← All companies ← SPPL Manual SRAD → ← SGML Metals & Mining SSRM →
SQM, Sociedad Quimica y Minera S.A.
We are the world's largest producer of potassium nitrate and iodine and one of the world's largest lithium producers.
Our products are sold in over 100 countries through our worldwide distribution network, with 96.5% of our sales in 2025 derived from countries outside Chile.
Our products are mainly derived from mineral deposits found in northern Chile.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 21% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 32% and operating margin about 24% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The operating margin has swung widely — from 17% to 52% over the years — so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year, and the worst year more than the best. Inventory runs near 41% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the commodity price and the cost position. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2015–2024
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2015’15 | 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | TTMTTMDec 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $1.7B | $1.9B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $2.9B | $10.7B | $7.5B | $4.5B | $4.5B | RevenueRevenue |
| 31% | 32% | 35% | 34% | 29% | 27% | 38% | 54% | 41% | 29% | 29% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| $369M | $449M | $618M | $667M | $434M | $303M | $927M | $5.5B | $2.8B | $1.1B | $1.1B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 21.3% | 23.1% | 28.6% | 29.4% | 22.3% | 16.6% | 32.4% | 51.6% | 38.1% | 23.5% | 23.5% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $220M | $278M | $428M | $440M | $278M | $165M | $585M | $3.9B | $923M | $685M | $685M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 28% | 32% | 28% | 29% | 28% | 30% | 30% | 29% | — | 29% | 29% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $427M | $634M | $758M | $525M | $427M | $182M | $823M | $4.1B | ($197M) | $1.3B | $1.3B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $272M | $250M | $241M | $221M | $201M | $204M | $214M | $244M | $281M | $342M | $342M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $479M | $106M | $90M | ($136M) | ($52M) | ($186M) | $23M | ($73M) | ($1.4B) | $247M | $247M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $111M | $131M | $142M | $245M | $321M | $322M | $465M | $905M | $1.1B | $972M | $972M | CapexCapex |
| 6.4% | 6.8% | 6.6% | 10.8% | 16.5% | 17.7% | 16.2% | 8.5% | 14.8% | 21.5% | 21.5% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $316M | $502M | $616M | $280M | $226M | ($22M) | $608M | $3.8B | ($477M) | $932M | $932M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 18.3% | 25.9% | 28.6% | 12.4% | 11.6% | −1.2% | 21.3% | 35.8% | −6.4% | 20.6% | 20.6% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $316M | $502M | $616M | $280M | $106M | ($140M) | $358M | $3.2B | ($1.3B) | $303M | $303M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 18.3% | 25.9% | 28.6% | 12.4% | 5.4% | −7.7% | 12.5% | 29.6% | −17.4% | 6.7% | 6.7% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $127M | $399M | $374M | $550M | $330M | $222M | $572M | $2.2B | $1.5B | $67M | $67M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| 9% | 12% | 20% | 21% | 13% | 8% | 18% | 80% | 21% | 13% | 13% | Return on equityROE |
| 4% | −5% | 2% | −5% | −2% | −3% | 0% | 34% | −12% | 12% | 12% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $527M | $799M | $991M | $869M | $1.1B | $857M | $2.4B | $3.6B | $2.4B | $2.5B | $1.7B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $369M | $447M | $467M | $399M | $365M | $654M | $1.1B | $907M | $606M | $606M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $1.0B | $993M | $902M | $914M | $983M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $1.7B | InventoryInvent. |
| — | $200M | $196M | $164M | $206M | $204M | $280M | $375M | $450M | $471M | $471M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.6B | $2.5B | $2.2B | $1.8B | $1.8B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $153M | $2.5B | $2.4B | $2.7B | $2.6B | $4.6B | $7.0B | $5.9B | $5.6B | $5.6B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $580M | $748M | $556M | $777M | $476M | $992M | $3.1B | $2.5B | $2.2B | $2.2B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 0.3× | 3.3× | 4.3× | 3.5× | 5.4× | 4.6× | 2.3× | 2.3× | 2.5× | 2.5× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $38M | $38M | $38M | $35M | $35M | $42M | $35M | $967K | $958K | $948K | $948K | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $4.6B | $4.2B | $4.3B | $4.3B | $4.7B | $4.8B | $7.2B | $10.8B | $10.8B | $11.5B | $11.5B | Total assetsAssets |
| 5.3× | 7.8× | 12.3× | 11.5× | 5.6× | 3.7× | 11.0× | 63.8× | 20.6× | 5.4× | 5.4× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $2.4B | $2.2B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $2.1B | $2.1B | $3.2B | $4.9B | $4.4B | $5.2B | $5.2B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 6.6M | 6.6M | 6.6M | 6.6M | 6.6M | 6.6M | 7.0M | 7.1M | 7.1M | 7.1M | 7.1M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $262.67 | $294.73 | $327.86 | $344.35 | $295.39 | $276.17 | $411.61 | $1499.88 | $1045.73 | $634.20 | $634.40 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $33.49 | $42.29 | $65.00 | $66.84 | $42.27 | $25.00 | $84.19 | $547.03 | $129.28 | $95.94 | $95.97 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $48.03 | $76.36 | $93.64 | $42.58 | $34.29 | $-3.29 | $87.47 | $536.78 | $-66.86 | $130.55 | $130.59 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $48.03 | $76.36 | $93.64 | $42.58 | $16.06 | $-21.28 | $51.45 | $444.25 | $-182.08 | $42.42 | $42.43 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $19.35 | $60.70 | $56.83 | $83.64 | $50.12 | $33.74 | $82.21 | $313.46 | $206.00 | $9.41 | $9.42 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $16.92 | $19.95 | $21.60 | $37.19 | $48.83 | $48.97 | $66.83 | $126.77 | $154.54 | $136.09 | $136.13 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $364.80 | $341.35 | $332.50 | $316.95 | $317.07 | $322.66 | $457.51 | $685.71 | $621.93 | $722.71 | $722.94 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before TTM are restated ×1/40 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +10.3%/yr | +16.5%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +11.8%/yr | +30.7%/yr |
| EPS | +12.4%/yr | +17.8%/yr |
| Dividends / share | −7.7%/yr | −28.4%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +26.1%/yr | +22.7%/yr |
| Book value / share | +7.9%/yr | +17.9%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2015–2024Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2024 the business earned $932M of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $342M it takes just to hold its position. It put $629M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was $303M.
| FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $685M | $923M | $3.9B | $585M | $165M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$342M | +$281M | +$244M | +$214M | +$204M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$247M | −$1.4B | −$73M | +$23M | −$186M |
| Cash from operations | $1.3B | ($197M) | $4.1B | $823M | $182M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$342M | −$281M | −$244M | −$214M | −$204M |
| Owner earnings | $932M | ($477M) | $3.8B | $608M | ($22M) |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −$629M | −$823M | −$661M | −$250M | −$118M |
| Free cash flow | $303M | ($1.3B) | $3.2B | $358M | ($140M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 21% | -6% | 36% | 21% | -1% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $342M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $629M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ComfortableOperating income $1.1B ÷ interest expense $198M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- Debt under-captured — leverage unknown, not low
What this means
This company pays far more interest than its tagged debt implies (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so its net cash or net debt cannot be read honestly: the gap is unknown, not zero, and 'net cash' here would be exactly the fiction the figure is meant to prevent. Judge it on the record and owner earnings instead.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 49 + DIO 194 − DPO 54 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Debt under-capturedIndustry peers: median 8%
What this means
This company's interest bill implies far more debt than its filings tag at the consolidated level (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so invested capital, and the return on it, cannot be read honestly. Judge this one on Owner Earnings and the record instead.
- High through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -6%–36%; latest $932M = operating cash $1.3B − maintenance capex $342MIndustry peers: median 4%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 21% of revenue this year, a 18% median across 10 years. It chose to put $629M more into growth, so free cash flow this year was $303M — the gap is investment, not weakness.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $1.3B ÷ net income $685M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $67M ÷ Owner Earnings $932M
What this means
Of $932M Owner Earnings, $67M (7%) went back to shareholders, $67M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 2.84×ExpandingCapex $972M ÷ depreciation $342M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 5 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $4.5B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 2.51×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt —Debt ≤ working capital · —
What this means
The filings tag only a fraction of the debt this company's interest bill implies (much of it sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so this test can't be run honestly.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +495%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $6.44/share (latest year $2.40), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $18.07/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2015–2024
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 10 of 10
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Operating margin 24% → 38% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The record and the words agree: the margin widened and the filing attributes the gain to its own pricing, not volume alone.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 24% early to 38% lately, median 24% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Owner earnings growth −6%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings shrank about 6% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · 16.6% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count +0.9%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 10 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2024Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$1.7B
- Receivables$606M
- Inventory$1.7B
- Other current assets$1.5B
- Debt due within a year$199K
- Accounts payable$471M
- Other current liabilities$1.7B
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2015–2024
Over the record, the business generated $8.9B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.
- Reinvested$4.7B · 53%
- Dividends$6.4B · 71%
- Returned to owners$6.4B
93% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $6.4B as dividends and $0 as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$2.1B
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $2.1B beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.
- Net change in share count8.5%
The diluted count rose from 7M to 7M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$9.41/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend shrinking about 8% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
- Return on what it retained61%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($1.6B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $951M, so each retained $1 added about 0.61 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Sociedad Quimica y Minera S.A. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2015–2024.
2 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?16.7% vs 24.3%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 24.3% early in the record and 16.7% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?8.5%
Diluted shares grew 8.5% over 2015–2024. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?≈$1.1B · 24% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
“The 10 largest customers collectively accounted for approximately 24% of sales during that period.”verify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Metals & Mining
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMCVulcan Materials Company | $7.9B | 26% | 18.3% | 8% | 11% |
| MLMMartin Marietta Materials Inc. | $6.2B | 25% | 19.1% | 9% | 13% |
| SQMSociedad Quimica y Minera S.A. | $4.5B | 33% | 26.1% | 28% | 19% |
| KNFKnife Riv Holding Co. | $3.1B | 18% | 9.1% | 13% | 4% |
| MDUMDU Resources Group, Inc. | $1.9B | — | 9.9% | 5% | -0% |
| HLHecla Mining Company | $1.4B | 22% | 10.0% | -0% | 2% |
| CMPCompass Minerals Intl Inc | $1.2B | — | 8.3% | 4% | 4% |
| USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals Inc. | $373M | 30% | 22.1% | 21% | 18% |
| Group median | — | 25% | 14.1% | 8% | 7% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American depositary shares, each representing one series B common”; Sociedad Quimica y Minera S.A. reports in USD, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Sociedad Quimica y Minera S.A. has delivered.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow $303M on 286M shares outstanding (a weighted average, the only count this filer tags); net cash $1.7B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($972M) runs well above depreciation ($342M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $932M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← SPPL its page in the Manual SRAD →
Industry order: ← SGML the Metals & Mining chapter SSRM →