Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← HAS Manual HAYW → ← FINV Mortgage & Specialty Finance ONIT →

HASI, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.

We have long-standing, programmatic relationships with some of the leading U.S. clean energy project developers, owners and operators, utilities, and energy service companies, which provide recurring, investment and fee-generating opportunities, while also enabling scale benefits and operational and transactional efficiencies.

The mix of our Portfolio is expected to vary over time, as we seek to manage the diversity of our Portfolio by, among other factors, project type, project operator, type of investment, type of technology, transaction size, geography, obligor, and maturity.

The fourth such quality is our multi-decade experience in investing in our target end markets, and the unique technology, policy, taxes, incentives and investment structures that characterize such markets.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
HASI · HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$401M
+4.4% YoY · 16% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $428M 5-yr avg $311M
FFO margin −3% 5-yr avg 22%
Debt / assets 42% 5-yr avg 40%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on concentrated dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Funds from operations per share have compounded about 5% a year across the record. Debt is 42% of assets, moderate for a REIT. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$81M$106M$139M$142M$187M$213M$240M$320M$384M$401M$428MRevenueRevenue
$15M$31M$42M$82M$82M$127M$42M$149M$200M$185M$56MNet incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
$22M$34M$46M$85M$86M$62M($12M)$83M$121M$120M($12M)Funds from operationsFFO
Balance sheet
222%198%154%101%116%183%192%159%174%Dividend payout (FFO)Payout
$1.7B$2.3B$2.2B$2.4B$3.5B$4.1B$4.8B$6.6B$7.1B$8.2B$8.2BTotal assetsAssets
40%54%39%29%37%42%37%35%44%42%42%Debt / assetsDebt/assets
$692M$1.2B$835M$700M$1.3B$1.8B$1.8B$2.3B$3.1B$3.5B$3.4BTotal debtDebt
$663M$1.2B$814M$694M$997M$1.5B$1.6B$2.3B$3.0B$3.4B$3.3BNet debt / (cash)Net debt
1.3×1.5×1.6×2.4×1.9×2.2×1.4×2.1×2.1×1.9×1.3×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$574M$643M$805M$940M$1.2B$1.6B$1.7B$2.1B$2.4B$2.7B$2.5BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
40.3M50.4M52.8M64.8M74.4M87.7M90.6M109M131M138M128MShares out (diluted)Shares
$0.55$0.68$0.87$1.31$1.16$0.71$-0.13$0.76$0.92$0.87$-0.10FFO / shareFFO/sh
$1.23$1.35$1.34$1.33$1.34$1.29$1.46$1.46$1.47$1.52$1.69Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$14.25$12.76$15.24$14.51$16.27$17.87$18.37$19.56$18.43$19.23$19.87Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+4.1%/yr+2.9%/yr
EPS+15.6%/yr+3.8%/yr
Dividends / share+2.4%/yr+2.5%/yr
Book value / share+3.4%/yr+3.4%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
138Mpeak FY2025
Revenue
$401Mlow FY2016
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • about $0.87 per share
    Net income $185M + depreciation $780K − gains on sale $65M
    What this means

    GAAP net income with property depreciation added back, because the buildings a REIT charges against earnings usually hold or grow their value. This, not net income, is what a REIT is actually priced on. It is an approximation here: where a filing reports gains on property sales, we remove them, the way the NAREIT definition does.

  • Not covered by FFO
    Dividends $210M ÷ FFO $120M
    Industry peers: median 43%
    What this means

    A REIT must distribute most of its taxable income, so a high payout is normal and the question is whether FFO covers it. Above 100%, the trust is funding the dividend with debt or asset sales, and a cut usually follows.

Is it sound?

  • Moderate
    Total debt $3.5B ÷ assets $8.2B
    Industry peers: median 49%
    What this means

    Every REIT runs on leverage; how much is the question. Heavy debt is what turns a property downturn into a wipeout, as 2008 showed, so a conservative balance sheet is part of the moat here, not a drag on it.

  • Thin
    (operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest $292M
    Industry peers: median 3.7×
    What this means

    How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“Artificial intelligence could increase competitive, operational, legal and regulatory risks to our business in ways that we cannot predict.”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Net income
2021$9.2M$4.4M$127M
2022$8.0M−$977k$42M
2023Mr. Lipson$8.2M$7.4M$149M
2023$6.1M$5.1M$149M
2024Mr. Lipson$8.4M$8.4M$200M
2025Mr. Lipson$9.6M$12.6M$185M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Net income is the whole business's, as filed, for the same fiscal years. A dash under the name means the filing tags the figure without naming the officer.

  • Insider ownership2.2%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$30M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 7% of revenue, equal to 5% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Credit & receivables, Stock compensation as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Specialty REITs

The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueFFO marginFFO / assetsPayout (FFO)Debt / assets
OUTOUTFRONT Media Inc.$1.8B16%5.1%70%48%
HHHHoward Hughes Holdings Inc.$1.5B19%2.9%55%
TPLTexas Pacific Land$798M67%37.5%28%
EPREPR Properties$718M53%5.7%80%49%
JOESt. Joe Company (The)$513M33%7.0%21%26%
RYNRayonier Inc. REIT$484M28%8.1%56%37%
HASIHA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.$401M31%1.5%174%39%
SAFESafehold Inc. New Common Stock$386M20%1.7%30%63%
Group median30%5.4%56%48%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

A reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/HASI, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← HAS its page in the Manual HAYW →

Industry order: ← FINV the Mortgage & Specialty Finance chapter ONIT →