Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← BDMD Manual BEP → ← ASPS Real Estate Development & Services BN →

BEKE, KE Holdings Inc

Revenue is led by New home transaction services (32%) and Existing home transaction services (26%), with 3 more segments behind.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F · figures as filed, in CNY · 1 ADS = 3 ordinary shares
BEKE · KE Holdings Inc
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
CN¥94.6B
+1.2% YoY · 6% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue CN¥94.6B 5-yr avg CN¥81.4B
Return on equity 5% 5-yr avg 3%
Return on tangible equity 5% 5-yr avg 3%
Equity / assets 56.9% 5-yr avg 60.0%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
A balance-sheet business, read on book value, net interest margin and credit losses rather than an earnings multiple.
What moves the needle
Net interest margin, loan losses, and book value. A lender is read on the quality of its balance sheet, not an earnings multiple, and the worst year of credit losses matters more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on debt terms & refinancing, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on equity has sat below the cost of equity (median 5%, above 12% in only 1 of 7 years). A mortgage REIT lives on the spread between what its mortgages earn and what its borrowing costs, levered many times over; weigh the worst rate and credit years in the record, not the average, and read the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

Revenue spreads across 5 segments, the largest New home transaction services at 32%.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
  • New home transaction services32%CN¥30.6B
  • Existing home transaction services26%CN¥25.0B
  • Home rental services23%CN¥21.9B
  • Home renovation and furnishing16%CN¥15.4B
  • Emerging and other services2%CN¥1.6B

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2018–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
CN¥28.6BCN¥46.0BCN¥70.5BCN¥80.8BCN¥60.7BCN¥77.8BCN¥93.5BCN¥94.6BCN¥94.6BRevenueRevenue
CN¥121MCN¥230MCN¥164MCN¥355MCN¥743MCN¥1.3BCN¥1.3BNet interest incomeNet int.
(CN¥428M)(CN¥2.2B)CN¥2.8B(CN¥525M)(CN¥1.4B)CN¥5.9BCN¥4.1BCN¥3.0BCN¥3.0BNet incomeNet inc.
37%25%41%36%36%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
-3.2%2.7%-0.5%-1.3%4.9%3.1%2.6%2.6%Return on assetsROA
4%-1%-2%8%6%5%5%Return on equityROE
6%2%0%0%Retained to equityRetained/eq
4%-1%-2%9%6%5%5%Return on tangible equityROTCE
Balance sheet
CN¥67.3BCN¥104.3BCN¥100.3BCN¥109.3BCN¥120.3BCN¥133.1BCN¥116.7BCN¥116.7BTotal assetsAssets
CN¥1.1BCN¥2.5BCN¥2.5BCN¥1.8BCN¥4.9BCN¥4.9BCN¥4.8BCN¥4.7BCN¥4.7BGoodwillGoodwill
(CN¥8.9B)CN¥66.8BCN¥67.0BCN¥68.9BCN¥72.1BCN¥71.3BCN¥66.4BCN¥66.4BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
1.36B1.38B2.27B3.55B3.57B3.61B3.54B3.47B3.47BShares out (diluted)Shares
CN¥-0.31CN¥-1.58CN¥1.23CN¥-0.15CN¥-0.39CN¥1.63CN¥1.15CN¥0.86CN¥0.86EPS (diluted)EPS
CN¥0.39CN¥0.80CN¥0.83CN¥0.83Dividends / shareDiv/sh
CN¥-6.48CN¥29.45CN¥18.87CN¥19.31CN¥19.96CN¥20.16CN¥19.14CN¥19.14Book value / shareBVPS
CN¥-10.13CN¥27.63CN¥18.04CN¥17.45CN¥18.32CN¥18.57CN¥17.59CN¥17.59Tangible book / shareTBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×1.65 into 2020 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×1.57 into 2021 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
7-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+3.8%/yr−2.6%/yr
EPS−6.8%/yr
Dividends / share+45.0%/yr (2-yr)+45.0%/yr (2-yr)
Capital spending / share−11.1%/yr−14.9%/yr
Book value / share−8.3%/yr

The record, charted

FY2018–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
3.5Bpeak FY2023
Revenue
CN¥94.6Blow FY2018
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • Below the cost of equity
    Net income CN¥3.0B ÷ equity CN¥66.4B
    Industry peers: median 10%
    What this means

    The bank's north star, what it earns on shareholders' capital. Cost of equity is roughly 10%, so a return durably above that builds value and below it destroys it. One year is noisy; the durability across a full credit cycle is what counts.

  • Modest
    Net income ÷ (equity − goodwill CN¥4.7B − intangibles CN¥723M)
    Industry peers: median 13%
    What this means

    The cleaner return, stripping out the goodwill paid for past acquisitions. This is the number a buyer of the whole bank actually earns on the hard capital.

  • Not enough data
    Industry peers: median 64%
    What this means

    Noninterest expense or revenue missing.

Is it sound?

  • Capital (equity / assets) 56.9%
    Well capitalized
    Equity CN¥66.4B ÷ assets CN¥116.7B
    What this means

    A plain-English leverage read: how much of the balance sheet is the owners' own money. This is a rough proxy; the regulatory figure is the CET1 ratio, which is risk-weighted and reported in the filing. The point is the same, how much loss the bank can absorb before depositors are at risk.

  • Borrowed against book
    Assets CN¥116.7B ÷ equity CN¥66.4B
    What this means

    A mortgage REIT finances a pool of mortgages with borrowed money — mostly short-term repo, which sits in liabilities rather than as tagged debt — so its true leverage is the whole balance sheet against the owners' equity, not just labeled debt. That leverage magnifies both the spread it earns and the loss when rates or credit move against it; read it beside the book value, the question being whether the spread compensated for the leverage through a cycle.

  • Credit cost
    Not enough data
    What this means

    Provision or net interest income missing.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“Through a human-AI collaboration model, we are driving the evolution of our services toward decision-oriented services, enhancing customer experience, improving service provider capabilities, and increasing platform operating efficiency, thereby strengthening our long-term competitiveness.…”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assetsCN¥68.1B
  • Cash & short-term investmentsCN¥47.4B
  • ReceivablesCN¥3.1B
  • InventoryCN¥2.9B
  • Other current assetsCN¥14.8B
Current liabilitiesCN¥42.4B
  • Accounts payableCN¥6.1B
  • Other current liabilitiesCN¥36.4B
Current ratio1.61×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.54×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio1.12×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capitalCN¥25.7Bthe cushion left after near-term bills
Cash runway48.1 yrsthe business is consuming cash; this is how long the cash on hand lasts at that rate
Deeper floors
Tangible book valueCN¥61.1Bequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset valueCN¥18.0BGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leasesCN¥10.8BCN¥10.7B of it operating leases
Deferred revenueCN¥4.4Bcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

Peers, nearest by economic model

No close industry peers in the catalog yet, so these are the nearest by economic model (reit / real estate), compared on the bank lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueROEROTCEEfficiencyNII / assets
BACBank of America Corp.$113.1B10%13%64%1.8%
BEKEKE Holdings IncCN¥94.6B4%5%0.4%
CCitigroup Inc.$85.2B7%8%62%2.3%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.$83.7B11%13%67%2.5%
GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc. (The)$58.3B10%10%65%0.4%
COFCapital One Financial Corporation$53.4B8%12%54%6.0%
AXPAmerican Express Company$72.2B30%35%73%4.3%
JLLJones Lang LaSalle Incorporated$26.1B11%74%-0.6%
Group median10%12%2.0%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / tangible book

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American depositary shares, each of which represents three Class”; KE Holdings Inc reports in CNY, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at CNY 1 = $0.147 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in CNY.

A mortgage REIT is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what KE Holdings Inc’s record justifies.

$
The assumptions

Tangible book / share, delivered−6%/yr’20→’25

The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). A mortgage REIT earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for a mortgage REIT.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / tangible book
Justified by the return
Normalized return on tangible equity5%
Price / book
Earnings yield
P/E (3-yr avg ’23–’25)
Graham’s price gate

Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.

Tangible book $9.0B on 1157M shares, a 5% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the mortgage REIT keeps earning that return; a rate shock, a spread that compresses or a credit cycle changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "KE Holdings Inc (BEKE), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/BEKE, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← BDMD its page in the Manual BEP →

Industry order: ← ASPS the Real Estate Development & Services chapter BN →