Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← DLX Manual DMC → ← CYTK Pharmaceuticals DNTH →

DMAC, DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc.

Pharmaceuticals consumer brand UnprofitableNet current asset value

Our lead candidate DM199, is the first pharmaceutically active recombinant form of the human tissue kallikrein-1 protein to be clinically studied in patients and has been granted Fast Track Designation by the U.S.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
DMAC · DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$500K
Vital signs · FY2025
Cash & investments $60M
Cash burn · annual $29M
Runway 2.1 yrs

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

Situation
Unprofitable. No meaningful revenue yet; the record is the cash on hand against the burn. Net current asset value. Current assets alone exceed every liability combined, and the surplus is most of the balance sheet: the shape Graham called a net-net.
What moves the needle
The pipeline against the patent cliff, and pricing. What decides it: whether new drugs replace those losing exclusivity, the odds in the clinical pipeline, and how durable pricing stays against payers and generics. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2018 the business earned ($6M) of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $15K it takes just to hold its position. It put $35K more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was ($6M).

FY2018
Reported net income($6M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$15K
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$620K
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−$597K
Cash from operations($6M)
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$15K
Owner earnings($6M)
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$35K
Free cash flow($6M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue-1142%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $15K, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $35K of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows. The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $620K), owner earnings is nearer ($6M).

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • No meaningful interest burden
    Little or no interest expense reported
    What this means

    Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.

  • Net cash, debt-free
    Cash $16M + ST investments $44M − debt $0
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $60M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Not enough data
    Industry peers: median -64%
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Consumes cash
    Owner earnings ($29M) = operating cash ($29M) − maintenance capex $40K
    Industry peers: median -1308%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -5820% of revenue this year. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $4M of SBC) leaves ($33M).

  • Loss, and burning cash
    Net income ($33M) · cash from operations ($29M)
    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did not.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.93×
    Maintaining
    Capex $40K ÷ depreciation $43K
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 2 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $500K
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 11.81×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Earnings are $-0.61/share, and book value is $1.04/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$52M
  • Cash & short-term investments$51M
  • Receivables$301K
  • Other current assets$731K
Current liabilities$6M
  • Accounts payable$3M
  • Other current liabilities$2M
Current ratio9.11×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratioinventory untagged this quarter, so withheld rather than shown equal to the current ratio
Cash ratio8.93×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$47Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Current ratio, recent quarters17.8× → 9.1×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$47Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Debt incl. operating leases$200K$200K of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Net income
2023Rick Pauls$1.2M$1.4M
2024Rick Pauls$1.6M$2.4M
2025Rick Pauls$2.7M$5.3M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Net income is the whole business's, as filed, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership5%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$4M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 769% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Stock compensation as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Pharmaceuticals

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
DNTHDianthus Therapeutics Inc.$2M-1704.7%-54%-1308%
ORMPOramed Pharmaceuticals Inc.$2M1%-754.4%-29%-479%
STTKShattuck Labs Inc.$1M-1408.3%-104%-1059%
SLNSilence Therapeutics PLC$559K60%-242.7%-177%-211%
QUCYQuantum Cyber N.V.$537K73%-3005.0%-2045%
DMACDiaMedica Therapeutics Inc.$500K-6879.4%-67%-5820%
MREOMereo BioPharma Group plc$500K-8021.4%-6198%
SVRASavara Inc.$257K-6852.8%-64%-5624%
Group median-2354.8%-66%-1676%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc. is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

$
The assumptions

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach
Margin the price demands
Owner-earnings margin today−5820%

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc. (DMAC), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/DMAC, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← DLX its page in the Manual DMC →

Industry order: ← CYTK the Pharmaceuticals chapter DNTH →