← All companies ← CXT Manual CYH → ← CUZ REITs — Specialty & Diversified DEA →
CXW, CoreCivic Inc.
We provide to our federal customers continue to be a significant component of our business.
Two agencies of the DOJ, the United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, or BOP, and the United States Marshals Service, or USMS, utilize our services.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run about 10% through the cycle, a thin margin, where volume, cost discipline and the price it gets all bear on the result. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 6%, above 15% in 0 of 10 years). By owner earnings: roughly 10% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $1.9B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $2.0B | $2.2B | $2.3B | RevenueRevenue |
| $220M | $178M | $159M | $189M | $54M | ($52M) | $122M | $68M | $69M | $117M | $129M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $387M | $325M | $316M | $333M | $218M | $44M | $162M | $194M | $194M | $244M | $260M | Funds from operationsFFO |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| 66% | 62% | 65% | 63% | 49% | 6% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | Dividend payout (FFO)Payout |
| $3.3B | $3.4B | $3.7B | $3.6B | $3.6B | $3.4B | $3.3B | $3.3B | $3.3B | $3.4B | $3.4B | Real estate (gross)RE gross |
| $3.3B | $3.3B | $3.7B | $3.8B | $3.7B | $3.5B | $3.2B | $3.1B | $2.9B | $3.3B | $3.4B | Total assetsAssets |
| 44% | 45% | 50% | 52% | 49% | 44% | 39% | 36% | 34% | 38% | 42% | Debt / assetsDebt/assets |
| $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.6B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $997M | $1.2B | $1.4B | Total debtDebt |
| $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $985M | $890M | $1.1B | $1.2B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| — | — | — | 3.3× | 2.0× | 2.2× | 2.0× | 2.3× | 2.7× | 3.5× | 1.7× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.4B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 118M | 118M | 119M | 119M | 121M | 120M | 118M | 114M | 111M | 107M | 98.7M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $3.28 | $2.74 | $2.66 | $2.80 | $1.80 | $0.37 | $1.37 | $1.71 | $1.75 | $2.28 | $2.63 | FFO / shareFFO/sh |
| $2.17 | $1.69 | $1.72 | $1.76 | $0.88 | $0.02 | $0.01 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $12.39 | $12.25 | $11.92 | $11.55 | $11.50 | $11.42 | $12.12 | $12.98 | $13.46 | $13.13 | $14.14 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +3.1%/yr | +5.6%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −14.6%/yr | −21.2%/yr |
| EPS | −5.8%/yr | +19.4%/yr |
| Dividends / share | −61.3%/yr | −78.3%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +1.7%/yr | +0.1%/yr |
| Book value / share | +0.6%/yr | +2.7%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- AdequateOperating income $163M ÷ interest expense $62M
What this means
Comfortable in a normal year, but below the margin of safety Graham looked for. Worth checking how stable the coverage has been across a full cycle.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $1.1B · 7.0× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $98M − debt $1.2B
What this means
Netting $98M of cash and short-term investments against $1.2B of debt leaves $1.1B owed, about 7.0× a year's operating profit (7.6× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle10-yr median, range 4%–10%; 5% latest = NOPAT $121M ÷ invested capital $2.5BIndustry peers: median 4%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 5% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median margin, range 2%–13%; latest $53M = operating cash $195M − maintenance capex $142MIndustry peers: median 35%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 2% of revenue this year, a 10% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $28M of SBC) leaves $25M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $195M ÷ net income $117M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returned more than it generatedDividends + buybacks $229M ÷ Owner Earnings $53M
What this means
The company returned more than it generated: against $53M of Owner Earnings, $229M (434%) went back to shareholders, $45K dividends, $229M buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. Net of $28M stock comp, the real buyback was about $201M. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.10×MaintainingCapex $142M ÷ depreciation $129M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $2.2B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.66×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $1.2B vs $242M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (10-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −55%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.85/share (latest year $1.18), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $14.21/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 9 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 15% → 9% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 15% early to 9% lately, median 10% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Owner earnings growth −7%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings shrank about 7% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · 8.5% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −1.1%/yr
What this means
The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 10 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$210M
- Receivables$480M
- Other current assets$54M
- Debt due within a year$17M
- Accounts payable$288M
From the company's latest filing.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Damon T. Hininger | $5.4M | $7.2M | $182M |
| 2022 | Damon T. Hininger | $5.2M | $5.3M | $70M |
| 2023 | Damon T. Hininger | $5.8M | $7.6M | $164M |
| 2024 | Damon T. Hininger | $7.5M | $13.0M | $199M |
| 2025 | Damon T. Hininger | $7.2M | $6.6M | $53M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership1.8%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$28M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 17% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Peers, REITs — Specialty & Diversified
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAMRLamar Advertising | $2.3B | 67% | 29.2% | 12% | 29% |
| AHRAmerican Healthcare REIT Inc. | $2.3B | 20% | 18.0% | -0% | 12% |
| CXWCoreCivic Inc. | $2.2B | — | 10.0% | 6% | 10% |
| MAAMid-America Apartment Communities Inc. | $2.2B | — | 31.9% | 5% | 35% |
| KIMKimco Realty Corporation (HC) | $2.1B | — | 34.7% | 4% | 36% |
| ESSEssex Property Trust Inc. | $1.9B | — | 35.8% | 3% | 52% |
| AMHAmerican Homes 4 Rent | $1.9B | — | 13.1% | 1% | 38% |
| OUTOUTFRONT Media Inc. | $1.8B | — | 15.3% | 7% | 10% |
| Group median | — | — | 23.6% | 5% | 32% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what CoreCivic Inc. has delivered.
Through the cycle, CoreCivic Inc. earns about $220M on its 9.9% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 2.4% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $26M on 99M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-01; net debt $1.2B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← CXT its page in the Manual CYH →
Industry order: ← CUZ the REITs — Specialty & Diversified chapter DEA →