← All companies ← WPP Manual WRD → ← TWIN Industrial Machinery WTS →
WPRT, Westport Fuel Systems Inc
Westport is a technology and innovation company connecting synergistic technologies to power a cleaner tomorrow.
As a supplier of affordable, alternative fuel, low-emissions transportation technologies, the Company designs, manufactures, and supplies advanced components and systems that enable the transition from traditional fuels to alternative energy solutions.
Westport's technologies support a wide range of alternative fuels including natural gas, renewable natural gas, and hydrogen enabling OEMs and commercial transportation industries to meet performance demands, regulatory requirements, and climate targets in a cost-effective way.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No meaningful revenue yet; the record is the cash on hand against the burn. Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run around −29% through the cycle on a 15% gross margin, the operating line deeply negative — so the lever is the path to a margin at all: revenue growth against the cost curve and the cash runway, not the level of a margin that isn't there yet. Inventory runs near 20% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the capital-goods cycle and the aftermarket. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −19%, above 15% in 0 of 10 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $167M | $230M | $270M | $305M | $252M | $312M | $306M | $68M | $41M | $23M | $23M | RevenueRevenue |
| 20% | 26% | 24% | 22% | 16% | 15% | 12% | 1% | 7% | 11% | 11% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| ($126M) | ($67M) | ($53M) | ($21M) | ($22M) | ($31M) | ($50M) | ($46M) | ($38M) | ($14M) | ($14M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −75.3% | −29.0% | −19.5% | −7.0% | −8.7% | −9.8% | −16.4% | −66.9% | −92.7% | −61.0% | −61.0% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($98M) | ($10M) | ($31M) | $41K | ($7M) | $14M | ($33M) | ($50M) | ($22M) | ($62M) | ($98M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| ($82M) | ($49M) | ($27M) | ($16M) | ($35M) | ($44M) | ($35M) | ($13M) | $7M | ($14M) | $7M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $15M | $15M | $17M | $16M | $14M | $14M | $12M | $6M | $2M | $735K | $735K | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $491K | ($54M) | ($12M) | ($32M) | ($42M) | ($71M) | ($14M) | $31M | $27M | $47M | $104M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $9M | $25M | $10M | $9M | $7M | $14M | $14M | $6M | $4M | $3M | $3M | CapexCapex |
| 5.2% | 11.0% | 3.8% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 4.5% | 4.7% | 9.5% | 9.4% | 11.5% | 11.5% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($90M) | ($75M) | ($38M) | ($25M) | ($42M) | ($58M) | ($49M) | ($20M) | $3M | ($17M) | $4M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −54.1% | −32.5% | −14.0% | −8.0% | −16.7% | −18.5% | −16.0% | −28.9% | 8.3% | −72.6% | 19.3% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($90M) | ($75M) | ($38M) | ($25M) | ($42M) | ($58M) | ($49M) | ($20M) | $3M | ($17M) | $4M | Free cash flowFCF |
| −54.1% | −32.5% | −14.0% | −8.0% | −16.7% | −18.5% | −16.0% | −28.9% | 8.3% | −72.6% | 19.3% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| -406% | -114% | -39% | -7% | -7% | -13% | -19% | -19% | -22% | -16% | -8% | ROICROIC |
| -114% | -8% | -35% | 0% | -7% | 6% | -16% | -31% | -16% | -90% | -142% | Return on equityROE |
| −114% | −8% | −35% | 0% | −7% | 6% | −16% | −31% | −16% | −90% | −142% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $62M | $72M | $61M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $62M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $67M | $62M | $57M | $67M | $90M | $102M | $102M | $88M | $19M | $10M | $10M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $53M | $46M | $46M | $48M | $51M | $83M | $82M | $68M | $7M | $3M | $3M | InventoryInvent. |
| $120M | $108M | $103M | $115M | $142M | $185M | $183M | $156M | $25M | $13M | $13M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $214M | $201M | $169M | $168M | $229M | $339M | $277M | $217M | $170M | $42M | $42M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $160M | $120M | $105M | $115M | $147M | $146M | $136M | $135M | $108M | $22M | $22M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.3× | 1.7× | 1.6× | 1.5× | 1.6× | 2.3× | 2.0× | 1.6× | 1.6× | 1.9× | 1.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | — | $3M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $331M | $314M | $270M | $280M | $346M | $471M | $407M | $356M | $292M | $94M | $94M | Total assetsAssets |
| — | — | $76M | $67M | $141M | — | — | $29M | — | — | $131M | Total debtDebt |
| — | — | $15M | $67M | $141M | — | — | $29M | — | — | $69M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -11.7× | -4.6× | -5.8× | -2.9× | -2.8× | -6.2× | -15.0× | -15.3× | — | — | -4.8× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $85M | $118M | $91M | $89M | $104M | $236M | $204M | $160M | $137M | $69M | $69M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 91.0M | 120M | 132M | 144M | 137M | 162M | 17.1M | 17.2M | 17.2M | 17.3M | 17.4M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $1.84 | $1.92 | $2.04 | $2.12 | $1.84 | $1.93 | $17.85 | $3.97 | $2.36 | $1.34 | $1.34 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-1.07 | $-0.08 | $-0.24 | $0.00 | $-0.05 | $0.08 | $-1.91 | $-2.90 | $-1.27 | $-3.55 | $-5.62 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-0.99 | $-0.63 | $-0.28 | $-0.17 | $-0.31 | $-0.36 | $-2.85 | $-1.15 | $0.20 | $-0.98 | $0.26 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-0.99 | $-0.63 | $-0.28 | $-0.17 | $-0.31 | $-0.36 | $-2.85 | $-1.15 | $0.20 | $-0.98 | $0.26 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.10 | $0.21 | $0.08 | $0.06 | $0.05 | $0.09 | $0.83 | $0.38 | $0.22 | $0.16 | $0.15 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $0.94 | $0.99 | $0.69 | $0.62 | $0.76 | $1.46 | $11.91 | $9.34 | $7.94 | $3.97 | $3.96 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The diluted share count moved ×1/9.47 into 2022 — shares retired, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −3.4%/yr | −6.1%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +5.6%/yr | +24.5%/yr |
| Book value / share | +17.4%/yr | +39.2%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $62M loss into ($17M) of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($62M) | ($22M) | ($50M) | ($33M) | $14M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$735K | +$2M | +$6M | +$12M | +$14M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$47M | +$27M | +$31M | −$14M | −$71M |
| Cash from operations | ($14M) | $7M | ($13M) | ($35M) | ($44M) |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$3M | −$4M | −$6M | −$14M | −$14M |
| Owner earnings | ($17M) | $3M | ($20M) | ($49M) | ($58M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -73% | 8% | -29% | -16% | -19% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -4.8×Does not cover its interestOperating income ($14M) ÷ interest expense $3M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Net debt against an operating lossCash $61M + ST investments $848K − debt $131M
What this means
Netting $62M of cash and short-term investments against $131M of debt leaves $69M owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle10-yr median, range -406%–-7%; -8% latest = NOPAT ($11M) ÷ invested capital $138MIndustry peers: median -74%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran -8% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Positive this year, negative across the cyclelatest $4M = operating cash $7M − maintenance capex $3M (positive this year), after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median -19%)Industry peers: median -19%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 19% of revenue this year, a -19% median across 10 years.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($98M) · cash from operations $7M
In the filing’s words And the filing leans heavily on adjusted, non-GAAP earnings — steering you off the GAAP figure just where the cash is not backing it. Read the reconciliation in the notes before taking the adjusted number.
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 3.66×ExpandingCapex $3M ÷ depreciation $735K
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $23M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.93×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $131M vs $20M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 8 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-2.56/share (latest year $-5.62), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $3.96/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 2 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 8 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 4 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin −41% → −74% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about −41% early to −74% lately, median −29% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Worst year 2024 · −92.7% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2024, understand why before trusting the good years.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$62M
- Receivables$10M
- Inventory$3M
- Debt due within a year$29M
From the company's latest filing.
Peers, Industrial Machinery
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSIXPower Solutions International Inc. | $722M | 16% | -0.6% | 15% | 0% |
| OUSTOuster Inc. | $169M | 27% | -297.0% | -101% | -224% |
| ERIIEnergy Recovery Inc. | $135M | 69% | 13.5% | 13% | 8% |
| CEPLCapstone Energy Plus Inc. | $106M | 14% | -23.2% | -74% | -19% |
| ASYSAmtech Systems Inc. | $79M | 37% | 1.8% | 1% | -4% |
| VELOVelo3D Inc. | $46M | -5% | -153.6% | -147% | -140% |
| WPRTWestport Fuel Systems Inc | $23M | 16% | -24.3% | -19% | -18% |
| CHRNChronoScale Holdings Corporation | $13M | 50% | -120.5% | -139% | -100% |
| Group median | — | 21% | -23.7% | -47% | -18% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Westport Fuel Systems Inc reports in USD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Westport Fuel Systems Inc has delivered.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $4M on 17M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net debt $69M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← WPP its page in the Manual WRD →
Industry order: ← TWIN the Industrial Machinery chapter WTS →