Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← BORR Manual BP → ← AUDC Communications Equipment CIEN →

BOSC, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions

Communications Equipment consumer brand

Solutions Division The Company markets its Supply Chain Solutions directly to customers or through distributors worldwide.

The Company's customers represent a cross-section of industry leaders, from the avionics, defense, retail, manufacturers and government markets.

The Company's Supply Chain Solutions customers include, among others, Vinyas and Sasmos Interconnection Systems Ltd. from the Indian market, and Refael and the Israel Aerospace Industries from the Israeli market.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F
BOSC · B.O.S. Better Online Solutions
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$51M
+26.6% YoY · 9% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $51M 5-yr avg $42M
Gross margin 22% 5-yr avg 22%
Operating margin 5.8% 5-yr avg 4.2%
ROIC 12% 5-yr avg 10%
Owner-earnings margin 9% 5-yr avg 3%
Free cash flow margin 9% 5-yr avg 2%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is Supply Chain Solutions (70%), RFID Division (27%) and Intelligent Robotics (4%).
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 21% and operating margin about 3.6% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. On a spread this thin the operating result swings hard on small moves in cost or volume — it has ranged from −1.9% to 5.8% over the years, so the cost line is where the needle moves. Inventory runs near 14% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 8%). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

Supply Chain Solutions is 70% of revenue, with RFID Division the other meaningful segment at 27%.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
  • Supply Chain Solutions70%$36M
  • RFID Division27%$14M
  • Intelligent Robotics4%$2M
  • Intercompany-1%($410K)
By geographyIsrael91%India3%Europe3%Americas3%East Asia0%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
$27M$29M$33M$34M$34M$34M$42M$44M$40M$51M$51MRevenueRevenue
19%22%21%20%18%20%23%21%25%22%22%Gross marginGross mgn
$706K$1M$1M($631K)($612K)$517K$2M$2M$1M$3M$3MOperating incomeOp. inc.
2.6%3.8%3.7%−1.9%−1.8%1.5%4.6%5.5%3.6%5.8%5.8%Operating marginOp. mgn
$360K$773K$990K($913K)($960K)$451K$1M$2M$2M$4MNet incomeNet inc.
2%2%-4%-9%0%0%-3%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
($360K)$377K$743K($915K)$1M$9K$1M$2M$1M$5M$5MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$248K$245K$289K$971K$310K$258K$361K$510K$560K$481KDepreciationDeprec.
($968K)($641K)($536K)($973K)$2M($700K)($354K)($686K)($2M)$954KWorking capital & otherWC & other
$139K$368K$689K$335K$84K$379K$2M$341K$519K$452K$452KCapexCapex
0.5%1.3%2.1%1.0%0.3%1.1%5.8%0.8%1.3%0.9%0.9%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
($499K)$132K$454K($1M)$974K($249K)$922K$1M$775K$5M$5MOwner earningsOwner earn.
−1.8%0.5%1.4%−3.7%2.9%−0.7%2.2%3.4%1.9%9.1%9.1%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
($499K)$9K$54K($1M)$974K($370K)($1M)$1M$775K$5M$5MFree cash flowFCF
−1.8%0.0%0.2%−3.7%2.9%−1.1%−2.8%3.4%1.9%9.1%9.1%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
6%9%9%-3%-4%4%11%14%7%16%12%ROICROIC
4%8%9%-7%-8%3%8%11%11%13%Return on equityROE
4%8%9%−7%−8%3%8%11%11%13%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$1M$2M$1M$339K$1M$2M$2M$2M$3M$12M$12MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$8M$10M$9M$10M$9M$9M$11M$12M$12M$16M$16MReceivablesReceiv.
$2M$3M$3M$5M$5M$6M$6M$6M$8M$7M$7MInventoryInvent.
$5M$6M$4M$7M$6M$6MAccounts payablePayables
$6M$7M$7M$9M$8M$15M$17M$18M$20M$22M$16MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$13M$16M$14M$17M$17M$18M$21M$22M$24M$36M$36MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$7M$8M$6M$10M$9M$9M$11M$11M$11M$13M$13MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.9×1.9×2.2×1.8×1.9×2.0×1.8×2.0×2.3×2.7×2.7×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$5M$5M$5M$5M$5M$5M$5M$5M$4M$3M$3MGoodwillGoodwill
$18M$21M$20M$25M$23M$25M$31M$32M$34M$45M$45MTotal assetsAssets
$4M$4M$3M$3M$2M$1M$2M$1M$1M$2M$2MTotal debtDebt
$2M$2M$1M$2M$995K($454K)$117K($1M)($2M)($10M)($10M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
2.6×6.3×6.1×7.3×4.3×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$9M$10M$12M$13M$12M$14M$17M$19M$21M$29M$29MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
2.6M3.2M3.5M4.1M4.3M5.4M5.6M5.9M5.9M6.3M7.0MShares out (diluted)Shares
$10.58$9.12$9.33$8.33$7.81$6.20$7.43$7.48$6.79$8.01$7.19Revenue / shareRev/sh
$0.14$0.24$0.28$-0.22$-0.22$0.08$0.23$0.34$0.39$0.57EPS (diluted)EPS
$-0.19$0.04$0.13$-0.31$0.23$-0.05$0.16$0.25$0.13$0.73$0.65Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$-0.19$0.00$0.02$-0.31$0.23$-0.07$-0.20$0.25$0.13$0.73$0.65Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.05$0.12$0.20$0.08$0.02$0.07$0.43$0.06$0.09$0.07$0.06Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$3.31$3.22$3.29$3.09$2.76$2.65$2.98$3.19$3.62$4.55$4.08Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share−3.0%/yr+0.5%/yr
Owner earnings / share+26.3%/yr
EPS+17.0%/yr
Capital spending / share+3.3%/yr+29.7%/yr
Book value / share+3.6%/yr+10.5%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
6Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
16%low FY2020
Gross margin
22%low FY2020

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$5Mowner earningsvs.$4Mnet incomelow FY2019

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2017FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned $4M of profit into $5M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

Reported net income$4M
Owner earnings$5M · 9% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$4M$2M$2M$1M$451K
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$481K+$560K+$510K+$361K+$258K
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$954K−$2M−$686K−$354K−$700K
Cash from operations$5M$1M$2M$1M$9K
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$452K−$519K−$341K−$361K−$258K
Owner earnings$5M$775K$1M$922K($249K)
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$2M−$121K
Free cash flow$5M$775K$1M($1M)($370K)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue9%2%3%2%-1%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • No meaningful interest burden
    Little or no interest expense reported
    What this means

    Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.

  • Net cash
    Cash $12M − debt $2M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $10M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 113 + DIO 61 − DPO 58 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    10-yr median, range -4%–16%; 16% latest = NOPAT $3M ÷ invested capital $19M
    Industry peers: median 4%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 16% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid, recently turned positive
    latest $5M = operating cash $5M − maintenance capex $452K; positive each of the last 3 years, after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median 1%)
    Industry peers: median 10%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 9% of revenue this year, a 1% median across 10 years.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $5M ÷ net income $4M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.94×
    Maintaining
    Capex $452K ÷ depreciation $481K
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $51M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 2.70×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $2M vs $22M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 2 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · none paid
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +273%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.38/share (latest year $0.51), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $4.08/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 8 of 10
    What this means

    Lost money in 2 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 1 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 3% → 5% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The margin has held, but the filing names price competition — the pressure is present even where the margin has absorbed it so far.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 3% early to 5% lately, median 4% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 19%
    What this means

    Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.

  • Worst year 2019 · −1.9% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2019, understand why before trusting the good years.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$36M
  • Cash & short-term investments$12M
  • Receivables$16M
  • Inventory$7M
  • Other current assets$2M
Current liabilities$13M
  • Debt due within a year$775K
  • Accounts payable$6M
  • Other current liabilities$6M
Current ratio2.70×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio2.20×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.90×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$22Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$775K due · $12M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Dec 31, 2025 balance sheet
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$25Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Debt incl. operating leases$2M$251K of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$3Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $10M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.

  • Reinvested$6M · 55%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$5M · 45%
  • Source of fundingOperating cash

    Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt fell $2M and cash and short-term investments rose $11M.

  • Net change in share count171.1%

    The diluted count rose from 3M to 7M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record

    No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.

  • Return on what it retained23%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($10M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $2M, so each retained $1 added about 0.23 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why B.O.S. Better Online Solutions is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

1 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?171.1%

    Diluted shares grew 171.1% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Communications Equipment

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
NTGRNETGEAR Inc.$700M30%3.1%4%3%
DGIIDigi International Inc.$430M53%6.7%5%11%
ATENA10 Networks Inc.$291M78%10.6%38%16%
QMCOQuantum Corporation$280M41%-2.6%-4%
MITKMitek Systems Inc.$180M7.3%4%20%
EVLVEvolv Technologies Holdings Inc.$146M34%-154.2%-81%10%
BOSCB.O.S. Better Online Solutions$51M21%3.6%8%2%
OSSOne Stop Systems Inc.$32M31%-1.6%-5%-2%
Group median34%3.4%4%7%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. B.O.S. Better Online Solutions reports in USD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what B.O.S. Better Online Solutions has delivered.

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.

$

Through the cycle, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions earns about $842K on its 1.7% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 9.1% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+68%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · since FY2023+76%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $5M on 7M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $10M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "B.O.S. Better Online Solutions (BOSC), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/BOSC, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← BORR its page in the Manual BP →

Industry order: ← AUDC the Communications Equipment chapter CIEN →