← All companies ← HWCPZ Manual HWM → ← HRI Trading Companies & Distributors ITRN →
HWKN, Hawkins
We are a leading water treatment and specialty ingredients company that formulates, manufactures, distributes, and blends products for our Water Treatment, Food and Health Sciences, and Industrial Solutions customers.
Our Water Treatment Group specializes in providing chemicals, filtration media and systems, equipment, services and solutions for potable water, municipal and industrial wastewater, industrial process water, mainly non-residential swimming pool water and agricultural water.
The Water Treatment Group operates out of 53 warehouses in 28 states, primarily located in the eastern two-thirds of the United States, supplying products and services to customers across that footprint.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Water Treatment (50%), Food and Health Sciences (30%) and Industrial Solutions (20%).
- Situation
- Serial acquirer. Goodwill and acquired intangibles are 46% of assets, with meaningful acquisition spending in 5 of the record's 9 years; much of what this business is was bought, at prices the record carries.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 19% and operating margin about 9.4% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. On a spread this thin the operating result swings hard on small moves in cost or volume — it has ranged from −2.3% to 12% over the years, so the cost line is where the needle moves. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 12%). By owner earnings: roughly 6% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →The biggest segment, Water Treatment, is also where the profit is made: 50% of revenue and 56% of segment operating profit.
- Water Treatment50%$543M56% of profit
- Food and Health Sciences30%$321M28% of profit
- Industrial Solutions20%$220M16% of profit
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2018–2026
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | 2026’26 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| $504M | $556M | $540M | $597M | $775M | $935M | $919M | $974M | $1.1B | $1.1B | RevenueRevenue |
| 17% | 17% | 19% | 21% | 19% | 18% | 21% | 23% | 23% | 23% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 12% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 10% | 8% | 10% | 11% | 11% | 11% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| ($12M) | $37M | $42M | $56M | $71M | $88M | $104M | $119M | $121M | $121M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −2.3% | 6.6% | 7.7% | 9.4% | 9.2% | 9.4% | 11.3% | 12.2% | 11.2% | 11.2% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($9M) | $24M | $28M | $41M | $52M | $60M | $75M | $84M | $82M | $82M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | 27% | 27% | 27% | 26% | 27% | 25% | 26% | 25% | 25% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||||||
| $27M | $48M | $59M | $44M | $43M | $77M | $159M | $111M | $144M | $144M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $22M | $22M | $22M | $23M | $24M | $27M | $32M | $40M | $53M | $53M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $13M | ($209K) | $7M | ($23M) | ($37M) | ($14M) | $47M | ($20M) | $2M | $2M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $20M | $13M | $25M | $21M | $29M | $48M | $40M | $41M | $58M | $58M | CapexCapex |
| 3.9% | 2.3% | 4.5% | 3.5% | 3.7% | 5.2% | 4.4% | 4.2% | 5.4% | 5.4% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $8M | $35M | $34M | $23M | $14M | $50M | $128M | $70M | $86M | $86M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 1.5% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 3.9% | 1.8% | 5.3% | 13.9% | 7.2% | 7.9% | 7.9% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $8M | $35M | $34M | $23M | $14M | $29M | $119M | $70M | $86M | $86M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 1.5% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 3.9% | 1.8% | 3.1% | 13.0% | 7.2% | 7.9% | 7.9% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $0 | $0 | $0 | $51M | $22M | $0 | $83M | $87M | $167M | $167M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $9M | $12M | $10M | $10M | $11M | $12M | $13M | $15M | $16M | $16M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| -3% | 9% | 11% | 11% | 12% | 14% | 16% | 14% | 12% | 12% | ROICROIC |
| -5% | 11% | 12% | 15% | 17% | 17% | 19% | 18% | 15% | 15% | Return on equityROE |
| −9% | 6% | 8% | 12% | 13% | 14% | 15% | 15% | 12% | 12% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||||||||
| $5M | $9M | $4M | $3M | $3M | $8M | $7M | $5M | $4M | $7M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $64M | $64M | $67M | $91M | $123M | $129M | $114M | $132M | $140M | $140M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $60M | $60M | $54M | $64M | $95M | $89M | $75M | $84M | $78M | $78M | InventoryInvent. |
| $33M | $29M | $34M | $37M | $67M | $54M | $56M | $61M | $60M | $60M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $90M | $95M | $88M | $117M | $151M | $164M | $133M | $154M | $158M | $158M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $135M | $139M | $131M | $163M | $228M | $232M | $203M | $231M | $231M | $231M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $61M | $55M | $62M | $70M | $101M | $91M | $103M | $97M | $105M | $105M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 2.2× | 2.5× | 2.1× | 2.3× | 2.2× | 2.6× | 2.0× | 2.4× | 2.2× | 2.2× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $58M | $58M | $58M | $71M | $77M | $77M | $103M | $135M | $223M | $223M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $391M | $386M | $389M | $473M | $567M | $591M | $658M | $770M | $986M | $986M | Total assetsAssets |
| $101M | $85M | $60M | $99M | $126M | $112M | $99M | $159M | $244M | $254M | Total debtDebt |
| $96M | $75M | $55M | $96M | $122M | $104M | $92M | $154M | $240M | $247M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $202M | $218M | $233M | $265M | $303M | $350M | $406M | $460M | $534M | $534M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.8% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | ||||||||||
| 21.3M | 21.5M | 21.3M | 21.3M | 21.1M | 21.0M | 21.0M | 20.9M | 20.9M | 20.9M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $23.68 | $25.93 | $25.35 | $28.07 | $36.65 | $44.50 | $43.74 | $46.54 | $51.95 | $51.95 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.43 | $1.14 | $1.33 | $1.93 | $2.44 | $2.86 | $3.59 | $4.03 | $3.91 | $3.91 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.36 | $1.65 | $1.61 | $1.08 | $0.68 | $2.38 | $6.08 | $3.34 | $4.13 | $4.13 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.36 | $1.65 | $1.61 | $1.08 | $0.68 | $1.38 | $5.68 | $3.34 | $4.13 | $4.13 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.43 | $0.56 | $0.46 | $0.47 | $0.52 | $0.57 | $0.63 | $0.70 | $0.75 | $0.75 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.93 | $0.59 | $1.15 | $0.98 | $1.35 | $2.30 | $1.91 | $1.96 | $2.79 | $2.79 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $9.50 | $10.16 | $10.96 | $12.48 | $14.32 | $16.66 | $19.32 | $21.99 | $25.60 | $25.60 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2019 are restated ×2 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
| 8-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +10.3%/yr | +13.1%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +35.7%/yr | +30.7%/yr |
| EPS | — | +15.2%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +7.2%/yr | +9.7%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +14.8%/yr | +23.3%/yr |
| Book value / share | +13.2%/yr | +15.5%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Operating income+1.8%
“Operating Income Operating income increased $2.1 million, or 2%, to $121.3 million, or 11% of sales, for fiscal 2026, as compared to $119.2 million, or 12% of sales, for fiscal 2025, due to the combined impact of the factors discussed above.”
✓ figure matches the filed record
The record, charted
FY2018–2026Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2026 the business turned $82M of profit into $86M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $82M | $84M | $75M | $60M | $52M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$53M | +$40M | +$32M | +$27M | +$24M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$9M | +$6M | +$5M | +$4M | +$4M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$2M | −$20M | +$47M | −$14M | −$37M |
| Cash from operations | $144M | $111M | $159M | $77M | $43M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$58M | −$41M | −$32M | −$27M | −$29M |
| Owner earnings | $86M | $70M | $128M | $50M | $14M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | — | −$8M | −$21M | — |
| Free cash flow | $86M | $70M | $119M | $29M | $14M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 8% | 7% | 14% | 5% | 2% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $9M), owner earnings is nearer $78M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Interest expense not tagged in the data
What this means
No usable interest-expense line was tagged in the filing data, but the balance sheet carries real net debt — so the interest burden here is unknown, not absent. Read the debt on the net-debt check below.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $250M · 2.1× operating profitMeaningful net debtCash $4M − debt $254M
What this means
Netting $4M of cash and short-term investments against $254M of debt leaves $250M owed, about 2.1× a year's operating profit. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- TightDSO 47 + DIO 34 − DPO 26 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Solid through the cycle9-yr median, range -3%–16%; 12% latest = NOPAT $90M ÷ invested capital $784MIndustry peers: median 6%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran 12% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle9-yr median margin, range 2%–14%; latest $86M = operating cash $144M − maintenance capex $58MIndustry peers: median 2%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 8% of revenue this year, a 6% median across 9 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $9M of SBC) leaves $78M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $144M ÷ net income $82M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $16M ÷ Owner Earnings $86M
What this means
Of $86M Owner Earnings, $16M (18%) went back to shareholders, $16M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.11×MaintainingCapex $58M ÷ depreciation $53M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size NearRevenue ≥ $2B · $1.1B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 2.21×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $254M vs $127M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (9-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (9)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +453%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $3.85/share (latest year $3.91), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $25.59/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2018–2026
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 8 of 9
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 1 of 9 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 4% → 12% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The margin widened even though the filing names price competition — the gain came from volume or cost, not pricing power. Read where.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 4% early to 12% lately, median 9% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 21%
What this means
Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.
- Owner earnings growth +17%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 17% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2018 · −2.3% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2018, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Moderate contestabilityAI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.
The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Mar 29, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$4M
- Receivables$140M
- Inventory$78M
- Other current assets$9M
- Debt due within a year$10M
- Accounts payable$60M
- Other current liabilities$35M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2018–2026
Over the record, the business generated $713M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$294M · 41%
- Dividends$108M · 15%
- Retained (debt / cash)$312M · 44%
- Returned to owners$108M
24% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $108M as dividends and $0 as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose $153M and cash and short-term investments fell $676K.
- Net change in share count−2.0%
The diluted count fell from 21M to 21M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record$0.75/sh
Paid in 9 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 7% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
- Return on what it retained21%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($330M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $69M, so each retained $1 added about 0.21 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 9-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
$39M written down across 1 year (2018): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 9-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $2.1M | $3.7M | $14M |
| 2023 | $2.2M | $2.2M | $50M |
| 2024 | $2.6M | $5.2M | $128M |
| 2025 | $3.2M | $5.3M | $70M |
| 2026 | $3.6M | $6.2M | $86M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership3.7%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio39:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$9M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 7% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Hawkins is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2018–2026.
None of the 6 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Trading Companies & Distributors
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USFDUS Foods | $39.4B | 17% | 2.7% | 8% | 2% |
| WKCWorld Kinect | $36.9B | 3% | 0.5% | 6% | 0% |
| CHSCOCHS Inc. | $35.5B | 3% | 1.2% | 4% | 2% |
| DPZDomino's Pizza Inc. | $4.9B | 39% | 18.0% | 91% | 12% |
| CHEFChefs' Warehouse | $4.1B | 24% | 3.2% | 6% | 2% |
| UVVUniversal Corporation | $2.9B | 18% | 7.6% | 8% | 3% |
| VSTSVestis Corporation | $2.7B | — | 6.4% | 6% | 6% |
| HWKNHawkins | $1.1B | 19% | 9.4% | 12% | 6% |
| Group median | — | 18% | 4.8% | 7% | 2% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Hawkins has delivered.
Hawkins’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Hawkins earns about $69M on its 6.4% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 7.9% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $86M on 21M shares outstanding, per the 10-K cover, as of 2026-05-08; net debt $247M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← HWCPZ its page in the Manual HWM →
Industry order: ← HRI the Trading Companies & Distributors chapter ITRN →