← All companies ← BDX Manual BEAM → ← BDC Electrical Equipment BLDP →
BE, Bloom Energy Corporation
ITEM 1—BUSINESS Overview Description of Bloom Energy Bloom Energy is a global leader in onsite power generation, delivering a foundational platform purpose-built for the digital era and the global energy transition.
We manufacture a versatile fuel cell energy platform, supporting the commercial availability of two main products: the Bloom Energy Server fuel cell system for generating electricity and the Bloom Electrolyzer for producing hydrogen.
Our primary product, the Bloom Energy Server is a proprietary high-temperature solid-oxide fuel cell technology that converts fuels—including natural gas, biogas, and hydrogen—into electricity at high-density without combustion or moving parts, achieving lower emissions and higher efficiency than legacy systems.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is led by Products (77%) and Services (11%), with 2 more lines behind.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run around −23% through the cycle on a 5.1% gross margin, the operating line deeply negative — so the lever is the path to a margin at all: revenue growth against the cost curve and the cash runway, not the level of a margin that isn't there yet. Inventory runs near 24% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −40%, above 15% in 0 of 6 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Products is 77% of revenue, with Services the other meaningful line at 11%.
- Products77%$1.5B
- Services11%$228M
- Installation10%$204M
- Electricity2%$38M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $209M | $366M | $575M | $725M | $731M | $907M | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $2.0B | $2.4B | RevenueRevenue |
| −50% | −4% | 8% | 5% | 14% | — | — | — | — | — | — | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 30% | 15% | 21% | 21% | 15% | 13% | 15% | 13% | 11% | 10% | 9% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 22% | 14% | 15% | 14% | 11% | 11% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 9% | 8% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| ($241M) | ($155M) | ($165M) | ($233M) | ($81M) | ($115M) | ($261M) | ($209M) | $23M | $73M | $164M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −115.6% | −42.4% | −28.7% | −32.1% | −11.0% | −12.6% | −23.0% | −16.5% | 1.6% | 3.6% | 6.8% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($280M) | ($276M) | ($274M) | ($304M) | ($158M) | ($164M) | ($302M) | ($302M) | ($27M) | ($87M) | $7M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| ($283M) | ($92M) | ($92M) | $164M | ($99M) | ($61M) | ($192M) | ($373M) | $92M | $114M | $298M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $43M | $54M | $54M | $79M | $52M | $53M | $62M | $63M | $53M | $51M | $52M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($46M) | $130M | $128M | $390M | $6M | $50M | $48M | ($133M) | $66M | $151M | $239M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $9M | $61M | $45M | $51M | $38M | $50M | $117M | $84M | $59M | $57M | $69M | CapexCapex |
| 4.3% | 16.8% | 7.9% | 7.0% | 5.2% | 5.5% | 10.3% | 6.6% | 4.1% | 2.8% | 2.8% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($292M) | ($153M) | ($137M) | $113M | ($137M) | ($110M) | ($253M) | ($435M) | $33M | $57M | $246M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −139.9% | −42.0% | −23.8% | 15.6% | −18.7% | −12.2% | −22.3% | −34.3% | 2.3% | 2.9% | 10.1% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($292M) | ($153M) | ($137M) | $113M | ($137M) | ($110M) | ($309M) | ($456M) | $33M | $57M | $230M | Free cash flowFCF |
| −139.9% | −42.0% | −23.8% | 15.6% | −18.7% | −12.2% | −27.2% | −36.0% | 2.3% | 2.9% | 9.5% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | $0 | $0 | $1M | $947K | $947K | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | — | — | -105% | -29% | -105% | -51% | -24% | 2% | — | — | ROICROIC |
| — | — | — | — | -200% | — | -89% | -60% | -5% | -11% | 1% | Return on equityROE |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | −89% | −60% | −5% | −11% | 1% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $218M | $131M | $108M | $307M | $247M | $396M | $348M | $665M | $803M | $2.5B | $2.5B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $30M | $62M | $38M | $96M | $88M | $251M | $341M | $336M | $372M | $359M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $90M | $94M | $110M | $142M | $143M | $268M | $503M | $545M | $643M | $733M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | $49M | $48M | $56M | $58M | $73M | $162M | $132M | $93M | $203M | $242M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $72M | $108M | $92M | $180M | $158M | $358M | $711M | $788M | $812M | $850M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $420M | $365M | $473M | $619M | $806M | $1.1B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $3.7B | $4.0B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $271M | $221M | $574M | $436M | $342M | $542M | $470M | $637M | $624M | $787M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.5× | 1.7× | 0.8× | 1.4× | 2.4× | 1.9× | 3.6× | 3.2× | 6.0× | 5.0× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | — | — | — | $0 | $2M | — | — | — | — | $2M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $2.4B | $2.7B | $4.4B | $4.7B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $941M | $741M | $637M | $391M | $527M | $412M | $847M | $1.1B | $2.6B | $2.6B | Total debtDebt |
| — | $811M | $633M | $330M | $144M | $131M | $63M | $182M | $326M | $164M | $111M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -3.0× | -1.2× | -1.6× | -2.5× | -1.0× | -1.7× | -4.9× | -1.9× | 0.4× | 1.4× | 3.4× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| — | ($2.2B) | ($2.2B) | ($260M) | $79M | ($44M) | $341M | $502M | $562M | $769M | $921M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 50.2M | 51.2M | 53.3M | 115M | 139M | 173M | 186M | 213M | 227M | 240M | 320M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $4.15 | $7.14 | $10.80 | $6.30 | $5.27 | $5.23 | $6.11 | $5.97 | $6.34 | $8.33 | $7.60 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-5.57 | $-5.39 | $-5.14 | $-2.64 | $-1.14 | $-0.95 | $-1.62 | $-1.42 | $-0.12 | $-0.36 | $0.02 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-5.81 | $-2.99 | $-2.57 | $0.98 | $-0.99 | $-0.64 | $-1.36 | $-2.05 | $0.15 | $0.24 | $0.77 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-5.81 | $-2.99 | $-2.57 | $0.98 | $-0.99 | $-0.64 | $-1.66 | $-2.15 | $0.15 | $0.24 | $0.72 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.01 | $0.00 | $0.00 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.18 | $1.20 | $0.85 | $0.44 | $0.27 | $0.29 | $0.63 | $0.39 | $0.26 | $0.24 | $0.21 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| — | $-42.54 | $-41.55 | $-2.26 | $0.57 | $-0.26 | $1.83 | $2.36 | $2.47 | $3.20 | $2.88 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2018 are restated ×5 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
The diluted share count moved ×2.16 into 2019 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +8.0%/yr | +9.6%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +3.1%/yr | −2.9%/yr |
| Book value / share | — | +41.3%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Installation+66.8%
“Installation Revenue Installation revenue increased by $81.8 million, or 66.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the prior year period. The increase was primarily driven by the timing of key project milestones particularly to meet our time to power milestones on certain key sites requiring our installation services during the fiscal year 2025.”
✓ figure matches the filed record - Electricity+86.3%
“Electricity revenue increased by $7.5 million, or 14.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the prior year period. The increase was driven by a $307.0 million increase in cost of product revenue, a $76.5 million increase in installation revenue, partially offset by, a $9.6 million decrease in cost of service revenue, and a $6.5 million decrease in cost of electricity revenue.”
✓ direction matches the filed record
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $87M loss into $57M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($87M) | ($27M) | ($302M) | ($302M) | ($164M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$51M | +$53M | +$63M | +$62M | +$53M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$151M | +$66M | −$133M | +$48M | +$50M |
| Cash from operations | $114M | $92M | ($373M) | ($192M) | ($61M) |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$57M | −$59M | −$63M | −$62M | −$50M |
| Owner earnings | $57M | $33M | ($435M) | ($253M) | ($110M) |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | — | −$21M | −$55M | — |
| Free cash flow | $57M | $33M | ($456M) | ($309M) | ($110M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 3% | 2% | -34% | -22% | -12% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $73M ÷ interest expense $54M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $59M · 0.8× operating profitModest net debtCash $2.5B + ST investments $104M − debt $2.6B
What this means
Netting $2.6B of cash and short-term investments against $2.6B of debt leaves $59M owed, about 0.8× a year's operating profit (36.0× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 68 + DIO 13045 − DPO 4119 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle6-yr median, range -105%–2%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profitIndustry peers: median 11%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 6 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Positive this year, negative across the cyclelatest $57M = operating cash $114M − maintenance capex $57M (positive this year), after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median -22%)Industry peers: median 10%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 3% of revenue this year, a -22% median across 10 years.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($87M) · cash from operations $114M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $947K ÷ Owner Earnings $57M
What this means
Of $57M Owner Earnings, $947K (2%) went back to shareholders, $947K dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.12×MaintainingCapex $57M ÷ depreciation $51M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $2.0B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 5.98×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · $2.6B vs $3.1B WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 10 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 2 of 10 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.49/share (latest year $-0.31), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $2.70/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 0 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 10 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 7 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin −62% → −4% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −62% early to −4% lately, median −23% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 18%
What this means
Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.
- Worst year 2016 · −115.6% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2016, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 2 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$2.5B
- Receivables$359M
- Inventory$733M
- Other current assets$371M
- Debt due within a year$4M
- Accounts payable$242M
- Other current liabilities$541M
From the company's latest filing.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | KR Sridhar | $34.2M | $45.0M | ($110M) |
| 2022 | KR Sridhar | $2.6M | −$1.6M | ($253M) |
| 2023 | KR Sridhar | $1.7M | −$2.9M | ($435M) |
| 2024 | KR Sridhar | $45.0M | $40.0M | $33M |
| 2025 | KR Sridhar | $3.5M | $416.3M | $57M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership<1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?≈$1.0B · 43% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
“During the year ended December 31, 2025, revenue from three of these customers and distributors, the first of which is related party, accounted for approximately 43%, 13% and 12% of our total revenue.”verify →
- Does management own its misses?1 plain admission in this year's filing
“In the past, certain sale-and-leaseback transactions failed to achieve all of the criteria for sale accounting and consequently the proceeds from the transaction were recognized as financing obligations within our consolidated balance sheets.”verify →
- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Income taxes as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Electrical Equipment
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNRCGenerac | $4.2B | 36% | 14.5% | 14% | 11% |
| WWDWoodward | $3.6B | 26% | 12.5% | 11% | 10% |
| FLNCFluence Energy Inc. | $2.3B | 4% | -5.0% | -32% | -6% |
| FELEFranklin Electric | $2.1B | 34% | 11.6% | 14% | 9% |
| BEBloom Energy Corporation | $2.0B | 5% | -19.7% | -40% | -21% |
| VISNVistance Networks Inc. | $1.9B | 37% | 0.9% | -0% | 10% |
| HELEHelen of Troy | $1.8B | 43% | 11.8% | 11% | 12% |
| PLUGPlug Power Inc. | $710M | -34% | -92.0% | -50% | -70% |
| Group median | — | 30% | 6.3% | 5% | 9% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Bloom Energy Corporation has delivered.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow $230M on 284M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-24; net debt $111M. The if-converted diluted count is 320M, 12% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($69M) runs well above depreciation ($52M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $241M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← BDX its page in the Manual BEAM →
Industry order: ← BDC the Electrical Equipment chapter BLDP →