Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← SMP Manual SMR → ← SJM Food Products TR →

SMPL, The Simply Good Foods Company

Food Products consumer brand

We develop, market and sell consists primarily of protein bars, ready-to-drink protein shakes, sweet and salty protein snacks and confectionery products marketed under the Quest, Atkins, and OWYN brand names.

Simply Good Foods is poised to expand its wellness platform through innovation and organic growth along with acquisition opportunities.

We distribute our products in major retail channels, primarily in North America, including grocery, club, and mass merchandise, and through e-commerce, convenience, specialty, and other channels.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
SMPL · The Simply Good Foods Company
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$1.5B
+9.0% YoY · 12% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $1.4B 5-yr avg $1.2B
Gross margin 33% 5-yr avg 38%
Operating margin −17.1% 5-yr avg 15.5%
ROIC −11% 5-yr avg 8%
Owner-earnings margin 9% 5-yr avg 12%
Free cash flow margin 9% 5-yr avg 12%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 38% and operating margin about 15% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 8%). By owner earnings: roughly 13% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

Most recent quarterly filing 10-Q filed Jul 9, 2026 Source at SEC EDGAR →

Revenue down 6.3% year over year; operating income down 184.1%

“Net sales were $357.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 30, 2026, compared to $381.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 31, 2025, representing a decrease of $24.0 million, or 6.3%, driven by distribution-related declines for Atkins which were partially offset by Quest and OWYN volume-driven growth.”

figures computed from the filing's XBRL; the words are the company's

The record, 2018–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMay 2026
Income statement
$438M$524M$817M$1.0B$1.2B$1.2B$1.3B$1.5B$1.4BRevenueRevenue
42%42%40%41%38%36%38%36%33%Gross marginGross mgn
11%12%13%11%9%9%10%11%11%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
1%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%R&D / revenueR&D/rev
$67M$73M$78M$174M$203M$205M$206M$157M($237M)Operating incomeOp. inc.
15.4%13.9%9.6%17.3%17.3%16.5%15.5%10.8%−17.1%Operating marginOp. mgn
$37M($25M)$66M$41M$109M$134M$139M$104M($199M)Net incomeNet inc.
17%49%28%24%25%24%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$61M$73M$59M$132M$111M$171M$216M$178M$148MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$8M$8M$16M$18M$19M$20M$21M$21M$24MDepreciationDeprec.
$12M$85M($30M)$65M($29M)$3M$37M$38M$307MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$2M$1M$2M$6M$5M$12M$6M$21M$28MCapexCapex
0.4%0.2%0.2%0.6%0.4%0.9%0.4%1.4%2.0%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$59M$72M$57M$126M$105M$160M$210M$158M$119MOwner earningsOwner earn.
13.5%13.7%7.0%12.5%9.0%12.8%15.8%10.9%8.6%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$59M$72M$57M$126M$105M$160M$210M$158M$119MFree cash flowFCF
13.5%13.7%7.0%12.5%9.0%12.8%15.8%10.9%8.6%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$0$0$0$0$0AcquisitionsAcquis.
$0$2M$0$0$60M$16M$0$51MBuybacksBuybacks
4%8%9%8%6%-11%ROICROIC
6%-4%6%3%8%9%8%6%-14%Return on equityROE
6%−4%6%3%8%9%8%6%−14%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$112M$266M$96M$75M$67M$88M$133M$98M$124MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$37M$44M$90M$111M$133M$145M$151M$165M$156MReceivablesReceiv.
$30M$38M$59M$97M$125M$117M$142M$167M$164MInventoryInvent.
$11M$16M$32M$60M$62M$53M$59M$78M$57MAccounts payablePayables
$55M$67M$117M$149M$196M$209M$234M$254M$263MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$186M$358M$260M$299M$352M$372M$440M$454M$464MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$31M$48M$71M$114M$102M$90M$109M$125M$97MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
6.1×7.4×3.6×2.6×3.4×4.1×4.1×3.6×4.8×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$471M$471M$545M$543M$543M$543M$592M$590M$552MGoodwillGoodwill
$975M$1.1B$2.0B$2.1B$2.1B$2.1B$2.4B$2.4B$2.1BTotal assetsAssets
$192M$191M$597M$452M$403M$282M$397M$249M$397MTotal debtDebt
$80M($75M)$501M$376M$336M$194M$265M$151M$273MNet debt / (cash)Net debt
5.4×5.3×2.4×5.5×9.3×6.8×7.9×6.7×-11.8×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$621M$713M$1.1B$1.2B$1.4B$1.6B$1.7B$1.8B$1.4BShareholders’ equityEquity
0.9%1.1%0.9%0.8%1.0%1.2%1.4%1.1%1.1%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
72.8M80.7M98.3M97.4M101M101M101M102M93.7MShares out (diluted)Shares
$6.02$6.49$8.30$10.33$11.62$12.32$13.14$14.29$14.86Revenue / shareRev/sh
$0.51$-0.31$0.67$0.42$1.08$1.32$1.38$1.02$-2.12EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.81$0.89$0.58$1.30$1.05$1.58$2.07$1.56$1.27Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$0.81$0.89$0.58$1.30$1.05$1.58$2.07$1.56$1.27Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.02$0.01$0.02$0.06$0.05$0.11$0.06$0.20$0.30Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$8.53$8.83$11.59$12.21$14.30$15.57$17.06$17.80$15.14Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
7-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+13.2%/yr+11.5%/yr
Owner earnings / share+9.7%/yr+21.8%/yr
EPS+10.3%/yr+8.9%/yr
Capital spending / share+35.4%/yr+62.9%/yr
Book value / share+11.1%/yr+9.0%/yr

The year, in the company's words

the filing →

Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.

  • Revenue+9.0%
    “Net sales of $1,450.9 million represented an increase of $119.6 million, or 9.0%, for the fifty-two weeks ended August 30, 2025, compared to the fifty-three weeks ended August 31, 2024. The increase in net sales was primarily driven by Quest and OWYN volume growth, which more than offset continued declines in Atkins driven primarily by a reduction of distribution.”
    ✓ figure matches the filed record
  • Operating income-24.0%
    “Income from operations decreased by $49.7 million to $156.9 million for the fifty-two weeks ended August 30, 2025, as compared to $206.5 million for the fifty-three weeks ended August 31, 2024. The decrease was driven by higher operating expenses, primarily the loss on impairment, and was partially offset by higher gross profit.”
    ✓ figure matches the filed record
  • Net income-25.6%
    “Net income was $103.6 million for the fifty-two weeks ended August 30, 2025, a decrease of $35.7 million, compared to net income of $139.3 million for the fifty-three weeks ended August 31, 2024. The decrease was driven by higher operating expenses, primarily the loss on impairment, and was partially offset by higher gross profit and lower interest expense.”
    ✓ figure matches the filed record

The record, charted

FY2018–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
102Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
6%low FY2020
Gross margin
36%low FY2025
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
1.0×peak FY2020

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$158Mowner earningsvs.$104Mnet incomelow FY2020

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2018FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned $104M of profit into $158M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

Reported net income$104M
Owner earnings$158M · 11% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$104M$139M$134M$109M$41M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$21M+$21M+$20M+$19M+$18M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$15M+$18M+$14M+$12M+$8M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$38M+$37M+$3M−$29M+$65M
Cash from operations$178M$216M$171M$111M$132M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$21M−$6M−$12M−$5M−$6M
Owner earnings$158M$210M$160M$105M$126M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue11%16%13%9%13%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $15M), owner earnings is nearer $143M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $157M ÷ interest expense $23M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $151M · 1.0× operating profit
    Modest net debt
    Cash $98M − debt $249M
    What this means

    Netting $98M of cash and short-term investments against $249M of debt leaves $151M owed, about 1.0× a year's operating profit (1.6× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 42 + DIO 66 − DPO 31 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    5-yr median, range 4%–9%; 6% latest = NOPAT $120M ÷ invested capital $2.0B
    Industry peers: median 8%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 5 years (it ran 6% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid through the cycle
    8-yr median margin, range 7%–16%; latest $158M = operating cash $178M − maintenance capex $21M
    Industry peers: median 5%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 11% of revenue this year, a 13% median across 8 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $15M of SBC) leaves $143M.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $178M ÷ net income $104M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $51M ÷ Owner Earnings $158M
    What this means

    Of $158M Owner Earnings, $51M (32%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $51M buybacks. Net of $15M stock comp, the real buyback was about $36M. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.96×
    Maintaining
    Capex $21M ÷ depreciation $21M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Near
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $1.5B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 3.64×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $249M vs $329M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Near
    A profit every year (8-yr record) · 1 loss year
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · none paid
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +384%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $1.42/share (latest year $1.17), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $20.43/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2018–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 7 of 8
    What this means

    Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 8 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 13% → 14% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices, but the margin in the record has not followed — the claim outruns the result here.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 13% early, 14% lately, median 15%.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 9%
    What this means

    Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.

  • Owner earnings growth +16%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 16% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2020 · 9.6% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count +4.9%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, May 30, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$464M
  • Cash & short-term investments$124M
  • Receivables$156M
  • Inventory$164M
  • Other current assets$20M
Current liabilities$97M
  • Accounts payable$57M
  • Other current liabilities$40M
Current ratio4.80×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio3.10×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio1.28×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$367Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago−6.3%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters4.1× → 4.8×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value($91M)equity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value($180M)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$448M$51M of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2018–2025

Over the record, the business generated $1.0B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$54M · 5%
  • Buybacks$129M · 13%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$818M · 82%
  • Returned to owners$129M

    14% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $129M as buybacks.

  • Source of fundingOperating cash

    Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose $205M and cash and short-term investments rose $12M.

  • Average price paid for buybacks$32.68

    Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 4M shares were bought for $129M, about $32.68 each. Year to year the price paid ranged from $21.84 (2019) to $34.79 (2022), and 2022, near the top of that range, was also its heaviest buyback year ($60M).

  • Net change in share count28.7%

    The diluted count rose from 73M to 94M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record

    No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.

  • Return on what it retained24%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($474M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $113M, so each retained $1 added about 0.24 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 8-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles$1.9B77% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity33%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiring$282Mover 8 years buying other businesses, against $54M of capital spent building

None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 8-year record, from the company's own filings.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Geoff E. Tanner$7.3M$12.6M$126M
2022Geoff E. Tanner$4.3M$1.4M$105M
2023Geoff E. Tanner$4.2M$7.0M$160M
2023Geoff E. Tanner$4.3M$4.3M$160M
2024Geoff E. Tanner$4.1M$2.3M$210M
2025Geoff E. Tanner$4.3M$3.7M$158M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership8.8%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2025 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • CEO pay ratio30:1

    What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2025 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.

  • Stock-based compensation$15M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 10% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why The Simply Good Foods Company is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2018–2025.

2 of the 6 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?28.7%

    Diluted shares grew 28.7% over 2018–2025, even as the company spent $129M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

  • Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?15% → 23% of sales

    Receivables and inventory grew from $67M to $320M while revenue grew 218%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (15% of revenue then, 23% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Revenue recognition, Income taxes, Acquisitions as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Food Products

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
FLOFlowers Foods$5.3B74%5.9%8%6%
BRBRBellRing Brands Inc. Common Stock$2.3B33%16.0%37%11%
BGSB&G Foods$1.8B22%12.3%5%5%
JJSFJ&J Snack Foods$1.6B30%7.2%10%7%
SENEASeneca Foods$1.6B10%4.8%7%1%
SMPLThe Simply Good Foods Company$1.5B39%15.4%8%13%
UTZUtz Brands$1.4B29%1.9%1%1%
VITLVital Farms$759M34%6.0%19%5%
Group median32%6.6%8%6%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what The Simply Good Foods Company has delivered.

$

Through the cycle, The Simply Good Foods Company earns about $184M on its 12.7% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 10.9% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+12%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’18→’25+16%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $119M on 88M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-07-02; net debt $273M. The if-converted diluted count is 94M, 6% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($28M) runs well above depreciation ($24M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $127M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/SMPL, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← SMP its page in the Manual SMR →

Industry order: ← SJM the Food Products chapter TR →