← All companies ← TXNM Manual TXRH → ← TTI Oil & Gas Producers VET →
TXO, TXO Partners L.P. Common
Revenue is Oil and Condensate (71%), Gas (20%) and Natural gas liquids (9%).
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- An oil and gas business, whose fortunes rise and fall with a price it does not set.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand. Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 20% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has reached 20% at its best but run negative through the cycle (median −5.7%) — so the question is which reading is truer: whether the median was pulled below zero by one-off charges, by the cycle, or by spending it is still growing into, and whether it settles back at a profit. Capital spending runs about 8.1% of sales, below what it charges for depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on the commodity price, and the cost to lift a barrel. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Oil and Condensate is 71% of revenue, with Gas the other meaningful line at 20%.
- Oil and Condensate71%$257M
- Gas20%$74M
- Natural gas liquids9%$32M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2021–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| $219M | $450M | $358M | $285M | $363M | $389M | RevenueRevenue |
| 6% | 0% | 2% | 5% | 6% | 6% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $44M | ($26M) | ($124M) | ($7M) | ($31M) | ($105M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 20.1% | −5.7% | −34.6% | −2.4% | −8.4% | −26.9% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $52M | ($8M) | ($104M) | $23M | ($22M) | ($98M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||
| $74M | $136M | $77M | $109M | $118M | $121M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $40M | $41M | $44M | $52M | $97M | $104M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($21M) | $103M | $133M | $27M | $27M | $98M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $8M | $24M | $36M | $23M | $72M | $73M | CapexCapex |
| 3.8% | 5.3% | 10.0% | 8.1% | 19.7% | 18.7% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $65M | $113M | $41M | $86M | $46M | $48M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 29.8% | 25.1% | 11.6% | 30.2% | 12.8% | 12.4% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $65M | $113M | $41M | $86M | $46M | $48M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 29.8% | 25.1% | 11.6% | 30.2% | 12.8% | 12.4% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| Balance sheet | ||||||
| $8M | $9M | $5M | $7M | $9M | $8M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $52M | $32M | $40M | $52M | $58M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $15M | $9M | $18M | $28M | $39M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $38M | $24M | $21M | $24M | $19M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $74M | $55M | $64M | $95M | $90M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $147M | $39M | $66M | $154M | $210M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 0.5× | 1.4× | 1.0× | 0.6× | 0.4× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | $925M | $696M | $1.0B | $1.4B | $1.3B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $120M | $28M | $157M | $291M | $277M | Total debtDebt |
| — | $111M | $24M | $150M | $282M | $269M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 7.5× | -3.1× | -28.0× | -0.9× | -1.8× | -5.5× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| 1.1% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 2.2% | 4.5% | 4.6% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | ||||||
| 25.0M | 25.0M | 30.3M | 36.1M | 49.8M | 55.1M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $8.77 | $17.98 | $11.81 | $7.90 | $7.30 | $7.06 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $2.10 | $-0.31 | $-3.44 | $0.65 | $-0.43 | $-1.79 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $2.61 | $4.51 | $1.37 | $2.38 | $0.93 | $0.87 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $2.61 | $4.51 | $1.37 | $2.38 | $0.93 | $0.87 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.33 | $0.95 | $1.18 | $0.64 | $1.44 | $1.32 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| 4-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −4.5%/yr | −4.5%/yr (4-yr) |
| Owner earnings / share | −22.7%/yr | −22.7%/yr (4-yr) |
| Capital spending / share | +44.0%/yr | +44.0%/yr (4-yr) |
The record, charted
FY2021–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $22M loss into $46M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($22M) | $23M | ($104M) | ($8M) | $52M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$97M | +$52M | +$44M | +$41M | +$40M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$16M | +$6M | +$3M | — | +$2M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$27M | +$27M | +$133M | +$103M | −$21M |
| Cash from operations | $118M | $109M | $77M | $136M | $74M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$72M | −$23M | −$36M | −$24M | −$8M |
| Owner earnings | $46M | $86M | $41M | $113M | $65M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 13% | 30% | 12% | 25% | 30% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $16M), owner earnings is nearer $30M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -1.8×Does not cover its interestOperating income ($31M) ÷ interest expense $17M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Net debt against an operating lossCash $9M − debt $291M
What this means
Netting $9M of cash and short-term investments against $291M of debt leaves $282M owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median 6%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- High through the cycle5-yr median margin, range 12%–30%; latest $46M = operating cash $118M − maintenance capex $72MIndustry peers: median 50%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 13% of revenue this year, a 25% median across 5 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $16M of SBC) leaves $30M.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($22M) · cash from operations $118M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.74×HarvestingCapex $72M ÷ depreciation $97M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $363M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.62×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $291M vs ($59M) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (5-yr record) · 3 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.62/share (latest year $-0.39), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2021–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 2 of 5
What this means
Lost money in 3 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin 7% → −5% (2-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words Input costs rose and the filing says it could not fully pass them on — which is where this margin compressed.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 7% early to −5% lately, median −6% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Owner earnings growth −7%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings shrank about 7% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2023 · −34.6% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2023, understand why before trusting the good years.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$8M
- Receivables$58M
- Other current assets$24M
- Accounts payable$39M
- Other current liabilities$171M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2021–2025
Over the record, the business generated $515M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$163M · 32%
- Retained (debt / cash)$352M · 68%
- Net change in share count120.4%
The diluted count rose from 25M to 55M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.
- Stock-based compensation$16M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 4% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why TXO Partners L.P. Common is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2021–2025.
2 of the 3 tests turned up something to look into; the other 1 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?21.5% vs 27.4%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 27.4% early in the record and 21.5% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?120.4%
Diluted shares grew 120.4% over 2021–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Oil & Gas Producers
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTIW&T Offshore Inc. | $501M | — | 13.8% | 3% | 16% |
| GRNTGranite Ridge Resources Inc. | $450M | — | 19.3% | 9% | 56% |
| BSMBlack Stone Minerals L.P. Common | $422M | — | 50.6% | — | 65% |
| REPXRiley Exploration Permian Inc. | $392M | — | 21.7% | 10% | 31% |
| TXOTXO Partners L.P. Common | $363M | — | -5.7% | — | 25% |
| EGYVAALCO Energy Inc. | $359M | — | 27.2% | 18% | 23% |
| INRInfinity Natural Resources Inc. | $350M | — | 33.0% | 3% | 69% |
| VTSVitesse Energy Inc. | $274M | — | 15.9% | 4% | 50% |
| Group median | — | — | 20.5% | — | 41% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what TXO Partners L.P. Common has delivered.
Through the cycle, TXO Partners L.P. Common earns about $91M on its 25.1% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 12.8% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $48M on 55M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-04; net debt $269M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← TXNM its page in the Manual TXRH →
Industry order: ← TTI the Oil & Gas Producers chapter VET →