← All companies ← LESL Manual LEVI → ← KNF Metals & Mining LGO →
LEU, Centrus Energy Corp.
A metals and mining business, a price-taker on a global commodity.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 25% and operating margin about 11% through the cycle, a spread the cycle sets more than the company does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −48% and 23% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Inventory runs near 57% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the commodity price and the cost position. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →25% of revenue comes from outside the United States.
- United States75%$335M
- Japan23%$103M
- Other Foreign2%$11M
- Netherlands0%$0
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $311M | $218M | $193M | $210M | $247M | $298M | $294M | $320M | $442M | $449M | $452M | RevenueRevenue |
| 14% | 14% | −9% | 15% | 39% | 38% | 40% | 35% | 25% | 26% | 26% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 15% | 20% | 21% | 16% | 15% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 8% | 8% | 8% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 15% | 7% | 14% | 7% | 1% | 1% | 5% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 7% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| ($62M) | ($45M) | ($92M) | ($20M) | $51M | $68M | $60M | $52M | $48M | $50M | $31M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −19.8% | −20.5% | −47.9% | −9.4% | 20.6% | 22.9% | 20.3% | 16.4% | 10.9% | 11.2% | 6.7% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($67M) | $12M | ($104M) | ($17M) | $54M | $175M | $52M | $84M | $73M | $78M | $61M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | -1% | — | — | -3% | — | 23% | 0% | -0% | 9% | 4% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $38M | ($16M) | ($74M) | $11M | $67M | $50M | $21M | $9M | $37M | $51M | ($21M) | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $13M | $12M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $9M | $10M | $7M | $11M | $10M | $11M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $92M | ($40M) | $22M | $21M | $5M | ($134M) | ($41M) | ($82M) | ($47M) | ($37M) | ($92M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $3M | $500K | $100K | $100K | $1M | $1M | $700K | $2M | $4M | $20M | $41M | CapexCapex |
| 1.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 4.4% | 9.0% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $35M | ($17M) | ($75M) | $11M | $66M | $49M | $20M | $8M | $33M | $41M | ($31M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 11.1% | −7.6% | −38.6% | 5.3% | 26.6% | 16.4% | 6.8% | 2.3% | 7.4% | 9.2% | −6.9% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $35M | ($17M) | ($75M) | $11M | $66M | $49M | $20M | $8M | $33M | $31M | ($61M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| 11.1% | −7.6% | −38.6% | 5.3% | 26.6% | 16.4% | 6.8% | 2.3% | 7.4% | 7.0% | −13.6% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 261% | 45% | 10% | 8% | Return on equityROE |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 261% | 45% | 10% | 8% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $261M | $209M | $123M | $131M | $152M | $194M | $180M | $201M | $671M | $2.0B | $1.9B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $20M | $60M | $60M | $21M | $30M | $29M | $38M | $49M | $80M | $31M | $42M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $177M | $153M | $130M | $65M | $65M | $91M | $209M | $306M | $162M | $323M | $336M | InventoryInvent. |
| $60M | $79M | $46M | $8M | $51M | $38M | $66M | $42M | $39M | $42M | $50M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $138M | $134M | $144M | $78M | $44M | $82M | $182M | $314M | $203M | $312M | $328M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $561M | $567M | $485M | $370M | $406M | $466M | $587M | $685M | $1.0B | $2.4B | $2.3B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $326M | $403M | $439M | $337M | $366M | $393M | $449M | $471M | $347M | $423M | $401M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.7× | 1.4× | 1.1× | 1.1× | 1.1× | 1.2× | 1.3× | 1.5× | 2.9× | 5.6× | 5.7× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $714M | $675M | $572M | $456M | $486M | $572M | $706M | $796M | $1.1B | $2.4B | $2.4B | Total assetsAssets |
| $234M | $164M | $153M | $120M | $114M | $108M | $102M | $96M | $479M | $1.2B | $1.2B | Total debtDebt |
| ($27M) | ($45M) | $30M | ($11M) | ($38M) | ($86M) | ($78M) | ($106M) | ($193M) | ($782M) | ($692M) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.3× | 17.8× | 3.6× | 2.2× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| ($236M) | ($219M) | ($322M) | ($337M) | ($321M) | ($142M) | ($74M) | $32M | $161M | $765M | $775M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 9.1M | 9.1M | 9.2M | 9.6M | 10.1M | 13.9M | 15.0M | 15.5M | 16.4M | 19.9M | 22.4M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $34.21 | $24.05 | $21.09 | $21.92 | $24.42 | $21.49 | $19.60 | $20.66 | $27.00 | $22.52 | $20.15 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-7.36 | $1.34 | $-11.38 | $-1.72 | $5.37 | $12.61 | $3.48 | $5.44 | $4.47 | $3.90 | $2.70 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $3.81 | $-1.83 | $-8.14 | $1.17 | $6.49 | $3.52 | $1.33 | $0.48 | $2.01 | $2.06 | $-1.39 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $3.81 | $-1.83 | $-8.14 | $1.17 | $6.49 | $3.52 | $1.33 | $0.48 | $2.01 | $1.57 | $-2.74 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.33 | $0.06 | $0.01 | $0.01 | $0.14 | $0.09 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.25 | $0.99 | $1.82 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $-25.95 | $-24.11 | $-35.18 | $-35.22 | $-31.67 | $-10.22 | $-4.94 | $2.08 | $9.86 | $38.40 | $34.54 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −4.5%/yr | −1.6%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −6.6%/yr | −20.5%/yr |
| EPS | — | −6.2%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +13.0%/yr | +48.2%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Net income+6.3%
“Net Income Net income was $77.8 million and $73.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, an increase of $4.6 million (or 6%). The increase was primarily driven by an increase in investment income of $31.8 million and the extinguishment of long-term debt of $11.8 million, partially offset by a decrease of $21.5 million in nonoperating components of net periodic benefit income and an increase of $11.3 million in interest expense. 76 Liquidity and Capital Resources As of December 31, 2025, the Company had a c…”
✓ figure matches the filed record
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business earned $41M of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $10M it takes just to hold its position. It put $10M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was $31M.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $78M | $73M | $84M | $52M | $175M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$10M | +$11M | +$7M | +$10M | +$9M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$37M | −$47M | −$82M | −$41M | −$134M |
| Cash from operations | $51M | $37M | $9M | $21M | $50M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$10M | −$4M | −$2M | −$700K | −$1M |
| Owner earnings | $41M | $33M | $8M | $20M | $49M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −$10M | — | — | — | — |
| Free cash flow | $31M | $33M | $8M | $20M | $49M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 9% | 7% | 2% | 7% | 16% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $10M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $10M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- AdequateOperating income $50M ÷ interest expense $14M
What this means
Comfortable in a normal year, but below the margin of safety Graham looked for. Worth checking how stable the coverage has been across a full cycle.
- Net cashCash $2.0B − debt $1.2B
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $782M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 25 + DIO 356 − DPO 46 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Not meaningful hereInvested capital ($17M) = debt $1.2B + equity $765M − cashIndustry peers: median 4%
What this means
Invested capital is near zero or negative, usually years of buybacks pulling equity down. ROIC explodes or flips sign and stops meaning anything. Judge this one on Owner Earnings instead.
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -39%–27%; latest $41M = operating cash $51M − maintenance capex $10MIndustry peers: median 2%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 9% of revenue this year, a 7% median across 10 years. It chose to put $10M more into growth, so free cash flow this year was $31M — the gap is investment, not weakness.
- Mostly cash-backedCash from ops $51M ÷ net income $78M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.99×ExpandingCapex $20M ÷ depreciation $10M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $449M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 5.59×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · $1.2B vs $1.9B WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 3 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $3.97/share (latest year $3.93), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $38.69/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 7 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 3 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin −29% → 13% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The record and the words agree: the margin widened and the filing attributes the gain to its own pricing, not volume alone.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −29% early to 13% lately, median 11% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Owner earnings growth +17%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 17% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2018 · −47.9% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2018, understand why before trusting the good years.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$1.9B
- Receivables$42M
- Inventory$336M
- Other current assets$49M
- Accounts payable$50M
- Other current liabilities$352M
From the company's latest filing.
Debt maturity
the debt note, SEC EDGAR →Not how much it owes, but when it falls due, and against what. The ladder the company files, beside cash on hand and a year's owner earnings.
Bars scaled to the largest single year; “later” is everything due after 2030, shown apart since it dwarfs the years.
Maturity schedule extracted from the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled to the total the table states.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $193M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash builder, a large share of cash simply built up on the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$32M · 17%
- Retained (debt / cash)$161M · 83%
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose $942M and cash and short-term investments rose $1.6B.
- Net change in share count146.7%
The diluted count rose from 9M to 22M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
- Return on what it retained13%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($342M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $46M, so each retained $1 added about 0.13 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mr. Poneman | $2.1M | $4.6M | $49M |
| 2022 | — | $2.1M | $267k | $20M |
| 2023 | — | $1.9M | $2.0M | $8M |
| 2024 | — | $3.5M | $2.7M | $33M |
| 2025 | Mr. Vexler | $2.2M | $6.9M | $41M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years. A dash under the name means the filing tags the figure without naming the officer.
- Insider ownership<1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Centrus Energy Corp. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
4 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 1 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?146.7%
Diluted shares grew 146.7% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$234M → $1.2B
Debt rose from $234M to $1.2B while owner earnings went from about ($19M) to $27M: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.
- Look hereDid reported profit become cash?0.57×
Across the record the business reported $342M of net income but generated $193M of operating cash, a 0.57-to-one conversion. Profit that does not turn into cash over many years is the classic mark of earnings that are softer than they look. Ask where the gap sits, receivables, inventory, or costs being capitalized rather than expensed.
- Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?63% → 84% of sales
Receivables and inventory grew from $197M to $378M while revenue grew 45%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (63% of revenue then, 84% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Pension & retirement, Income taxes as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Metals & Mining
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KNFKnife Riv Holding Co. | $3.1B | 18% | 9.1% | 13% | 4% |
| MDUMDU Resources Group, Inc. | $1.9B | — | 9.9% | 5% | -0% |
| HLHecla Mining Company | $1.4B | 22% | 10.0% | -0% | 2% |
| CMPCompass Minerals Intl Inc | $1.2B | — | 8.3% | 4% | 4% |
| LEUCentrus Energy Corp. | $449M | 26% | 11.0% | — | 7% |
| USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals Inc. | $373M | 30% | 22.1% | 21% | 18% |
| IPIIntrepid Potash Inc | $298M | — | -2.1% | -1% | -3% |
| UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. | $66M | 37% | -122.6% | -16% | -102% |
| Group median | — | 26% | 9.5% | — | 3% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Centrus Energy Corp. has delivered.
Centrus Energy Corp.’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, the mark of a build-out: total capital spending outruns the cash the business throws off today. So the tool opens on the steady-state base (maintenance capex in place of the build-out spend), the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Centrus Energy Corp. earns about $32M on its 7.1% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 9.2% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow ($61M) on 20M shares outstanding (a weighted basic average, the only count this filer tags); net cash $692M. The if-converted diluted count is 22M, 14% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($41M) runs well above depreciation ($11M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about ($31M), the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← LESL its page in the Manual LEVI →
Industry order: ← KNF the Metals & Mining chapter LGO →