← All companies ← ENGS Manual ENLT → ← EMA Electric Utilities ENLT →
ENIC, Enel Chile S.A.
Enel Chile is a Chilean electric utility. It does two things: it generates electricity — from water, wind, and sun alongside other kinds of plants — and it owns the wires that carry power to homes and businesses in central Chile, including the Santiago area. It earns by selling that power and by charging to deliver it across its network, with the delivery side run as a regulated local monopoly.
As of December 31, 2025, we had 8,904 MW of net installed capacity and approximately 2.2 million distribution customers.
We do not report them as a separate segment in this Report or in our consolidated financial statements.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Regulated utility. Returns are set by regulation on an approved rate base; the capital spending regulators approve becomes the growth, recovered through allowed rates. Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 18% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- The business is two animals under one roof, and the investor's job is to weigh them apart. The distribution wires are a regulated franchise — captive customers, no rival line down the street — but the regulator, not the company, sets the return, so the test is whether the allowed return clears the cost of the capital this network forever swallows. Generation is closer to a commodity, where power is power; what matters is the cost position of the fleet and how far it leans on rainfall and weather rather than on bought fuel, since a dry year or a high fuel bill lands straight on profit. Watch the financing too — debt sits in dollars while the cash comes in pesos, demand tracks the Chilean economy, and both the regulator and the courts can reach into the till; the record below holds the margins, the returns, and the debt.
Drafted from the company's filings and reviewed by hand; every number is shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2015–2024
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2015’15 | 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | TTMTTMDec 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| CLP 2.38T | CLP 2.52T | CLP 2.48T | CLP 2.41T | CLP 2.62T | CLP 2.55T | CLP 2.83T | CLP 4.38T | CLP 4.26T | CLP 3.90T | CLP 3.90T | RevenueRevenue |
| CLP 525.5B | CLP 567.8B | CLP 578.6B | CLP 670.6B | CLP 526.1B | (CLP 34.3B) | CLP 259.6B | CLP 912.4B | CLP 767.8B | CLP 373.1B | CLP 373.1B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 22.0% | 22.6% | 23.3% | 27.8% | 20.0% | −1.3% | 9.2% | 20.8% | 18.0% | 9.6% | 9.6% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| CLP 251.8B | CLP 384.2B | CLP 349.4B | CLP 361.7B | CLP 296.2B | (CLP 50.9B) | CLP 85.2B | CLP 1.25T | CLP 633.5B | CLP 145.1B | CLP 145.1B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 30% | 22% | 29% | 30% | 17% | — | 15% | 27% | 26% | 19% | 19% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| CLP 576.5B | CLP 614.7B | CLP 635.6B | CLP 735.5B | CLP 743.7B | CLP 755.9B | CLP 412.9B | CLP 744.8B | CLP 705.7B | CLP 1.53T | CLP 1.53T | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| CLP 153.2B | CLP 161.7B | CLP 152.7B | CLP 215.2B | CLP 236.6B | CLP 230.0B | CLP 210.9B | CLP 238.3B | CLP 253.4B | CLP 295.5B | CLP 230.0B | DepreciationDeprec. |
| CLP 171.5B | CLP 68.9B | CLP 133.5B | CLP 158.6B | CLP 210.9B | CLP 576.8B | CLP 116.8B | (CLP 745.6B) | (CLP 181.2B) | CLP 1.09T | CLP 1.16T | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| CLP 309.5B | CLP 222.4B | CLP 266.0B | CLP 300.5B | CLP 300.3B | CLP 514.8B | CLP 748.0B | CLP 915.7B | CLP 636.8B | CLP 684.0B | CLP 684.0B | CapexCapex |
| 13.0% | 8.8% | 10.7% | 12.5% | 11.4% | 20.2% | 26.4% | 20.9% | 14.9% | 17.5% | 17.5% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| CLP 423.3B | CLP 453.0B | CLP 482.9B | CLP 520.3B | CLP 507.1B | CLP 525.9B | CLP 202.0B | CLP 506.5B | CLP 452.3B | CLP 1.24T | CLP 1.30T | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 17.8% | 18.0% | 19.4% | 21.6% | 19.3% | 20.6% | 7.1% | 11.6% | 10.6% | 31.6% | 33.3% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| CLP 267.0B | CLP 392.3B | CLP 369.6B | CLP 435.0B | CLP 443.4B | CLP 241.1B | (CLP 335.1B) | (CLP 170.9B) | CLP 68.9B | CLP 846.9B | CLP 846.9B | Free cash flowFCF |
| 11.2% | 15.6% | 14.9% | 18.0% | 16.9% | 9.5% | −11.8% | −3.9% | 1.6% | 21.7% | 21.7% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| CLP 134.7B | CLP 322.8B | CLP 260.8B | CLP 231.4B | CLP 236.5B | CLP 312.7B | CLP 231.1B | CLP 39.6B | CLP 401.6B | CLP 345.1B | CLP 345.1B | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| 8% | 14% | 12% | 11% | 8% | -2% | 3% | 31% | 14% | 3% | 3% | Return on equityROE |
| 4% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 2% | −11% | −5% | 30% | 5% | −4% | −4% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| CLP 144.3B | CLP 246.6B | CLP 440.1B | CLP 285.5B | CLP 237.0B | CLP 335.4B | CLP 314.0B | CLP 878.7B | CLP 631.0B | CLP 402.9B | CLP 402.9B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | CLP 445.1B | CLP 407.0B | CLP 478.2B | CLP 511.5B | CLP 554.9B | CLP 688.2B | CLP 1.51T | CLP 1.45T | CLP 1.49T | CLP 1.49T | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | CLP 37.5B | CLP 39.7B | CLP 57.0B | CLP 39.7B | CLP 23.3B | CLP 31.2B | CLP 77.9B | CLP 58.8B | CLP 65.2B | CLP 65.2B | InventoryInvent. |
| — | CLP 561.5B | CLP 556.0B | CLP 554.3B | CLP 599.3B | CLP 628.0B | CLP 978.3B | CLP 1.74T | CLP 1.46T | CLP 1.53T | CLP 1.53T | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | (CLP 78.9B) | (CLP 109.3B) | (CLP 19.2B) | (CLP 48.1B) | (CLP 49.8B) | (CLP 258.9B) | (CLP 156.5B) | CLP 43.6B | CLP 24.7B | CLP 24.7B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | CLP 866.5B | CLP 1.06T | CLP 996.9B | CLP 1.02T | CLP 1.03T | CLP 1.27T | CLP 3.06T | CLP 2.37T | CLP 2.23T | CLP 2.23T | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | CLP 757.2B | CLP 816.8B | CLP 1.22T | CLP 1.04T | CLP 1.05T | CLP 2.13T | CLP 3.17T | CLP 2.79T | CLP 2.24T | CLP 2.24T | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.1× | 1.3× | 0.8× | 1.0× | 1.0× | 0.6× | 1.0× | 0.8× | 1.0× | 1.0× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| CLP 887.3B | CLP 887.3B | CLP 887.3B | CLP 915.0B | CLP 917.4B | CLP 915.7B | CLP 921.1B | CLP 883.6B | CLP 884.5B | CLP 889.2B | CLP 889.2B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | CLP 5.40T | CLP 5.69T | CLP 7.49T | CLP 7.86T | CLP 7.90T | CLP 9.50T | CLP 11.87T | CLP 11.83T | CLP 12.72T | CLP 12.72T | Total assetsAssets |
| 7.9× | 9.8× | 10.8× | 5.5× | 3.2× | -0.3× | 1.5× | 4.7× | 3.1× | 1.6× | 1.6× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| CLP 3.20T | CLP 2.76T | CLP 2.98T | CLP 3.42T | CLP 3.48T | CLP 3.35T | CLP 3.10T | CLP 4.10T | CLP 4.45T | CLP 4.96T | CLP 4.96T | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 49.09B | 49.09B | 49.09B | 63.91B | 69.17B | 69.17B | 69.17B | 69.17B | 69.17B | 69.17B | 69.2M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| CLP 48.57 | CLP 51.25 | CLP 50.60 | CLP 37.71 | CLP 37.95 | CLP 36.84 | CLP 40.91 | CLP 63.31 | CLP 61.63 | CLP 56.45 | CLP 56454.06 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| CLP 5.13 | CLP 7.83 | CLP 7.12 | CLP 5.66 | CLP 4.28 | CLP -0.74 | CLP 1.23 | CLP 18.10 | CLP 9.16 | CLP 2.10 | CLP 2098.01 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| CLP 8.62 | CLP 9.23 | CLP 9.84 | CLP 8.14 | CLP 7.33 | CLP 7.60 | CLP 2.92 | CLP 7.32 | CLP 6.54 | CLP 17.86 | CLP 18808.93 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| CLP 5.44 | CLP 7.99 | CLP 7.53 | CLP 6.81 | CLP 6.41 | CLP 3.49 | CLP -4.85 | CLP -2.47 | CLP 1.00 | CLP 12.24 | CLP 12244.38 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| CLP 2.74 | CLP 6.58 | CLP 5.31 | CLP 3.62 | CLP 3.42 | CLP 4.52 | CLP 3.34 | CLP 0.57 | CLP 5.81 | CLP 4.99 | CLP 4989.01 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| CLP 6.30 | CLP 4.53 | CLP 5.42 | CLP 4.70 | CLP 4.34 | CLP 7.44 | CLP 10.81 | CLP 13.24 | CLP 9.21 | CLP 9.89 | CLP 9889.23 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| CLP 65.22 | CLP 56.29 | CLP 60.77 | CLP 53.53 | CLP 50.38 | CLP 48.46 | CLP 44.79 | CLP 59.24 | CLP 64.28 | CLP 71.69 | CLP 71693.58 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The diluted share count moved ×1/1000 into TTM — shares retired, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +1.7%/yr | +8.3%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +8.4%/yr | +19.5%/yr |
| EPS | −9.5%/yr | −13.3%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +6.9%/yr | +7.9%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +5.1%/yr | +17.9%/yr |
| Book value / share | +1.1%/yr | +7.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2015–2024Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2024 the business earned CLP 1.24T of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the CLP 295.5B it takes just to hold its position. It put CLP 388.5B more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was CLP 846.9B.
| FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | CLP 145.1B | CLP 633.5B | CLP 1.25T | CLP 85.2B | (CLP 50.9B) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +CLP 295.5B | +CLP 253.4B | +CLP 238.3B | +CLP 210.9B | +CLP 230.0B |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +CLP 1.09T | −CLP 181.2B | −CLP 745.6B | +CLP 116.8B | +CLP 576.8B |
| Cash from operations | CLP 1.53T | CLP 705.7B | CLP 744.8B | CLP 412.9B | CLP 755.9B |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −CLP 295.5B | −CLP 253.4B | −CLP 238.3B | −CLP 210.9B | −CLP 230.0B |
| Owner earnings | CLP 1.24T | CLP 452.3B | CLP 506.5B | CLP 202.0B | CLP 525.9B |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −CLP 388.5B | −CLP 383.4B | −CLP 677.4B | −CLP 537.1B | −CLP 284.9B |
| Free cash flow | CLP 846.9B | CLP 68.9B | (CLP 170.9B) | (CLP 335.1B) | CLP 241.1B |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 32% | 11% | 12% | 7% | 21% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about CLP 295.5B, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other CLP 388.5B of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income CLP 373.1B ÷ interest expense CLP 232.6B
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- Debt under-captured — leverage unknown, not low
What this means
This company pays far more interest than its tagged debt implies (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so its net cash or net debt cannot be read honestly: the gap is unknown, not zero, and 'net cash' here would be exactly the fiction the figure is meant to prevent. Judge it on the record and owner earnings instead.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Debt under-capturedIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
This company's interest bill implies far more debt than its filings tag at the consolidated level (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so invested capital, and the return on it, cannot be read honestly. Judge this one on Owner Earnings and the record instead.
- High through the cycle10-yr median margin, range 7%–32%; latest CLP 1.30T = operating cash CLP 1.53T − maintenance capex CLP 230.0BIndustry peers: median 11%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 33% of revenue this year, a 18% median across 10 years. It chose to put CLP 454.0B more into growth, so free cash flow this year was CLP 846.9B — the gap is investment, not weakness.
- Are earnings backed by cash? 10.55×Cash-backedCash from ops CLP 1.53T ÷ net income CLP 145.1B
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks CLP 345.1B ÷ Owner Earnings CLP 1.30T
What this means
Of CLP 1.30T Owner Earnings, CLP 345.1B (27%) went back to shareholders, CLP 345.1B dividends, CLP 0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 2.97×ExpandingCapex CLP 684.0B ÷ depreciation CLP 230.0B
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 4 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · CLP 3.90T
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.00×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt —Debt ≤ working capital · —
What this means
The filings tag only a fraction of the debt this company's interest bill implies (much of it sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so this test can't be run honestly.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (10-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +106%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are CLP 9786.28/share (latest year CLP 2098.01), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is CLP 71693.58/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2015–2024
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 9 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin 23% → 16% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices but names price competition too — and the margin slipped, so the pressure is winning here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 23% early to 16% lately, median 20% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Owner earnings growth +8%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 8% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · −1.3% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +3.9%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
- How management talks about it Promotional
What this means
The record is compounding, but the filing leans on a promoter’s vocabulary rather than the per-share, return-on-capital terms an owner uses. The results back the talk here; the register is still worth noting.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2024Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investmentsCLP 402.9B
- ReceivablesCLP 1.49T
- InventoryCLP 65.2B
- Other current assetsCLP 276.2B
- Accounts payableCLP 1.53T
- Other current liabilitiesCLP 713.1B
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2015–2024
Over the record, the business generated CLP 7.46T of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- ReinvestedCLP 4.90T · 66%
- DividendsCLP 2.52T · 34%
- BuybacksCLP 72.4B · 1%
- Returned to ownersCLP 2.59T
49% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, CLP 2.52T as dividends and CLP 72.4B as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran CLP 72.4B over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count−99.9%
The diluted count fell from 49093M to 69M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend recordCLP 4.99/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 7% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
- Return on what it retained25%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out (CLP 1.12T over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew CLP 278.3B, so each retained CLP 1 added about 0.25 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Enel Chile S.A. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2015–2024.
None of the 3 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Electric Utilities
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENICEnel Chile S.A. | CLP 3.90T | — | 20.4% | — | 19% |
| ETEnergy Transfer LP Common | $85.5B | 25% | 10.3% | 8% | 8% |
| NRGNRG Energy | $30.3B | 24% | 7.6% | 13% | 9% |
| SOSouthern Company (The) | $29.6B | — | 22.8% | 6% | 12% |
| NEENextEra Energy Inc. | $27.4B | — | 28.2% | 6% | — |
| CEGConstellation Energy | $22.7B | — | 5.0% | 8% | -17% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Company Inc. | $21.7B | — | 19.2% | 6% | 26% |
| VSTVistra | $17.6B | — | 10.8% | 7% | 17% |
| Group median | — | — | 15.0% | — | 12% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “Each ADS represents 50 shares of common”; Enel Chile S.A. reports in CLP, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at CLP 1 = $0.001 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in CLP.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Enel Chile S.A. has delivered.
Enel Chile S.A.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Enel Chile S.A. earns about $789M on its 18.7% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 33.3% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow $916M on 1M shares outstanding (a weighted average, the only count this filer tags); net cash $436M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($740M) runs well above depreciation ($249M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $1.4B, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← ENGS its page in the Manual ENLT →
Industry order: ← EMA the Electric Utilities chapter ENLT →