← All companies ← SWBI Manual SWK → ← SW Containers & Packaging
SWIM, Latham Group Inc.
We are the largest designer, manufacturer, and marketer of in-ground residential swimming pools in North America, Australia, and New Zealand.
With an operating history that spans over 70 years, we offer the industry's broadest portfolio of pools and related products, including in-ground swimming pools, pool covers, and pool liners.
In an industry that has traditionally marketed on a business-to-business basis (pool manufacturer to dealer), we pioneered the first "direct-to-homeowner" digital and social marketing strategy that has transformed the homeowner's purchase journey.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is In-ground Swimming Pools (48%), Covers (29%) and Liners (23%).
- Situation
- Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Serial acquirer. Goodwill and acquired intangibles are 51% of assets, with meaningful acquisition spending in 4 of the record's 7 years; much of what this business is was bought, at prices the record carries.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 31% and operating margin about 4.3% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The operating margin has swung widely — from −5.7% to 10% — on a steadier 31% gross margin, so what moves it sits below the gross line, in operating spend and one-off charges more than in the cost of the product itself. Inventory runs near 16% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 4%, above 15% in 1 of 5 years). By owner earnings: roughly 8% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Revenue spreads across 3 lines, the largest In-ground Swimming Pools at 48%.
- In-ground Swimming Pools48%$262M
- Covers29%$161M
- Liners23%$123M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2019–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||
| $318M | $403M | $630M | $696M | $566M | $509M | $546M | $552M | RevenueRevenue |
| 31% | 35% | 32% | 31% | 27% | 30% | 33% | 34% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 18% | 21% | 35% | 21% | 19% | 21% | 22% | 23% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $25M | $40M | ($36M) | $30M | $16M | $18M | $31M | $29M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 7.9% | 9.9% | −5.7% | 4.3% | 2.8% | 3.6% | 5.6% | 5.2% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $7M | $16M | ($62M) | ($6M) | ($2M) | ($18M) | $11M | $9M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | 30% | — | — | — | — | 18% | 30% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||||
| $36M | $63M | $34M | $32M | $116M | $61M | $63M | $63M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $22M | $25M | $32M | $38M | $41M | $44M | $51M | $52M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $6M | $20M | ($65M) | ($51M) | $59M | $27M | ($8M) | ($6M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $8M | $16M | $25M | $40M | $33M | $20M | $25M | $32M | CapexCapex |
| 2.6% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 5.7% | 5.9% | 4.0% | 4.7% | 5.9% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $27M | $47M | $9M | ($7M) | $83M | $41M | $38M | $30M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 8.6% | 11.6% | 1.4% | −1.1% | 14.7% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 5.5% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $27M | $47M | $9M | ($7M) | $83M | $41M | $38M | $30M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 8.6% | 11.6% | 1.4% | −1.1% | 14.7% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 5.5% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $20M | $75M | $91M | $5M | $0 | $65M | $5M | $14M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $200K | $582K | $282M | $281M | $0 | $0 | — | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 18% | 12% | -5% | 2% | — | — | 4% | 3% | ROICROIC |
| 4% | 6% | -18% | -1% | -1% | -5% | 3% | 2% | Return on equityROE |
| 4% | 6% | −18% | −1% | −1% | −5% | 3% | 2% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||||||
| $57M | $59M | $44M | $33M | $103M | $56M | $71M | $27M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $33M | $61M | $49M | $30M | $32M | $40M | $89M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $65M | $110M | $165M | $97M | $77M | $75M | $88M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | $27M | $38M | $25M | — | $13M | $19M | $30M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $71M | $132M | $189M | $128M | $96M | $96M | $147M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $167M | $229M | $255M | $239M | $178M | $219M | $230M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $94M | $115M | $87M | $86M | $71M | $79M | $122M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.8× | 2.0× | 2.9× | 2.8× | 2.5× | 2.8× | 1.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $102M | $116M | $129M | $131M | $131M | $153M | $155M | $161M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | $647M | $794M | $870M | $835M | $794M | $823M | $856M | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $13M | $280M | $313M | $301M | $282M | $280M | $280M | Total debtDebt |
| — | ($46M) | $236M | $280M | $198M | $225M | $209M | $253M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 1.1× | 2.2× | -1.5× | 1.9× | 0.5× | 0.7× | 1.2× | 1.2× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $194M | $282M | $354M | $383M | $399M | $387M | $406M | $397M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.3% | 0.5% | 20.4% | 7.3% | 3.3% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 1.5% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | ||||||||
| 95.4M | 103M | 111M | 113M | 113M | 115M | 120M | 117M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $3.33 | $3.93 | $5.70 | $6.14 | $5.02 | $4.41 | $4.56 | $4.72 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $0.08 | $0.16 | $-0.56 | $-0.05 | $-0.02 | $-0.15 | $0.09 | $0.07 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.29 | $0.46 | $0.08 | $-0.07 | $0.74 | $0.36 | $0.32 | $0.26 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.29 | $0.46 | $0.08 | $-0.07 | $0.74 | $0.36 | $0.32 | $0.26 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.09 | $0.16 | $0.23 | $0.35 | $0.29 | $0.17 | $0.21 | $0.28 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $2.03 | $2.74 | $3.20 | $3.38 | $3.54 | $3.35 | $3.39 | $3.39 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 6-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +5.3%/yr | +3.0%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +1.6%/yr | −7.0%/yr |
| EPS | +2.9%/yr | −9.8%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +16.3%/yr | +6.0%/yr |
| Book value / share | +8.9%/yr | +4.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2019–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $11M of profit into $38M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $11M | ($18M) | ($2M) | ($6M) | ($62M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$51M | +$44M | +$41M | +$38M | +$32M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$9M | +$7M | +$19M | +$51M | +$129M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$8M | +$27M | +$59M | −$51M | −$65M |
| Cash from operations | $63M | $61M | $116M | $32M | $34M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$25M | −$20M | −$33M | −$40M | −$25M |
| Owner earnings | $38M | $41M | $83M | ($7M) | $9M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 7% | 8% | 15% | -1% | 1% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $9M), owner earnings is nearer $29M.
Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $31M ÷ interest expense $26M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $209M · 6.8× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $71M − debt $280M
What this means
Netting $71M of cash and short-term investments against $280M of debt leaves $209M owed, about 6.8× a year's operating profit (9.2× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 27 + DIO 75 − DPO 19 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle5-yr median, range -5%–18%; 4% latest = NOPAT $25M ÷ invested capital $615MIndustry peers: median 11%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 5 years (it ran 4% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle7-yr median margin, range -1%–15%; latest $38M = operating cash $63M − maintenance capex $25MIndustry peers: median 8%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 7% of revenue this year, a 8% median across 7 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $9M of SBC) leaves $29M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $63M ÷ net income $11M
In the filing’s words The filing leans on adjusted, non-GAAP earnings, but the GAAP profit is itself cash-backed — the adjustments are not papering over a cash shortfall here.
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $0 ÷ Owner Earnings $38M
What this means
Of $38M Owner Earnings, $0 (0%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.49×HarvestingCapex $25M ÷ depreciation $51M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $546M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 2.77×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $280M vs $140M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (7-yr record) · 4 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.03/share (latest year $0.09), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $3.46/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2019–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 3 of 7
What this means
Lost money in 4 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 6 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 4% → 4% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices, but the margin in the record has not followed — the claim outruns the result here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 4% early, 4% lately, median 4%.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Owner earnings growth +1%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 1% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2021 · −5.7% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2021, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +3.9%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Moderate contestabilityAI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat.
“For example, we believe our introduction of Latham Measure, which employs AI technology, has the potential disrupt competition in the market for safety covers and liners.”
The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 28, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$27M
- Receivables$89M
- Inventory$88M
- Other current assets$26M
- Debt due within a year$3M
- Accounts payable$30M
- Other current liabilities$89M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2019–2025
Over the record, the business generated $406M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.
- Reinvested$168M · 41%
- Buybacks$563M · 139%
- Returned to owners$563M
236% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $563M as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$325M
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $325M beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $563M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count22.5%
The diluted count rose from 95M to 117M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 7-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 7-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.
- Insider ownership3.3%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$9M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 2% of revenue, equal to 30% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Income taxes, Acquisitions, Stock compensation as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Containers & Packaging
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATRAptarGroup Inc. | $3.8B | — | 12.3% | 10% | 8% |
| ENTGEntegris Inc. | $3.2B | 45% | 15.8% | 11% | 14% |
| AWIArmstrong World Industries Inc | $1.6B | 37% | 25.7% | 23% | 11% |
| AZEKThe Azek Company Inc. | $1.4B | 32% | 8.7% | 5% | 4% |
| NPOEnPro Industries | $1.1B | 40% | 6.1% | 3% | 10% |
| MYEMyers Industries Inc. | $826M | 32% | 6.9% | 16% | 7% |
| SWIMLatham Group Inc. | $546M | 31% | 4.3% | 4% | 8% |
| KRTKarat Packaging Inc. | $468M | 34% | 8.9% | 24% | 7% |
| Group median | — | 34% | 8.8% | 11% | 8% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Latham Group Inc. has delivered.
Through the cycle, Latham Group Inc. earns about $44M on its 8.1% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 7.0% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow $30M on 117M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-01; net debt $253M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($32M) runs well above depreciation ($52M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $37M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← SWBI its page in the Manual SWK →
Industry order: ← SW the Containers & Packaging chapter