Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← WTRG Manual WTTR → ← WPRT Industrial Machinery XYL →

WTS, Watts Water Technologies

Industrial Machinery capital-intensive Serial acquirer

We focus on selling solutions to our customers that integrate a variety of our product offerings.

Since then, Watts has grown into a global manufacturer and become one of the world's leading providers of water technologies and solutions that are designed to promote safety, energy efficiency, and water conservation for commercial and residential buildings.

Advances in smart, connected, and software-enabled technologies have enabled companies to enhance products with sensing, connectivity, and data-driven insights.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
WTS · Watts Water Technologies
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$2.4B
+8.3% YoY · 10% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $2.6B 5-yr avg $2.1B
Gross margin 49% 5-yr avg 46%
Operating margin 19.3% 5-yr avg 16.4%
ROIC 18% 5-yr avg 19%
Owner-earnings margin 12% 5-yr avg 12%
Free cash flow margin 12% 5-yr avg 12%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is Americas (76%), Europe (18%) and APMEA (6%).
Situation
Serial acquirer. Goodwill and acquired intangibles are 37% of assets, with meaningful acquisition spending in 5 of the record's 10 years; much of what this business is was bought, at prices the record carries.
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 42% and operating margin about 12% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. Inventory runs near 18% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has run in the teens (median 15%, above 15% in 5 of 10 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 10% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Returns like these are solid but short of clear franchise economics; whether they hold is what the 10-K settles, not the multiple.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

Americas is 76% of revenue, with Europe the other meaningful segment at 18%.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
  • Americas76%$1.8B
  • Europe18%$451M
  • APMEA6%$140M

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$1.4B$1.5B$1.6B$1.6B$1.5B$1.8B$2.0B$2.1B$2.3B$2.4B$2.6BRevenueRevenue
40%41%42%42%41%42%44%47%47%49%49%Gross marginGross mgn
30%30%30%30%29%28%28%29%30%30%30%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
2%2%2%2%3%3%3%3%3%3%3%R&D / revenueR&D/rev
$145M$162M$188M$197M$181M$240M$315M$351M$390M$448M$493MOperating incomeOp. inc.
10.4%11.1%12.0%12.3%12.0%13.2%15.9%17.1%17.3%18.4%19.3%Operating marginOp. mgn
$84M$73M$128M$132M$114M$166M$252M$262M$291M$341M$366MNet incomeNet inc.
34%49%27%28%32%29%18%25%25%24%25%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$138M$156M$169M$194M$229M$181M$224M$311M$361M$402M$365MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$51M$52M$49M$47M$47M$45M$40M$43M$54M$57M$59MDepreciationDeprec.
($11M)$17M($21M)($2M)$55M($53M)($86M)($15M)($4M)($17M)($84M)Working capital & otherWC & other
$36M$29M$36M$29M$44M$27M$28M$30M$35M$46M$47MCapexCapex
2.6%2.0%2.3%1.8%2.9%1.5%1.4%1.4%1.6%1.9%1.9%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$102M$127M$134M$165M$185M$154M$196M$281M$326M$356M$317MOwner earningsOwner earn.
7.3%8.7%8.5%10.3%12.3%8.5%9.9%13.7%14.5%14.6%12.4%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$102M$127M$134M$165M$185M$154M$196M$281M$326M$356M$317MFree cash flowFCF
7.3%8.7%8.5%10.3%12.3%8.5%9.9%13.7%14.5%14.6%12.4%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$88M$0$2M$43M$15M$9M$313M$96M$257M$189MAcquisitionsAcquis.
$27M$18M$26M$20M$29M$16M$69M$16M$17M$16MBuybacksBuybacks
9%8%13%13%12%16%23%18%19%19%18%ROICROIC
11%9%14%13%11%14%19%17%17%17%17%Return on equityROE
11%9%14%13%11%14%19%17%17%17%17%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$338M$280M$204M$220M$219M$242M$311M$350M$387M$406M$375MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$198M$216M$206M$220M$198M$221M$234M$260M$253M$294M$374MReceivablesReceiv.
$239M$259M$287M$270M$264M$371M$376M$399M$392M$524M$543MInventoryInvent.
$101M$124M$127M$123M$110M$143M$134M$132M$148M$182M$189MAccounts payablePayables
$336M$351M$365M$367M$351M$448M$475M$527M$497M$636M$729MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$819M$784M$721M$735M$710M$862M$951M$1.1B$1.1B$1.3B$1.3BCurrent assetsCur. assets
$426M$327M$349M$419M$313M$409M$379M$406M$418M$512M$496MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.9×2.4×2.1×1.8×2.3×2.1×2.5×2.6×2.6×2.5×2.7×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$533M$551M$545M$581M$602M$601M$590M$693M$715M$780M$860MGoodwillGoodwill
$1.8B$1.7B$1.7B$1.7B$1.7B$1.9B$1.9B$2.3B$2.4B$2.9B$2.9BTotal assetsAssets
$650M$497M$353M$309M$198M$142M$148M$298M$197M$198M$280MTotal debtDebt
$312M$217M$149M$90M($21M)($100M)($163M)($52M)($190M)($208M)($94M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
6.4×8.5×11.6×14.0×13.6×38.0×45.0×42.8×26.6×41.5×46.1×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$736M$829M$891M$978M$1.1B$1.2B$1.3B$1.5B$1.7B$2.0B$2.1BShareholders’ equityEquity
1.0%1.0%0.9%1.1%0.8%1.3%0.9%1.0%0.9%0.9%0.9%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
34.5M34.4M34.3M34.2M34.0M33.9M33.6M33.5M33.5M33.5M33.5MShares out (diluted)Shares
$40.53$42.35$45.62$46.80$44.37$53.37$58.91$61.38$67.23$72.79$76.35Revenue / shareRev/sh
$2.44$2.13$3.73$3.85$3.36$4.89$7.49$7.82$8.69$10.17$10.94EPS (diluted)EPS
$2.96$3.68$3.89$4.82$5.44$4.55$5.83$8.39$9.73$10.64$9.47Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$2.96$3.68$3.89$4.82$5.44$4.55$5.83$8.39$9.73$10.64$9.47Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$1.04$0.85$1.05$0.85$1.29$0.79$0.84$0.89$1.05$1.36$1.41Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$21.34$24.10$25.99$28.60$31.46$34.61$38.71$45.17$50.98$60.53$62.58Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+6.7%/yr+10.4%/yr
Owner earnings / share+15.3%/yr+14.3%/yr
EPS+17.2%/yr+24.8%/yr
Capital spending / share+3.0%/yr+1.2%/yr
Book value / share+12.3%/yr+14.0%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
34Mpeak FY2016
ROIC
19%low FY2017
Gross margin
49%low FY2016

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$356Mowner earningsvs.$341Mnet incomelow FY2016

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cash

Each year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned $341M of profit into $356M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

Reported net income$341M
Owner earnings$356M · 15% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$341M$291M$262M$252M$166M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$57M+$54M+$43M+$40M+$45M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$21M+$20M+$20M+$18M+$23M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−$17M−$4M−$15M−$86M−$53M
Cash from operations$402M$361M$311M$224M$181M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$46M−$35M−$30M−$28M−$27M
Owner earnings$356M$326M$281M$196M$154M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue15%14%14%10%9%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $21M), owner earnings is nearer $335M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $448M ÷ interest expense $11M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • Net cash
    Cash $406M − debt $303M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $103M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 44 + DIO 155 − DPO 54 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Solid through the cycle
    10-yr median, range 8%–23%; 18% latest = NOPAT $343M ÷ invested capital $1.9B
    Industry peers: median 11%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 18% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range 7%–15%; latest $356M = operating cash $402M − maintenance capex $46M
    Industry peers: median 11%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 15% of revenue this year, a 10% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $21M of SBC) leaves $335M.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $402M ÷ net income $341M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $16M ÷ Owner Earnings $356M
    What this means

    Of $356M Owner Earnings, $16M (4%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $16M buybacks. But the buybacks barely exceed stock issued to employees ($21M SBC), net of dilution, little was truly returned. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.80×
    Maintaining
    Capex $46M ÷ depreciation $57M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 5 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Pass
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $2.4B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 2.51×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $303M vs $774M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · none paid
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +213%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $8.90/share (latest year $10.17), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $60.53/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 10 of 10
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 5 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 11% → 18% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The words confirm the number: the filing says price increases held their volume, and the margin widened with them — Buffett’s strongest mark of pricing power.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 11% early to 18% lately, median 12% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 35%
    What this means

    Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.

  • Owner earnings growth +13%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 13% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2016 · 10.4% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count −0.3%/yr
    What this means

    Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.

  • How management talks about it Owner’s terms
    What this means

    The record and the register agree: capital is compounding and the filing reasons in an owner’s terms — per-share value, return on capital, the long term — not a promoter’s.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Named as a competitive risk

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat.

“If we are unable to be agile and responsive to disruption in the development of new products, services and technologies, including artificial intelligence, machine learning and other advanced digital technologies that are increasingly central to product development, manufacturing efficiency, and customer engagement, ou…”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 29, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$1.3B
  • Cash & short-term investments$375M
  • Receivables$374M
  • Inventory$543M
  • Other current assets$56M
Current liabilities$496M
  • Debt due within a year$83M
  • Accounts payable$189M
  • Other current liabilities$225M
Current ratio2.72×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.62×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.76×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$852Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$83M due · $375M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Mar 29, 2026 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+21.4%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters2.5× → 2.7×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$950Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Debt incl. operating leases$372M$92M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$17Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $2.4B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$340M · 14%
  • Buybacks$254M · 11%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$1.8B · 75%
  • Returned to owners$254M

    13% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $254M as buybacks.

  • Source of fundingOperating cash

    Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt fell $370M and cash and short-term investments rose $36M.

  • Average price paid for buybacks$138.53

    Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 1M shares were bought for $163M, about $138.53 each. Year to year the price paid ranged from $87.17 (2020) to $240.53 (2025); its heaviest year, 2022, paid $140.56 ($69M).

  • Net change in share count−2.9%

    The diluted count fell from 35M to 34M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.

  • Dividend record

    No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.

  • Return on what it retained13%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($1.6B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $200M, so each retained $1 added about 0.13 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles$1.1B37% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity38%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiring$824Mover 10 years buying other businesses, against $340M of capital spent building

$500K written down across 1 year (2016): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Robert J. Pagano, Jr.$7.1M$25.1M$154M
2022Robert J. Pagano, Jr.$7.1M$4.1M$196M
2023Robert J. Pagano, Jr.$7.5M$17.1M$281M
2024Robert J. Pagano, Jr.$9.1M$9.2M$326M
2025Robert J. Pagano, Jr.$10.4M$20.4M$356M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • CEO pay ratio191:1

    What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.

  • Stock-based compensation$21M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 5% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Watts Water Technologies is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

None of the 6 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.

Each test came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
  • Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Revenue recognition, Income taxes, Inventory, Insurance reserves as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Industrial Machinery

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
AXONAxon Enterprise$2.8B61%3.3%3%11%
GFFGriffon Corporation$2.5B28%6.3%6%3%
WTSWatts Water Technologies$2.4B42%12.8%15%10%
SSDSimpson Manufacturing$2.3B46%19.4%19%13%
CRCrane$2.3B40%13.4%14%7%
CXTCrane NXT Co.$1.7B40%14.4%14%11%
MWAMueller Water Products$1.4B33%12.6%11%8%
HLIOHelios Technologies Inc.$839M37%15.2%8%12%
Group median40%13.1%12%10%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Watts Water Technologies has delivered.

Watts Water Technologies’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.

$

Through the cycle, Watts Water Technologies earns about $246M on its 10.1% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 14.6% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+18%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25+13%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $317M on 34M shares outstanding (a weighted basic average, the only count this filer tags); net cash $94M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Watts Water Technologies (WTS), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/WTS, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← WTRG its page in the Manual WTTR →

Industry order: ← WPRT the Industrial Machinery chapter XYL →