← All companies ← VTRS Manual VVV → ← VNOM Oil & Gas Producers WDS →
VTS, Vitesse Energy Inc.
An oil and gas business, whose fortunes rise and fall with a price it does not set.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run about 15% through the cycle, a solid margin the cost base and competition set as much as the price does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −35% and 55% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 9.5% of sales, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on the commodity price, and the cost to lift a barrel. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 4%, above 15% in 1 of 4 years). By owner earnings: roughly 50% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2020–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||
| $97M | $168M | $282M | $234M | $242M | $274M | $275M | RevenueRevenue |
| 9% | 6% | 7% | 10% | 10% | 9% | 8% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| ($34M) | $54M | $154M | $35M | $41M | $17M | $18M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −34.8% | 32.1% | 54.6% | 14.9% | 16.9% | 6.3% | 6.4% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($9M) | $18M | $119M | ($20M) | $21M | $25M | ($20M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | 0% | 0% | — | 27% | 28% | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||
| $76M | $87M | $147M | $142M | $155M | $170M | $177M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $86M | $67M | $39M | $129M | $126M | $135M | $188M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $9M | $29M | $29M | $36M | $21M | $7M | $5M | CapexCapex |
| 9.5% | 17.0% | 10.1% | 15.2% | 8.7% | 2.4% | 1.9% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $67M | $58M | $118M | $106M | $134M | $164M | $172M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 69.0% | 34.8% | 42.0% | 45.4% | 55.3% | 59.8% | 62.4% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $67M | $58M | $118M | $106M | $134M | $164M | $172M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 69.0% | 34.8% | 42.0% | 45.4% | 55.3% | 59.8% | 62.4% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | $12M | $36M | $58M | $64M | $92M | $90M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | $0 | $0 | $248K | $0 | $0 | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| — | — | 26% | 3% | 5% | 2% | — | ROICROIC |
| — | 4% | 21% | -4% | 4% | 4% | -3% | Return on equityROE |
| — | 1% | 15% | −14% | −8% | −11% | −19% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||
| $2M | $5M | $10M | $552K | $3M | $1M | $3M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $32M | $41M | $45M | $40M | $31M | $41M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $5M | $7M | $28M | $34M | $12M | $16M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $27M | $34M | $17M | $5M | $19M | $26M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $36M | $54M | $58M | $51M | $52M | $49M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $32M | $37M | $60M | $100M | $51M | $87M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.1× | 1.5× | 1.0× | 0.5× | 1.0× | 0.6× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | $614M | $660M | $766M | $811M | $893M | $883M | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $68M | $48M | $81M | $117M | $125M | $145M | Total debtDebt |
| — | $63M | $38M | $80M | $114M | $123M | $141M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -7.2× | 16.8× | 37.0× | 6.6× | 4.1× | 1.7× | 1.8× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| — | $480M | $564M | $546M | $500M | $629M | $570M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| −0.6% | 0.8% | −3.8% | 13.8% | 3.4% | 3.7% | 3.1% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||
| 29.2M | 29.2M | 29.2M | 29.6M | 32.9M | 39.6M | 40.1M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $3.33 | $5.74 | $9.64 | $7.91 | $7.35 | $6.93 | $6.87 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.30 | $0.62 | $4.07 | $-0.67 | $0.64 | $0.64 | $-0.49 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $2.29 | $2.00 | $4.05 | $3.60 | $4.07 | $4.14 | $4.28 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $2.29 | $2.00 | $4.05 | $3.60 | $4.07 | $4.14 | $4.28 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| — | $0.41 | $1.23 | $1.96 | $1.93 | $2.33 | $2.24 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.32 | $0.97 | $0.98 | $1.21 | $0.64 | $0.17 | $0.13 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| — | $16.42 | $19.30 | $18.49 | $15.20 | $15.91 | $14.23 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2023 are restated ×1/15 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
| 5-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +15.8%/yr | +15.8%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +12.5%/yr | +12.5%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +54.4%/yr (4-yr) | +54.4%/yr (4-yr) |
| Capital spending / share | −11.9%/yr | −11.9%/yr |
| Book value / share | −0.8%/yr (4-yr) | −0.8%/yr (4-yr) |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Oil+6.2%
“Oil and natural gas revenue increased to $274.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $242.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in oil and natural gas revenue was due to a 34% increase in production volumes, and was partially offset by a 15% decrease in the average realized prices per Boe before hedging for the year ended December 31, 2025.”
✓ direction matches the filed record
The record, charted
FY2020–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $25M of profit into $164M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $25M | $21M | ($20M) | $119M | $18M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$10M | +$8M | +$32M | −$11M | +$1M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$135M | +$126M | +$129M | +$39M | +$67M |
| Cash from operations | $170M | $155M | $142M | $147M | $87M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$7M | −$21M | −$36M | −$29M | −$29M |
| Owner earnings | $164M | $134M | $106M | $118M | $58M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 60% | 55% | 45% | 42% | 35% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $10M), owner earnings is nearer $153M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $17M ÷ interest expense $10M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $123M · 7.2× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $1M − debt $125M
What this means
Netting $1M of cash and short-term investments against $125M of debt leaves $123M owed, about 7.2× a year's operating profit (7.3× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle4-yr median, range 2%–26%; 2% latest = NOPAT $12M ÷ invested capital $752MIndustry peers: median 6%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 4 years (it ran 2% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- High through the cycle6-yr median margin, range 35%–69%; latest $164M = operating cash $170M − maintenance capex $7MIndustry peers: median 31%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 60% of revenue this year, a 45% median across 6 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $10M of SBC) leaves $153M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $170M ÷ net income $25M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returns about halfDividends + buybacks $92M ÷ Owner Earnings $164M
What this means
Of $164M Owner Earnings, $92M (56%) went back to shareholders, $92M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? —Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $274M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.02×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $125M vs $916K WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (6-yr record) · 2 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 5 of 6 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −79%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.21/share (latest year $0.61), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $15.09/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2020–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 4 of 6
What this means
Lost money in 2 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 1 of 5 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 17% → 13% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices but names price competition too — and the margin slipped, so the pressure is winning here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 17% early to 13% lately, median 15% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Owner earnings growth +19%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 19% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · −34.8% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$3M
- Receivables$41M
- Other current assets$4M
- Accounts payable$16M
- Other current liabilities$71M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2020–2025
Over the record, the business generated $778M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$130M · 17%
- Dividends$262M · 34%
- Buybacks$248K · 0%
- Retained (debt / cash)$386M · 50%
- Returned to owners$262M
40% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $262M as dividends and $248K as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks$16.99
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 0M shares were bought for $248K, about $16.99 each.
- Net change in share count37.1%
The diluted count rose from 29M to 40M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$2.33/sh
Paid in 5 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 54% a year. It was never cut over the span.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.
- Insider ownership13.9%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$10M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 4% of revenue, equal to 60% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Vitesse Energy Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2020–2025.
1 of the 3 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?37.1%
Diluted shares grew 37.1% over 2020–2025, even as the company spent $248K on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Oil & Gas Producers
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTIW&T Offshore Inc. | $501M | — | 13.8% | 3% | 16% |
| BSMBlack Stone Minerals L.P. Common | $422M | — | 50.6% | — | 65% |
| REPXRiley Exploration Permian Inc. | $392M | — | 21.7% | 10% | 31% |
| TXOTXO Partners L.P. Common | $363M | — | -5.7% | — | 25% |
| EGYVAALCO Energy Inc. | $359M | — | 27.2% | 18% | 23% |
| INRInfinity Natural Resources Inc. | $350M | — | 33.0% | 3% | 69% |
| VTSVitesse Energy Inc. | $274M | — | 15.9% | 4% | 50% |
| DMLPDorchester Minerals L.P. Common | $153M | — | 67.0% | — | 87% |
| Group median | — | — | 24.5% | 4% | 41% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Vitesse Energy Inc. has delivered.
Vitesse Energy Inc.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Vitesse Energy Inc. earns about $138M on its 50.4% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 59.8% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $172M on 42M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-01; net debt $141M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← VTRS its page in the Manual VVV →
Industry order: ← VNOM the Oil & Gas Producers chapter WDS →