← All companies ← EXR Manual EYE → ← ERIC Communications Equipment FFIV →
EXTR, Extreme Networks Inc.
Extreme is a leader in AI-powered cloud networking, focused on delivering simple and secure solutions that help businesses address challenges and enable connections among devices, applications, and users.
In the course of operating our business, we routinely make decisions as to the timing of the payment of invoices, the collection of receivables, the manufacturing and shipment of products, the fulfillment of orders, the purchase of supplies, and the building of inventory and service parts, among other matters.
We derive a majority of our revenues from the sale of our networking equipment, software subscriptions and services, and related maintenance contracts.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Products (62%) and Subscription and Support (38%).
- Situation
- Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power. Serial acquirer. Goodwill and acquired intangibles are 35% of assets, with meaningful acquisition spending in 4 of the record's 10 years; much of what this business is was bought, at prices the record carries.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run around −1.5% through the cycle on a 55% gross margin, the operating line in the red even at its best — so the lever is whether the spending below the gross line can come down enough to clear a profit: revenue growth against the cost curve, and the cash runway until it does. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on debt terms & refinancing, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −0%, above 15% in 3 of 10 years). The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 8% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Products is 62% of revenue, with Subscription And Support the other meaningful line at 38%.
- Products62%$704M
- Subscription And Support38%$436M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $520M | $607M | $983M | $996M | $948M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.3B | RevenueRevenue |
| 51% | 55% | 54% | 55% | 55% | 58% | 57% | 58% | 56% | 62% | 61% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 7% | 6% | 5% | 6% | 6% | 7% | 6% | 7% | 9% | 12% | 11% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 15% | 15% | 19% | 21% | 22% | 20% | 17% | 16% | 19% | 19% | 18% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| ($30M) | $6M | ($38M) | ($15M) | ($99M) | $34M | $64M | $108M | ($65M) | $17M | $40M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −5.8% | 1.0% | −3.9% | −1.5% | −10.4% | 3.4% | 5.8% | 8.3% | −5.8% | 1.5% | 3.2% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($36M) | ($2M) | ($47M) | ($26M) | ($127M) | $2M | $44M | $78M | ($86M) | ($7M) | $16M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | 15% | 17% | — | — | 45% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $30M | $59M | $19M | $105M | $36M | $145M | $128M | $249M | $55M | $152M | $132M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $11M | $11M | $23M | $27M | $29M | $23M | $20M | $20M | $24M | $15M | $15M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $41M | $38M | $15M | $71M | $96M | $81M | $20M | $88M | $41M | $62M | $14M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $5M | $10M | $40M | $23M | $15M | $17M | $15M | $14M | $18M | $25M | $27M | CapexCapex |
| 1.0% | 1.7% | 4.1% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 1.6% | 2.2% | 2.2% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $25M | $49M | ($4M) | $82M | $21M | $127M | $113M | $235M | $37M | $137M | $117M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 4.8% | 8.0% | −0.5% | 8.3% | 2.2% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 17.9% | 3.3% | 12.0% | 9.4% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $25M | $49M | ($21M) | $82M | $21M | $127M | $113M | $235M | $37M | $127M | $105M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 4.8% | 8.0% | −2.2% | 8.3% | 2.2% | 12.6% | 10.1% | 17.9% | 3.3% | 11.2% | 8.4% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | $51M | $98M | — | $219M | — | $70M | — | — | — | $70M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| — | — | — | $15M | $30M | — | $45M | $100M | $50M | $38M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| -37% | 3% | -16% | -4% | -19% | 4% | 27% | 87% | -92% | 72% | 33% | ROICROIC |
| -36% | -1% | -42% | -22% | -2350% | 4% | 49% | 67% | -340% | -11% | 21% | Return on equityROE |
| −36% | −1% | −42% | −22% | n/m | 4% | 49% | 67% | −340% | −11% | 21% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $98M | $135M | $121M | — | — | — | $195M | $235M | $157M | $232M | $240M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $81M | $93M | $212M | $174M | $123M | $156M | $184M | $182M | $90M | $127M | $163M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $41M | $47M | $64M | $64M | $63M | $33M | $49M | $89M | $141M | $103M | $77M | InventoryInvent. |
| $31M | $32M | $76M | $66M | $48M | $60M | $84M | $100M | $51M | $64M | $81M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $92M | $109M | $201M | $172M | $137M | $129M | $149M | $171M | $179M | $165M | $158M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $229M | $299M | $428M | $442M | $414M | $488M | $489M | $576M | $467M | $535M | $542M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $212M | $213M | $360M | $356M | $398M | $456M | $500M | $576M | $518M | $588M | $593M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.1× | 1.4× | 1.2× | 1.2× | 1.0× | 1.1× | 1.0× | 1.0× | 0.9× | 0.9× | 0.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $71M | $80M | $139M | $139M | $331M | $331M | $400M | $395M | $394M | $400M | $398M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $374M | $460M | $770M | $757M | $979M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.2B | Total assetsAssets |
| $55M | $93M | $198M | $179M | $411M | $340M | $304M | $222M | $188M | $178M | $197M | Total debtDebt |
| ($43M) | ($42M) | $77M | $179M | $411M | $340M | $109M | ($13M) | $31M | ($54M) | ($43M) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -9.7× | 1.5× | -2.7× | -1.2× | -4.2× | 1.5× | 5.0× | 6.2× | -3.8× | 1.1× | 2.9× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $102M | $126M | $113M | $116M | $5M | $54M | $90M | $117M | $25M | $66M | $79M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 2.8% | 2.1% | 2.8% | 3.3% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 4.8% | 6.9% | 7.2% | 7.0% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 103M | 108M | 114M | 118M | 120M | 128M | 133M | 134M | 129M | 132M | 135M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $5.04 | $5.61 | $8.61 | $8.44 | $7.91 | $7.91 | $8.33 | $9.82 | $8.64 | $8.62 | $9.28 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.35 | $-0.02 | $-0.41 | $-0.22 | $-1.06 | $0.02 | $0.33 | $0.58 | $-0.66 | $-0.06 | $0.12 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.24 | $0.45 | $-0.04 | $0.70 | $0.17 | $1.00 | $0.84 | $1.76 | $0.29 | $1.04 | $0.87 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.24 | $0.45 | $-0.19 | $0.70 | $0.17 | $1.00 | $0.84 | $1.76 | $0.29 | $0.96 | $0.78 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.35 | $0.19 | $0.13 | $0.13 | $0.12 | $0.10 | $0.14 | $0.19 | $0.20 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $0.99 | $1.16 | $0.99 | $0.98 | $0.05 | $0.43 | $0.68 | $0.87 | $0.20 | $0.50 | $0.59 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +6.1%/yr | +1.7%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +17.5%/yr | +43.2%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +15.3%/yr | +7.9%/yr |
| Book value / share | −7.4%/yr | +61.5%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business earned $137M of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $15M it takes just to hold its position. It put $10M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was $127M.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($7M) | ($86M) | $78M | $44M | $2M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$15M | +$24M | +$20M | +$20M | +$23M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$82M | +$77M | +$63M | +$43M | +$39M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$62M | +$41M | +$88M | +$20M | +$81M |
| Cash from operations | $152M | $55M | $249M | $128M | $145M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$15M | −$18M | −$14M | −$15M | −$17M |
| Owner earnings | $137M | $37M | $235M | $113M | $127M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −$10M | — | — | — | — |
| Free cash flow | $127M | $37M | $235M | $113M | $127M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 12% | 3% | 18% | 10% | 13% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $15M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $10M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows. The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $82M), owner earnings is nearer $55M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $17M ÷ interest expense $16M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- Net cashCash $232M + ST investments $4M − debt $178M
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $58M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 41 + DIO 87 − DPO 54 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle10-yr median, range -92%–87%; 72% latest = NOPAT $8M ÷ invested capital $12MIndustry peers: median 4%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 72% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -0%–18%; latest $137M = operating cash $152M − maintenance capex $15MIndustry peers: median 11%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 12% of revenue this year, a 8% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $82M of SBC) leaves $55M.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($7M) · cash from operations $152M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $38M ÷ Owner Earnings $137M
What this means
Of $137M Owner Earnings, $38M (28%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $38M buybacks. But the buybacks barely exceed stock issued to employees ($82M SBC), net of dilution, little was truly returned. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.68×ExpandingCapex $25M ÷ depreciation $15M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size NearRevenue ≥ $2B · $1.1B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.91×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $178M vs ($53M) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 7 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.04/share (latest year $-0.06), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $0.50/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 3 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 7 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 3 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin −3% → 1% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −3% early to 1% lately, median −1% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Owner earnings growth +10%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 10% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · −10.4% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +2.8%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing positions AI as something the company uses, not something it fears.
“Extreme is a leader in AI-powered cloud networking, focused on delivering simple and secure solutions that help businesses address challenges and enable connections among devices, applications, and users.”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$240M
- Receivables$163M
- Inventory$77M
- Other current assets$63M
- Debt due within a year$48M
- Accounts payable$81M
- Other current liabilities$464M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $979M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$183M · 19%
- Buybacks$278M · 28%
- Retained (debt / cash)$518M · 53%
- Returned to owners$278M
34% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $278M as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks$13.42
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 21M shares were bought for $278M, about $13.42 each. Year to year the price paid ranged from $6.34 (2019) to $20.77 (2024); its heaviest year, 2023, paid $18.49 ($100M).
- Net change in share count30.9%
The diluted count rose from 103M to 135M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Edward B. Meyercord | $5.6M | $17.7M | $127M |
| 2022 | Edward B. Meyercord | $8.9M | $6.2M | $113M |
| 2023 | Edward B. Meyercord | $16.1M | $52.7M | $235M |
| 2024 | Edward B. Meyercord | $15.0M | −$12.2M | $37M |
| 2025 | Edward B. Meyercord | $12.0M | $19.6M | $137M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership3.6%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2025 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio116:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2025 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$82M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 7% of revenue, equal to 486% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Extreme Networks Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
1 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?30.9%
Diluted shares grew 30.9% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $278M on buybacks. The repurchases were a treadmill: stock issued to staff outran them, so owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Income taxes, Inventory, Acquisitions as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Communications Equipment
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFIVF5 Inc. | $3.1B | 81% | 23.1% | 26% | 27% |
| PBIPitney Bowes Inc. | $1.9B | 44% | 0.3% | 0% | 7% |
| CRSRCorsair Gaming Inc. | $1.5B | 25% | 1.4% | 1% | 2% |
| OMCLOmnicell | $1.2B | 46% | 2.3% | 2% | 11% |
| EXTRExtreme Networks Inc. | $1.1B | 56% | -0.2% | -0% | 8% |
| NTGRNETGEAR Inc. | $700M | 30% | 3.1% | 4% | 3% |
| DGIIDigi International Inc. | $430M | 53% | 6.7% | 5% | 11% |
| ATENA10 Networks Inc. | $291M | 78% | 10.6% | 38% | 16% |
| Group median | — | 49% | 2.7% | 3% | 9% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Extreme Networks Inc. has delivered.
Extreme Networks Inc.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Extreme Networks Inc. earns about $93M on its 8.2% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 12.0% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow $105M on 131M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-24; net cash $43M. The if-converted diluted count is 135M, 3% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($27M) runs well above depreciation ($15M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $118M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← EXR its page in the Manual EYE →
Industry order: ← ERIC the Communications Equipment chapter FFIV →