Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← ENGS Manual ENLT → ← EMA Electric Utilities ENLT →

ENIC, Enel Chile S.A.

Electric Utilities capital-intensive Regulated utilityCapital build-outCyclical

Enel Chile is a Chilean electric utility. It does two things: it generates electricity — from water, wind, and sun alongside other kinds of plants — and it owns the wires that carry power to homes and businesses in central Chile, including the Santiago area. It earns by selling that power and by charging to deliver it across its network, with the delivery side run as a regulated local monopoly.

As of December 31, 2025, we had 8,904 MW of net installed capacity and approximately 2.2 million distribution customers.

We do not report them as a separate segment in this Report or in our consolidated financial statements.

Latest annual: FY2024 20-F · figures as filed, in CLP · 1 ADS = 50 ordinary shares
ENIC · Enel Chile S.A.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2024
CLP 3.90T
−8.4% YoY · 8% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue CLP 3.90T 5-yr avg CLP 3.58T
Operating margin 9.6% 5-yr avg 11.2%
Owner-earnings margin 33% 5-yr avg 16%
Free cash flow margin 22% 5-yr avg 3%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

Situation
Regulated utility. Returns are set by regulation on an approved rate base; the capital spending regulators approve becomes the growth, recovered through allowed rates. Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 18% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
What moves the needle
The business is two animals under one roof, and the investor's job is to weigh them apart. The distribution wires are a regulated franchise — captive customers, no rival line down the street — but the regulator, not the company, sets the return, so the test is whether the allowed return clears the cost of the capital this network forever swallows. Generation is closer to a commodity, where power is power; what matters is the cost position of the fleet and how far it leans on rainfall and weather rather than on bought fuel, since a dry year or a high fuel bill lands straight on profit. Watch the financing too — debt sits in dollars while the cash comes in pesos, demand tracks the Chilean economy, and both the regulator and the courts can reach into the till; the record below holds the margins, the returns, and the debt.

Drafted from the company's filings and reviewed by hand; every number is shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2015–2024

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2015’152016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’24TTMTTMDec 2024
Income statement
CLP 2.38TCLP 2.52TCLP 2.48TCLP 2.41TCLP 2.62TCLP 2.55TCLP 2.83TCLP 4.38TCLP 4.26TCLP 3.90TCLP 3.90TRevenueRevenue
CLP 525.5BCLP 567.8BCLP 578.6BCLP 670.6BCLP 526.1B(CLP 34.3B)CLP 259.6BCLP 912.4BCLP 767.8BCLP 373.1BCLP 373.1BOperating incomeOp. inc.
22.0%22.6%23.3%27.8%20.0%−1.3%9.2%20.8%18.0%9.6%9.6%Operating marginOp. mgn
CLP 251.8BCLP 384.2BCLP 349.4BCLP 361.7BCLP 296.2B(CLP 50.9B)CLP 85.2BCLP 1.25TCLP 633.5BCLP 145.1BCLP 145.1BNet incomeNet inc.
30%22%29%30%17%15%27%26%19%19%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
CLP 576.5BCLP 614.7BCLP 635.6BCLP 735.5BCLP 743.7BCLP 755.9BCLP 412.9BCLP 744.8BCLP 705.7BCLP 1.53TCLP 1.53TOperating cash flowOp. cash
CLP 153.2BCLP 161.7BCLP 152.7BCLP 215.2BCLP 236.6BCLP 230.0BCLP 210.9BCLP 238.3BCLP 253.4BCLP 295.5BCLP 230.0BDepreciationDeprec.
CLP 171.5BCLP 68.9BCLP 133.5BCLP 158.6BCLP 210.9BCLP 576.8BCLP 116.8B(CLP 745.6B)(CLP 181.2B)CLP 1.09TCLP 1.16TWorking capital & otherWC & other
CLP 309.5BCLP 222.4BCLP 266.0BCLP 300.5BCLP 300.3BCLP 514.8BCLP 748.0BCLP 915.7BCLP 636.8BCLP 684.0BCLP 684.0BCapexCapex
13.0%8.8%10.7%12.5%11.4%20.2%26.4%20.9%14.9%17.5%17.5%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
CLP 423.3BCLP 453.0BCLP 482.9BCLP 520.3BCLP 507.1BCLP 525.9BCLP 202.0BCLP 506.5BCLP 452.3BCLP 1.24TCLP 1.30TOwner earningsOwner earn.
17.8%18.0%19.4%21.6%19.3%20.6%7.1%11.6%10.6%31.6%33.3%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
CLP 267.0BCLP 392.3BCLP 369.6BCLP 435.0BCLP 443.4BCLP 241.1B(CLP 335.1B)(CLP 170.9B)CLP 68.9BCLP 846.9BCLP 846.9BFree cash flowFCF
11.2%15.6%14.9%18.0%16.9%9.5%−11.8%−3.9%1.6%21.7%21.7%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
CLP 134.7BCLP 322.8BCLP 260.8BCLP 231.4BCLP 236.5BCLP 312.7BCLP 231.1BCLP 39.6BCLP 401.6BCLP 345.1BCLP 345.1BDividends paidDiv. paid
8%14%12%11%8%-2%3%31%14%3%3%Return on equityROE
4%2%3%4%2%−11%−5%30%5%−4%−4%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
CLP 144.3BCLP 246.6BCLP 440.1BCLP 285.5BCLP 237.0BCLP 335.4BCLP 314.0BCLP 878.7BCLP 631.0BCLP 402.9BCLP 402.9BCash & investmentsCash+inv
CLP 445.1BCLP 407.0BCLP 478.2BCLP 511.5BCLP 554.9BCLP 688.2BCLP 1.51TCLP 1.45TCLP 1.49TCLP 1.49TReceivablesReceiv.
CLP 37.5BCLP 39.7BCLP 57.0BCLP 39.7BCLP 23.3BCLP 31.2BCLP 77.9BCLP 58.8BCLP 65.2BCLP 65.2BInventoryInvent.
CLP 561.5BCLP 556.0BCLP 554.3BCLP 599.3BCLP 628.0BCLP 978.3BCLP 1.74TCLP 1.46TCLP 1.53TCLP 1.53TAccounts payablePayables
(CLP 78.9B)(CLP 109.3B)(CLP 19.2B)(CLP 48.1B)(CLP 49.8B)(CLP 258.9B)(CLP 156.5B)CLP 43.6BCLP 24.7BCLP 24.7BOperating working capitalOper. WC
CLP 866.5BCLP 1.06TCLP 996.9BCLP 1.02TCLP 1.03TCLP 1.27TCLP 3.06TCLP 2.37TCLP 2.23TCLP 2.23TCurrent assetsCur. assets
CLP 757.2BCLP 816.8BCLP 1.22TCLP 1.04TCLP 1.05TCLP 2.13TCLP 3.17TCLP 2.79TCLP 2.24TCLP 2.24TCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.1×1.3×0.8×1.0×1.0×0.6×1.0×0.8×1.0×1.0×Current ratioCurr. ratio
CLP 887.3BCLP 887.3BCLP 887.3BCLP 915.0BCLP 917.4BCLP 915.7BCLP 921.1BCLP 883.6BCLP 884.5BCLP 889.2BCLP 889.2BGoodwillGoodwill
CLP 5.40TCLP 5.69TCLP 7.49TCLP 7.86TCLP 7.90TCLP 9.50TCLP 11.87TCLP 11.83TCLP 12.72TCLP 12.72TTotal assetsAssets
7.9×9.8×10.8×5.5×3.2×-0.3×1.5×4.7×3.1×1.6×1.6×Interest coverageInt. cov.
CLP 3.20TCLP 2.76TCLP 2.98TCLP 3.42TCLP 3.48TCLP 3.35TCLP 3.10TCLP 4.10TCLP 4.45TCLP 4.96TCLP 4.96TShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
49.09B49.09B49.09B63.91B69.17B69.17B69.17B69.17B69.17B69.17B69.2MShares out (diluted)Shares
CLP 48.57CLP 51.25CLP 50.60CLP 37.71CLP 37.95CLP 36.84CLP 40.91CLP 63.31CLP 61.63CLP 56.45CLP 56454.06Revenue / shareRev/sh
CLP 5.13CLP 7.83CLP 7.12CLP 5.66CLP 4.28CLP -0.74CLP 1.23CLP 18.10CLP 9.16CLP 2.10CLP 2098.01EPS (diluted)EPS
CLP 8.62CLP 9.23CLP 9.84CLP 8.14CLP 7.33CLP 7.60CLP 2.92CLP 7.32CLP 6.54CLP 17.86CLP 18808.93Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
CLP 5.44CLP 7.99CLP 7.53CLP 6.81CLP 6.41CLP 3.49CLP -4.85CLP -2.47CLP 1.00CLP 12.24CLP 12244.38Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
CLP 2.74CLP 6.58CLP 5.31CLP 3.62CLP 3.42CLP 4.52CLP 3.34CLP 0.57CLP 5.81CLP 4.99CLP 4989.01Dividends / shareDiv/sh
CLP 6.30CLP 4.53CLP 5.42CLP 4.70CLP 4.34CLP 7.44CLP 10.81CLP 13.24CLP 9.21CLP 9.89CLP 9889.23Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
CLP 65.22CLP 56.29CLP 60.77CLP 53.53CLP 50.38CLP 48.46CLP 44.79CLP 59.24CLP 64.28CLP 71.69CLP 71693.58Book value / shareBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×1/1000 into TTM — shares retired, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+1.7%/yr+8.3%/yr
Owner earnings / share+8.4%/yr+19.5%/yr
EPS−9.5%/yr−13.3%/yr
Dividends / share+6.9%/yr+7.9%/yr
Capital spending / share+5.1%/yr+17.9%/yr
Book value / share+1.1%/yr+7.3%/yr

The record, charted

FY2015–2024

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
69.2Bpeak FY2019

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

CLP 1.24Towner earningsvs.CLP 145.1Bnet incomelow FY2021

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2015FY2024

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2024 the business earned CLP 1.24T of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the CLP 295.5B it takes just to hold its position. It put CLP 388.5B more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was CLP 846.9B.

Reported net incomeCLP 145.1B
Owner earningsCLP 1.24T · 32% of revenue
FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Reported net incomeCLP 145.1BCLP 633.5BCLP 1.25TCLP 85.2B(CLP 50.9B)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+CLP 295.5B+CLP 253.4B+CLP 238.3B+CLP 210.9B+CLP 230.0B
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+CLP 1.09T−CLP 181.2B−CLP 745.6B+CLP 116.8B+CLP 576.8B
Cash from operationsCLP 1.53TCLP 705.7BCLP 744.8BCLP 412.9BCLP 755.9B
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−CLP 295.5B−CLP 253.4B−CLP 238.3B−CLP 210.9B−CLP 230.0B
Owner earningsCLP 1.24TCLP 452.3BCLP 506.5BCLP 202.0BCLP 525.9B
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−CLP 388.5B−CLP 383.4B−CLP 677.4B−CLP 537.1B−CLP 284.9B
Free cash flowCLP 846.9BCLP 68.9B(CLP 170.9B)(CLP 335.1B)CLP 241.1B
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue32%11%12%7%21%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about CLP 295.5B, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other CLP 388.5B of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2024 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Thin
    Operating income CLP 373.1B ÷ interest expense CLP 232.6B
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.

  • Debt under-captured — leverage unknown, not low
    What this means

    This company pays far more interest than its tagged debt implies (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so its net cash or net debt cannot be read honestly: the gap is unknown, not zero, and 'net cash' here would be exactly the fiction the figure is meant to prevent. Judge it on the record and owner earnings instead.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Debt under-captured
    Industry peers: median 7%
    What this means

    This company's interest bill implies far more debt than its filings tag at the consolidated level (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so invested capital, and the return on it, cannot be read honestly. Judge this one on Owner Earnings and the record instead.

  • High through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range 7%–32%; latest CLP 1.30T = operating cash CLP 1.53T − maintenance capex CLP 230.0B
    Industry peers: median 11%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 33% of revenue this year, a 18% median across 10 years. It chose to put CLP 454.0B more into growth, so free cash flow this year was CLP 846.9B — the gap is investment, not weakness.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops CLP 1.53T ÷ net income CLP 145.1B
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks CLP 345.1B ÷ Owner Earnings CLP 1.30T
    What this means

    Of CLP 1.30T Owner Earnings, CLP 345.1B (27%) went back to shareholders, CLP 345.1B dividends, CLP 0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 2.97×
    Expanding
    Capex CLP 684.0B ÷ depreciation CLP 230.0B
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 4 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · CLP 3.90T
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.00×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt
    Debt ≤ working capital ·
    What this means

    The filings tag only a fraction of the debt this company's interest bill implies (much of it sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so this test can't be run honestly.

  • Earnings stability Near
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 1 loss year
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Pass
    Uninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +106%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are CLP 9786.28/share (latest year CLP 2098.01), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is CLP 71693.58/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2015–2024

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 9 of 10
    What this means

    Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Operating margin 23% → 16% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices but names price competition too — and the margin slipped, so the pressure is winning here.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 23% early to 16% lately, median 20% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Owner earnings growth +8%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 8% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2020 · −1.3% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.

  • Share count +3.9%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

  • How management talks about it Promotional
    What this means

    The record is compounding, but the filing leans on a promoter’s vocabulary rather than the per-share, return-on-capital terms an owner uses. The results back the talk here; the register is still worth noting.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2024

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assetsCLP 2.23T
  • Cash & short-term investmentsCLP 402.9B
  • ReceivablesCLP 1.49T
  • InventoryCLP 65.2B
  • Other current assetsCLP 276.2B
Current liabilitiesCLP 2.24T
  • Accounts payableCLP 1.53T
  • Other current liabilitiesCLP 713.1B
Current ratio1.00×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio0.97×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.18×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital(CLP 9.3B)the cushion left after near-term bills
Deeper floors
Tangible book valueCLP 3.78Tequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value(CLP 5.16T)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2015–2024

Over the record, the business generated CLP 7.46T of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.

  • ReinvestedCLP 4.90T · 66%
  • DividendsCLP 2.52T · 34%
  • BuybacksCLP 72.4B · 1%
  • Returned to ownersCLP 2.59T

    49% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, CLP 2.52T as dividends and CLP 72.4B as buybacks.

  • Average price paid for buybacks

    Buybacks ran CLP 72.4B over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.

  • Net change in share count−99.9%

    The diluted count fell from 49093M to 69M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.

  • Dividend recordCLP 4.99/sh

    Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 7% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.

  • Return on what it retained25%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out (CLP 1.12T over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew CLP 278.3B, so each retained CLP 1 added about 0.25 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Enel Chile S.A. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2015–2024.

None of the 3 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.

Each test came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did reported profit become cash?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Electric Utilities

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
ENICEnel Chile S.A.CLP 3.90T20.4%19%
ETEnergy Transfer LP Common$85.5B25%10.3%8%8%
NRGNRG Energy$30.3B24%7.6%13%9%
SOSouthern Company (The)$29.6B22.8%6%12%
NEENextEra Energy Inc.$27.4B28.2%6%
CEGConstellation Energy$22.7B5.0%8%-17%
AEPAmerican Electric Power Company Inc.$21.7B19.2%6%26%
VSTVistra$17.6B10.8%7%17%
Group median15.0%12%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “Each ADS represents 50 shares of common”; Enel Chile S.A. reports in CLP, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at CLP 1 = $0.001 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in CLP.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Enel Chile S.A. has delivered.

Enel Chile S.A.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.

$

Through the cycle, Enel Chile S.A. earns about $789M on its 18.7% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 33.3% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’20→’24+23%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’15→’24+4%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’22–’24)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $916M on 1M shares outstanding (a weighted average, the only count this filer tags); net cash $436M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($740M) runs well above depreciation ($249M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $1.4B, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Enel Chile S.A. (ENIC), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/ENIC, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← ENGS its page in the Manual ENLT →

Industry order: ← EMA the Electric Utilities chapter ENLT →