← All companies ← EDU Manual EGO → ← DOV Industrial Machinery EPAC →
EFXT, Enerflex Ltd
Enerflex s comprehensive portfolio includes compression, processing, cryogenic, power generation, and treated water solutions, spanning all phases of a project s lifecycle, from front-end engineering and design to after-market services.
Enerflex s Business Enerflex deploys and services high-quality and custom-at-scale energy infrastructure solutions.
Enerflex is well-positioned to serve its client partners in core markets, enhancing long-term stakeholder value through sustainable improvements in efficiency, profitability, and cash flow generation.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is ES (57%), EI (24%) and AMS (19%).
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 21% and operating margin about 7.2% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. Read this kind of business on the capital-goods cycle and the aftermarket. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Revenue spreads across 3 lines, the largest ES at 57%.
- ES57%$1.5B
- EI24%$621M
- AMS19%$494M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2023–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||
| $2.3B | $2.4B | $2.6B | $2.6B | RevenueRevenue |
| 20% | 21% | 23% | 23% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| $121M | $173M | $306M | $306M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 5.2% | 7.2% | 11.9% | 11.9% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($83M) | $32M | $64M | $64M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||
| $206M | $324M | $345M | $345M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $198M | $185M | $161M | $161M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $91M | $107M | $120M | $120M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $16M | $16M | $19M | $19M | CapexCapex |
| 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $190M | $308M | $326M | $326M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 8.1% | 12.8% | 12.7% | 12.7% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $190M | $308M | $326M | $326M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 8.1% | 12.8% | 12.7% | 12.7% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $9M | $9M | $17M | $17M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | 5% | 10% | 10% | ROICROIC |
| -7% | 3% | 6% | 6% | Return on equityROE |
| −8% | 2% | 4% | 4% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||
| $106M | $92M | $81M | $92M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $337M | $398M | $345M | $345M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $273M | $258M | $280M | $280M | InventoryInvent. |
| $610M | $656M | $625M | $625M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $1.1B | $1.0B | $992M | $992M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $839M | $911M | $879M | $879M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.3× | 1.1× | 1.1× | 1.1× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $433M | $422M | $430M | $430M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $3.1B | $2.8B | $2.7B | $2.7B | Total assetsAssets |
| $1.0B | $708M | $582M | $582M | Total debtDebt |
| $901M | $616M | $501M | $490M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 1.0× | 1.7× | 2.5× | 2.5× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | ||||
| 124M | 124M | 123M | 123M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $18.92 | $19.46 | $20.93 | $20.93 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.67 | $0.26 | $0.52 | $0.52 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $1.53 | $2.48 | $2.65 | $2.65 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $1.53 | $2.48 | $2.65 | $2.65 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.07 | $0.07 | $0.14 | $0.14 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.13 | $0.13 | $0.15 | $0.15 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $9.21 | $8.46 | $8.90 | $8.90 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The record, charted
FY2023–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $64M of profit into $326M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $64M | $32M | ($83M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$161M | +$185M | +$198M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$120M | +$107M | +$91M |
| Cash from operations | $345M | $324M | $206M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$19M | −$16M | −$16M |
| Owner earnings | $326M | $308M | $190M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 13% | 13% | 8% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- AdequateOperating income $306M ÷ interest expense $124M
What this means
Comfortable in a normal year, but below the margin of safety Graham looked for. Worth checking how stable the coverage has been across a full cycle.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $490M · 1.6× operating profitModest net debtCash $81M + ST investments $11M − debt $582M
What this means
Netting $92M of cash and short-term investments against $582M of debt leaves $490M owed, about 1.6× a year's operating profit (1.9× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- SolidNOPAT $153M ÷ invested capital $1.6B (debt + equity − cash)Industry peers: median 11%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle3-yr median margin, range 8%–13%; latest $326M = operating cash $345M − maintenance capex $19MIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 13% of revenue this year, a 13% median across 3 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $345M ÷ net income $64M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $17M ÷ Owner Earnings $326M
What this means
Of $326M Owner Earnings, $17M (5%) went back to shareholders, $17M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.12×HarvestingCapex $19M ÷ depreciation $161M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 3 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $2.6B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.13×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $582M vs $113M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.04/share (latest year $0.53), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $8.97/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing positions AI as something the company uses, not something it fears.
“Search Engines and Artificial Intelligence Enerflex permits the use of internet search engines and third-party generative artificial intelligence services provided that no Company or third-party proprietary or confidential information, personally identifiable information, or any …”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$92M
- Receivables$345M
- Inventory$280M
- Other current assets$275M
- Other current liabilities$879M
From the company's latest filing.
Peers, Industrial Machinery
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZBRAZebra Technologies | $5.4B | 47% | 13.7% | 13% | 15% |
| GTESGates Industrial | $3.4B | 39% | 12.9% | 7% | 9% |
| ESABEsab Corporation | $2.8B | 36% | 13.6% | 10% | 10% |
| NDSNNordson Corporation | $2.8B | 55% | 23.8% | 13% | 19% |
| EFXTEnerflex Ltd | $2.6B | 21% | 7.2% | 10% | 13% |
| SYMSymbotic Inc. | $2.2B | 15% | -21.3% | — | -4% |
| GGGGraco Inc. | $2.2B | 53% | 26.6% | 32% | 20% |
| ZWSZurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation | $1.7B | 40% | 13.4% | 7% | 10% |
| Group median | — | 39% | 13.5% | 10% | 11% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Enerflex Ltd reports in USD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Enerflex Ltd has delivered.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $326M on 122M shares outstanding, per the 40-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net debt $490M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← EDU its page in the Manual EGO →
Industry order: ← DOV the Industrial Machinery chapter EPAC →