← All companies ← EME Manual EMR → ← ECVT Chemicals ESI →
EMN, Eastman Chemical
Eastman has 36 manufacturing facilities and has equity interests in four manufacturing joint ventures in 12 countries that supply products to customers throughout the world.
With a robust portfolio of specialty businesses, Eastman works with customers to deliver innovative products and solutions with a commitment to safety and sustainability.
Eastman uses an innovation-driven growth model which consists of leveraging world class scalable technology platforms, delivering differentiated application development capabilities, and relentlessly engaging the market.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is led by Advanced Materials (33%) and Additives and Functional Products (33%), with 2 more segments behind.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 24% and operating margin about 10% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. Inventory runs near 16% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the spread and utilization. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 9%). By owner earnings: roughly 9% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Revenue spreads across 5 segments, the largest Advanced Materials at 33%.
- Advanced Materials33%$2.9B
- Additives And Functional Products33%$2.9B
- Chemical Intermediates22%$1.9B
- Fibers12%$1.1B
- Other0%$17M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $9.0B | $9.5B | $10.2B | $9.3B | $8.5B | $10.5B | $10.6B | $9.2B | $9.4B | $8.8B | $8.6B | RevenueRevenue |
| 26% | 25% | 24% | 24% | 23% | 24% | 20% | 22% | 24% | 21% | 20% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 8% | 8% | 7% | 7% | 8% | 8% | 7% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 2% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $899M | $519M | $1.1B | $974M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $567M | $1.5B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 15.4% | 16.0% | 12.9% | 9.7% | 6.1% | 10.2% | 9.2% | 11.8% | 11.5% | 6.5% | 17.7% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $854M | $1.4B | $1.1B | $759M | $478M | $857M | $793M | $894M | $905M | $474M | $399M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 18% | -8% | 17% | 16% | 8% | 20% | 19% | 18% | 16% | 16% | 12% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $975M | $1.4B | $1.3B | $970M | $1.0B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $580M | $587M | $604M | $611M | $574M | $538M | $477M | $498M | $509M | $513M | $518M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($49M) | ($314M) | ($141M) | $134M | $403M | $224M | ($295M) | ($18M) | ($127M) | ($17M) | $83M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $626M | $649M | $528M | $425M | $383M | $555M | $611M | $828M | $599M | $546M | $502M | CapexCapex |
| 6.9% | 6.8% | 5.2% | 4.6% | 4.5% | 5.3% | 5.8% | 9.0% | 6.4% | 6.2% | 5.8% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $759M | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $364M | $546M | $688M | $424M | $498M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 8.4% | 10.6% | 10.0% | 11.6% | 12.7% | 10.2% | 3.4% | 5.9% | 7.3% | 4.8% | 5.8% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $759M | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $364M | $546M | $688M | $424M | $498M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 8.4% | 10.6% | 10.0% | 11.6% | 12.7% | 10.2% | 3.4% | 5.9% | 7.3% | 4.8% | 5.8% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $26M | $4M | $3M | $48M | $1M | $114M | $1M | $77M | $0 | $0 | $0 | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $272M | $296M | $318M | $343M | $358M | $375M | $381M | $376M | $379M | $381M | $381M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| 10% | 13% | 9% | 7% | 4% | 8% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 11% | ROICROIC |
| 19% | 26% | 19% | 13% | 8% | 15% | 15% | 16% | 16% | 8% | 7% | Return on equityROE |
| 13% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 2% | 8% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 2% | 0% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $181M | $191M | $226M | $204M | $564M | $459M | $493M | $548M | $837M | $566M | $665M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $812M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $980M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $957M | $826M | $791M | $737M | $949M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.9B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $2.1B | InventoryInvent. |
| $704M | $842M | $914M | $890M | $799M | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $2.0B | Accounts payablePayables |
| $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.6B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.0B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $2.9B | $3.1B | $3.4B | $3.3B | $3.5B | $4.6B | $3.8B | $3.5B | $4.1B | $3.6B | $4.1B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $1.8B | $2.0B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $3.0B | $3.3B | $2.6B | $2.7B | $2.7B | $2.8B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.6× | 1.6× | 1.8× | 1.9× | 1.7× | 1.6× | 1.2× | 1.4× | 1.5× | 1.4× | 1.5× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $4.5B | $4.5B | $4.5B | $4.4B | $4.5B | $3.6B | $3.7B | $3.6B | $3.6B | $3.7B | $3.7B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $15.5B | $16.0B | $16.0B | $16.0B | $16.1B | $15.5B | $14.7B | $14.6B | $15.2B | $14.9B | $15.2B | Total assetsAssets |
| $6.6B | $6.5B | $6.2B | $5.8B | $5.6B | $5.2B | $5.2B | $4.8B | $5.0B | $4.8B | $7.3B | Total debtDebt |
| $6.4B | $6.3B | $5.9B | $5.6B | $5.1B | $4.7B | $4.7B | $4.3B | $4.2B | $4.2B | $6.6B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $4.5B | $5.4B | $5.8B | $6.0B | $6.0B | $5.7B | $5.2B | $5.5B | $5.8B | $6.0B | $6.0B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| — | — | $38M | $45M | — | — | — | — | — | — | $45M | Goodwill written downGW imp. |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 148M | 146M | 143M | 139M | 137M | 137M | 125M | 119M | 118M | 116M | 115M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $60.70 | $65.36 | $71.04 | $66.95 | $62.07 | $76.41 | $84.71 | $77.14 | $79.58 | $75.71 | $75.12 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $5.75 | $9.47 | $7.56 | $5.48 | $3.50 | $6.25 | $6.35 | $7.49 | $7.68 | $4.10 | $3.47 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $5.11 | $6.90 | $7.10 | $7.79 | $7.85 | $7.76 | $2.91 | $4.57 | $5.84 | $3.67 | $4.33 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $5.11 | $6.90 | $7.10 | $7.79 | $7.85 | $7.76 | $2.91 | $4.57 | $5.84 | $3.67 | $4.33 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $1.83 | $2.03 | $2.23 | $2.48 | $2.62 | $2.74 | $3.05 | $3.15 | $3.21 | $3.30 | $3.31 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $4.22 | $4.44 | $3.69 | $3.07 | $2.81 | $4.05 | $4.89 | $6.93 | $5.08 | $4.72 | $4.37 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $30.54 | $36.98 | $40.61 | $43.02 | $44.12 | $41.60 | $41.26 | $45.71 | $49.02 | $51.57 | $52.25 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +2.5%/yr | +4.1%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −3.6%/yr | −14.1%/yr |
| EPS | −3.7%/yr | +3.2%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +6.7%/yr | +4.7%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +1.3%/yr | +11.0%/yr |
| Book value / share | +6.0%/yr | +3.2%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business reported $474M of profit but $424M of owner earnings: $50M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $474M | $905M | $894M | $793M | $857M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$513M | +$509M | +$498M | +$477M | +$538M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$17M | −$127M | −$18M | −$295M | +$224M |
| Cash from operations | $970M | $1.3B | $1.4B | $975M | $1.6B |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$546M | −$599M | −$828M | −$611M | −$555M |
| Owner earnings | $424M | $688M | $546M | $364M | $1.1B |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 5% | 7% | 6% | 3% | 10% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Interest expense not tagged in the data
What this means
No usable interest-expense line was tagged in the filing data, but the balance sheet carries real net debt — so the interest burden here is unknown, not absent. Read the debt on the net-debt check below.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $4.2B · 2.8× operating profitMeaningful net debtCash $566M − debt $4.8B
What this means
Netting $566M of cash and short-term investments against $4.8B of debt leaves $4.2B owed, about 2.8× a year's operating profit (3.1× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 31 + DIO 105 − DPO 64 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median, range 4%–13%; 13% latest = NOPAT $1.3B ÷ invested capital $10.2BIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 13% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median margin, range 3%–13%; latest $424M = operating cash $970M − maintenance capex $546MIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 5% of revenue this year, a 8% median across 10 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $970M ÷ net income $474M
In the filing’s words The filing leans on adjusted, non-GAAP earnings, but the GAAP profit is itself cash-backed — the adjustments are not papering over a cash shortfall here.
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returned more than it generatedDividends + buybacks $1.3B ÷ Owner Earnings $424M
What this means
The company returned more than it generated: against $424M of Owner Earnings, $1.3B (302%) went back to shareholders, $381M dividends, $900M buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.06×MaintainingCapex $546M ÷ depreciation $513M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $8.8B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.37×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $4.8B vs $993M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −31%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $6.63/share (latest year $4.15), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $52.13/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 10 of 10
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 15% → 10% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices but names price competition too — and the margin slipped, so the pressure is winning here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 15% early to 10% lately, median 10% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Owner earnings growth −5%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings shrank about 5% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · 6.1% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −2.7%/yr
What this means
The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$665M
- Receivables$949M
- Inventory$2.1B
- Other current assets$364M
- Accounts payable$2.0B
- Other current liabilities$770M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $13.8B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$5.8B · 42%
- Dividends$3.5B · 25%
- Buybacks$900M · 7%
- Retained (debt / cash)$3.6B · 26%
- Returned to owners$4.4B
55% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $3.5B as dividends and $900M as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $900M over the span, but a stock split in the window left the reported buyback-share counts on a basis the diluted-share count doesn't match, so a comparable average price can't be drawn.
- Net change in share count−22.5%
The diluted count fell from 148M to 115M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record$3.30/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 7% a year. It was never cut over the span.
- Return on what it retained−9%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($4.1B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) fell $375M, so each retained $1 gave back about 0.09 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
$83M written down across 2 years (2018, 2019): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. That is roughly 30% of the cash it put into acquisitions over the span. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mark J. Costa | $17.8M | $33.7M | $1.1B |
| 2022 | Mark J. Costa | $17.1M | $12.0M | $364M |
| 2023 | Mark J. Costa | $17.6M | $17.0M | $546M |
| 2024 | Mark J. Costa | $15.9M | $22.8M | $688M |
| 2025 | Mark J. Costa | $19.5M | −$5.8M | $424M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership2.6%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Eastman Chemical is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
3 of the 6 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?6.0% vs 9.7%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 9.7% early in the record and 6.0% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?25% → 35% of sales
Receivables and inventory grew from $2.2B to $3.0B while revenue grew −4%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (25% of revenue then, 35% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.
- Look hereAre "one-time" charges a yearly habit?8 of 10 years
Management took an impairment or write-down in 8 of the last 10 years, $404M in all. A charge taken almost every year is not one-time; it is the business — past deals coming due, and an admission the assets were worth less than what was paid. Munger's rule: when the "one-time" keeps happening, it is the business. Read it beside the goodwill the company still carries.
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Chemicals
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOWDow Inc. Common Stock | $40.0B | 15% | 4.5% | 4% | 6% |
| CECelanese | $9.5B | 25% | 14.1% | 10% | 13% |
| EMNEastman Chemical | $8.8B | 24% | 10.8% | 9% | 9% |
| RPMRPM International | $7.4B | 39% | 10.5% | 12% | 7% |
| DDDuPont de Nemours Inc. | $6.8B | 33% | 9.9% | 3% | 5% |
| SEESealed Air | $5.3B | 31% | 13.9% | 13% | 8% |
| ALBAlbemarle Corporation | $5.1B | 33% | 18.6% | 7% | 12% |
| AVNTAvient | $3.3B | 27% | 6.5% | 7% | 5% |
| Group median | — | 29% | 10.7% | 8% | 7% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Eastman Chemical has delivered.
Through the cycle, Eastman Chemical earns about $806M on its 9.2% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 4.8% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $498M on 114M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-03-31; net debt $6.6B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← EME its page in the Manual EMR →
Industry order: ← ECVT the Chemicals chapter ESI →