Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← ITRG Manual ITUB → ← HWKN Trading Companies & Distributors JXG →

ITRN, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.

We are a leading provider of telematics services, consisting predominantly of stolen vehicle recovery, fleet management services and other tracking services as well as connected car and usage base insurance.

We utilize technologies that enable precise and secure high-speed data transmission and analysis.

Some of the technology underlying our products was originally developed for the Israeli Defence Forces.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F
ITRN · Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$359M
+6.8% YoY · 8% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $359M 5-yr avg $316M
Gross margin 50% 5-yr avg 48%
Operating margin 21.5% 5-yr avg 20.7%
ROIC 51% 5-yr avg 43%
Owner-earnings margin 21% 5-yr avg 17%
Free cash flow margin 19% 5-yr avg 15%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is Telematics Services (74%) and Telematics Products (26%).
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 48% and operating margin about 21% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has run high across the record (median 37%, above 15% in 8 of 10 years), though buybacks and expensed R&D and brands shrink the capital base, so the figure overstates the underlying economics. The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 17% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

The biggest segment, Telematics Services, is also where the profit is made: 74% of revenue and 94% of segment operating profit.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
Operating profit same segments
  • Telematics Services74%$265M94% of profit
  • Telematics Products26%$94M6% of profit
By geographyIsrael55%Brazil23%Other Foreign Countries22%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
$200M$235M$253M$279M$246M$271M$293M$320M$336M$359M$359MRevenueRevenue
51%51%50%47%47%47%47%48%48%50%50%Gross marginGross mgn
$48M$57M$62M$23M$28M$55M$59M$66M$71M$77M$77MOperating incomeOp. inc.
24.1%24.1%24.6%8.1%11.3%20.2%20.1%20.6%21.2%21.5%21.5%Operating marginOp. mgn
$35M$46M$63M$8M$17M$37M$40M$50M$57M$60M$60MNet incomeNet inc.
30%28%21%39%24%24%21%20%20%20%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$41M$44M$53M$60M$60M$56M$45M$77M$74M$89M$89MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$9M$10M$9M$17M$14M$14M$15M$15M$15M$14M$14MDepreciationDeprec.
($2M)($13M)($19M)$35M$28M$5M($9M)$12M$3M$15M$15MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$14M$16M$22M$18M$10M$17M$27M$14M$14M$22M$22MCapexCapex
6.8%6.9%8.6%6.6%4.2%6.1%9.0%4.5%4.1%6.1%6.1%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$32M$34M$44M$41M$50M$39M$30M$63M$61M$75M$75MOwner earningsOwner earn.
16.2%14.3%17.4%14.8%20.3%14.5%10.4%19.7%18.0%20.8%20.8%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$28M$28M$32M$41M$50M$39M$19M$63M$61M$67M$67MFree cash flowFCF
13.9%11.8%12.4%14.8%20.3%14.5%6.4%19.7%18.0%18.6%18.6%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$17M$23M$20M$20M$10M$16M$11M$12M$28M$38M$38MDividends paidDiv. paid
47%46%27%7%13%32%31%43%52%56%51%ROICROIC
34%37%41%6%14%28%27%29%31%28%28%Return on equityROE
17%19%28%−9%6%16%19%22%15%10%10%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$31M$40M$53M$54M$79M$55M$28M$54M$77M$108M$108MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$34M$41M$54M$45M$39M$44M$46M$45M$48M$59M$59MReceivablesReceiv.
$14M$14M$28M$26M$23M$27M$29M$27M$23M$23M$23MInventoryInvent.
$19M$23M$24M$23M$20M$21M$22M$21M$19M$19M$19MAccounts payablePayables
$30M$32M$59M$48M$42M$50M$52M$51M$52M$63M$63MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$111M$137M$189M$174M$179M$163M$151M$179M$195M$238M$238MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$56M$66M$105M$101M$113M$104M$93M$92M$88M$104M$104MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
2.0×2.1×1.8×1.7×1.6×1.6×1.6×1.9×2.2×2.3×2.3×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$3M$4M$63M$50M$40M$40M$40M$39M$39M$40M$40MGoodwillGoodwill
$178M$215M$374M$339M$312M$293M$291M$319M$327M$386M$386MTotal assetsAssets
$79M$86M$74M$49M$24M$592K$12MTotal debtDebt
$26M$32M($5M)($6M)($4M)($53M)($96M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
$102M$126M$154M$129M$127M$132M$146M$174M$185M$218M$218MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
21.0M21.0M21.1M21.0M20.8M20.8M20.4M20.0M19.9M19.9M23.5MShares out (diluted)Shares
$9.52$11.19$12.02$13.28$11.80$13.04$14.35$16.00$16.90$18.06$15.29Revenue / shareRev/sh
$1.66$2.21$3.00$0.37$0.83$1.78$1.93$2.52$2.84$3.02$2.56EPS (diluted)EPS
$1.54$1.60$2.09$1.97$2.39$1.89$1.49$3.15$3.05$3.76$3.19Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$1.33$1.32$1.50$1.97$2.39$1.89$0.91$3.15$3.05$3.36$2.85Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.81$1.08$0.96$0.94$0.48$0.76$0.56$0.58$1.41$1.89$1.60Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$0.65$0.77$1.03$0.87$0.49$0.80$1.30$0.71$0.69$1.10$0.93Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$4.88$6.00$7.29$6.15$6.11$6.38$7.14$8.72$9.31$10.95$9.27Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+7.4%/yr+8.9%/yr
Owner earnings / share+10.4%/yr+9.5%/yr
EPS+6.9%/yr+29.4%/yr
Dividends / share+9.8%/yr+31.6%/yr
Capital spending / share+6.0%/yr+17.4%/yr
Book value / share+9.4%/yr+12.4%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
20Mpeak FY2018
ROIC
56%low FY2019
Gross margin
50%low FY2019

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$75Mowner earningsvs.$60Mnet incomelow FY2022

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business earned $75M of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $14M it takes just to hold its position. It put $8M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was $67M.

Reported net income$60M
Owner earnings$75M · 21% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$60M$57M$50M$40M$37M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$14M+$15M+$15M+$15M+$14M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$15M+$3M+$12M−$9M+$5M
Cash from operations$89M$74M$77M$45M$56M
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$14M−$14M−$14M−$15M−$17M
Owner earnings$75M$61M$63M$30M$39M
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$8M−$12M
Free cash flow$67M$61M$63M$19M$39M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue21%18%20%10%14%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $14M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $8M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • No meaningful interest burden
    Little or no interest expense reported
    What this means

    Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.

  • Net cash
    Cash $108M + ST investments $3K − debt $12M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $96M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 59 + DIO 47 − DPO 39 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Very high (≥25%) through the cycle
    10-yr median, range 7%–56%; 51% latest = NOPAT $62M ÷ invested capital $122M
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 51% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • High through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range 10%–21%; latest $75M = operating cash $89M − maintenance capex $14M
    Industry peers: median 2%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 21% of revenue this year, a 16% median across 10 years. It chose to put $8M more into growth, so free cash flow this year was $67M — the gap is investment, not weakness.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $89M ÷ net income $60M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Returns about half
    Dividends + buybacks $38M ÷ Owner Earnings $75M
    What this means

    Of $75M Owner Earnings, $38M (50%) went back to shareholders, $38M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.58×
    Expanding
    Capex $22M ÷ depreciation $14M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $359M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 2.28×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $12M vs $134M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Pass
    Uninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Near
    Earnings +33% over the record · +16%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $2.81/share (latest year $3.03), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $10.98/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 10 of 10
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 4 of 6 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 24% → 21% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 24% early to 21% lately, median 21% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Owner earnings growth +8%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 8% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2019 · 8.1% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count −0.6%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Moderate contestability

AI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“The broader proliferation of AI may indirectly effect our business, financial conditions, results of operations, or competitive position...”

The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$238M
  • Cash & short-term investments$108M
  • Receivables$59M
  • Inventory$23M
  • Other current assets$48M
Current liabilities$104M
  • Debt due within a year$12M
  • Accounts payable$19M
  • Other current liabilities$73M
Current ratio2.28×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio2.06×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio1.03×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$134Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$12M due · $108M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Dec 31, 2025 balance sheet
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$169Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Debt incl. operating leases$14M$2M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$27Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $599M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$173M · 29%
  • Dividends$194M · 32%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$232M · 39%
  • Returned to owners$194M

    41% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $194M as dividends and $0 as buybacks.

  • Net change in share count12.0%

    The diluted count rose from 21M to 23M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record$1.89/sh

    Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 10% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.

  • Return on what it retained13%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($219M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $29M, so each retained $1 added about 0.13 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Ituran Location and Control Ltd. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

1 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?12.0%

    Diluted shares grew 12.0% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Trading Companies & Distributors

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
INGMIngram Micro Holding Corporation$52.6B7%1.8%10%0%
GOLDGold.com Inc.$11.0B2%1.3%28%-0%
CNXNPC Connection Inc.$2.9B16%3.4%12%2%
PLUSePlus inc.$2.4B25%6.3%18%11%
DXPEDXP Enterprises Inc.$2.0B28%5.6%10%3%
ITRNIturan Location and Control Ltd.$359M48%20.9%37%17%
Group median20%4.5%15%3%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Ituran Location and Control Ltd. reports in USD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Ituran Location and Control Ltd. has delivered.

Ituran Location and Control Ltd.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.

$

Through the cycle, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. earns about $60M on its 16.8% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 20.8% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+18%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25+10%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $67M on 20M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $96M. The if-converted diluted count is 23M, 19% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($22M) runs well above depreciation ($14M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $75M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/ITRN, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← ITRG its page in the Manual ITUB →

Industry order: ← HWKN the Trading Companies & Distributors chapter JXG →