other current assetsC$640M
- Debt due within a yearC$27M
- Accounts payableC$665M
- Other current liabilitiesC$433M
From the company's latest filing.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 3-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 3-year record, from the company's own filings.
What an owner would ask, FY2026
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Pension & retirement, Income taxes, Stock compensation as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Industrial Machinery
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRXRegal Rexnord Corporation | $5.9B | 27% | 9.9% | 7% | 9% |
| IEXIDEX Corp. | $3.5B | 44% | 22.3% | 15% | 18% |
| GTESGates Industrial | $3.4B | 39% | 12.9% | 7% | 9% |
| ESABEsab Corporation | $2.8B | 36% | 13.6% | 10% | 10% |
| NDSNNordson Corporation | $2.8B | 55% | 23.8% | 13% | 19% |
| ATSATS Corporation | C$2.5B | 28% | 8.6% | — | -0% |
| SYMSymbotic Inc. | $2.2B | 15% | -21.3% | — | -4% |
| GGGGraco Inc. | $2.2B | 53% | 26.6% | 32% | 20% |
| Group median | — | 37% | 13.2% | — | 9% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. ATS Corporation's US listing is the ordinary share itself; figures in this tool are translated at CAD 1 = $0.712 (2026-07-17, reference rate); the dollar quote then reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in CAD.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what ATS Corporation has delivered.
ATS Corporation’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, below the record’s own through-cycle owner earnings. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings ($6M) on 97M shares outstanding, per the 40-F cover, as of 2025-03-31; net debt $958M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits off the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← ATHM its page in the Manual AU →
Industry order: ← ALH the Industrial Machinery chapter AZ →