← All companies ← ING Manual INTR → ← ICUI Medical Devices & Equipment INSP →
INMD, InMode Ltd.
Revenue is Capital Equipment (78%) and Consumables and Service Revenues (22%).
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- A medical-device business, placing equipment that pulls consumables and service behind it.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 84% and operating margin about 35% through the cycle, a wide spread between price and the cost of what it sells — whether that advantage is durable pricing power or a margin that can erode is the question the record is for. Read this kind of business on the installed base and what follows it. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run high across the record (median 37%, above 15% in 8 of 8 years), though buybacks and expensed R&D and brands shrink the capital base, so the figure overstates the underlying economics. The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 37% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Capital Equipment is 78% of revenue, with Consumables And Service Revenues the other meaningful line at 22%.
- Capital Equipment78%$289M
- Consumables And Service Revenues22%$81M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2017–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| $53M | $100M | $156M | $206M | $358M | $454M | $492M | $395M | $370M | $370M | RevenueRevenue |
| 83% | 85% | 87% | 85% | 85% | 84% | 84% | 80% | 79% | 79% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| $9M | $23M | $60M | $73M | $167M | $198M | $196M | $113M | $85M | $85M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 16.7% | 23.5% | 38.1% | 35.3% | 46.8% | 43.6% | 39.8% | 28.5% | 23.0% | 23.0% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $9M | $22M | $61M | $75M | $165M | $162M | $198M | $181M | $94M | $94M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 10% | 5% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 20% | 9% | — | 15% | 15% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||||||
| $15M | $37M | $62M | $79M | $175M | $182M | $177M | $133M | $85M | $85M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $204K | $184K | $302K | $416K | $517K | $680K | $623K | $728K | $695K | $695K | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $6M | $14M | $746K | $4M | $9M | $19M | ($22M) | ($49M) | ($9M) | ($9M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $189K | $381K | $693K | $463K | $939K | $2M | $705K | $669K | $972K | $972K | CapexCapex |
| 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $14M | $37M | $62M | $79M | $174M | $181M | $176M | $132M | $85M | $85M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 27.0% | 36.6% | 39.6% | 38.2% | 48.8% | 39.8% | 35.8% | 33.4% | 22.8% | 22.8% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $14M | $37M | $62M | $79M | $174M | $180M | $176M | $132M | $84M | $84M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 27.0% | 36.4% | 39.3% | 38.2% | 48.6% | 39.6% | 35.8% | 33.4% | 22.7% | 22.7% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | — | — | $17M | $35M | $43M | $0 | $285M | $127M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| — | 120% | 45% | 39% | 47% | 35% | 28% | 21% | 19% | 19% | ROICROIC |
| — | 52% | 35% | 30% | 40% | 29% | 25% | 26% | 14% | 14% | Return on equityROE |
| — | 52% | 35% | 30% | 40% | 29% | 25% | 26% | 14% | 14% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||||||||
| $18M | $51M | $165M | $211M | $363M | $472M | $518M | $423M | $386M | $386M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $7M | $7M | $10M | $20M | $27M | $42M | $36M | $44M | $44M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $7M | $9M | $15M | $21M | $40M | $45M | $60M | $74M | $74M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | $5M | $4M | $6M | $9M | $16M | $14M | $14M | $18M | $18M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $9M | $12M | $19M | $32M | $51M | $73M | $82M | $100M | $100M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $78M | $213M | $290M | $470M | $629M | $845M | $714M | $699M | $699M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $29M | $32M | $35M | $52M | $82M | $64M | $70M | $71M | $71M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 2.6× | 6.6× | 8.3× | 9.1× | 7.7× | 13.2× | 10.2× | 9.9× | 9.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | $81M | $218M | $296M | $479M | $644M | $863M | $786M | $766M | $766M | Total assetsAssets |
| ($18M) | ($51M) | ($165M) | ($211M) | ($363M) | ($472M) | ($518M) | ($423M) | ($386M) | ($386M) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| — | $43M | $176M | $254M | $416M | $555M | $787M | $704M | $683M | $683M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | ||||||||||
| 29.7M | 35.0M | 76.1M | 84.2M | 86.0M | 85.4M | 86.0M | 80.6M | 65.4M | 63.4M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $1.80 | $2.86 | $2.05 | $2.45 | $4.16 | $5.32 | $5.72 | $4.90 | $5.66 | $5.85 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $0.30 | $0.64 | $0.80 | $0.89 | $1.92 | $1.89 | $2.30 | $2.25 | $1.43 | $1.48 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.49 | $1.05 | $0.81 | $0.94 | $2.03 | $2.12 | $2.05 | $1.64 | $1.29 | $1.33 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.49 | $1.04 | $0.81 | $0.94 | $2.02 | $2.11 | $2.05 | $1.64 | $1.29 | $1.33 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.01 | $0.01 | $0.01 | $0.01 | $0.01 | $0.02 | $0.01 | $0.01 | $0.01 | $0.02 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| — | $1.24 | $2.31 | $3.02 | $4.83 | $6.49 | $9.16 | $8.73 | $10.44 | $10.78 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The diluted share count moved ×2.17 into 2019 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 8-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +15.4%/yr | +18.3%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +13.0%/yr | +6.7%/yr |
| EPS | +21.7%/yr | +10.0%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +11.2%/yr | +22.0%/yr |
| Book value / share | +35.6%/yr (7-yr) | +28.2%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2017–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business earned $85M of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $695K it takes just to hold its position. It put $277K more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was $84M.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $94M | $181M | $198M | $162M | $165M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$695K | +$728K | +$623K | +$680K | +$517K |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$9M | −$49M | −$22M | +$19M | +$9M |
| Cash from operations | $85M | $133M | $177M | $182M | $175M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$695K | −$669K | −$705K | −$680K | −$517K |
| Owner earnings | $85M | $132M | $176M | $181M | $174M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −$277K | — | — | −$895K | −$422K |
| Free cash flow | $84M | $132M | $176M | $180M | $174M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 23% | 33% | 36% | 40% | 49% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $695K, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $277K of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- No meaningful interest burdenLittle or no interest expense reported
What this means
Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.
- Net cash, debt-freeCash $303M + ST investments $84M − debt $0
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $386M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 43 + DIO 340 − DPO 82 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median -8%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- High through the cycle9-yr median margin, range 23%–49%; latest $85M = operating cash $85M − maintenance capex $695KIndustry peers: median -3%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 23% of revenue this year, a 37% median across 9 years.
- Mostly cash-backedCash from ops $85M ÷ net income $94M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returned more than it generatedDividends + buybacks $127M ÷ Owner Earnings $85M
What this means
The company returned more than it generated: against $85M of Owner Earnings, $127M (151%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $127M buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.40×ExpandingCapex $972K ÷ depreciation $695K
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $370M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 9.88×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (9-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +412%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $2.49/share (latest year $1.48), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $10.78/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2017–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 9 of 9
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Operating margin 26% → 30% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 26% early to 30% lately, median 35% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Owner earnings growth +20%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 20% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2017 · 16.7% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$386M
- Receivables$44M
- Inventory$74M
- Other current assets$195M
- Accounts payable$18M
- Other current liabilities$53M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2017–2025
Over the record, the business generated $944M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash builder, a large share of cash simply built up on the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$7M · 1%
- Buybacks$508M · 54%
- Retained (debt / cash)$430M · 45%
- Returned to owners$508M
54% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $508M as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span cash and short-term investments rose $369M.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $508M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count113.5%
The diluted count rose from 30M to 63M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
- Return on what it retained20%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($459M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $93M, so each retained $1 added about 0.20 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why InMode Ltd. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2017–2025.
2 of the 3 tests turned up something to look into; the other 1 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?30.7% vs 34.4%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 34.4% early in the record and 30.7% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?113.5%
Diluted shares grew 113.5% over 2017–2025, even as the company spent $508M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Medical Devices & Equipment
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BVSBioventus Inc. | $568M | 68% | 2.8% | -3% | 7% |
| ATRCAtriCure | $535M | 75% | -10.8% | -8% | -8% |
| GKOSGlaukos Corporation | $507M | 76% | -25.2% | -8% | -3% |
| MDXGMiMedx Group Inc | $419M | 84% | -0.3% | 34% | 8% |
| INMDInMode Ltd. | $370M | 84% | 35.3% | 37% | 37% |
| ANGOAngioDynamics Inc. | $320M | 54% | -12.3% | -9% | -0% |
| PRCTPROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation | $308M | 51% | -93.9% | -115% | -96% |
| AXGNAxogen Inc. | $225M | 81% | -19.9% | -17% | -13% |
| Group median | — | 76% | -11.5% | -8% | -2% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. InMode Ltd.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what InMode Ltd. has delivered.
Through the cycle, InMode Ltd. earns about $136M on its 36.6% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 22.8% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow $84M on 63M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $386M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($972K) runs well above depreciation ($695K), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $85M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← ING its page in the Manual INTR →
Industry order: ← ICUI the Medical Devices & Equipment chapter INSP →