← All companies ← ENIC Manual ENLV → ← ENIC Electric Utilities ES →
ENLT, Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
Our transformation has been driven by a tailored strategy of gradual entry into new markets, coupled with a clear focus on execution.
As of February 16, 2026, our total portfolio of utility-scale, renewable energy projects included approximately 20.6 GW of multi-technology generation capacity and approximately 61.0 GWh of energy storage capacity, of which approximately 6.4 GW and approximately 17.5 GWh, respectively, are from Mature Projects.
From a technological perspective, we develop wind energy, solar energy, and energy storage projects, with energy storage collocated with generation capacity and on a standalone basis.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Regulated utility. Returns are set by regulation on an approved rate base; the capital spending regulators approve becomes the growth, recovered through allowed rates. Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 79% and operating margin about 46% through the cycle, a wide spread between price and the cost of what it sells — whether that advantage is durable pricing power or a margin that can erode is the question the record is for. Capital spending runs about 341% of sales, well above depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on rate base and the allowed return. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 9%). By owner earnings: roughly 33% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2020–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||
| $70M | $102M | $192M | $256M | $378M | $489M | $489M | RevenueRevenue |
| 79% | 79% | 79% | 79% | 79% | 72% | 72% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| $28M | $34M | $91M | $158M | $176M | $332M | $332M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 40.3% | 33.6% | 47.2% | 61.8% | 46.4% | 68.0% | 68.0% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($44M) | $11M | $25M | $71M | $44M | $132M | $132M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | 34% | 34% | 29% | 29% | 25% | 25% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||
| $39M | $52M | $90M | $192M | $255M | $283M | $283M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $15M | $19M | $42M | $66M | $109M | $150M | $150M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $67M | $21M | $23M | $55M | $102M | $622K | $622K | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $342M | $493M | $656M | $731M | $899M | $1.8B | $1.8B | CapexCapex |
| 486.2% | 480.9% | 341.4% | 285.9% | 237.9% | 371.0% | 371.0% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $24M | $33M | $48M | $126M | $146M | $133M | $133M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 33.5% | 31.8% | 25.0% | 49.2% | 38.7% | 27.2% | 27.2% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($303M) | ($441M) | ($566M) | ($539M) | ($644M) | ($1.5B) | ($1.5B) | Free cash flowFCF |
| −431.0% | −430.1% | −294.4% | −210.9% | −170.4% | −313.1% | −313.1% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $8M | $2M | $3M | $13M | $26M | $30M | $30M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $0 | $0 | $2M | $0 | $0 | — | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| — | 7% | 8% | 10% | — | 12% | 12% | ROICROIC |
| -9% | 2% | 3% | 6% | 4% | 8% | 8% | Return on equityROE |
| −10% | 2% | 3% | 5% | 2% | 6% | 6% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||
| $99M | $276M | $195M | $405M | $388M | $529M | $529M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $18M | $40M | $43M | $51M | $95M | $95M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $18M | $40M | $43M | $51M | $95M | $95M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $413M | $424M | $665M | $708M | $1.1B | $1.1B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $201M | $385M | $583M | $592M | $1.6B | $1.6B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 2.1× | 1.1× | 1.1× | 1.2× | 0.7× | 0.7× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | $148M | $148M | — | — | — | $148M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | $2.8B | $3.5B | $4.6B | $5.5B | $8.6B | $8.6B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $62M | $166M | $325M | $212M | $884M | $884M | Total debtDebt |
| — | ($214M) | ($30M) | ($80M) | ($176M) | $355M | $355M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 0.9× | 0.9× | 1.4× | 2.3× | 1.6× | 2.0× | 2.0× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $512M | $533M | $804M | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $1.7B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||
| 78.3M | 93.7M | 97.3M | 116M | 118M | 124M | 124M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $0.90 | $1.09 | $1.97 | $2.21 | $3.19 | $3.95 | $3.95 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.56 | $0.12 | $0.25 | $0.61 | $0.37 | $1.07 | $1.07 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.30 | $0.35 | $0.49 | $1.09 | $1.24 | $1.07 | $1.07 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-3.87 | $-4.70 | $-5.81 | $-4.66 | $-5.44 | $-12.37 | $-12.37 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.11 | $0.02 | $0.03 | $0.12 | $0.22 | $0.24 | $0.24 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $4.37 | $5.26 | $6.74 | $6.32 | $7.60 | $14.65 | $14.65 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $6.54 | $5.68 | $8.26 | $10.10 | $9.98 | $13.65 | $13.65 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 5-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +34.5%/yr | +34.5%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +28.9%/yr | +28.9%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +17.7%/yr | +17.7%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +27.4%/yr | +27.4%/yr |
| Book value / share | +15.8%/yr | +15.8%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2020–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business earned $133M of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $150M it takes just to hold its position. It put $1.7B more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was ($1.5B).
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $132M | $44M | $71M | $25M | $11M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$150M | +$109M | +$66M | +$42M | +$19M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$622K | +$102M | +$55M | +$23M | +$21M |
| Cash from operations | $283M | $255M | $192M | $90M | $52M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$150M | −$109M | −$66M | −$42M | −$19M |
| Owner earnings | $133M | $146M | $126M | $48M | $33M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −$1.7B | −$790M | −$665M | −$614M | −$473M |
| Free cash flow | ($1.5B) | ($644M) | ($539M) | ($566M) | ($441M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 27% | 39% | 49% | 25% | 32% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $150M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $1.7B of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- AdequateOperating income $332M ÷ interest expense $165M
What this means
Comfortable in a normal year, but below the margin of safety Graham looked for. Worth checking how stable the coverage has been across a full cycle.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $355M · 1.1× operating profitModest net debtCash $528M + ST investments $524K − debt $884M
What this means
Netting $529M of cash and short-term investments against $884M of debt leaves $355M owed, about 1.1× a year's operating profit (2.7× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle4-yr median, range 7%–12%; 12% latest = NOPAT $249M ÷ invested capital $2.0BIndustry peers: median 5%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 4 years (it ran 12% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- High through the cycle6-yr median margin, range 25%–49%; latest $133M = operating cash $283M − maintenance capex $150MIndustry peers: median 13%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 27% of revenue this year, a 32% median across 6 years. It chose to put $1.7B more into growth, so free cash flow this year was ($1.5B) — the gap is investment, not weakness.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $283M ÷ net income $132M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $30M ÷ Owner Earnings $133M
What this means
Of $133M Owner Earnings, $30M (22%) went back to shareholders, $30M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 12.09×ExpandingCapex $1.8B ÷ depreciation $150M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $489M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.67×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $884M vs ($533M) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (6-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (6)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.62/share (latest year $1.00), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $12.78/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2020–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 5 of 6
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 5 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 40% → 59% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The record and the words agree: the margin widened and the filing attributes the gain to its own pricing, not volume alone.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 40% early to 59% lately, median 46% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 20%
What this means
Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.
- Owner earnings growth +38%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 38% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2021 · 33.6% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count +9.6%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$529M
- Receivables$95M
- Other current assets$472M
- Debt due within a year$884M
- Other current liabilities$745M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2020–2025
Over the record, the business generated $911M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$4.9B · 542%
- Dividends$82M · 9%
- Buybacks$2M · 0%
- Returned to owners$84M
16% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $82M as dividends and $2M as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$4.1B
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $4.1B beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $2M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count58.0%
The diluted count rose from 78M to 124M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$0.24/sh
Paid in 6 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 18% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
- Return on what it retained64%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($156M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $100M, so each retained $1 added about 0.64 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2020–2025.
1 of the 3 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?58.0%
Diluted shares grew 58.0% over 2020–2025, even as the company spent $2M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Electric Utilities
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextEra Energy Inc. | $27.4B | — | 28.2% | 6% | — |
| DTBDTE Energy Co | $15.8B | — | 13.6% | 6% | — |
| IDAIDACORP | $1.8B | — | 21.9% | 6% | 16% |
| XIFRXPLR Infrastructure LP Common | $1.2B | — | 18.1% | 1% | 35% |
| ORAOrmat Technologies Inc. | $990M | 37% | 25.6% | 4% | 11% |
| HTOH2O America | $806M | — | 22.0% | 5% | — |
| ENLTEnlight Renewable Energy Ltd. | $489M | 79% | 46.8% | 9% | 33% |
| HNRGHallador Energy Company | $469M | 24% | 2.1% | 2% | 3% |
| Group median | — | 37% | 22.0% | 5% | 16% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. has delivered.
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, the mark of a build-out: total capital spending outruns the cash the business throws off today. So the tool opens on the steady-state base (maintenance capex in place of the build-out spend), the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. earns about $160M on its 32.7% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 27.2% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow ($1.5B) on 132M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net debt $355M. The base opens on the steady-state figure (the latest year is negative on total capex mid-build-out); clear Steady-state to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($1.8B) runs well above depreciation ($150M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $133M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← ENIC its page in the Manual ENLV →
Industry order: ← ENIC the Electric Utilities chapter ES →