Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← ODYS Manual OFG → ← NGVT Chemicals OLN →

OEC, Orion S.A.

Chemicals capital-intensive

We currently operate 14 wholly owned production facilities, excluding the under-construction facility at La Porte, Texas, in Europe, North and South America, South Africa, and Asia, and one jointly-owned production facility at Dortmund, Germany.

Carbon black products are primarily used as additives for the production of polymers, batteries, printing inks and coatings ("Specialty Carbon Black" or "Specialty") and in the reinforcement of tires and other rubber applications ("Rubber Carbon Black" or "Rubber").

Our core competencies include the ability to engineer the physical properties of carbon black to meet the functional needs of our customers.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
OEC · Orion S.A.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$1.8B
−3.8% YoY · 10% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $1.8B 5-yr avg $1.8B
Gross margin 19% 5-yr avg 23%
Operating margin 0.4% 5-yr avg 8.5%
Owner-earnings margin 4% 5-yr avg 3%
Free cash flow margin 2% 5-yr avg −1%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 25% and operating margin about 10% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. On a spread this thin the operating result swings hard on small moves in cost or volume — it has ranged from 1.5% to 15% over the years, so the cost line is where the needle moves. Capital spending runs about 11% of sales, well above depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on the spread and utilization. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 10%). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2017–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$1.3B$1.6B$1.5B$1.1B$1.5B$2.0B$1.9B$1.9B$1.8B$1.8BRevenueRevenue
28%27%26%26%25%22%24%23%20%19%Gross marginGross mgn
16%15%14%15%14%11%12%13%13%13%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
1%1%1%2%1%1%1%1%2%2%R&D / revenueR&D/rev
$138M$196M$147M$74M$229M$197M$205M$103M$28M$8MOperating incomeOp. inc.
10.4%12.4%10.0%6.5%14.8%9.7%10.8%5.5%1.5%0.4%Operating marginOp. mgn
$65M$121M$87M$18M$135M$106M$104M$44M($70M)($89M)Net incomeNet inc.
23%28%28%31%28%33%37%18%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$148M$122M$232M$125M$145M$81M$346M$125M$216M$203MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$98M$98M$97M$97M$104M$106M$113M$125M$132M$133MDepreciationDeprec.
($24M)($111M)$39M$6M($99M)($139M)$114M($60M)$140M$147MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$99M$111M$159M$139M$215M$233M$173M$207M$161M$168MCapexCapex
7.5%7.0%10.7%12.2%13.9%11.5%9.1%11.0%8.9%9.4%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$49M$11M$135M$29M$41M($25M)$233M$0$55M$70MOwner earningsOwner earn.
3.7%0.7%9.1%2.5%2.7%−1.2%12.3%0.0%3.0%3.9%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$49M$11M$73M($14M)($70M)($152M)$173M($81M)$55M$35MFree cash flowFCF
3.7%0.7%4.9%−1.2%−4.5%−7.5%9.1%−4.3%3.0%2.0%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$0$37M$0$0$0AcquisitionsAcquis.
$46M$48M$48M$12M$0$5M$5M$5M$5M$5MDividends paidDiv. paid
$0$5M$0$0$0$4M$66M$27M$25MBuybacksBuybacks
18%13%6%16%10%10%6%2%ROICROIC
68%76%47%10%42%23%22%9%-18%-23%Return on equityROE
20%46%21%3%42%22%21%8%−19%−25%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$72M$57M$64M$65M$66M$61M$38M$44M$61M$51MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$263M$213M$235M$289M$368M$241M$212M$214M$271MReceivablesReceiv.
$184M$165M$142M$230M$278M$287M$290M$277M$251MInventoryInvent.
$164M$156M$131M$195M$184M$184M$156M$197M$168MAccounts payablePayables
$283M$221M$245M$324M$462M$344M$346M$294M$354MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$575M$508M$501M$665M$779M$646M$613M$644M$662MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$320M$285M$325M$449M$553M$440M$517M$626M$660MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.8×1.8×1.5×1.5×1.4×1.5×1.2×1.0×1.0×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$58M$56M$77M$85M$78M$73M$76M$72M$0$0GoodwillGoodwill
$1.2B$1.3B$1.3B$1.4B$1.6B$1.9B$1.8B$1.9B$1.9B$1.9BTotal assetsAssets
$685M$667M$738M$783M$915M$814M$906M$980M$1.0BTotal debtDebt
$628M$603M$674M$717M$855M$777M$862M$919M$963MNet debt / (cash)Net debt
3.1×6.9×5.3×1.9×6.0×4.9×4.0×0.2×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$95M$159M$186M$181M$320M$459M$479M$475M$385M$380MShareholders’ equityEquity
0.7%0.9%0.6%0.4%0.3%0.4%0.8%0.8%0.8%0.7%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
60.7M61.0M61.3M61.4M61.0M61.4M60.0M58.4M56.3M56.4MShares out (diluted)Shares
$21.89$25.85$24.08$18.51$25.38$33.09$31.58$32.16$32.08$31.73Revenue / shareRev/sh
$1.07$1.99$1.42$0.30$2.21$1.73$1.73$0.76$-1.24$-1.58EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.80$0.18$2.20$0.47$0.67$-0.40$3.88$0.00$0.97$1.24Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$0.80$0.18$1.19$-0.22$-1.14$-2.47$2.89$-1.39$0.97$0.62Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.75$0.78$0.78$0.20$0.00$0.08$0.08$0.08$0.08$0.08Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$1.63$1.82$2.59$2.26$3.52$3.79$2.88$3.54$2.86$2.98Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$1.57$2.60$3.03$2.95$5.25$7.48$7.98$8.14$6.83$6.73Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
8-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+4.9%/yr+11.6%/yr
Owner earnings / share+2.4%/yr+15.8%/yr
Dividends / share−24.0%/yr−15.6%/yr
Capital spending / share+7.3%/yr+4.8%/yr
Book value / share+20.2%/yr+18.3%/yr

The record, charted

FY2017–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
56Mpeak FY2020
ROIC
2%low FY2025
Gross margin
20%low FY2025
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
16.8×peak FY2018

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$55Mowner earningsvs.($70M)net incomelow FY2022

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cash

Each year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.

FY2017FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $70M loss into $55M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income($70M)$44M$104M$106M$135M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$132M+$125M+$113M+$106M+$104M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$14M+$15M+$15M+$8M+$5M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$140M−$60M+$114M−$139M−$99M
Cash from operations$216M$125M$346M$81M$145M
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$161M−$125M−$113M−$106M−$104M
Owner earnings$55M$0$233M($25M)$41M
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$81M−$60M−$127M−$111M
Free cash flow$55M($81M)$173M($152M)($70M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue3%0%12%-1%3%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $14M), owner earnings is nearer $41M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Does not cover its interest
    Operating income $28M ÷ interest expense $51M
    What this means

    A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $919M · 33.4× operating profit
    Heavy net debt
    Cash $61M − debt $980M
    What this means

    Netting $61M of cash and short-term investments against $980M of debt leaves $919M owed, about 33.4× a year's operating profit (35.6× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 43 + DIO 70 − DPO 50 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Solid through the cycle
    8-yr median, range 2%–18%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profit
    Industry peers: median 11%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 8 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Thin through the cycle
    9-yr median margin, range -1%–12%; latest $55M = operating cash $216M − maintenance capex $161M
    Industry peers: median 8%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 3% of revenue this year, a 3% median across 9 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $14M of SBC) leaves $41M.

  • Loss, but cash-generative
    Net income ($70M) · cash from operations $216M
    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.

How is the cash used?

  • Returns about half
    Dividends + buybacks $30M ÷ Owner Earnings $55M
    What this means

    Of $55M Owner Earnings, $30M (54%) went back to shareholders, $5M dividends, $25M buybacks. Net of $14M stock comp, the real buyback was about $11M. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.22×
    Expanding
    Capex $161M ÷ depreciation $132M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Near
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $1.8B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.03×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · $980M vs $17M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Near
    A profit every year (9-yr record) · 1 loss year
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 8 of 9 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Miss
    Earnings +33% over the record · −72%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.46/share (latest year $-1.24), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $6.82/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2017–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 8 of 9
    What this means

    Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 2 of 8 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 11% → 6% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 11% early to 6% lately, median 10% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC −8%
    What this means

    Reinvested capital came back at a negative incremental return over this window — the invested base grew while operating profit did not. The filings show where it went.

  • Owner earnings growth −1%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings shrank about 1% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2025 · 1.5% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count −0.9%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.

  • Dividend record paid
    What this means

    Paid a dividend in 8 of the years on record.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$662M
  • Cash & short-term investments$51M
  • Receivables$271M
  • Inventory$251M
  • Other current assets$90M
Current liabilities$660M
  • Debt due within a year$351M
  • Accounts payable$168M
  • Other current liabilities$141M
Current ratio1.00×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio0.62×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.08×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$2Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$351M due · $51M cash cash alone won't cover the maturities; it leans on refinancing or operating cash · both figures from the Mar 31, 2026 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago−3.8%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters1.4× → 1.0×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$368Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Debt incl. operating leases$1.1B$44M of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2017–2025

Over the record, the business generated $1.5B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.

  • Reinvested$1.5B · 97%
  • Dividends$173M · 11%
  • Buybacks$126M · 8%
  • Returned to owners$299M

    57% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $173M as dividends and $126M as buybacks.

  • Source of funding−$255M

    Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $255M beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.

  • Average price paid for buybacks

    Buybacks ran $126M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.

  • Net change in share count−7.1%

    The diluted count fell from 61M to 56M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.

  • Dividend record$0.08/sh

    Paid in 8 of the years on record, the per-share dividend shrinking about 24% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.

  • Return on what it retained10%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($311M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $31M, so each retained $1 added about 0.10 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 9-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles$14M1% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity0%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiring$37Mover 9 years buying other businesses, against $1.5B of capital spent building

$81M written down across 1 year (2025): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 9-year record, from the company's own filings.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Mr. Painter$5.9M$4.8M$41M
2022Mr. Painter$4.7M$7.1M($25M)
2023Mr. Painter$7.6M$17.2M$233M
2024Mr. Painter$4.6M−$5.7M$0
2025Mr. Painter$3.5M−$221k$55M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Stock-based compensation$14M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 49% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Orion S.A. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2017–2025.

None of the 4 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.

Each test came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Chemicals

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
CBTCabot$3.7B24%11.3%15%8%
FULH. B. Fuller Company$3.5B28%8.2%6%5%
ESIElement Solutions Inc.$2.6B42%12.6%5%9%
HXLHexcel$1.9B24%11.6%11%9%
KROKronos Worldwide Inc$1.9B21%7.7%11%3%
OECOrion S.A.$1.8B25%10.0%10%3%
IOSPInnospec$1.8B30%9.3%10%6%
CSWCSW Industrials Inc.$1.1B45%16.3%12%14%
Group median26%10.7%10%7%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Orion S.A. has delivered.

$

Through the cycle, Orion S.A. earns about $48M on its 2.7% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 3.0% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+35%/yr
Owner-earnings growth, delivered
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $35M on 56M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-01; net debt $963M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Orion S.A. (OEC), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/OEC, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← ODYS its page in the Manual OFG →

Industry order: ← NGVT the Chemicals chapter OLN →